Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:00:22 +0200 Narcis Garciawrote: > El 18/09/17 a les 19:45, Steve Litt ha escrit: > > Why in the world would you need Gnome? > > 1. Gnome is the desktop environment that better fits my criteria for > unexperienced and normal people. > > 2. I select desktop software for hundreds of users, and 99% of users > that already use desktop computers installed by me (hundreds more), > use Gnome. I don't want to face another change like Gnome 2->3 was. > > 3. Why not? The following points concern Gnome3. I had nothing against Gnome2, but it's not available anymore. a) Gnome is a pig: A serious resource consumer. b) Gnome is tightly meshed with systemd. Even if somebody out there has published a secret incantation to get it to work without systemd, that incantation is unlikely to stay functional very long. In fact, Redhat and Poettering have a demonstrated motive for Gnome not to work without systemd. c) Gnome may (or may not) be "intuitive" to illogically thinking people, but with its "let me guess what you want and present it to you" way of working, it consistently gets in the way of logical people. And more people are logical than not. Give them a well thought out, static hierchical menu system, and they'll know what to do. d) Gnome is a mesh of promiscuously communicating parts, with all the feedback loops you'd expect, such that if one part malfunctions, various hard to diagnose problems will appear in other parts. e) Some of your hundreds of users will tweak their Gnome in various ways, leading to maintenance headaches. Of course, this is true of other WMDEs, but it's easier to do with Gnome, and with its manifold higher number of knobs and levers, harder to put it back into functionality. SteveT Steve Litt September 2017 featured book: Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting Brand new, second edition http://www.troubleshooters.com/mgr ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:56:13 +0200 "J. Fahrner"wrote: > I'm wondering why people cry when they don't get Gnome and why they > try to enforce Devuan developers to offer Gnome. Devuans goal is to > offer a Linux system without systemd. And that's not possible for > Gnome, because Gnome depends on systemd. If you want Gnome you have > to live with systemd. It's your choice. If you want a Windows GUI you > have to use Windows. But don't cry. Couldn't have said it better myself. We all have priorities, and some priority sets aren't conducive to Devuan. SteveT Steve Litt September 2017 featured book: Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting Brand new, second edition http://www.troubleshooters.com/mgr ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:22:14 +0200 Narcis Garciawrote: > I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. > But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate was > for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. Stick with Debian, become an expert on systemctl and journalctl, and don't come crying to me. SteveT Steve Litt September 2017 featured book: Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting Brand new, second edition http://www.troubleshooters.com/mgr ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:19:02 +0200 Narcis Garciawrote: > > > El 18/09/17 a les 19:45, Steve Litt ha escrit: > Why in the world would you need Gnome? Copy their home directory, >> I'm trying now to make an installation as similar as possible to >> Gnome. XFCE is the best option for a Gnome-like theme and behavior? I think Unity would provide the most Gnome like experience (assuming you mean Gnome3). Xfce enables you to have multiple panels, which I think you can use to simulate the panels and drawers in Gnome2. Am I reading correctly here that you're prioritizing your selection on the *theme*? How much stability and intuitiveness are you willing to sacrifice for theme? Xfce is OK, but from my perspective it's slowly sidling up to systemd, and may one day be unuseable without systemd. That said, Xfce is currently a good candidate assuming your computer has the horsepower to run it, and if your computer could run Gnome3, it certainly can run Xfce. SteveT Steve Litt September 2017 featured book: Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting Brand new, second edition http://www.troubleshooters.com/mgr ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] GNU/Linux security and grsecurity, WAS: upgrade from Debian stretch to Devuan ascii?
On 170919-18:47+, Bruce Perens wrote: > I suppose I am one of the "ungracious" ones, since I am currently fighting > a lawsuit that Grsecurity filed against me for criticizing their GPL > compliance. I'm really sorry the lawsuit happened. And I sincerely wish it be resolved quickly and with no harm for you, Bruce. > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, 10:30 zapwrote: > > > > > > > On 09/19/2017 10:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > > ( citation manually inserted not to make two email replies; however, > > I'll skip > > > Rick Moen's reply in the thread that arrived in the meantime, since it's > > off > > > topic ) > > > On 170919-07:43+0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: > > > > > Also its random and not even funny. Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia https://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] security
On 170919-14:47-0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 02:47:00PM +, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > > I'm trying not to go off topic here... But just a few more words... > > Security in systems running Devuan is on topic here. We choose Devuan > in part for security, and to be effective, we need security ll the You probably meant "all": > in part for security, and to be effective, we need security all the > way down. > > > > > > I am starting to believe computer security is an unattainable Utopia > > No, Edward. If computer security weren't attainable we wouldn't have > > Wikileaks, > > and neither would we have Edward Snowden. > > > > > No, it's not unattainable. If I ever become part of a team, we'll be using > > what > > FSF recommends (and it's what *taiidan* wrote extensively about recently on > > this mailing list: IBM Talos II Power9 processor-based server; > > Unfortunately, that comes at too high high a price for many of us. > But the cheaper systems are riddled with unexaminable firmware. Mine systems, the 10-yrs old 3 machines Abit AT8-32 and the 4 or 5 yrs old Asrock Extreme4 (also some 3 machines), both model MBO's are AMD64-based, they are of that unexaminable firmware kind as well (need to update in my topic on dev1galaxy Strange Bash under grsecurity's exec logging https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1598 with that info, more info, more likely I get an explanation on the Tab-launches-execs-frenzy events there (the frenzy there was on Asrock MBO system). > There's no good technical reason why this should be the case. We end > up resenting it but settling for it because it's what we can > afford. My above statement refers to possibly only my wishful future, some time in my remaining life. No way could I afford IBM Talos II Power9-base server at this time. But I keep dreaming and hoping... Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia https://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] upgrade from Debian stretch to Devuan ascii?
On 09/17/2017 04:30 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 01:49:00PM -0400, fsmithred wrote: >> - standard system install of debian stretch plus openbox, lxterminal, >> lxpanel and a few other packages. >> - changed sources to devuan ascii, update, add key, update again >> - install sysvinit-core, reboot. >> - [optional] install live-config-sysvinit to replace live-config-systemd >> - remove libpam-systemd systemd systemd-shim >> - apt-get autoremove > >> - install consolekit policykit-1 libpam-ck-connector (I don't know if >> these were really needed. It seemed ok, but I'm using startx to get a >> desktop.) > > policykit is needed only for letting an unprivileged user > shutdown/suspend/etc from a GUI, mount removable media and such. It doesn't > sound like you have an use for it. > >> - install xserver-xorg-legacy > > Bad idea! You'd want xserver-xorg-legacy only if you have a truly ancient > graphics card or an {u,eu,...}dev misconfiguration wrt input (or run hurd). > > Obviously if for you the regular user is almost as sensitive as root anyway > it's not a big concern, but if we stick to principles here we avoid training > the user that making random things setuid is a good solution. With KVM, > there's no need for X to run as root. > > > Meow! > I removed xserver-xorg-legacy, commented out "needs_root..." and installed a display manager (slim). X will run, but I'm confused about what part of it should no longer be running as root. They look the same to me. without xserver-xorg-legacy without "needs_root_rights" with display manager: root 2583 0.0 0.1 128876 15964 ?Ss 10:21 0:00 /usr/bin/slim -d root 2605 0.1 0.5 296356 45832 tty7 Ssl+ 10:21 0:03 /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg -nolisten tcp -auth /var/run/slim.auth with xserver-xorg-legacy with "needs_root_rights" without display manager: user 2118 0.0 0.0 4288 1580 tty1 S+ 15:07 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/startx user 2141 0.0 0.0 22312 1144 tty1 S+ 15:07 0:00 xinit /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc -- /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc :0 vt1 -keeptty -auth /tmp/serverauth.wP0Ynv4 root 2142 0.5 0.5 329932 45676 tty1 Sl 15:07 0:00 /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg -nolisten tcp :0 vt1 -keeptty -auth /tmp/serverauth.wP0Ynv40Nd fsmithred ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Devuan, Firefox and Apulse
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:46:46 +0200, Adam wrote in message <20170919144646.5hsbzypbzpuu7...@angband.pl>: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 08:38:24AM -0500, dev wrote: > > Mozilla got a new bedmate named PulseAudio. > > > > Looks like another Smooth Move by Mozilla that will end up costing > > them market share. I don't like Chrome, but basically forced to > > choose between Pottering or Google at this point :/ > > You mean, there'll be anything left of current 5% after FF57 hits? ..my guess is their real target is the Tor browser, it's based on FF. > Too bad, Firefox is the only somewhat usable browser. With enough > extensions (hello 57...) it's possible to beat some basic security > into it, while Chromium has built-in spyware even in that "incognito > mode" snake oil that can't be disabled by extensions. Pale Moon > guys, while their heart is in the right place, don't seem to be doing > well. ..can they take over as basis for a new Tor browser, or is it "too much water under the bridge"? Or are the Tor people too much in bed with the systemd people with Debian/systemd based Tails? > On the other hand, I don't quite see what's the point of sound in a > WWW browser. From time to time, someone insists you to view > something on YouTube (because it's so hard to write that instead...) > but that's a matter of clicking "download" then using a proper media > player. ..and it can be automated, which carries it's own set of traps... -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:49:31 +0200, Narcis wrote in message <2d75dd54-26ec-7d5a-e5c4-23506cbf7...@actiu.net>: > El 19/09/17 a les 16:16, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI ha escrit: > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:22:14 +0200 > > Narcis Garciawrote: > > > >> I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. > >> But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate > >> was for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. > > > > What does Gnome offer, that XFCE lacks ? > > > > Today, mainly the well-known design to users I support. > Most of computer users don't like computing; everyday they expect same > usage and behavior of machines. ..are you able to "upgrade" your users to TDE, KDE, LXDE, LXQt, MATE or Cinnamon using a Wintendo-style theme to keep your users happy? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Desktop_Environment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KDE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LXDE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LXQt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MATE_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinnamon_(software) ..I don't know these much, TDE is a fork off KDE-3.5 which was great, also had Wintendo-style themes to keep users and bean counters happy. ..compared to KDE-3.5 (and I guess TDE), KDE-4.x and Plasma sucks, but has become endurable with 8GB ram. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 03:00:22PM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote: > El 18/09/17 a les 19:45, Steve Litt ha escrit: > > 2. I select desktop software for hundreds of users, and 99% of users > that already use desktop computers installed by me (hundreds more), use > Gnome. I don't want to face another change like Gnome 2->3 was. Wait for gnome 3->4. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] security
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 02:47:00PM +, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > I'm trying not to go off topic here... But just a few more words... Security in systems running Devuan is on topic here. We choose Devuan in part for security, and to be effective, we need security ll the way down. > > > I am starting to believe computer security is an unattainable Utopia > No, Edward. If computer security weren't attainable we wouldn't have > Wikileaks, > and neither would we have Edward Snowden. > > No, it's not unattainable. If I ever become part of a team, we'll be using > what > FSF recommends (and it's what *taiidan* wrote extensively about recently on > this mailing list: IBM Talos II Power9 processor-based server; Unfortunately, that comes at too high high a price for many of us. But the cheaper systems are riddled with unexaminable firmware. There's no good technical reason why this should be the case. We end up resenting it but settling for it because it's what we can afford. -- hendrik ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] GNU/Linux security and grsecurity, WAS: upgrade from Debian stretch to Devuan ascii?
I suppose I am one of the "ungracious" ones, since I am currently fighting a lawsuit that Grsecurity filed against me for criticizing their GPL compliance. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, 10:30 zapwrote: > > > On 09/19/2017 10:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > ( citation manually inserted not to make two email replies; however, > I'll skip > > Rick Moen's reply in the thread that arrived in the meantime, since it's > off > > topic ) > > On 170919-07:43+0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: > > > Also its random and not even funny. > ___ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 at 16:49:31 +0200 Narcis Garciawrote: > El 19/09/17 a les 16:16, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI ha escrit: >> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:22:14 +0200 >> Narcis Garcia wrote: >> >>> I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. >>> But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate was >>> for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. >> >> What does Gnome offer, that XFCE lacks ? >> > > Today, mainly the well-known design to users I support. > Most of computer users don't like computing; everyday they expect same > usage and behavior of machines. I'd like to know how those people reacted during the Gnome2 -> Gnome3 transition. Regards, Alessandro ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Devuan, Firefox and Apulse
On 19.09.2017 16:46, Adam Borowski wrote: Too bad, Firefox is the only somewhat usable browser. With enough extensions (hello 57...) it's possible to beat some basic security into it, while Chromium has built-in spyware even in that "incognito mode" snake oil that can't be disabled by extensions. FF has it's spyware and censorware, too. I've started a fork (still on esr52 as I didn't want to open the rust pandorra box), but it's a quite huge job, so it needs more people. On the other hand, I don't quite see what's the point of sound in a WWW browser. From time to time, someone insists you to view something on YouTube (because it's so hard to write that instead...) but that's a matter of clicking "download" then using a proper media player. I actually like YT, running it all the day (my preferred background noise ;-) and the browser is still the best frontend I know yet. Of course, the video stuff should be delegated to a proper player application instead of bundling everything in the browser, but that's a different story ... --mtx ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] GNU/Linux security and grsecurity, WAS: upgrade from Debian stretch to Devuan ascii?
On 09/19/2017 10:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > ( citation manually inserted not to make two email replies; however, I'll skip > Rick Moen's reply in the thread that arrived in the meantime, since it's off > topic ) > On 170919-07:43+0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: > Also its random and not even funny. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
El 19/09/17 a les 16:16, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI ha escrit: > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:22:14 +0200 > Narcis Garciawrote: > >> I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. >> But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate was >> for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. > > What does Gnome offer, that XFCE lacks ? > Today, mainly the well-known design to users I support. Most of computer users don't like computing; everyday they expect same usage and behavior of machines. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
[DNG] GNU/Linux security and grsecurity, WAS: upgrade from Debian stretch to Devuan ascii?
( citation manually inserted not to make two email replies; however, I'll skip Rick Moen's reply in the thread that arrived in the meantime, since it's off topic ) On 170919-07:43+0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: > With a compromised CPU that has questionable smaller cores running a > HIDDEN OS, I cannot see what advantages anyone gets by installing > grsecurity. This is worse than having a compromised machine that is > always connected to your computer. I see your point. If https://forums.grsecurity.net weren't locked since they were chased out by ingratitude and ripoff of their code, I'd ask there about it. Curious about this aspect really... Well, I should first try and search more on it (but how?), and then ask about it, where?... maybe at https://www.superuser.com or elsewhere? Maybe at: https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave ? If only the exploit writers there were inclined to tell us their secrets (which is not so likely; but they're certainly not hostile to whitehats... spender did participate occasionally and briefly in that mailing list)... Not much more dare I venture on this issue because it is not directly related to Devuan ( other than me offering documentation to newbies about grsecurity as I wrote in my email to which Edward replied, and in which I gave the links to my dev1galaxy grsecurity topic and github repo script; only, at this time, for compiling grsecurity hardened kernel; later I would also like to provide kernel deb packages --as I used to provide for Debian-- or, in case corsac ( http://perso.corsac.net/~corsac ) returns and picks up instead from unavailable original grsecurity, from *minipli's* unofficial-grsecurity and starts packaging them for Debian, then would like to try to test them for Devuan ) I'm trying not to go off topic here... But just a few more words... > ... > There is yet the other uncertainty of what ISPs do with data > travelling through their systems. Even if users set up completely > secure systems, their data still has to travel through an ISPs > infrastructure. No, that ISP part can be fixed, if it isn't brute force censorship. It is/would be very hard to control that part, but possible! (would be way offtopic trying to go into details of my understanding on it, though) > I am starting to believe computer security is an unattainable Utopia No, Edward. If computer security weren't attainable we wouldn't have Wikileaks, and neither would we have Edward Snowden. No, it's not unattainable. If I ever become part of a team, we'll be using what FSF recommends (and it's what *taiidan* wrote extensively about recently on this mailing list: IBM Talos II Power9 processor-based server; BTW, in that discussion the winning argument is, as often, Rick Moen's :-) on the sanity of what FSF recommends: https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20170912.000313.f8275717.en.html with the link to: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/support-the-talos-ii-a-candidate-for-respects-your-freedom-certification-by-pre-ordering-by-september-15 ). And then you fix Linux with grsecurity, and you would have a secure GNU/Linux server... On 170919-10:24+0100, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > For example, some attack kits must be hoarded. They're very powerful, but > every time they're used they risk disclosure, Disclosure is what I'm fighting tooth and nails to get... My: http://github.com/miroR/uncenz is all about that... And disclosure is what can be seen in the first installment of the same type as this second installment in Devuan forums: Strange Bash under grsecurity's exec logging https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1598 where the first installement was four months ago, with what happened in my Gentoo system: Strange script planted with Bash https://www.croatiafidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-170504-strange-bash/index.php But it's a very partial disclosure... because I'm not an expert... > if the victim notices and > sends the computer off to someone like Citizenlab. The attacker has great > power and is almost unable to use it. I looked up https://citizenlab.ca/ but didn't find a way to ask there about help on my issue above repeated... I hope I haven't gone too much off topic. I presented my problem's basic aspects, and it's grsecurity that helped uncover it... unofficial-grsecurity that I try to offer tips about to newbies in Devuan ( for clarity: Grsecurity/Pax installation on Devuan GNU/Linux https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=596 ) Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia https://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
El 19/09/17 a les 15:56, J. Fahrner ha escrit: > Am 2017-09-19 15:00, schrieb Narcis Garcia: >> El 18/09/17 a les 19:45, Steve Litt ha escrit: >>> Why in the world would you need Gnome? >> >> 1. Gnome is the desktop environment that better fits my criteria for >> unexperienced and normal people. >> >> 2. I select desktop software for hundreds of users, and 99% of users >> that already use desktop computers installed by me (hundreds more), use >> Gnome. I don't want to face another change like Gnome 2->3 was. >> >> 3. Why not? > > I'm wondering why people cry when they don't get Gnome and why they try > to enforce Devuan developers to offer Gnome. Devuans goal is to offer a > Linux system without systemd. And that's not possible for Gnome, because > Gnome depends on systemd. If you want Gnome you have to live with > systemd. It's your choice. If you want a Windows GUI you have to use > Windows. But don't cry. > My first strategy on Windows to GNU migrations was to use a WindowsXP-like theme for Gnome. All users were happy with this, unlike I left Gnome 2 as it was. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Devuan, Firefox and Apulse
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 08:38:24AM -0500, dev wrote: > Mozilla got a new bedmate named PulseAudio. > > Looks like another Smooth Move by Mozilla that will end up costing them > market share. I don't like Chrome, but basically forced to choose between > Pottering or Google at this point :/ You mean, there'll be anything left of current 5% after FF57 hits? Too bad, Firefox is the only somewhat usable browser. With enough extensions (hello 57...) it's possible to beat some basic security into it, while Chromium has built-in spyware even in that "incognito mode" snake oil that can't be disabled by extensions. Pale Moon guys, while their heart is in the right place, don't seem to be doing well. On the other hand, I don't quite see what's the point of sound in a WWW browser. From time to time, someone insists you to view something on YouTube (because it's so hard to write that instead...) but that's a matter of clicking "download" then using a proper media player. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ I've read an article about how lively happy music boosts ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ productivity. You can read it, too, you just need the ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ right music while doing so. I recommend Skepticism ⠈⠳⣄ (funeral doom metal). ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
El 19/09/17 a les 15:30, Rick Moen ha escrit: > Quoting Narcis Garcia (informat...@actiu.net): > >> I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. >> But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate was >> for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. > > Or you could give Xfce a try. It's rather nice. > > But whatever's your cuppa. > I have no problem with other desktop softwares if them can be configured/themed to seem Gnome. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tuesday 19 September 2017 at 15:16:58, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:22:14 +0200 Narcis Garcia wrote: > > > I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. > > But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate was > > for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. > > What does Gnome offer, that XFCE lacks ? In this situation I'd guess the answer is familiarity. Antony. -- Archaeologists have found a previously-unknown dinosaur which seems to have had a very large vocabulary. They've named it Thesaurus. Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 13:45 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:02:37 +0200 > > Why in the world would you need Gnome? I don't think we should blindly reject providing Gnome in Devuan. As I wrote, shwsh has already provided the two needed packages: elogind and gnome-settings- daemon. As you might know GuixSD is running Gnome, and they use elogind (ported by a Guix developer from systemd). Ability to choose desktops is good for versatility in addition to init system choices. Even if I don't run Gnome somebody else might want to. And if we can provide it why not. This is a situation very similar to eudev (fork of udev from systemd). ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:22:14 +0200 Narcis Garciawrote: > I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. > But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate was > for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. What does Gnome offer, that XFCE lacks ? Cheers, Ron. -- Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses. -- H. L. Mencken -- http://www.olgiati-in-paraguay.org -- ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 14:51 +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote: > I've tried shwsh's procedure and it doesn't work in the first step. > Scenario was: Devuan 8 fresh install with all defaults, and only removed > default desktop with: > $ sudo tasksel remove desktop xfce-desktop > $ sudo reboot You have to be careful which version you use to try out gnome. It seems like shwsh use ceres and ascii, combined with Debian strech. Definitely not jessie! ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 15:22 +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote: > I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. > But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate was > for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. I run mate in Devuan Ascii. BBL when I started up that image again. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
Am 2017-09-19 15:00, schrieb Narcis Garcia: El 18/09/17 a les 19:45, Steve Litt ha escrit: Why in the world would you need Gnome? 1. Gnome is the desktop environment that better fits my criteria for unexperienced and normal people. 2. I select desktop software for hundreds of users, and 99% of users that already use desktop computers installed by me (hundreds more), use Gnome. I don't want to face another change like Gnome 2->3 was. 3. Why not? I'm wondering why people cry when they don't get Gnome and why they try to enforce Devuan developers to offer Gnome. Devuans goal is to offer a Linux system without systemd. And that's not possible for Gnome, because Gnome depends on systemd. If you want Gnome you have to live with systemd. It's your choice. If you want a Windows GUI you have to use Windows. But don't cry. Jochen ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Devuan, Firefox and Apulse
On 09/18/2017 03:54 PM, Joel Roth wrote: > Does FF 55 not support ALSA OOTB? AFAIK, Mozilla got a new bedmate named PulseAudio. http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/03/firefox-52-no-sound-pulseaudio-alsa-linux Apulse used to work but now Firefox has some weird sandbox thing causing permissions issues on (bottom of page): https://github.com/i-rinat/apulse. I've added "/dev/snd/" to "security.sandbox.content.write_path_whitelist" but still no luck. Probably not a Devuan thing. Looks like another Smooth Move by Mozilla that will end up costing them market share. I don't like Chrome, but basically forced to choose between Pottering or Google at this point :/ ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
Quoting Narcis Garcia (informat...@actiu.net): > I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. > But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate was > for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. Or you could give Xfce a try. It's rather nice. But whatever's your cuppa. -- Rick Moen "The numbers one through ten should be spelled out, r...@linuxmafia.comwhile numbers greater than ten are products of the McQ! (4x80) Illuminati and should be avoided." -- @FakeAPStylebook ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] upgrade from Debian stretch to Devuan ascii?
Quoting Arnt Gulbrandsen (a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no): > >I am starting to believe computer security is an unattainable Utopia. > > That's a good book, I recommend reading it, if only for its > descriptions of Utopia and attainability. And for a picture of a slave society, where premarital sex is a crime, and wives have to confess their sins to their husbands once a month. Personally, I'd rather live in "Demolition Man"'s San Angeles, and I _hate_ Taco Bell. ;-> ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
I understand perfectly current situation with Gnome and Systemd. But if I cannot offer Gnome 3 to desktop users (or a fork as Mate was for Gnome 2), Devuan is not an option for me in this area. Servers are an independent chapter. El 19/09/17 a les 15:14, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI ha escrit: > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:00:22 +0200 > Narcis Garciawrote: > >> 3. Why not? > > Because all recent versions of Gnome are infected with the systemd pox. > > Cheers, > > Ron. > ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 03:00:22PM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote: > El 18/09/17 a les 19:45, Steve Litt ha escrit: > > Why in the world would you need Gnome? > > 1. Gnome is the desktop environment that better fits my criteria for > unexperienced and normal people. > > 2. I select desktop software for hundreds of users, and 99% of users > that already use desktop computers installed by me (hundreds more), use > Gnome. I don't want to face another change like Gnome 2->3 was. > > 3. Why not? ...and foremost, why should one provide excuses for their choices on Desktop Environments at all? :) I have not used GNOME since its version 1.x (with x very small, I guess), and still think that it would be better for a universal distribution like Devuan to provide a way to install GNOME, if at all possible (i.e., if it does not require systemd). I am lacking the basic skills and interest to work on that, but still. :) KatolaZ -- [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ] signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:00:22 +0200 Narcis Garciawrote: > 3. Why not? Because all recent versions of Gnome are infected with the systemd pox. Cheers, Ron. -- A society that puts equality over freedom will not get any of those things. A society that puts freedom above equality will get a high degree of both." -- Milton Friedman -- http://www.olgiati-in-paraguay.org -- ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
El 18/09/17 a les 19:45, Steve Litt ha escrit: > Why in the world would you need Gnome? 1. Gnome is the desktop environment that better fits my criteria for unexperienced and normal people. 2. I select desktop software for hundreds of users, and 99% of users that already use desktop computers installed by me (hundreds more), use Gnome. I don't want to face another change like Gnome 2->3 was. 3. Why not? ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
I've tried shwsh's procedure and it doesn't work in the first step. apt loops in a large messages list, all saying: ... Note, selecting 'python2.7-taurus' for regex '.' Note, selecting 'r-cran-kernsmooth' for regex '.' Note, selecting 'slsh' for regex '.' ... Neither with dpkg: $ sudo dkg -i elogind_234-2.2_amd64.deb ... dpkg: error processing archive elogind_234-2.2_amd64.deb (--install): trying to overwrite '/lib/udev/rules.d/70-power-switch.rules', which is also in package udev 215-17+deb8u7 dpkg: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: elogind_234-2.2_amd64.deb Scenario was: Devuan 8 fresh install with all defaults, and only removed default desktop with: $ sudo tasksel remove desktop xfce-desktop $ sudo reboot El 18/09/17 a les 12:28, Svante Signell ha escrit: > On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 09:02 +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote: >> Is there some published procedure to install Gnome in Devuan 8/9 ? >> >> I need this to migrate desktop users from Debian & Ubuntu. > > On IRC September 6 somebody (shwsh) reported gnome running on Devuan. He > packaged elogind gnome-settings-deamon. For more info see > https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1581 > ___ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 11:19 +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote: > I'm trying now to make an installation as similar as possible to Gnome. > XFCE is the best option for a Gnome-like theme and behavior? See https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20170918.102751.1992aff3.en.html ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] What if...
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:35:27PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: [cut] > > > Which do you think Devuan should support, a dying Debian version or > > the supported Devuan version and its replacement ? > > ..above all, the volonteers trying to help people stuck there. > I only see my minima "Devuan Wheezy" idea as an upgrade tool > towards Devuan Jessie. > > ..hopefully as simple as a metapackage for nosystemd-unstable > and debootstrap? Or a flavor? > Basically a Wheezy netboot copy with our stuff thrown in and > handily useful to the volonteers. > Hi Arnt, I am still convinced that it's not the most useful thing in the world, especially because there is a *safe* and *tested* path to upgrade a Debian Wheezy into a Devuan Jessie (this is the same path hundreds of people have used to get Devuan on virtual servers). And because Devuan does not have literally anything to add to Debian Wheezy. But if you are otherwise conviced that this is the way to go, just do it. HND Enzo -- [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ] signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] upgrade from Debian stretch to Devuan ascii?
Edward Bartolo writes: With a compromised CPU that has questionable smaller cores running a HIDDEN OS, I cannot see what advantages anyone gets by installing grsecurity. This is worse than having a compromised machine that is always connected to your computer. Bah. We already know that a CPU can be compromised by changing a single NAND gate and that it can be done at the fab, without the CPU designer team's knowledge. In other words, you can raise security requirements so high that literally no computer builder can satisfy them. This does not mean that every lower requirement is pointless. For example, some attack kits must be hoarded. They're very powerful, but every time they're used they risk disclosure, if the victim notices and sends the computer off to someone like Citizenlab. The attacker has great power and is almost unable to use it. That's a threshold. A useful security threshold. With such hardware around, GNU/Linux has just become yet another Windows. The only advantage _till_now_ is GNU/Linux still allows user-centred configurations and modularity. There is yet the other uncertainty of what ISPs do with data travelling through their systems. Even if users set up completely secure systems, their data still has to travel through an ISPs infrastructure. You've just discovered that windows and friends aren't all black and linux not white. Indeed, both are patchily grey. I personally prefer linux, it gets the job done and much of it is lightish grey. Getting the job done goes before "and" and security after, because if the job isn't done, security protects nothing and is worthless. I am starting to believe computer security is an unattainable Utopia. That's a good book, I recommend reading it, if only for its descriptions of Utopia and attainability. Arnt ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.
On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 14:30:37 -0400 Steve Littwrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 13:03:01 +0200 > Florian Zieboll wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 23:43:34 -0400 > > Steve Litt wrote: > > > > > Is it just me, or does ssh-agent interacting with dbus seem like a > > > horrible idea? > > > > > > IIUC, they are only interacting insofar, that the ssh-agent will > > terminate as soon as (in this case) dbus(-launch) exits. > > > > From the manpage: > > > > | SYNOPSIS > > |ssh-agent [-c | -s] [-d] [-a bind_address] [-t life] [command > > [arg ...]] | > > | (...) > > | > > |If a commandline is given, this is executed as a subprocess of > > the |agent. When the command dies, so does the agent. > > Hi Florian, > > I'm not sure what you're saying. Are you saying that the command at > the end of the ssh-agent line involves dbus? Hallo Steve, yes, that's how I interpret the (quote from the) manpage, which in fact doesn't mention dbus at all. Libre Grüße, Florian ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
I'm trying now to make an installation as similar as possible to Gnome. XFCE is the best option for a Gnome-like theme and behavior? El 18/09/17 a les 19:45, Steve Litt ha escrit: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:02:37 +0200 > Narcis Garciawrote: > >> Is there some published procedure to install Gnome in Devuan 8/9 ? > > Gnome is so tightly would with systemd that it can't be run on Devuan > with reasonable effort. > >> I need this to migrate desktop users from Debian & Ubuntu. > > Why in the world would you need Gnome? Copy their home directory, add > them to /etc/group and /etc/passwd as on the old machine, assign them > temporary passwords which you give them, and have them change their > passwords. Set them all up with Xfce, and if they want to migrate to > LXDE or Openbox or ctwm let them do it themselves. > > PS: Do them a favor and incorporate dmenu using an easy hotkey. They'll > be so thrilled with the quick and easy user interface that they'll > never miss Gnome. > > SteveT > > Steve Litt > September 2017 featured book: Manager's Guide to Technical > Troubleshooting Brand new, second edition > http://www.troubleshooters.com/mgr > ___ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] Gnome?
Le 18/09/2017 à 19:45, Steve Litt a écrit : assign them temporary passwords which you give them, and have them change their passwords. Or just copy their shadow passwords. Didier ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng