Re: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
On 9/10/19 5:11 AM, Daniel Reurich wrote: On 08/09/19 07:37, fsmithred via Dng wrote: On 9/7/19 1:33 PM, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote: - Original Message - From: "fsmithred via Dng" To: "dng" Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 9:23 AM Subject: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll) In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in buster. The version in buster depends on libpam-systemd OR libpam-elogind. (Also libsystemd0 OR libelogind0) Since we have libpam-elogind and libelogind0 in the repos, we don't really need to devuanize udisks2 anymore. Do we? Does anyone use udisks2 who doesn't want libpam-elogind or libelogind0 with it? fsmithred (looking to reduce the work load) I use udisks2, but I also use libpam-elogind and libelogind0 Right now I am needing this update to install other packages. Best Regards -- Ismael Thanks. Things are moving slowly now, and I have no idea when we will get the newer version into the repo. For now, I suggest you download udisks2 and libudisks2-0 from packages.debian.org and install them manually. https://packages.debian.org/buster/udisks2 If you wait for us, you'll get the exact same packages, only it will be later. fsmithred fsmithred - do we need to drop udisks2 forked package from unstable and beowulf? Yes. Nobody has objected to that, and it will fix the problem. Here's the current landscape: Version table: 2.8.4-1 500 500 http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian sid/main amd64 Packages 2.8.1-4 10 10 http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian buster/main amd64 Packages 2.1.8-1+devuan2 500 500 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii/main amd64 Packages 500 http://auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged ascii/main amd64 Packages 2.1.8-1 10 10 http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages 2.1.3-5+devuan2 50 50 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages 50 http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ceres/main amd64 Packages ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
On 08/09/19 07:37, fsmithred via Dng wrote: > On 9/7/19 1:33 PM, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote: >> - Original Message - From: "fsmithred via Dng" >> >> To: "dng" >> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 9:23 AM >> Subject: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll) >> >> >>> In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on >>> libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) >>> >>> The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in >>> buster. >>> >>> The version in buster depends on libpam-systemd OR libpam-elogind. >>> (Also libsystemd0 OR libelogind0) Since we have libpam-elogind and >>> libelogind0 in the repos, we don't really need to devuanize udisks2 >>> anymore. Do we? >>> >>> Does anyone use udisks2 who doesn't want libpam-elogind or >>> libelogind0 with it? >>> >>> fsmithred (looking to reduce the work load) >>> >> >> I use udisks2, but I also use libpam-elogind and libelogind0 >> >> Right now I am needing this update to install other packages. >> >> Best Regards >> -- >> Ismael >> > > Thanks. > > Things are moving slowly now, and I have no idea when we will get the > newer version into the repo. For now, I suggest you download udisks2 and > libudisks2-0 from packages.debian.org and install them manually. > https://packages.debian.org/buster/udisks2 > > If you wait for us, you'll get the exact same packages, only it will be > later. > > fsmithred fsmithred - do we need to drop udisks2 forked package from unstable and beowulf? -- Daniel Reurich Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd. 021 797 722 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
On 06/09/19 at 15:23, fsmithred via Dng wrote: > In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on > libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) > > The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in > buster. Really? I'm on beowulf now, and I have: ii udisks2 2.8.1-4 amd64 D-Bus service to access and manipulate storage devices Same as Debian 10 (buster): https://packages.debian.org/stable/allpackages udisks2 (2.8.1-4) D-Bus service to access and manipulate storage devices Latest version upstream is 2.8.4, released in Jul 22, 2019: https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/releases 2.8.1 was released in Sep 26, 2018. > The version in buster depends on libpam-systemd OR libpam-elogind. > (Also libsystemd0 OR libelogind0) Since we have libpam-elogind and > libelogind0 in the repos, we don't really need to devuanize udisks2 > anymore. Do we? > > Does anyone use udisks2 who doesn't want libpam-elogind or libelogind0 > with it? I have them both, and I have nothing against them. Bye, Alessandro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
On 9/7/19 1:33 PM, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote: - Original Message - From: "fsmithred via Dng" To: "dng" Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 9:23 AM Subject: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll) In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in buster. The version in buster depends on libpam-systemd OR libpam-elogind. (Also libsystemd0 OR libelogind0) Since we have libpam-elogind and libelogind0 in the repos, we don't really need to devuanize udisks2 anymore. Do we? Does anyone use udisks2 who doesn't want libpam-elogind or libelogind0 with it? fsmithred (looking to reduce the work load) I use udisks2, but I also use libpam-elogind and libelogind0 Right now I am needing this update to install other packages. Best Regards -- Ismael Thanks. Things are moving slowly now, and I have no idea when we will get the newer version into the repo. For now, I suggest you download udisks2 and libudisks2-0 from packages.debian.org and install them manually. https://packages.debian.org/buster/udisks2 If you wait for us, you'll get the exact same packages, only it will be later. fsmithred ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
- Original Message - From: "fsmithred via Dng" To: "dng" Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 9:23 AM Subject: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll) In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in buster. The version in buster depends on libpam-systemd OR libpam-elogind. (Also libsystemd0 OR libelogind0) Since we have libpam-elogind and libelogind0 in the repos, we don't really need to devuanize udisks2 anymore. Do we? Does anyone use udisks2 who doesn't want libpam-elogind or libelogind0 with it? fsmithred (looking to reduce the work load) I use udisks2, but I also use libpam-elogind and libelogind0 Right now I am needing this update to install other packages. Best Regards -- Ismael ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
On 07/09/19 at 01:58, Alessandro Selli wrote: > On 07/09/19 at 00:34, fsmithred via Dng wrote: >> On 9/6/19 5:43 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote: >>> On 06/09/19 at 15:23, fsmithred via Dng wrote: In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in buster. >>> Really? I'm on beowulf now, and I have: >>> >>> ii udisks2 2.8.1-4 amd64 D-Bus service to access and >>> manipulate storage devices >>> >>> Same as Debian 10 (buster): >>> >> >> Where did you get it? That version is not in devuan. I'm still running >> the ascii version in my beowulf, because the beowulf/ceres version is >> older. >> > [alessandro@wkstn02 ~]$ apt-cache policy udisks2 > udisks2: > Installed: 2.8.1-4 > Candidate: 2.8.1-4 > Version table: > *** 2.8.1-4 100 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 2.1.3-5+devuan2 500 > 500 https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages > 500 http://packages.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages > [alessandro@wkstn02 ~]$ > > > Greetings, > > > Alessandro Which means the package I have does come from Debian, like most (all?) Devuan packages that did not need to be hacked to take systemd out of it. [alessandro@wkstn02 ~]$ grep -iR debian /etc/apt/sources.list* [alessandro@wkstn02 ~]$ Bye, -- Alessandro Selli VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key: BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
On 07/09/19 at 00:34, fsmithred via Dng wrote: > On 9/6/19 5:43 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote: >> On 06/09/19 at 15:23, fsmithred via Dng wrote: >>> In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on >>> libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) >>> >>> The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in >>> buster. >> >> Really? I'm on beowulf now, and I have: >> >> ii udisks2 2.8.1-4 amd64 D-Bus service to access and >> manipulate storage devices >> >> Same as Debian 10 (buster): >> > > > Where did you get it? That version is not in devuan. I'm still running > the ascii version in my beowulf, because the beowulf/ceres version is > older. > [alessandro@wkstn02 ~]$ apt-cache policy udisks2 udisks2: Installed: 2.8.1-4 Candidate: 2.8.1-4 Version table: *** 2.8.1-4 100 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.1.3-5+devuan2 500 500 https://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages 500 http://packages.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages [alessandro@wkstn02 ~]$ Greetings, Alessandro -- Alessandro Selli VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key: BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
On 9/6/19 5:43 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote: On 06/09/19 at 15:23, fsmithred via Dng wrote: In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in buster. Really? I'm on beowulf now, and I have: ii udisks2 2.8.1-4 amd64 D-Bus service to access and manipulate storage devices Same as Debian 10 (buster): Where did you get it? That version is not in devuan. I'm still running the ascii version in my beowulf, because the beowulf/ceres version is older. udisks2: Installed: 2.1.8-1+devuan2 Candidate: 2.1.8-1+devuan2 Version table: 2.8.1-4 10 10 http://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian buster/main amd64 Packages *** 2.1.8-1+devuan2 100 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.1.3-5+devuan2 500 500 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 Packages 50 http://deb.devuan.org/merged ceres/main amd64 Packages I do have the buster version in one beowulf install, but I got that from outside of devuan. fsmithred ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Re: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
On 06/09/19 at 15:23, fsmithred via Dng wrote: > In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on > libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) > > The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in > buster. Really? I'm on beowulf now, and I have: ii udisks2 2.8.1-4 amd64 D-Bus service to access and manipulate storage devices Same as Debian 10 (buster): https://packages.debian.org/stable/allpackages udisks2 (2.8.1-4) D-Bus service to access and manipulate storage devices Latest version upstream is 2.8.4, released in Jul 22, 2019: https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/releases 2.8.1 was released in Sep 26, 2018. > The version in buster depends on libpam-systemd OR libpam-elogind. > (Also libsystemd0 OR libelogind0) Since we have libpam-elogind and > libelogind0 in the repos, we don't really need to devuanize udisks2 > anymore. Do we? > > Does anyone use udisks2 who doesn't want libpam-elogind or libelogind0 > with it? I have them both, and I have nothing against them. Bye, Alessandro -- Alessandro Selli VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key: BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
[DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.) The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in buster. The version in buster depends on libpam-systemd OR libpam-elogind. (Also libsystemd0 OR libelogind0) Since we have libpam-elogind and libelogind0 in the repos, we don't really need to devuanize udisks2 anymore. Do we? Does anyone use udisks2 who doesn't want libpam-elogind or libelogind0 with it? fsmithred (looking to reduce the work load) ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
