Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer to co-chair the DNS wg
On 10/1/19 9:07 AM, Dave Knight wrote: >> If selected again you have my commitment for the next 3-years. support -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria
On 6/11/19 11:10 PM, Jonas Frey wrote: > This whole BCP (whatever that includes in detail) is nowhere > documented. hi, to be honest there is a meaningful BCP about the topic: RFC 5358, BCP 140, Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks. under "Recommended configuration" paragraph: In general, it is a good idea to keep recursive and authoritative services separate as much as practical. -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [dns-wg] co-chair appointment: yet another reminder
On 10/17/16 3:18 PM, Jim Reid wrote: > I’d appreciate it if more members of the WG spoke up my support to shane -- antonio
Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones
On 10/18/16 11:36 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > The contractual terms are implementation detail and therefore out of scope > for the WG > if we have reason to believe the RFP and/or contract was unfair or defective > in some way. > The WG must not and can’t (try to) micromanage the NCC’s DNS team. jim, I agree on your last sentence. besides, I cannot fully understand how this WG could ask the NCC board to investigate "if we have reason to believe the rfp was unfair or defective in some way" when, actually, you just said "the contractual terms are out of scope for the WG". thank you -- antonio
