On 10/18/16 11:36 AM, Jim Reid wrote:
> The contractual terms are implementation detail and therefore out of scope
> for the WG
> if we have reason to believe the RFP and/or contract was unfair or defective
> in some way.
> The WG must not and can’t (try to) micromanage the NCC’s DNS team.
I agree on your last sentence.
besides, I cannot fully understand how this WG could ask the NCC board
to investigate "if we have reason to believe the rfp was unfair or
defective in some way" when, actually, you just said "the contractual
terms are out of scope for the WG".