On 18 Jun 2015, at 6:53, Tony Finch wrote:
Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote:
The over arching issue here is that there is no right answer regarding
non ascii in URIs.
What about RFC 3987 ?
Not everyone have implemented it, and the consensus when creating the URI RR
was that the RR should not be limited to only IRIs.
I see an issue with IETF not stating clearly IRI's (i.e. UTF-8 and then
%-encoding) are in use is a problem both here and there. And such a statement
is what I think is needed for not only the URI RR but also other cases.
paf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop