Re: [docbook-apps] chunking with xhtml-1_1 produce invalid xhtml11?
Jirka, thanks for your reply. You are right, but: On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Jirka Kosek ji...@kosek.cz wrote: DocBook has much more complex structures which can be nested and can't be directly mapped to valid XHTML. Handling this on stylesheet level would be to complex, so running HTML Tidy on output of DocBook stylesheets makes sense in this situations. I need to have footnotes in table titles (that's why I usecaptionpara) and figures in table cells (that's why I use tdpara) and there should be a mean to have them both valid in docbook and xhtml11 output (I need xhtml11 because I am targeting IDPF epub content). Anyone has some suggestions (apart from postprocessing the html files)? TIA, __peppo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] chunking with xhtml-1_1 produce invalid xhtml11?
Giuseppe Bonelli wrote: I need to have footnotes in table titles (that's why I usecaptionpara) Well then you have to customize stylesheets to not emit excessive p in HTML output. and figures in table cells (that's why I use tdpara) In table cell you can directly use inlinemediaobject without any surrounding elements. Jirka -- -- Jirka Kosek e-mail: ji...@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz -- Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing -- OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member -- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[docbook-apps] chunking with xhtml-1_1 produce invalid xhtml11?
Hi list, I am using /xhtml-1_1/docbook.xsl (1.75.2) to chunck a valid docbook 4.5 file and I get invalid xhtml11. In the docbook source I have valid structures like: tablecaptionparamixed content/para/caption ... td para figure float=0title/ mediaobject role=print imageobject imagedata width=28 fileref=figs/img13.png format=PNG/ /imageobject /mediaobject /figure /para /td /table that get transformed in: tablecaptionpmixed content/p/caption ... td pdiv class=figure/div/p /td ... /table The above html is not valid as per !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd; because caption does not allow p children and p does not allow div children. Is this the expected behaviour starting from a valid docbook file or I am missing something? TIA, __peppo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] chunking with xhtml-1_1 produce invalid xhtml11?
Hi, On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Giuseppe Bonelli peppo.bone...@gmail.com wrote: The above html is not valid as per !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd; because caption does not allow p children and p does not allow div children. My guess is that captions for HTML tables in DocBook 4.5 were not intended to include paras (compare with http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/html.caption.html), although you're right that they don't expressly forbid them. Similarly, I think the above would be improved if the (otherwise empty) para wrapper was removed from the td. In either case, both are probably bugs in the stylesheets, so please report them http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=21935atid=373747 You may have better luck with the CALS table model if you're aiming for valid XHTML 1.1 output (I'm honestly not sure). Is this the expected behaviour starting from a valid docbook file or I am missing something? May I ask why you've chosen to use the XHTML 1.1 stylesheets rather than the XHTML 1.0 stylesheets? Keith - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] chunking with xhtml-1_1 produce invalid xhtml11?
Giuseppe Bonelli wrote: Is this the expected behaviour starting from a valid docbook file or I am missing something? DocBook has much more complex structures which can be nested and can't be directly mapped to valid XHTML. Handling this on stylesheet level would be to complex, so running HTML Tidy on output of DocBook stylesheets makes sense in this situations. Anyway, if you are targeting web browsers, I would discourage you from using XHTML 1.1. It's impossible to serve XHTML 1.1 to IE without breaking XHTML 1.1 specification. Jirka -- -- Jirka Kosek e-mail: ji...@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz -- Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing -- OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member -- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
