[libreoffice-documentation] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Uploading Edited Manual

2012-06-14 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol

Hi Joel, *,
(ccing the documention-ml)

Am 13.06.2012 20:33, schrieb Joel Madero:

Hi All,
Where do I upload an updated manual. I made an incredibly small change
to address a bug report that someone had:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41600

I've done about a paragraph addition just to address the language issue
that the user brought up. Can I send this somewhere? Thanks in advance.


For questions about documentation it is better to write to 
documentation-ml (documentation@global.libreoffice.org). There you will 
get (hopefully) the right answers and help.


Changes in documentation should be first published in ODFAuthors. You 
should work on the existing document.


If it is too difficult to do it for you, give a short signal. It should 
be easy to integrate your work.


Here some links for more information:

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Production#Workflow

--
Grüße
k-j



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco CMIS access

2012-06-14 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi documentation team, David,

I'm just keeping you informed that the CMIS support in LibreOffice is
pretty well advanced in the future 3.6 and will already be usable as an
experimental feature.

In order for this to work with the TDF Alfresco repository, you'll need
to provide the link to the AtomPub CMIS binding from Alfresco (don't
hesitate to contact me if you need infos to find it).

Regards,

--
Cedric


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!

2012-06-14 Thread Jean Weber
Peter! Glad to hear you had a good holiday. I haven't been in Croatia
in 45 (!) years, back when it was part of Yugoslavia. I enjoyed it
then and have been looking for an opportunity to go back.

Here is the page for downloading the Beta 1 of LO3.6:
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/

That page also has a link to the nightly builds, if you feel really daring.

Glad to know you'll be doing Draw 3.5 as well as 3.6.

--Jean

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Peter Schofield psaut...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello Jean

 Back from a wonderful holiday in Croatia. Definitely worth visiting again and 
 we are already making tentative plans for next year. Now it is back to work.

 If you can point me in the right direction to get a reasonably stable version 
 of LO3.6, I can continue with Draw guide LO3.5. Then check LO3.5 guide 
 against LO3.6 after completing each chapter. Make any necessary alterations 
 and we shall be a little ahead when it is a go for publishing LO3.6 guides.

 Regards

 Peter Schofield
 psaut...@gmail.com


 On 14 Jun 2012, at 08:21, Jean Weber wrote:

 I have now studied the features lists for v3.5
 (http://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-5-new-features-and-fixes/) and
 v3.6 (http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6).

 Numerous important changes were made in v3.5 to Writer and Draw as
 well as Impress. Few new or updated features are listed for Draw and
 Impress v3.6.

 Updating the Draw Guide to 3.5 should not be a major job for PeterS,
 because of the overlap between Draw and Impress. He has already agreed
 to do it. Producing a v3.6 book for Draw or Impress should require
 very little further work.

 Updating the affected chapters of the Writer Guide to v3.5 will be a
 fair bit of work for whoever does it (JohnS?), but then the update to
 v3.6 should be relatively minor.

 Calc appears to have numerous important changes in v3.5 and in v3.6,
 so perhaps a case can be made for skipping a Calc Guide for v3.5 and
 going directly to v3.6... assuming anyone is available to work on it,
 given everything else that needs to be done.

 IMO, we should have a Getting Started guide for v3.5 and another for
 v3.6. But again, that assumes someone is available to work on it. I
 traditionally do that book, other than the chapters extracted from
 work others do for other books (Writer, Impress, Draw, Calc).

 So, to summarise:
 I think we should NOT skip the v3.5 books (other than, perhaps, Calc),
 because of the major changes in v3.5. However, if individual
 volunteers prefer to go directly to v3.6 for whatever they are working
 on, I won't argue.

 BTW, I intend to work on the remaining chapters of Calc v3.4 over the
 next few days, so we can finish that book as soon as Andrew Pitonyak
 does his chapters.

 After that, I intend to work on Getting Started v3.5.

 --Jean


 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Don't know whether 3.6 is usable enough for us to start documenting
 it, but it should be. It's in early beta at the moment. I haven't
 tested it nor even read through the list of updates yet.

 Skipping 3.5.x guides: I'll look at the features lists for 3.5 and 3.6
 and form an opinion today or tomorrow. Skipping a release has both
 advantages and disadvantages, so the pros and cons need to be weighed
 up. Sometimes incremental updating works best; sometimes it's not
 needed. (Others' informed opinions are welcome, of course.)

 --Jean

 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk 
 wrote:
 Hi :)
 Is the 3.6.x usable enough to completely skip all the remaining 3.5.x 
 guides and go straight to the 3.6.x guides instead?
 Regards from
 Tom :)

 --- On Wed, 13/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
 Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching 
 quickly!
 To: Documentation@global.libreoffice.org
 Date: Wednesday, 13 June, 2012, 23:32

 This article is a nice summary:
 http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/LibreOffice-3-6-0-enters-beta-testing-1616858.html

 It contains links to relevant LO wiki pages including:
 * the release plan,
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/3.6#3.6.0_release
 * the preliminary Release Notes,
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6

 Note that release is scheduled for late July - early August. We need
 to finish the v3.4 Calc Guide and all the v3.5 books, as well as work
 on v3.6.

 --Jean

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco CMIS access

2012-06-14 Thread CHRISTOPHER DAVIDSON
Hi Cedric,

I have been watching the Open Office project looking at a way of getting 
involved. I am an Alfresco consultant and would be very interested in this 
feature.

Would be interested in getting involved if you were looking for help, e.g. 
testing.

Regards,


Chris Davidson




 From: Cedric Bosdonnat cedric.bosdonnat@free.fr
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org 
Cc: David Nelson li...@traduction.biz 
Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012, 8:37
Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco CMIS access
 
Hi documentation team, David,

I'm just keeping you informed that the CMIS support in LibreOffice is
pretty well advanced in the future 3.6 and will already be usable as an
experimental feature.

In order for this to work with the TDF Alfresco repository, you'll need
to provide the link to the AtomPub CMIS binding from Alfresco (don't
hesitate to contact me if you need infos to find it).

Regards,

--
Cedric


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco CMIS access

2012-06-14 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Christopher,

On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 09:36 +0100, CHRISTOPHER DAVIDSON wrote:
 I have been watching the Open Office project looking at a way of
 getting involved. I am an Alfresco consultant and would be very
 interested in this feature.

Don't get confused here: this is not a feature for OpenOffice... only
LibreOffice has it.

 Would be interested in getting involved if you were looking for help,
 e.g. testing.

Testing will be useful, but not only for Alfresco :) BTW I'm currently
testing against a local Alfresco (I was Alfresco consultant in a
previous life) and a local SharePoint 2010. Any other server type at
hand is welcomed too.

For testing, you'll need to grab the latest 3.6 beta installs or build
LibreOffice yourself.

Thanks for your testing offer, don't hesitate to ask for more infos.
--
Cedric


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-documentation] Working on Ch14 (Customizing) of the Calc Guide

2012-06-14 Thread Jean Weber
I am working on Chapter 14 (Customizing) of the Calc Guide. Andrew
Pitonyak is doing Chapters 12  13.

--Jean

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!

2012-06-14 Thread Ian Leyton
Hi Jean,

Just downloaded and installed on my Mac. If they do not change any of the icons 
before release many of the Calc guide screen shots will need redoing as they 
have changed many of them and some of the menu items.

How to catch up with the guides with the limited number of people is going to 
be a problem.

What time I'll have to help with the Calc guide remains an unknown given the 
change of government! 

I was hoping to have already to have started on the LO3.5 Calc guides. May be 
the same plan as Peter mentioned below might be the best plan

Regards

Ian Leyton
On 14/06/2012, at 6:17 PM, Jean Weber wrote:

 Peter! Glad to hear you had a good holiday. I haven't been in Croatia
 in 45 (!) years, back when it was part of Yugoslavia. I enjoyed it
 then and have been looking for an opportunity to go back.
 
 Here is the page for downloading the Beta 1 of LO3.6:
 http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
 
 That page also has a link to the nightly builds, if you feel really daring.
 
 Glad to know you'll be doing Draw 3.5 as well as 3.6.
 
 --Jean
 
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Peter Schofield psaut...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello Jean
 
 Back from a wonderful holiday in Croatia. Definitely worth visiting again 
 and we are already making tentative plans for next year. Now it is back to 
 work.
 
 If you can point me in the right direction to get a reasonably stable 
 version of LO3.6, I can continue with Draw guide LO3.5. Then check LO3.5 
 guide against LO3.6 after completing each chapter. Make any necessary 
 alterations and we shall be a little ahead when it is a go for publishing 
 LO3.6 guides.
 
 Regards
 
 Peter Schofield
 psaut...@gmail.com
 
 
 On 14 Jun 2012, at 08:21, Jean Weber wrote:
 
 I have now studied the features lists for v3.5
 (http://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-5-new-features-and-fixes/) and
 v3.6 (http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6).
 
 Numerous important changes were made in v3.5 to Writer and Draw as
 well as Impress. Few new or updated features are listed for Draw and
 Impress v3.6.
 
 Updating the Draw Guide to 3.5 should not be a major job for PeterS,
 because of the overlap between Draw and Impress. He has already agreed
 to do it. Producing a v3.6 book for Draw or Impress should require
 very little further work.
 
 Updating the affected chapters of the Writer Guide to v3.5 will be a
 fair bit of work for whoever does it (JohnS?), but then the update to
 v3.6 should be relatively minor.
 
 Calc appears to have numerous important changes in v3.5 and in v3.6,
 so perhaps a case can be made for skipping a Calc Guide for v3.5 and
 going directly to v3.6... assuming anyone is available to work on it,
 given everything else that needs to be done.
 
 IMO, we should have a Getting Started guide for v3.5 and another for
 v3.6. But again, that assumes someone is available to work on it. I
 traditionally do that book, other than the chapters extracted from
 work others do for other books (Writer, Impress, Draw, Calc).
 
 So, to summarise:
 I think we should NOT skip the v3.5 books (other than, perhaps, Calc),
 because of the major changes in v3.5. However, if individual
 volunteers prefer to go directly to v3.6 for whatever they are working
 on, I won't argue.
 
 BTW, I intend to work on the remaining chapters of Calc v3.4 over the
 next few days, so we can finish that book as soon as Andrew Pitonyak
 does his chapters.
 
 After that, I intend to work on Getting Started v3.5.
 
 --Jean
 
 
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Don't know whether 3.6 is usable enough for us to start documenting
 it, but it should be. It's in early beta at the moment. I haven't
 tested it nor even read through the list of updates yet.
 
 Skipping 3.5.x guides: I'll look at the features lists for 3.5 and 3.6
 and form an opinion today or tomorrow. Skipping a release has both
 advantages and disadvantages, so the pros and cons need to be weighed
 up. Sometimes incremental updating works best; sometimes it's not
 needed. (Others' informed opinions are welcome, of course.)
 
 --Jean
 
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk 
 wrote:
 Hi :)
 Is the 3.6.x usable enough to completely skip all the remaining 3.5.x 
 guides and go straight to the 3.6.x guides instead?
 Regards from
 Tom :)
 
 --- On Wed, 13/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
 Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching 
 quickly!
 To: Documentation@global.libreoffice.org
 Date: Wednesday, 13 June, 2012, 23:32
 
 This article is a nice summary:
 http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/LibreOffice-3-6-0-enters-beta-testing-1616858.html
 
 It contains links to relevant LO wiki pages including:
 * the release plan,
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/3.6#3.6.0_release
 * the preliminary Release Notes,
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6
 
 Note that 

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!

2012-06-14 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I think one of the problems with the 3.5.x branch was that so many things 
didn't work that it was difficult to get screen-shots or accurately update the 
text of the guides.  

We don't really know whether there will be more changes to the icon sets at 
official release.  Is anyone on the design teams list to ask there?  It might 
be worth asking the devs list too as they might have some idea of plans.  
Regards from
Tom :)


--- On Thu, 14/6/12, Ian Leyton leyto...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Ian Leyton leyto...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 10:52

Hi Jean,

Just downloaded and installed on my Mac. If they do not change any of the icons 
before release many of the Calc guide screen shots will need redoing as they 
have changed many of them and some of the menu items.

How to catch up with the guides with the limited number of people is going to 
be a problem.

What time I'll have to help with the Calc guide remains an unknown given the 
change of government! 

I was hoping to have already to have started on the LO3.5 Calc guides. May be 
the same plan as Peter mentioned below might be the best plan

Regards

Ian Leyton
On 14/06/2012, at 6:17 PM, Jean Weber wrote:

 Peter! Glad to hear you had a good holiday. I haven't been in Croatia
 in 45 (!) years, back when it was part of Yugoslavia. I enjoyed it
 then and have been looking for an opportunity to go back.
 
 Here is the page for downloading the Beta 1 of LO3.6:
 http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
 
 That page also has a link to the nightly builds, if you feel really daring.
 
 Glad to know you'll be doing Draw 3.5 as well as 3.6.
 
 --Jean
 
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Peter Schofield psaut...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello Jean
 
 Back from a wonderful holiday in Croatia. Definitely worth visiting again 
 and we are already making tentative plans for next year. Now it is back to 
 work.
 
 If you can point me in the right direction to get a reasonably stable 
 version of LO3.6, I can continue with Draw guide LO3.5. Then check LO3.5 
 guide against LO3.6 after completing each chapter. Make any necessary 
 alterations and we shall be a little ahead when it is a go for publishing 
 LO3.6 guides.
 
 Regards
 
 Peter Schofield
 psaut...@gmail.com
 
 
 On 14 Jun 2012, at 08:21, Jean Weber wrote:
 
 I have now studied the features lists for v3.5
 (http://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-5-new-features-and-fixes/) and
 v3.6 (http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6).
 
 Numerous important changes were made in v3.5 to Writer and Draw as
 well as Impress. Few new or updated features are listed for Draw and
 Impress v3.6.
 
 Updating the Draw Guide to 3.5 should not be a major job for PeterS,
 because of the overlap between Draw and Impress. He has already agreed
 to do it. Producing a v3.6 book for Draw or Impress should require
 very little further work.
 
 Updating the affected chapters of the Writer Guide to v3.5 will be a
 fair bit of work for whoever does it (JohnS?), but then the update to
 v3.6 should be relatively minor.
 
 Calc appears to have numerous important changes in v3.5 and in v3.6,
 so perhaps a case can be made for skipping a Calc Guide for v3.5 and
 going directly to v3.6... assuming anyone is available to work on it,
 given everything else that needs to be done.
 
 IMO, we should have a Getting Started guide for v3.5 and another for
 v3.6. But again, that assumes someone is available to work on it. I
 traditionally do that book, other than the chapters extracted from
 work others do for other books (Writer, Impress, Draw, Calc).
 
 So, to summarise:
 I think we should NOT skip the v3.5 books (other than, perhaps, Calc),
 because of the major changes in v3.5. However, if individual
 volunteers prefer to go directly to v3.6 for whatever they are working
 on, I won't argue.
 
 BTW, I intend to work on the remaining chapters of Calc v3.4 over the
 next few days, so we can finish that book as soon as Andrew Pitonyak
 does his chapters.
 
 After that, I intend to work on Getting Started v3.5.
 
 --Jean
 
 
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Don't know whether 3.6 is usable enough for us to start documenting
 it, but it should be. It's in early beta at the moment. I haven't
 tested it nor even read through the list of updates yet.
 
 Skipping 3.5.x guides: I'll look at the features lists for 3.5 and 3.6
 and form an opinion today or tomorrow. Skipping a release has both
 advantages and disadvantages, so the pros and cons need to be weighed
 up. Sometimes incremental updating works best; sometimes it's not
 needed. (Others' informed opinions are welcome, of course.)
 
 --Jean
 
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk 
 wrote:
 Hi :)
 Is the 3.6.x usable enough to completely skip all the remaining 3.5.x 
 guides and go 

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!

2012-06-14 Thread Jean Weber
Ian,
Be sure you are using the Galaxy icon set in LibreOffice (LODev 
Preferences  LOdev  View  Icon size and style). When I installed
LO3.6 beta on my Mac, it came up with the Automatic (Tango) icon set.
Many Tango icons look different, but a quick flip through some Calc
screens suggests that the Galaxy icon set is mostly unchanged... or
the changes are minor enough that new screenshots are not required for
that reason alone (and may look somewhat different on other platforms
anyway).

--Jean

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Ian Leyton leyto...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Jean,

 Just downloaded and installed on my Mac. If they do not change any of the 
 icons before release many of the Calc guide screen shots will need redoing as 
 they have changed many of them and some of the menu items.

 How to catch up with the guides with the limited number of people is going to 
 be a problem.

 What time I'll have to help with the Calc guide remains an unknown given the 
 change of government!

 I was hoping to have already to have started on the LO3.5 Calc guides. May be 
 the same plan as Peter mentioned below might be the best plan

 Regards

 Ian Leyton
 On 14/06/2012, at 6:17 PM, Jean Weber wrote:

 Peter! Glad to hear you had a good holiday. I haven't been in Croatia
 in 45 (!) years, back when it was part of Yugoslavia. I enjoyed it
 then and have been looking for an opportunity to go back.

 Here is the page for downloading the Beta 1 of LO3.6:
 http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/

 That page also has a link to the nightly builds, if you feel really daring.

 Glad to know you'll be doing Draw 3.5 as well as 3.6.

 --Jean

 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Peter Schofield psaut...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello Jean

 Back from a wonderful holiday in Croatia. Definitely worth visiting again 
 and we are already making tentative plans for next year. Now it is back to 
 work.

 If you can point me in the right direction to get a reasonably stable 
 version of LO3.6, I can continue with Draw guide LO3.5. Then check LO3.5 
 guide against LO3.6 after completing each chapter. Make any necessary 
 alterations and we shall be a little ahead when it is a go for publishing 
 LO3.6 guides.

 Regards

 Peter Schofield
 psaut...@gmail.com


 On 14 Jun 2012, at 08:21, Jean Weber wrote:

 I have now studied the features lists for v3.5
 (http://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-5-new-features-and-fixes/) and
 v3.6 (http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6).

 Numerous important changes were made in v3.5 to Writer and Draw as
 well as Impress. Few new or updated features are listed for Draw and
 Impress v3.6.

 Updating the Draw Guide to 3.5 should not be a major job for PeterS,
 because of the overlap between Draw and Impress. He has already agreed
 to do it. Producing a v3.6 book for Draw or Impress should require
 very little further work.

 Updating the affected chapters of the Writer Guide to v3.5 will be a
 fair bit of work for whoever does it (JohnS?), but then the update to
 v3.6 should be relatively minor.

 Calc appears to have numerous important changes in v3.5 and in v3.6,
 so perhaps a case can be made for skipping a Calc Guide for v3.5 and
 going directly to v3.6... assuming anyone is available to work on it,
 given everything else that needs to be done.

 IMO, we should have a Getting Started guide for v3.5 and another for
 v3.6. But again, that assumes someone is available to work on it. I
 traditionally do that book, other than the chapters extracted from
 work others do for other books (Writer, Impress, Draw, Calc).

 So, to summarise:
 I think we should NOT skip the v3.5 books (other than, perhaps, Calc),
 because of the major changes in v3.5. However, if individual
 volunteers prefer to go directly to v3.6 for whatever they are working
 on, I won't argue.

 BTW, I intend to work on the remaining chapters of Calc v3.4 over the
 next few days, so we can finish that book as soon as Andrew Pitonyak
 does his chapters.

 After that, I intend to work on Getting Started v3.5.

 --Jean


 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Don't know whether 3.6 is usable enough for us to start documenting
 it, but it should be. It's in early beta at the moment. I haven't
 tested it nor even read through the list of updates yet.

 Skipping 3.5.x guides: I'll look at the features lists for 3.5 and 3.6
 and form an opinion today or tomorrow. Skipping a release has both
 advantages and disadvantages, so the pros and cons need to be weighed
 up. Sometimes incremental updating works best; sometimes it's not
 needed. (Others' informed opinions are welcome, of course.)

 --Jean

 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk 
 wrote:
 Hi :)
 Is the 3.6.x usable enough to completely skip all the remaining 3.5.x 
 guides and go straight to the 3.6.x guides instead?
 Regards from
 Tom :)

 --- On Wed, 13/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Jean Weber 

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!

2012-06-14 Thread Jean Weber
OK Tom, you've given your opinion. Let those of us actually doing the
work decide what we prefer to do.

Cheers, Jean


On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi :)
 I think it would be more impressive if people mostly skipped the 3.5.x and 
 went straight on to the 3.6.x as happened with the Impress Guide this time.  
 Maybe by the time the 3.6.x guides are done the need for 3.5.x guides would 
 be over anyway.  There are not many releases left before 3.5.x reaches 
 end-of-life.

 Yes, there might have been big changes but if no-one is using the 3.5.x by 
 the time the guides are done then there will have been no point in doing the 
 guides.
 Regards from
 Tom :)


 --- On Thu, 14/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching 
 quickly!
 To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
 Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 7:21

 I have now studied the features lists for v3.5
 (http://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-5-new-features-and-fixes/) and
 v3.6 (http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6).

 Numerous important changes were made in v3.5 to Writer and Draw as
 well as Impress. Few new or updated features are listed for Draw and
 Impress v3.6.

 Updating the Draw Guide to 3.5 should not be a major job for PeterS,
 because of the overlap between Draw and Impress. He has already agreed
 to do it. Producing a v3.6 book for Draw or Impress should require
 very little further work.

 Updating the affected chapters of the Writer Guide to v3.5 will be a
 fair bit of work for whoever does it (JohnS?), but then the update to
 v3.6 should be relatively minor.

 Calc appears to have numerous important changes in v3.5 and in v3.6,
 so perhaps a case can be made for skipping a Calc Guide for v3.5 and
 going directly to v3.6... assuming anyone is available to work on it,
 given everything else that needs to be done.

 IMO, we should have a Getting Started guide for v3.5 and another for
 v3.6. But again, that assumes someone is available to work on it. I
 traditionally do that book, other than the chapters extracted from
 work others do for other books (Writer, Impress, Draw, Calc).

 So, to summarise:
 I think we should NOT skip the v3.5 books (other than, perhaps, Calc),
 because of the major changes in v3.5. However, if individual
 volunteers prefer to go directly to v3.6 for whatever they are working
 on, I won't argue.

 BTW, I intend to work on the remaining chapters of Calc v3.4 over the
 next few days, so we can finish that book as soon as Andrew Pitonyak
 does his chapters.

 After that, I intend to work on Getting Started v3.5.

 --Jean


 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Don't know whether 3.6 is usable enough for us to start documenting
 it, but it should be. It's in early beta at the moment. I haven't
 tested it nor even read through the list of updates yet.

 Skipping 3.5.x guides: I'll look at the features lists for 3.5 and 3.6
 and form an opinion today or tomorrow. Skipping a release has both
 advantages and disadvantages, so the pros and cons need to be weighed
 up. Sometimes incremental updating works best; sometimes it's not
 needed. (Others' informed opinions are welcome, of course.)

 --Jean

 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi :)
 Is the 3.6.x usable enough to completely skip all the remaining 3.5.x 
 guides and go straight to the 3.6.x guides instead?
 Regards from
 Tom :)

 --- On Wed, 13/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
 Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!
 To: Documentation@global.libreoffice.org
 Date: Wednesday, 13 June, 2012, 23:32

 This article is a nice summary:
 http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/LibreOffice-3-6-0-enters-beta-testing-1616858.html

 It contains links to relevant LO wiki pages including:
 * the release plan,
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/3.6#3.6.0_release
 * the preliminary Release Notes,
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6

 Note that release is scheduled for late July - early August. We need
 to finish the v3.4 Calc Guide and all the v3.5 books, as well as work
 on v3.6.

 --Jean

 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
 documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
 deleted


 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
 documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Uploading Edited Manual

2012-06-14 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
I think, in this case, that it might be better to just upload straight to the 
wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications

ODFAuthors is for proof-reading and all the rest of the process.  This case 
sounds like it is probably ready to go straight to the wiki.  Please let us 
know which chapter and when you have done it as the change might need to get 
pulled into the completed full book as well as the chapter you have edited.

Regards from
Tom :)  


--- On Thu, 14/6/12, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol o...@sophia-louise.de wrote:

From: klaus-jürgen weghorn ol o...@sophia-louise.de
Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Uploading Edited 
Manual
To: Libreoffice-qa libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: documentation@global.libreoffice.org, jmadero@gmail.com
Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 7:01

Hi Joel, *,
(ccing the documention-ml)

Am 13.06.2012 20:33, schrieb Joel Madero:
 Hi All,
 Where do I upload an updated manual. I made an incredibly small change
 to address a bug report that someone had:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
 
 I've done about a paragraph addition just to address the language issue
 that the user brought up. Can I send this somewhere? Thanks in advance.

For questions about documentation it is better to write to documentation-ml 
(documentation@global.libreoffice.org). There you will get (hopefully) the 
right answers and help.

Changes in documentation should be first published in ODFAuthors. You should 
work on the existing document.

If it is too difficult to do it for you, give a short signal. It should be easy 
to integrate your work.

Here some links for more information:

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Production#Workflow

-- Grüße
k-j



-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!

2012-06-14 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
+1
Regards from
Tom :)  

--- On Thu, 14/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 11:41

OK Tom, you've given your opinion. Let those of us actually doing the
work decide what we prefer to do.

Cheers, Jean


On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi :)
 I think it would be more impressive if people mostly skipped the 3.5.x and 
 went straight on to the 3.6.x as happened with the Impress Guide this time.  
 Maybe by the time the 3.6.x guides are done the need for 3.5.x guides would 
 be over anyway.  There are not many releases left before 3.5.x reaches 
 end-of-life.

 Yes, there might have been big changes but if no-one is using the 3.5.x by 
 the time the guides are done then there will have been no point in doing the 
 guides.
 Regards from
 Tom :)


 --- On Thu, 14/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching 
 quickly!
 To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
 Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 7:21

 I have now studied the features lists for v3.5
 (http://www.libreoffice.org/download/3-5-new-features-and-fixes/) and
 v3.6 (http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6).

 Numerous important changes were made in v3.5 to Writer and Draw as
 well as Impress. Few new or updated features are listed for Draw and
 Impress v3.6.

 Updating the Draw Guide to 3.5 should not be a major job for PeterS,
 because of the overlap between Draw and Impress. He has already agreed
 to do it. Producing a v3.6 book for Draw or Impress should require
 very little further work.

 Updating the affected chapters of the Writer Guide to v3.5 will be a
 fair bit of work for whoever does it (JohnS?), but then the update to
 v3.6 should be relatively minor.

 Calc appears to have numerous important changes in v3.5 and in v3.6,
 so perhaps a case can be made for skipping a Calc Guide for v3.5 and
 going directly to v3.6... assuming anyone is available to work on it,
 given everything else that needs to be done.

 IMO, we should have a Getting Started guide for v3.5 and another for
 v3.6. But again, that assumes someone is available to work on it. I
 traditionally do that book, other than the chapters extracted from
 work others do for other books (Writer, Impress, Draw, Calc).

 So, to summarise:
 I think we should NOT skip the v3.5 books (other than, perhaps, Calc),
 because of the major changes in v3.5. However, if individual
 volunteers prefer to go directly to v3.6 for whatever they are working
 on, I won't argue.

 BTW, I intend to work on the remaining chapters of Calc v3.4 over the
 next few days, so we can finish that book as soon as Andrew Pitonyak
 does his chapters.

 After that, I intend to work on Getting Started v3.5.

 --Jean


 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Don't know whether 3.6 is usable enough for us to start documenting
 it, but it should be. It's in early beta at the moment. I haven't
 tested it nor even read through the list of updates yet.

 Skipping 3.5.x guides: I'll look at the features lists for 3.5 and 3.6
 and form an opinion today or tomorrow. Skipping a release has both
 advantages and disadvantages, so the pros and cons need to be weighed
 up. Sometimes incremental updating works best; sometimes it's not
 needed. (Others' informed opinions are welcome, of course.)

 --Jean

 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi :)
 Is the 3.6.x usable enough to completely skip all the remaining 3.5.x 
 guides and go straight to the 3.6.x guides instead?
 Regards from
 Tom :)

 --- On Wed, 13/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
 Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!
 To: Documentation@global.libreoffice.org
 Date: Wednesday, 13 June, 2012, 23:32

 This article is a nice summary:
 http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/LibreOffice-3-6-0-enters-beta-testing-1616858.html

 It contains links to relevant LO wiki pages including:
 * the release plan,
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/3.6#3.6.0_release
 * the preliminary Release Notes,
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.6

 Note that release is scheduled for late July - early August. We need
 to finish the v3.4 Calc Guide and all the v3.5 books, as well as work
 on v3.6.

 --Jean

 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
 documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems? 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
 All messages sent to this list will be 

Re: [libreoffice-documentation] LibreOffice 3.6 is approaching quickly!

2012-06-14 Thread Gary Schnabl

On 6/14/2012 2:23 AM, Jean Weber wrote:

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Gary Schnablgschn...@swdetroit.com  wrote:

On 6/14/2012 12:19 AM, Gary Schnabl wrote:

On 6/13/2012 8:18 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
Is the 3.6.x usable enough to completely skip all the remaining 3.5.x
guides and go straight to the 3.6.x guides instead?
Regards from
Tom :)


My dos centavos...

Due to the very small number of writers available, LO should always
rewrite its current material at the beta version level, at least. Better
yet, write for the pre-release alpha stage and update the chapters
accordingly, as needed.

Otherwise, when the LO docs project attempts to complete an incremental
edition, it will likely keep remaining an incremental version or three
behind--and possibly contain deprecated or even worse, obsolete, material in
addition to being untimely.

Gary


I forgot to add...

The writings should be done much like the technical editing and rewriting we
performed for Motorla/Freescale Semiconductor: using conditional text for
the various material that differs. After a reasonable amount of time, the
obsolete or deprecated material can be permanently deleted.

Gary


Gary, you know perfectly well that very few volunteers are able to
cope with conditional text or any of the other professional methods of
maintaining documentation. Otherwise, I would agree.

As for working with beta software, this is also a problem for many
volunteers. We've seen that over and over again at OOo and here.
However, I'm far more willing to tackle that problem. Of course, some
of our regular contributors have no problem with using upcoming
releases, so that's not a showstopper.

See my other note about my conclusions from studying the features
lists for v3.5 and v3.6.

--Jean


For those who might be unaware of the use of conditional text...

Using conditional text is not as complicated as you are making it seem. 
Reviewers or re(writers) could work as before with their writings or 
reviews.


Afterward, a maintenance editor (a type of technical editor who updates 
docs) could then incorporate the conditional text into a master chapter 
document, as needed. As a result, any desired incremental version could 
be generated, utilizing the appropriate conditional field for the 
particular version. And the final port of a particular version's chapter 
is (typically) cleared of its conditional text for the master document 
used for book building, assuming that a book or PDF is the desired output.


All of that could be made transparent to those writers, editors, or 
reviewers with less experience. There were times in the past (mostly for 
version 2.x, when there were a bit more volunteers at times than 
currently) when OO had maintenance editors assigned to chapters, thus 
aiding in updating those chapters of the Writer Guide.


Of course, the problem in that regard is a current lack of maintenance 
editors--something that could be corrected with an aggressive 
recruitment of volunteers (no easy task). Another benefit would be 
keeping the modularity involved when a guide is broken up into chapters 
along with their attendant maintaining editors--much like it was a few 
years ago.


One problem was LO/OO reinventing the wheel over and over again when 
redoing a complete incremental edition with mostly unaltered material, 
thus resulting in some delays in getting out a complete increment guide 
for whatever component being developed. But the real delay at LO is not 
getting an appropriate leg-up with new material while not starting the 
updating until way past the time the incremental version is already in 
its general, stable release.



Gary

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Uploading Edited Manual

2012-06-14 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
+1
Sorry.  Now i have thought about it that final sentence of mine flags up a 
potential minefield.  Klaus-jürgen and Jean's answer is wise.
Apols and regards from
Tom :)

--- On Thu, 14/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Uploading Edited 
Manual
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 12:00

I disagree. The changed document should be checked by someone on the
team (for example, me) before replacing anything on the wiki.

--Jean

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 Hi :)
 I think, in this case, that it might be better to just upload straight to the 
 wiki
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications

 ODFAuthors is for proof-reading and all the rest of the process.  This case 
 sounds like it is probably ready to go straight to the wiki.  Please let us 
 know which chapter and when you have done it as the change might need to get 
 pulled into the completed full book as well as the chapter you have edited.

 Regards from
 Tom :)


 --- On Thu, 14/6/12, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol o...@sophia-louise.de wrote:

 From: klaus-jürgen weghorn ol o...@sophia-louise.de
 Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Uploading Edited 
 Manual
 To: Libreoffice-qa libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org
 Cc: documentation@global.libreoffice.org, jmadero@gmail.com
 Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 7:01

 Hi Joel, *,
 (ccing the documention-ml)

 Am 13.06.2012 20:33, schrieb Joel Madero:
 Hi All,
 Where do I upload an updated manual. I made an incredibly small change
 to address a bug report that someone had:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41600

 I've done about a paragraph addition just to address the language issue
 that the user brought up. Can I send this somewhere? Thanks in advance.

 For questions about documentation it is better to write to documentation-ml 
 (documentation@global.libreoffice.org). There you will get (hopefully) the 
 right answers and help.

 Changes in documentation should be first published in ODFAuthors. You should 
 work on the existing document.

 If it is too difficult to do it for you, give a short signal. It should be 
 easy to integrate your work.

 Here some links for more information:

 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Production#Workflow

 -- Grüße
 k-j


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-documentation] Contribution (Alfresco)

2012-06-14 Thread Sanket Sharma
Hi, 

While looking for some documentation on Alfresco, I came across this wikipage 
- 
http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Help_Wanted#LibreOffice_Alfresco_Implementation 
(The last on at the bottom of the page) The page says:

LibreOffice Alfresco Implementation

The LibreOffice project uses Alfresco to manage technical documentation. They 
are looking for help customizing their Alfresco implementation (folder 
structure, permissions, minor Share user interface tweaks, workflow, etc.).

Primary contact: David Nelson



Which says that the LibreOffice project is looking for people with Alfresco 
knowledge to help them with their Alfresco implementation. While I may not be a 
pro, but I would love to contribute in any way I can. I have worked on other 
open source projects and have made contributions here and there and have 
extensive experience in Document management and ECM.

So, are you guys still looking for help with Alfresco? Can I help? if Yes, How 
do I get started?


Best Regards,
Sanket
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Uploading Edited Manual

2012-06-14 Thread Jean Weber
Is this in the full book or a chapter file or both? Please tell me the exact 
file names. 

One reason I like to check files before uploading is to change info on 
copyright page if needed. Also sometimes changes to files cause page break 
changes that I want to correct or they've used an incorrect style or something. 
Fiddly stuff not directly related to the content. 

Probably all is fine with what you've done, but I would like to check. If you 
don't have an ODFAuthors account, go ahead and upload to wiki. Just be sure to 
tell me the file name(s). Thanks!

Jean

On 15/06/2012, at 1:27, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for the info. I'm slightly confused, am I uploading to wiki or
 following Jean's advice and letting someone proof it before? It's honestly
 a really simple addition. It's more to address the user who submitted the
 request and knock one of the 5,000+ bugs off the list :) I can even post it
 here:
 
 *This is pertaining to bug reported here*:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
 
 *The original text is located in:*
 Install the required dictionaries
 
 *It reads:*
 LibreOffice automatically installs several dictionaries with the program.
 To add other dictionaries, be sure you are connected to the Internet, and
 then use Tools  Language  More Dictionaries Online. LibreOffice will open
 your default web browser to a page containing links to additional
 dictionaries that you can install. Follow the prompts to select and install
 the ones you want.
 
 
 *I changed/added to the following:*
 LibreOffice automatically installs several dictionaries with the program.
 To add other dictionaries, be sure you are connected to the Internet, and
 then use Tools  Language  More Dictionaries Online. LibreOffice will open
 your default web browser to a page containing links to additional
 dictionaries that you can install.
 
 When you download the dictionary or dictionaries that you want, they will
 be in the open office extension format (.oxt). In order to install these
 extensions use Tools  Extension Manager...click on Add...located at the
 bottom of the extension manager dialog. Navigate to the appropriate folder
 containing your dictionary in .oxt format, select the oxt dictionary and
 click Open.
 
 
 Many thanks,
 Joel
 
 
 
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
 
 Hi :)
 +1
 Sorry.  Now i have thought about it that final sentence of mine flags up a
 potential minefield.  Klaus-jürgen and Jean's answer is wise.
 Apols and regards from
 Tom :)
 
 --- On *Thu, 14/6/12, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com* wrote:
 
 
 From: Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Uploading
 Edited Manual
 To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
 Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 12:00
 
 I disagree. The changed document should be checked by someone on the
 team (for example, me) before replacing anything on the wiki.
 
 --Jean
 
 
 On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tom Davies 
 tomdavie...@yahoo.co.ukhttp://mc/compose?to=tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
 wrote:
 Hi :)
 I think, in this case, that it might be better to just upload straight
 to the wiki
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications
 
 ODFAuthors is for proof-reading and all the rest of the process.  This
 case sounds like it is probably ready to go straight to the wiki.  Please
 let us know which chapter and when you have done it as the change might
 need to get pulled into the completed full book as well as the chapter you
 have edited.
 
 Regards from
 Tom :)
 
 
 --- On Thu, 14/6/12, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol 
 o...@sophia-louise.dehttp://mc/compose?to=o...@sophia-louise.de
 wrote:
 
 From: klaus-jürgen weghorn ol 
 o...@sophia-louise.dehttp://mc/compose?to=o...@sophia-louise.de
 
 Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Uploading
 Edited Manual
 To: Libreoffice-qa 
 libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.orghttp://mc/compose?to=libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org
 
 Cc: 
 documentation@global.libreoffice.orghttp://mc/compose?to=documentation@global.libreoffice.org,
 jmadero@gmail.com http://mc/compose?to=jmadero@gmail.com
 Date: Thursday, 14 June, 2012, 7:01
 
 Hi Joel, *,
 (ccing the documention-ml)
 
 Am 13.06.2012 20:33, schrieb Joel Madero:
 Hi All,
 Where do I upload an updated manual. I made an incredibly small change
 to address a bug report that someone had:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41600
 
 I've done about a paragraph addition just to address the language issue
 that the user brought up. Can I send this somewhere? Thanks in advance.
 
 For questions about documentation it is better to write to
 documentation-ml 
 (documentation@global.libreoffice.orghttp://mc/compose?to=documentation@global.libreoffice.org).
 There you will get (hopefully) the right answers and help.
 
 Changes in documentation should be first published in ODFAuthors. You
 should work on the existing document.