Re: [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.

2008-03-24 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Bent -

A thought occurred to me last night!  (Scary!!)

You could put the TV-3300 on the Direct 1 or Direct 2 output of the MN-2000 to the beam, since you 
really don't need it for the low bands and the beam is a good enough termination for the filter anyway.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA



Bent wrote:

Hello All
 
Is someone able to inform me about the most 
opmimal/recommendable way/order to combine the 1: TR-4CW, 2: 
TV-3300-LP, 3: W-4 and 4: MN2000.

What is the correct way to combine 2, 3 and 4?
 
The MN2000 is only used for the 80m dipol for limited space.

Else FB33 for 10,15 and 20 meter.
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Regards

Bent
OZ5ZD.



--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.

2008-03-24 Thread David Drake


David Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Gary,
Thats exactly how mine is hooked up.  It works just fine, certainly better 
than before.  I had TV problems before I put the 3300 on the antenna line. 
None afterward.  The direct line is to my standard antenna.  So in this 
case, I only match one antenna.  Will probably sell my 3300 after digital. 
Won't need it.  Or should'nt??

David

- Original Message - 
From: Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.




Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
gang

--
Bent -

A thought occurred to me last night!  (Scary!!)

You could put the TV-3300 on the Direct 1 or Direct 2 output of the 
MN-2000 to the beam, since you really don't need it for the low bands and 
the beam is a good enough termination for the filter anyway.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA



Bent wrote:

Hello All
 Is someone able to inform me about the most opmimal/recommendable 
way/order to combine the 1: TR-4CW, 2: TV-3300-LP, 3: W-4 and 4: MN2000.

What is the correct way to combine 2, 3 and 4?
 The MN2000 is only used for the 80m dipol for limited space.
Else FB33 for 10,15 and 20 meter.
 Thanks in advance.
 Regards
Bent
OZ5ZD.



--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--




--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


[drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.

2008-03-23 Thread Bent
Hello All

Is someone able to inform me about the most opmimal/recommendable way/order to 
combine the 1: TR-4CW, 2: TV-3300-LP, 3: W-4 and 4: MN2000.
What is the correct way to combine 2, 3 and 4?

The MN2000 is only used for the 80m dipol for limited space.
Else FB33 for 10,15 and 20 meter.

Thanks in advance.

Regards
Bent
OZ5ZD.

Re: [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.

2008-03-23 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Bent -

Not real critical in this case.  Why the W-4?   The MN-2000 has a 
wattmeter in it.


I would say TR-4C, TV-3300-LP and MN-2000.  The TV-3300 needs to see 50 
ohms in and out.  The W-4 could be put on either side of the TV-3300, 
but really doesn't tell you anything you don't already know.  The 
MN-2000 can be switched to Direct 1 or Direct 2 for the higher bands, 
its wattmeter is still in circuit.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Bent wrote:

Hello All
 
Is someone able to inform me about the most 
opmimal/recommendable way/order to combine the 1: TR-4CW, 2: 
TV-3300-LP, 3: W-4 and 4: MN2000.

What is the correct way to combine 2, 3 and 4?
 
The MN2000 is only used for the 80m dipol for limited space.

Else FB33 for 10,15 and 20 meter.
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Regards

Bent
OZ5ZD.


--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.

2008-03-23 Thread David Chris Drake
Hi, I have a W4 and use it after my mn2000.  That way I can monitor the final 
matched output, as well as swr at the same time.  Works out pretty good.  Also, 
I have the peak reading board in my W4 so I can see SSB peak output.  Makes it 
good to set the mic gain as well.   So, what I have is TR4C, then MN2000, then 
W4, then LP filter, then antenna.
David




- Original Message - 
  From: Bent 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 4:06 PM
  Subject: [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.


  Hello All

  Is someone able to inform me about the most opmimal/recommendable way/order 
to combine the 1: TR-4CW, 2: TV-3300-LP, 3: W-4 and 4: MN2000.
  What is the correct way to combine 2, 3 and 4?

  The MN2000 is only used for the 80m dipol for limited space.
  Else FB33 for 10,15 and 20 meter.

  Thanks in advance.

  Regards
  Bent
  OZ5ZD.

Re: [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.

2008-03-23 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
David -

Only problem with that is that the filter no longer sees a 50 ohm 
termination, resulting in who knows? what the cutoff looks like. 

Also, if the antenna is well matched enough for the W-4 to read 
accurately, then you don't really need the tuner.  The tuner should 
always be last before the antenna since the impedance is unknown, 
which is why you are using the tuner!


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



David  Chris Drake wrote:
Hi, I have a W4 and use it after my mn2000.  That way I can monitor 
the final matched output, as well as swr at the same time.  Works out 
pretty good.  Also, I have the peak reading board in my W4 so I can 
see SSB peak output.  Makes it good to set the mic gain as well.   So, 
what I have is TR4C, then MN2000, then W4, then LP filter, then antenna.

David
 
 
 
 
- Original Message -


*From:* Bent mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Sunday, March 23, 2008 4:06 PM
*Subject:* [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.

Hello All
 
Is someone able to inform me about the most

opmimal/recommendable way/order to combine the 1: TR-4CW, 2:
TV-3300-LP, 3: W-4 and 4: MN2000.
What is the correct way to combine 2, 3 and 4?
 
The MN2000 is only used for the 80m dipol for limited space.

Else FB33 for 10,15 and 20 meter.
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Regards

Bent
OZ5ZD.

  


--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.

2008-03-23 Thread Gary Poland


Gary Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
I may be wrong but isn't having the MN-2000 in line and adjusted for minimum 
SWR doing the job of a TV-3300?


73, Gary 



--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] Low-pass filter etc. setup.

2008-03-23 Thread Garey Barrell


Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Gary -

No, not quite.  Tuners of this type knock down 2nd harmonic energy by
about 30 dB, which in truth is probably enough for most areas any more.
But a TV-3300 cuts off a little above 30 MHz, and has 80 dB of
attenuation by Channel 2 around 54 MHz.  Also, Bent is not using the
MN-2000 for the 20 - 10M bands in his particular setup.

By February of next year it won't matter anyway, at least in the US,
since everything has to be HD by then.  Then all we have to do is worry
about whoever the FCC sells Channels 2-6 to!  :-)

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Gary Poland wrote:


Gary Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the 
drakelist gang

--
I may be wrong but isn't having the MN-2000 in line and adjusted for 
minimum SWR doing the job of a TV-3300?


73, Gary




--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


[drakelist] Low pass filter?

2008-01-03 Thread ARDUJENSKI
It is my understanding that a low pass filter is not necessary with T-4XB  is 
used in conjunction with an MN-2000 trans-match because the MN-2000 utilizes  
a PI-circuit and this network basically serves as a low pass filter...is this 
 correct?
 
Thanks...Alan KB7MBI



**Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape. 
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp0030002489


Re: [drakelist] Low pass filter?

2008-01-03 Thread Dennis Monticelli

Dennis Monticelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
No harm in leaving the LP filter in circuit.  Having said that, the
Drake tuners are indeed Pi configuration and do a good job of reducing
harmonics commensurate with the limitations of having only three
reactive elements involved in low passing.

Dennis

On Jan 3, 2008 1:03 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 It is my understanding that a low pass filter is not necessary with T-4XB is
 used in conjunction with an MN-2000 trans-match because the MN-2000 utilizes
 a PI-circuit and this network basically serves as a low pass filter...is
 this correct?

 Thanks...Alan KB7MBI


 
 Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year.

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] Low pass filter?

2008-01-03 Thread Jim Shorney

Jim Shorney [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:55:17 -0800, Dennis Monticelli wrote:


Dennis Monticelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
No harm in leaving the LP filter in circuit.  Having said that, the
Drake tuners are indeed Pi configuration and do a good job of reducing
harmonics commensurate with the limitations of having only three
reactive elements involved in low passing.


It also bears mentioning that the filters work best into a 50 ohm load, and
should be placed between the transmitter and the tuner.

I swept one of the Drake filters at work not too long ago, and they do cut
off rather sharply right above six meters. Very cool.


73

-Jim

--
Ham Radio NU0C
TR7/RV7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C, L4B, NCL2000, SB104A, R390A, GT550A/RV550A, HyGain 
3750, IBM PS/2 - all vintage, all the time!

HyGain 3750 User's Group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HyGain_3750/


--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] Low pass filter?

2008-01-03 Thread Dennis Monticelli

Dennis Monticelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Good point, Jim.  That's the best place for the LP filter all right.

On Jan 3, 2008 9:25 PM, Jim Shorney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jim Shorney [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
 --
 On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:55:17 -0800, Dennis Monticelli wrote:

 
 Dennis Monticelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist 
 gang
 --
 No harm in leaving the LP filter in circuit.  Having said that, the
 Drake tuners are indeed Pi configuration and do a good job of reducing
 harmonics commensurate with the limitations of having only three
 reactive elements involved in low passing.


 It also bears mentioning that the filters work best into a 50 ohm load, and
 should be placed between the transmitter and the tuner.

 I swept one of the Drake filters at work not too long ago, and they do cut
 off rather sharply right above six meters. Very cool.


 73

 -Jim

 --
 Ham Radio NU0C
 TR7/RV7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C, L4B, NCL2000, SB104A, R390A, GT550A/RV550A, 
 HyGain 3750, IBM PS/2 - all vintage, all the time!

 HyGain 3750 User's Group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HyGain_3750/



 --
 Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
 Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
 Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
 --


--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--