RE: [drakelist] MN2000 balanced feeders

2008-06-02 Thread Ed G
I have had great success here with what is essentially a 135 foot inverted
vee fed with 300 ohm twinlead. I use a DX Engineering 1:1 balun mounted
outside the house, with a short section of RG-8 leading into the shack (and
the MN-2000). That way I don't have to worry about bringing in the twinlead.
The 1:1 balun keeps the impedance on the transmission line from dropping too
low as might happen with the 4:1 balun. I did slightly change the length of
the twinlead (should be approx 108/F) to find a perfect match on all bands.

--Ed G-

 

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Ellis
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 1:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [drakelist] MN2000  balanced feeders

 

Has anyone been able to adapt the MN2000 for use with open feeders?


Bill, WB9CAC

  



Re: [drakelist] MN2000 balanced feeders

2008-06-02 Thread Darrell Bellerive
Darrell Bellerive [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
While a balun on the output side of a tuner will couple some energy it may not 
be very efficient at some impedances.

A balun, whether 1:1 or 4:1, is designed for a specific characteristic 
impedance. In most ham radio applications the transmitter side impedance is 
designed for 50 ohms unbalanced. So in a 1:1 balun the antenna side should 
have a resistive impedance of 50 ohms balanced and a 4:1 balun should have a 
resistive impedance of 200 ohms balanced.

As the antenna impedance changes from the designed characteristic impedance by 
reactance and/or resistance, the efficiency and transformation ratio will 
deteriorate. Just how much will depend on the design of the balun windings, 
the core material, and the resistance and reactance of the load.

As many point out, it will still work. One can lose as much as 6 to 10 dB or 
more in a tuner, balun, and feedline and still make lots of contacts. QRP 
operators prove this all the time.

Heating of the core material is one indicator of lost power, but remember that 
the lost power will heat a small core to a much higher temperature than a 
large core. So just because the core does not get too warm, doesn't mean 
power isn't being lost to heat.

Modern automatic antenna tuners are hard to beat for ease of operation, but 
for the highest efficiency it is hard to beat the old link coupled tuners for 
balanced line applications.

All electrical systems are compromises between a number of variables such as 
efficiency, cost, ergonomics, size, weight, availability of materials, etc. 
Just be sure you understand the compromises you are making.

73,
Darrell
VA7TO 



On Monday 02 June 2008 03:12, Ed G wrote:
 I have had great success here with what is essentially a 135 foot inverted
 vee fed with 300 ohm twinlead. I use a DX Engineering 1:1 balun mounted
 outside the house, with a short section of RG-8 leading into the shack (and
 the MN-2000). That way I don't have to worry about bringing in the
 twinlead. The 1:1 balun keeps the impedance on the transmission line from
 dropping too low as might happen with the 4:1 balun. I did slightly change
 the length of the twinlead (should be approx 108/F) to find a perfect match
 on all bands.

 --Ed G-

-- 
Darrell Bellerive
Amateur Radio Stations VA7TO and VE7CLA
Grand Forks, British Columbia, Canada

--
Submissions:drakelist@zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] MN2000 balanced feeders

2008-06-01 Thread K9SQG

[EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Bill,

Yes, the Drake B-1000 balun (which will cost half the price of the MN-2000) 
will enable use of balanced lines with the MN-2000.  However, whether it works 
well or not is yet to be determined.  Baluns are not designed to work over a 
large range of impedances and if the impedance presented at the terminals is 
too high/low, then there will be loss and heating.  But it often does work.

73,

Evan**Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with 
Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.  (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod000302)

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] MN2000 balanced feeders

2008-06-01 Thread wa5pok

[EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Hi Bill,

I have connected a 4:1 balun at the output of the tuner and it has 
worked fine.

73, Mike

On 31 May 2008 at 22:44, Bill Ellis wrote:

 
 Has anyone been able to adapt the MN2000 for use with open feeders?
 
 
 Bill, WB9CAC
  



--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] MN2000 balanced feeders

2008-06-01 Thread Gary Poland


Gary Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
Bill,
I have done the same ... 4:1 balun, 450 ohm line feeding a 80 meter 
inverted vee. You may have to play around with the feedline length to get a 
low SWR on some bands. I remember I had a problem with 10 meters.


73, Gary W8PU 



--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


Re: [drakelist] MN2000 balanced feeders

2008-06-01 Thread Dennis Monticelli

Dennis Monticelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
--
I have a MN2700 and rather than search and pay excessively for the
rare Drake balun, I elected to use a Johnson Matchbox Jr as a balun
substitute.  The Matchbox makes a much better balun than a typical
core balun.  It handles a wider range of impedances and does so with
both ow loss and excellent feedline balance.  As another post noted,
you can play with feedline length to get an unbalanced tuner with
toroid balun to yield a low SWR and you can play the same game with a
Matchbox all by itself.  But by using the Matchbox together with the
unbalanced tuner makes life easier.  On those bands where the
impedance falls into a convenient range for the Matchbox alone, I run
the MN2700 straight through and use only its metering capabilities.
For the odd band or two where the Matchbox cannot bring the SWR all
the way down, I engage the MN2700 to reduce say a 2:1 or 1.5:1 down to
a 1:1.  The feedline balancing afforded by the Matchbox works just as
well when transforming the antenna Z down to say 100 ohms vs taking it
all the way down to 1:1.  The overall loss of the unbalanced tuner
plus Matchbox is lower than that of the unbalanced tuner plus toriod
balun because each component is working within an impedance range that
is close to design center vs the toriod balun working well outside its
design Z and the unbalanced tuner having to correct for a high
residual SWR that may well have a high reactive componet (ie. hi Q).
The match made with the tuner plus matchbox will usually be of lower
Q, which means broader bandwidth. They make a great combo and the
Matchbox costs less than the Drake balun.

Dennis AE6C

On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:06 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang
 --

 Bill,

 Yes, the Drake B-1000 balun (which will cost half the price of the MN-2000)
 will enable use of balanced lines with the MN-2000.  However, whether it
 works
 well or not is yet to be determined.  Baluns are not designed to work over a
 large range of impedances and if the impedance presented at the terminals is
 too high/low, then there will be loss and heating.  But it often does work.

 73,

 Evan


 **
 Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch Cooking with
 Tyler Florence on AOL Food.

 (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4?NCID=aolfod000302)

 --
 Submissions: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
 unsubscribe drakelist in body Hopelessly Lost: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help
 in body of message Zerobeat Web Page: www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by
 www.tlchost.net
 --

--
Submissions:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
--


[drakelist] MN2000 balanced feeders

2008-05-31 Thread Bill Ellis
Has anyone been able to adapt the MN2000 for use with open feeders?


Bill, WB9CAC