Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Tony Earnshaw skrev, on 22-12-2007 10:58: FWIW I get a SIGSEGV with CVS on FC6 when running dspam from stdin; don't get it with 3.8.0. CVS is a no-go for me. I'll update my last post about available rpms. This doesn't happen any more with CVS 0712220843, so I'll leave it as it is; happy to go with CVS on FC6. I lied, it's still sigseving; back to 3.8.0 that doesn't. As I just wrote in a post mainly to Steve, I can't honestly see what non-descriptive Gentoo patches can possibly do for FC6/RHELL5 where dspam 3.8.0 is running well and stably, without memory leaks or anything, for weeks at a time. Best, --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl
Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Tony Earnshaw skrev, on 23-12-2007 15:32: Steve skrev, on 23-12-2007 12:02: [...] I lied, it's still sigseving; back to 3.8.0 that doesn't. As I just wrote in a post mainly to Steve, I can't honestly see what non-descriptive Gentoo patches can possibly do for FC6/RHELL5 where dspam 3.8.0 is running well and stably, without memory leaks or anything, for weeks at a time. Sorry to say: Shit! No need to be sorry, shit happens. I have over here the possibility to run DSPAM on CentOS 5.1. Should I do that? Up to you, ain' it? Works for me on RHEL5. I only work with Red Hat systems, someoe once forced me to use Debian Sarge (wasn't allowed to use Etch) and that was horrible. What switches have you active in DSPAM? Well, he offered cautiously, I have my own srpm for RHEL5, which was written at the behest of Jonz. How did you compile it? See the above. It's available at my ftp site, which I've already given. It should build on CentOS5, maybe not recognize the Release. It will install to LFH directories, which you might not like. Any thing other you can tell me in order to reproduce that issue on my end? Oh, sorry, dspam-3.8.0-4.rhl5.src.rpm is the good one. dspam-cvs0712220843-1.fc6.src.rpm is the one that sigsegvs. That's from the CVS. It might say fc6, but it will build ok on Centos5. It's not patched 3.8.0, just pure CVS: Best, --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl
Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:32:45 +0100 Von: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Tony Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:32:52 +0100 Von: Tony Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools Steve skrev, on 23-12-2007 12:02: [...] I lied, it's still sigseving; back to 3.8.0 that doesn't. As I just wrote in a post mainly to Steve, I can't honestly see what non-descriptive Gentoo patches can possibly do for FC6/RHELL5 where dspam 3.8.0 is running well and stably, without memory leaks or anything, for weeks at a time. Sorry to say: Shit! No need to be sorry, shit happens. I know, I know... I have over here the possibility to run DSPAM on CentOS 5.1. Should I do that? Up to you, ain' it? Sort of. If you want me to find the error and want to work with me together to find/spot the error, then I need your okay. I know that I am free to do what ever I like. I am Swiss! We are free. No torture, no repression, nothing. I am free as free can be. Works for me on RHEL5. I only work with Red Hat systems, I work mainly with Gentoo on my end. But on the customers side I have everything you could possibly imagine. Red Hat (the old things before Fedora Core), SuSE (any flavor. SLES, etc), Debian, RHAS, Debian, HPUX, AIX, Solaris, etc, etc... someoe once forced me to use Debian Sarge (wasn't allowed to use Etch) and that was horrible. LOL. After a while you get used to it. I personally like Red Hat. It is a good system. I don't like so much SuSE but that's another story. What switches have you active in DSPAM? Well, he offered cautiously, I have my own srpm for RHEL5, which was written at the behest of Jonz. Okay. How did you compile it? See the above. It's available at my ftp site, which I've already given. It should build on CentOS5, maybe not recognize the Release. It will install to LFH directories, which you might not like. I will take your spec as the base for the layout. Btw: Why is LFH? The only thing regarding where to put stuff on a system I know is FHS (File System Hierarchy Standard). Is LFH now something new? Any thing other you can tell me in order to reproduce that issue on my end? Just don't patch with any Gentoo patches ;) And what about the other patches? BTW: I run DSPAM since years. I had 3.8.0 in production without any single patch from Gentoo for months. It never crashed. Never! Any message triggering that segmentation fault? This was the line in my cron script that caused it: /usr/bin/dspam --class=spam --source=error --deliver=spam --user $mail $misclass /dev/null 21 Can you reproduce this by passing that message again over DSPAM? If this is the case, then allow me to ask you if I could have that message? If it is nothing sensitive, then I would love to get that message. $mail is the shared group leerlingen. leerlingen? Probably this is the same as the German word Lehrlinge? LOL. I like the NL langauge. Currently working at Heineken in a project. It kills me when I hear them some time in a telco breaking out of the English we are forced to talk. As a Swiss I understand some of their words. It is funny. The ending of a conversation mostly ends with Puss, Puss Ach! I think it is hey, hey or hay, hay and not puss, puss. But I don't remember exactly. (I don't know if it is written correctly, nor I know what it means). This sounds so funny to me :) $misclass is the message. This is what happened: /etc/cron.hourly/dspam.cron: /etc/cron.hourly/dspam.cron: line 14: 3620 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/dspam --class=spam --source=error --deliver=spam --user $mail $misclass /dev/null 21 It don't happen with 3.8.0 on RHEL5 nor FC6. But when it happens with the CVS version it happens immediately or you have to wait for DSPAM to crash? Best, --Tonni Steve -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser -- Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger?did=10
Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Tony Earnshaw skrev, on 13-12-2007 16:25: [...] FWIW I get a SIGSEGV with CVS on FC6 when running dspam from stdin; don't get it with 3.8.0. CVS is a no-go for me. I'll update my last post about available rpms. This doesn't happen any more with CVS 0712220843, so I'll leave it as it is; happy to go with CVS on FC6. Best, --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl
[dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Hey dudes, After I made new build from CVS where is included lot of patches, dspam_admin and dspam_stat tools at least stopped working. I did try to retrain message via webui and this is result: apache 11103 96.5 0.0 14772 704 ?RN 08:50 454:09 /usr/bin/dspam_admin agg pref [EMAIL PROTECTED] it just hang there. Some happen if I try it from commandline and dspam_stat do exactly same. Any ideas what might be a problem? I run dspam with mysql db. Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy Jani Partanen System administrator tel. +358 505 817 817 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Partanen;Jani FN:Jani Partanen NICKNAME:JiiPee ORG:Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy TITLE:System administrator NOTE;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE: =0D=0A TEL;CELL;VOICE:+358 505 817 817 ADR;WORK:;;Kiventie 1;Vampula;;32610;Finland LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Kiventie 1=0D=0AVampula 32610=0D=0AFinland ADR;HOME:;;Kirjolohentie 8 a2;Saimaanharju;;54915;Finland LABEL;HOME;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Kirjolohentie 8 a2=0D=0ASaimaanharju 54915=0D=0AFinland URL;WORK:http://www.pelikaista.net BDAY:19740316 KEY;X509;ENCODING=BASE64: MIIF4zCCA8ugAwIBAgIDBAlKMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHkxEDAOBgNVBAoTB1Jvb3QgQ0Ex HjAcBgNVBAsTFWh0dHA6Ly93d3cuY2FjZXJ0Lm9yZzEiMCAGA1UEAxMZQ0EgQ2VydCBTaWdu aW5nIEF1dGhvcml0eTEhMB8GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYSc3VwcG9ydEBjYWNlcnQub3JnMB4XDTA3 MDkxMzE3NTgwMFoXDTA4MDMxMTE3NTgwMFowgfoxGDAWBgNVBAMTD0NBY2VydCBXb1QgVXNl cjEhMB8GCSqGSIb3DQEJARYSamlpcGVlQHNvdGFwZWxpLmZpMRowGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFgty dGZtQGlraS5maTElMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYWamlpcGVlQGxhcHBlZW5yYW50YS50azElMCMG CSqGSIb3DQEJARYWamlpcGVlQHB1bmtzYnVzdGVkLmNvbTEkMCIGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYVamlp cGVlQHBlbGlrYWlzdGEubmV0MSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxqYW5pLnBhcnRhbmVuQHRhaXBh bHNhYXJpLmZpMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDl83O7QtdjBWktNPf2lY3B +qCEbQupvvTM7oVgtAC4cugmx3ov/i964M2FA+XuoETstu7bKGJpcweslqB/r1FnjYFPllBw fwEXEmd+PhDRI2A+Mi7BhtZXcZdKipOQ/CX6ND2mjKMneuhcImAEUwsHZ1rvQjfUZc8yNdco A7JhjwIDAQABo4IBdDCCAXAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADBWBglghkgBhvhCAQ0ESRZHVG8gZ2V0 IHlvdXIgb3duIGNlcnRpZmljYXRlIGZvciBGUkVFIGhlYWQgb3ZlciB0byBodHRwOi8vd3d3 LkNBY2VydC5vcmcwQAYDVR0lBDkwNwYIKwYBBQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCBgorBgEEAYI3CgME BgorBgEEAYI3CgMDBglghkgBhvhCBAEwMgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEJjAkMCIGCCsGAQUFBzABhhZo dHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jYWNlcnQub3JnMIGRBgNVHREEgYkwgYaBEmppaXBlZUBzb3RhcGVsaS5m aYELcnRmbUBpa2kuZmmBFmppaXBlZUBsYXBwZWVucmFudGEudGuBFmppaXBlZUBwdW5rc2J1 c3RlZC5jb22BFWppaXBlZUBwZWxpa2Fpc3RhLm5ldIEcamFuaS5wYXJ0YW5lbkB0YWlwYWxz YWFyaS5maTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAgEAckQdO/e2RQdYnC45HEevwhDCcBPELtYCgGvB I8eS1ibR8WAtz0pEiMpV4GWicgimU5vsgwHZvnAxNx8yB49xvqlELFYZRmcvVktptKiLaHBR FdNeUEYzJoJT5AUretzOsf+hsTTPYs39GR5Zob5cnt//ojr7QvgqsJ575ww4txnnMclx6bD8 4E3np0xcss9Z3SH1QB4GKTDV23V8sXG9PIuUrpRt1MP6fWvZnEE2GoJG6Qijuutr5JsToof/ Jez8wmUkrtq0CsmeliNjG6zuYBYXPE9Fw0IM2Dh9NtGwMcMH31pu6glbmEjnwWBH7kF7rqCV 3a/Jc4NtBv3C+h7sI1sKnYpV3cjF632JznOUP5NbeZ0ji7aqbdEIfjZpIbiUMI7nMCMufmu5 P79x8u2iYuV7/oQAu+ieq28t5qFrfzb+0MfCtyABwuQ6244VSpnYC+9d7QfEPgZektR7uVdH KWxBtMQ3X+HZ/Oq3u6sCEEH6jC/4fzv5vfutr4kbiNTdBDa8I/c0YlvnpODInCOsRGjbCeTx hyoIvH5Hrh4alMaXnuwl8yam+7GEGSnFCj6P7kaFCc2TRwjEgMtobIu8k6TGCNvwNDGKDYqc 7ye65+OBNMVNBRQfYA7l1dalRDAwBANVR3HBLiKt6CtzT1B6Jf7MtSPaRmQDxudnlmiCJHs= EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20071008T022046Z END:VCARD
Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Jani Partanen skrev, on 13-12-2007 15:42: After I made new build from CVS where is included lot of patches, dspam_admin and dspam_stat tools at least stopped working. I did try to retrain message via webui and this is result: apache 11103 96.5 0.0 14772 704 ?RN 08:50 454:09 /usr/bin/dspam_admin agg pref [EMAIL PROTECTED] it just hang there. Some happen if I try it from commandline and dspam_stat do exactly same. Any ideas what might be a problem? I run dspam with mysql db. FWIW I get a SIGSEGV with CVS on FC6 when running dspam from stdin; don't get it with 3.8.0. CVS is a no-go for me. I'll update my last post about available rpms. Best, --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl
Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:25:08 +0100 Von: Tony Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools Jani Partanen skrev, on 13-12-2007 15:42: After I made new build from CVS where is included lot of patches, dspam_admin and dspam_stat tools at least stopped working. I did try to retrain message via webui and this is result: apache 11103 96.5 0.0 14772 704 ?RN 08:50 454:09 /usr/bin/dspam_admin agg pref [EMAIL PROTECTED] it just hang there. Some happen if I try it from commandline and dspam_stat do exactly same. Any ideas what might be a problem? I run dspam with mysql db. FWIW I get a SIGSEGV with CVS on FC6 when running dspam from stdin; don't get it with 3.8.0. Uha! Did you run a debugger to see where you get sigsegv? CVS is a no-go for me. I'll update my last post about available rpms. Best, --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl -- Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
Re: RE: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:04:33 +0200 Von: Jani Partanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: \'Steve\' [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Betreff: RE: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 10:47 PM To: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: Re: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools What version did you had before the CVS? I run here all the stuff from CVS plus around 10 more patches and have no issue so far: I was running and I'm running again 3.8.0 with few patches released on list. I took webui from CVS because it added some new features and now everything works fine, so some patch had to do it. Do you run 32-bit or 64-bit system? I have 64-bit system. The output above was from 32-bit. Have another system with 64-bit but no DSPAM on it. Running currently MySQL-5.0.50 but will soon update to 5.0.51 or 5.0.52 when it gets public downloadable. I'm running mysql 5.0.27 5.0.27 or 5.0.50 does not make any difference for DSPAM. I am since weeks coding when I have time on a reworked mysql driver for DSPAM. So far I don't see any code which should not work on 5.0.27. But I see a lot of possible issues... The code inside DSPAM has way to much potential for problems with signed/unsigned and 32-bit/64-bit. -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail
Re: RE: RE: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools
Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:17:41 +0200 Von: Jani Partanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: \'Steve\' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: RE: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:13 PM Cc: dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com Subject: Re: RE: [dspam-users] Problem with dspam_admin and other tools code inside DSPAM has way to much potential for problems with signed/unsigned and 32-bit/64-bit. dspam daemon itself was running and operating just fine. It was only all external utils what was foobar. I have not looked at the CVS and don't know what is running there. I will not use the CVS stuff. If DSPAM gets a new release then I will look into. But now CVS is for me Gentoo patches (most submitted anyway by me) + some other small patches + DSPAM 3.8.0 And I run Gentoo and have more patches and fixes then the current CVS. Using CVS is in some sort a downgrade for me. Anyway... could you grep the patches and look which of them does change the tools? Maybe your problem is the patch which does modularize libdspam? // Steve -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail
