Re: [DuMuX] strange artifacts
Hi Bernd, Thanks a lot for the quick help. This solved the problem. Best regards Georg Von: Dumux [mailto:dumux-boun...@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de] Im Auftrag von Bernd Flemisch Gesendet: Freitag, 17. April 2015 11:06 An: DuMuX User Forum Betreff: Re: [DuMuX] strange artifacts Hi Georg, it might also relate to the way your Neumann condition is implemented. Have a look here: https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/pipermail/dumux/2015q1/001076.html You can also use the ...AtPos versions of boundaryTypes, neumann and dirichlet to be on the safe side. Kind regards Bernd On 04/17/2015 10:58 AM, georg.fut...@dlr.demailto:georg.fut...@dlr.de wrote: Hi Christoph, Here it is. Georg -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dumux [mailto:dumux-boun...@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de] Im Auftrag von Christoph Grüninger Gesendet: Freitag, 17. April 2015 10:52 An: dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.demailto:dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de Betreff: Re: [DuMuX] strange artifacts Hi Georg, can you provide the code where you set the boundary condition type? Bye Christoph -- People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at least some idea of what the underlying hardware is like. Otherwise the programs they write will be pretty weird. -- Donald Knuth ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.demailto:Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux -- ___ Bernd Flemisch phone: +49 711 685 69162 IWS, Universität Stuttgart fax: +49 711 685 60430 Pfaffenwaldring 61email: be...@iws.uni-stuttgart.demailto:be...@iws.uni-stuttgart.de D-70569 Stuttgarturl: www.hydrosys.uni-stuttgart.dehttp://www.hydrosys.uni-stuttgart.de ___ ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
[DuMuX] dunecontrol options file - example
Hello, I am trying to configure/compile Dumux with dunecontrol using cmake and I need to include UG and SuperLU, eventually Pardiso in the CMAKE_FLAGS. Can someone provide an example of options file such that I see these cmake flags (former -with-ug, --with-superlu)? Thank you in advance, Calin ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
Re: [DuMuX] strange artifacts
Hi Georg, can you provide the code where you set the boundary condition type? Bye Christoph -- People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at least some idea of what the underlying hardware is like. Otherwise the programs they write will be pretty weird. -- Donald Knuth signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
Re: [DuMuX] strange artifacts
Hi Christoph,
Here it is.
Georg
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dumux [mailto:dumux-boun...@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de] Im Auftrag von
Christoph Grüninger
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. April 2015 10:52
An: dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de
Betreff: Re: [DuMuX] strange artifacts
Hi Georg,
can you provide the code where you set the boundary condition type?
Bye
Christoph
--
People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at least
some idea of what the underlying hardware is like. Otherwise
the programs they write will be pretty weird. -- Donald Knuth
/*!
* \brief Specifies which kind of boundary condition should be
*used for which equation on a given boundary segment.
*
* \param values The boundary types for the conservation equations
* \param vertex The vertex for which the boundary type is set
*/
void boundaryTypes(BoundaryTypes values, const Vertex vertex) const
{
const GlobalPosition globalPos = vertex.geometry().center();
values.setAllNeumann();
if(onRightBoundary_(globalPos))
values.setAllDirichlet();
}
bool onRightBoundary_(const GlobalPosition globalPos) const
{ return globalPos[0] bboxMax_[0] - eps_; }
___
Dumux mailing list
Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de
https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
Re: [DuMuX] strange artifacts
Hi Georg, it might also relate to the way your Neumann condition is implemented. Have a look here: https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/pipermail/dumux/2015q1/001076.html You can also use the ...AtPos versions of boundaryTypes, neumann and dirichlet to be on the safe side. Kind regards Bernd On 04/17/2015 10:58 AM, georg.fut...@dlr.de wrote: Hi Christoph, Here it is. Georg -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dumux [mailto:dumux-boun...@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de] Im Auftrag von Christoph Grüninger Gesendet: Freitag, 17. April 2015 10:52 An: dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de Betreff: Re: [DuMuX] strange artifacts Hi Georg, can you provide the code where you set the boundary condition type? Bye Christoph -- People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at least some idea of what the underlying hardware is like. Otherwise the programs they write will be pretty weird. -- Donald Knuth ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux -- ___ Bernd Flemisch phone: +49 711 685 69162 IWS, Universität Stuttgart fax: +49 711 685 60430 Pfaffenwaldring 61email: be...@iws.uni-stuttgart.de D-70569 Stuttgarturl: www.hydrosys.uni-stuttgart.de ___ ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
[DuMuX] Minimal compiler versions for DuMuX 2.8
Dear DuMuX users, we want to tighten the supported compiler versions for the next DuMuX release 2.8. We aim for GCC 4.7+ and Clang 3.3+. Is there any reason to changes the supported compiler version? Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Bye Christoph -- People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at least some idea of what the underlying hardware is like. Otherwise the programs they write will be pretty weird. -- Donald Knuth signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
[DuMuX] Flyspray Activity for Task 263 (Don't build executables on make test)
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added: FS#263 - Don't build executables on make test User who did this - Christoph Grüninger (gruenich) -- I don't object. It would reduce the complexity of out build system. Timo, would you mind to make the suggestion upstream at Dune? Maybe it is favorable for all Dune module after the Dune 2.4 release? -- More information can be found at the following URL: http://www.dumux.org/flyspray/index.php?do=detailstask_id=263#comment557 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
Re: [DuMuX] dunecontrol options file - example
Hello Christoph, Thank you for explanations, it compiles now! I have another problem with Boost::Fusion needed by dune-multidomaingrid. I have installed boost_1.5[7,8], both contain the Fusion libraries in boost_1_5?_0/include/boost/fusion During the compilation, it finds boost, but it does not check for Fusion: -- Boost version: 1.58.0 -- Skipping check for Boost::FUSION as Boost is not available. I attached the compilation outputs. Do you have any idea what could be wrong? regards, calin -Original Message- From: Dumux [mailto:dumux-boun...@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de] On Behalf Of Christoph Grüninger Sent: Freitag, 17. April 2015 11:27 To: dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de Subject: Re: [DuMuX] dunecontrol options file - example Hi Calin, I assume you use DuMuX 2.7 where we provide opts files for CMake. Unfortunately I forgot to add USE_CMAKE=1 in them. 1. You can use the CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH as described in [1]. 2. Alternatively you can set -DSUPERLU_ROOT and -DUG_ROOT. Bye Christoph [1] http://users.dune-project.org/projects/main-wiki/wiki/Using_cmake_to_build_your_DUNE_project -- People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at least some idea of what the underlying hardware is like. Otherwise the programs they write will be pretty weird. -- Donald Knuth output-compil.dat Description: output-compil.dat ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
[DuMuX] Flyspray Activity for Task 263 (Don't build executables on make test)
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Timo Koch (timokoch) Attached to Project - DuMuX Summary - Don't build executables on make test Task Type - Feature Request Category - CMake Status - New Assigned To - Operating System - Unspecified Severity - Low Priority - Normal Reported Version - SVN Due in Version - Undecided Due Date - Undecided Details - The CMake way to do this is make all make test where make all builds all executables, make test RUNS the tests. Some Dune magic can be used to compile all tests on make test. This has the disadvantage that all tests build also if only one test is desired to run (with ctest -R my_test). This only occurs when there are more than one test in the same directory. The CMake way has advantages that get lost by contracting build and execution: - In an automated build the compilation and execution can fail/pass separately - One test can be build and executed if desired (make my_test, ctest -R my_test) More information can be found at the following URL: http://www.dumux.org/flyspray/index.php?do=detailstask_id=263 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. ___ Dumux mailing list Dumux@listserv.uni-stuttgart.de https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
