RE: [DX-CHAT] will this help?

2006-10-09 Thread Robert Schmieder
The cost of operating DXA on K7C was inadvertently high (about $10K) due to
the server crashes generated by the extraordinary demand (42,000 logged in
DXers, 20,000 logins every day, 40 million total hits). The extra cost was
mostly the extra satellite time to modify DXA remotely from Kure and to
monitor the server. Watching DXA from the remote site is vary expensive due
to the overhead of the browser. The actual cost of uploading the radio log
is negligible (about $0.001/QSO using Inmarsat). I expect the next
deployment of DXA on a big DXpedition will add perhaps $1K to the budget,
almost all of which will be set-up, monitoring, service communications, etc.
When it becomes a reliable part of the equipment, it will add negligibly to
a DXpedition budget.
 

> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Wylie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 11:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
> Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] will this help?
> 
> How much did that cost on K7C  Bob?
> 
> Tom GM4FDM
> (part of the VU7 team)
> 


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org



Re: [DX-CHAT] will this help?

2006-10-09 Thread Tom Wylie

How much did that cost on K7C  Bob?

Tom GM4FDM
(part of the VU7 team)




Robert Schmieder wrote:

Pirating is not very extensive, but it is a problem for DXpeditions, because
those unfortunate DXers who work a pirate often blame the DXpedition for
sloppy work. The K7C DXpedition is a good case in point: Quite a few DXers
told stories that we believe...they truly made a good QSO with "K7C" but the
QSO does not appear in the K7C radio log. The log is not at
fault--apparently the DXers worked pirates. 


One answer to pirates is real-time online log display, of the kind we did
with DXA on K7C. Very soon after you worked the real K7C (5 minutes or so),
you saw confirmation on the DXA window (the "greenies"). If you worked a
pirate, that confirmation would not come, since the pirate cannot give the
confirming greenies. Properly used, a real-time log display would almost
totally eliminate pirates as a source of lost QSOs. 


Bob KK6EK


  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Dougherty

Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 12:46 PM
To: Charles Harpole; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] will this help?

At 05:25 AM 10/07/2006, Charles Harpole wrote:


Will this help?
If a DXpedition station gave out serial numbers, 
  
incrementing for each 

QSO (like some contests ), would that retard pirates?  A 
  
pirate could 

give out serial numbers, too, but could he ever get so close in 
sequence to the real DX to make confusion?  Also, would 
  
serial numbers 


on the incoming QSL card requests make hand log searching easier?
  
I could see that slowing a pileup down to a crawl, to be 
perfectly honest -- and to what end? Is call pirating really 
a major problem for DXpeditions? It might make QSLing a tad 
easier, but I think trying to get everyone to understand 
what's being done might be an exercise in futility, and if 
you think pileups are bad NOW, I'd hate to see what would 
happen with serial numbers.


In this age of online logs for major DXpeditions, if I don't 
see my call show up within 2 or 3 days of a QSO on a needed 
band I just make another Q.




Cheers,

Peter,
W2IRT 



Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org







Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org




  


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org




Re: [DX-CHAT] will this help?

2006-10-08 Thread Jerry Keller
A near-real-time log display like DXA would also lessen the need for 
"insurance" QSOs... making it possible for the DX to get to more of the 
little pistols.

73, Jerry K3BZ

- Original Message - 
From: "Robert Schmieder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 9:22 PM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] will this help?


Pirating is not very extensive, but it is a problem for DXpeditions, 
because

those unfortunate DXers who work a pirate often blame the DXpedition for
sloppy work. The K7C DXpedition is a good case in point: Quite a few DXers
told stories that we believe...they truly made a good QSO with "K7C" but 
the

QSO does not appear in the K7C radio log. The log is not at
fault--apparently the DXers worked pirates.

One answer to pirates is real-time online log display, of the kind we did
with DXA on K7C. Very soon after you worked the real K7C (5 minutes or 
so),

you saw confirmation on the DXA window (the "greenies"). If you worked a
pirate, that confirmation would not come, since the pirate cannot give the
confirming greenies. Properly used, a real-time log display would almost
totally eliminate pirates as a source of lost QSOs.

Bob KK6EK



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Dougherty
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 12:46 PM
To: Charles Harpole; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] will this help?

At 05:25 AM 10/07/2006, Charles Harpole wrote:
>Will this help?
>If a DXpedition station gave out serial numbers,
incrementing for each
>QSO (like some contests ), would that retard pirates?  A
pirate could
>give out serial numbers, too, but could he ever get so close in
>sequence to the real DX to make confusion?  Also, would
serial numbers
>on the incoming QSL card requests make hand log searching easier?

I could see that slowing a pileup down to a crawl, to be
perfectly honest -- and to what end? Is call pirating really
a major problem for DXpeditions? It might make QSLing a tad
easier, but I think trying to get everyone to understand
what's being done might be an exercise in futility, and if
you think pileups are bad NOW, I'd hate to see what would
happen with serial numbers.

In this age of online logs for major DXpeditions, if I don't
see my call show up within 2 or 3 days of a QSO on a needed
band I just make another Q.



Cheers,

Peter,
W2IRT


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org






Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org



Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org




RE: [DX-CHAT] will this help?

2006-10-08 Thread Robert Schmieder
Pirating is not very extensive, but it is a problem for DXpeditions, because
those unfortunate DXers who work a pirate often blame the DXpedition for
sloppy work. The K7C DXpedition is a good case in point: Quite a few DXers
told stories that we believe...they truly made a good QSO with "K7C" but the
QSO does not appear in the K7C radio log. The log is not at
fault--apparently the DXers worked pirates. 

One answer to pirates is real-time online log display, of the kind we did
with DXA on K7C. Very soon after you worked the real K7C (5 minutes or so),
you saw confirmation on the DXA window (the "greenies"). If you worked a
pirate, that confirmation would not come, since the pirate cannot give the
confirming greenies. Properly used, a real-time log display would almost
totally eliminate pirates as a source of lost QSOs. 

Bob KK6EK


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Dougherty
> Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 12:46 PM
> To: Charles Harpole; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
> Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] will this help?
> 
> At 05:25 AM 10/07/2006, Charles Harpole wrote:
> >Will this help?
> >If a DXpedition station gave out serial numbers, 
> incrementing for each 
> >QSO (like some contests ), would that retard pirates?  A 
> pirate could 
> >give out serial numbers, too, but could he ever get so close in 
> >sequence to the real DX to make confusion?  Also, would 
> serial numbers 
> >on the incoming QSL card requests make hand log searching easier?
> 
> I could see that slowing a pileup down to a crawl, to be 
> perfectly honest -- and to what end? Is call pirating really 
> a major problem for DXpeditions? It might make QSLing a tad 
> easier, but I think trying to get everyone to understand 
> what's being done might be an exercise in futility, and if 
> you think pileups are bad NOW, I'd hate to see what would 
> happen with serial numbers.
> 
> In this age of online logs for major DXpeditions, if I don't 
> see my call show up within 2 or 3 days of a QSO on a needed 
> band I just make another Q.
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Peter,
> W2IRT 
> 
> 
> Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
> http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
> 
> To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
> 
> This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
> 
> 
> 


Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org



Re: [DX-CHAT] will this help?

2006-10-07 Thread Peter Dougherty

At 05:25 AM 10/07/2006, Charles Harpole wrote:

Will this help?
If a DXpedition station gave out serial numbers, incrementing for 
each QSO (like some contests ), would that retard pirates?  A pirate 
could give out serial numbers, too, but could he ever get so close 
in sequence to the real DX to make confusion?  Also, would serial 
numbers on the incoming QSL card requests make hand log searching easier?


I could see that slowing a pileup down to a crawl, to be perfectly 
honest -- and to what end? Is call pirating really a major problem 
for DXpeditions? It might make QSLing a tad easier, but I think 
trying to get everyone to understand what's being done might be an 
exercise in futility, and if you think pileups are bad NOW, I'd hate 
to see what would happen with serial numbers.


In this age of online logs for major DXpeditions, if I don't see my 
call show up within 2 or 3 days of a QSO on a needed band I just make 
another Q.




Cheers,

Peter,
W2IRT 



Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat


To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org