Re: [Dx4win] New TQSL not ready for prime time

2013-05-23 Thread Michael Gulbranson
Jim:
Are the people at LOTW desk aware of this?? If so, what say them?  Monday, I
installed the new version, but did not try it.

Thanks

Mike WG0M


 It's better to be a pleasant surprise than a bitter
disappointment 
 Dick
Armey

-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Jim - N4ST
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:18 PM
To: 'Joseph Orsak'; dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] New TQSL not ready for prime time

I have been using TQSL 1.14 beta for weeks and have experienced no issues.
YMMV

73,
Jim - N4ST

-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Joseph Orsak
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 20:33
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] New TQSL not ready for prime time

I think I'll be waiting a good long while before trying the new Trusted QSL:

May 21, 2013: From the Trusted QSL software development team - We announced
last week that TQSL 1.14 would be available today (20 May 2013). However,
three defects were reported last week:   

  a.. Incorrect behavior when the user specifies the wrong ITU zone
  b.. Incorrect behavior when TQSL is invoked via command line without the
-l switch present
  c.. Incorrect behavior when processing an ADIF file containing duplicate
QSOs when TQSL is running on MacOS These defects have been corrected, but we
must test the corrected version before publicly releasing it. Expect the
public release within the next  10 days.

http://www.arrl.org/logbook-of-the-world

73,

Joe W4WN


__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Dx4win] New TQSL not ready for prime time

2013-05-23 Thread Rick Murphy
Yes, the LoTW help desk people are quite aware of the problem with logging
in to LoTW.

That has nothing to do with the TQSL 1.14 update.73,
73,
-Rick



On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Michael Gulbranson w...@aol.com wrote:

 Jim:
 Are the people at LOTW desk aware of this?? If so, what say them?  Monday,
 I
 installed the new version, but did not try it.

 Thanks

 Mike WG0M


  It's better to be a pleasant surprise than a bitter
 disappointment
  Dick
 Armey

 -Original Message-
 From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:
 dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
 On Behalf Of Jim - N4ST
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:18 PM
 To: 'Joseph Orsak'; dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] New TQSL not ready for prime time

 I have been using TQSL 1.14 beta for weeks and have experienced no issues.
 YMMV

 73,
 Jim - N4ST

 -Original Message-
 From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:
 dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
 On Behalf Of Joseph Orsak
 Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 20:33
 To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [Dx4win] New TQSL not ready for prime time

 I think I'll be waiting a good long while before trying the new Trusted
 QSL:

 May 21, 2013: From the Trusted QSL software development team - We
 announced
 last week that TQSL 1.14 would be available today (20 May 2013). However,
 three defects were reported last week:

   a.. Incorrect behavior when the user specifies the wrong ITU zone
   b.. Incorrect behavior when TQSL is invoked via command line without the
 -l switch present
   c.. Incorrect behavior when processing an ADIF file containing duplicate
 QSOs when TQSL is running on MacOS These defects have been corrected, but
 we
 must test the corrected version before publicly releasing it. Expect the
 public release within the next  10 days.

 http://www.arrl.org/logbook-of-the-world

 73,

 Joe W4WN


 __
 DX4WIN mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 DX4WIN mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 --
 Rick Murphy, CISSP-ISSAP, K1MU/4, Annandale VA USA

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Dx4win] Country Files Web Site

2013-05-23 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
Hi Folks,

I'm the process of re-designing the country files web site at:

http://www.country-files.com/

I am trying to retain all the original content.  However, it may take
a few days before most things have been restored.  There are probably
many broken links right now.  It will take many days to re-format all
the old release notices, though I plan to do the ones from this year
ASAP.

You can subscribe to the above URL to get an RSS feed of the
postings. Some people may find this convenient.

None of the contest files (downloads) have moved, all can still be
found inside of:

http://www.country-files.com/cty/

Some of the others will have to move, unfortunately.  If any of the
non-contest URLS are built into your software, please let me know
ASAP (I've already heard from Scott N3FJP).

73 - Jim AD1C

-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreisert at alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us


__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Dx4win] FT5000

2013-05-23 Thread Rick
Just swapping my FT1000MP in the shack for a FT5000. So far I have not been 
able to get the radio to communicate with DX4WIN. I selected the new radio in 
preferences and set the baud rate in the radio to match DX4win. I know I’m 
missing something. The comport should not have changed. Ideas?

Thanks

Rick 
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Dx4win] FT5000

2013-05-23 Thread Rick
Thanks to all. Got it going. I think I am going to enjoy the 5000.

It might have been a long night without ya’ll.


Rick
N4HU
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] FT5000

2013-05-23 Thread Andreas Junge
Rick,

what did you have to do to get it going?

73,

Andreas, N6NU

On May 23, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Rick n...@mindspring.com wrote:

 Thanks to all. Got it going. I think I am going to enjoy the 5000.
 
 It might have been a long night without ya’ll.
 
 
 Rick
 N4HU
 __
 DX4WIN mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Dx4win] New TQSL not ready for prime time

2013-05-23 Thread Joseph Orsak

Hi Rick,



You sir are also entitled to your opinion. I stand by my comment that it's 
Not Ready for Prime Time. Your perception I was making a Cheap Shot is 
off base and I will say it's certainly not my intent to take a Cheap Shot 
at what I'm certain will be a fine piece of software.




I had seen the mention of the improvements and went to the ARRL link to 
download a copy but found the announcement which I cut  pasted with 
quotation marks into my message.




Please note the last sentence from the announcement:


These defects have been corrected, but we must test the corrected version
before publicly releasing it. Expect the public release within the next 
10

days.


Where I come from this is pretty much the same thing as saying it's not 
ready for prime time. I'm also confident in 10 days or so it will be.




You asked me to explain myself so I'll make this attempt; I'm an RF Engineer 
for a worldwide wireless telephone and data service provider. As much as I 
enjoy concentrating on the RF portion of my job it requires more and more 
Software and less and less Radio these days. I am responsible for 
software testing on both the networks and handsets, bleeding edge technology 
I assure you. That said there's only so much of a good thing I can take. 
When I come home after a big day of bug squashing I like to spend some time 
with the family and maybe after helping with the homework and tossing the 
baseball with my son I sometimes like to turn on the rig and talk to some 
folks around the world. The last thing I want to do is another beta test, 
haha! I leave the task to your very capable hands and the other hams who 
like to tinker with software. To each his own - the bottom line for me when 
it comes to ham radio software is I'd rather tinker with the hardware and 
try to work a new one instead. Meanwhile I have the experience to 
appreciate better than most what kind of brainpower, blood, sweat,  guts 
goes into software development. I hope this gives you enough background on 
my situation to believe I intended no malice and was not taking a cheap 
shot.




So let me make it perfectly clear I am a big fan of DX4WIN, LOTW,  TQSL. I've 
been using DX4WIN since around 1998 and it's the best, most solid logging 
program around. Like anything else it has it's quirks but it's solid as a 
rock which I appreciate. The same goes for LOTW  TQSL. The stability and 
security make it the premier electronic QSL system others would do well to 
emulate (there I go, probably stepping on toes again).




My hat's off to the development team and all the folks spending their time 
and energy to get it ready for public release. Say maybe y'all could give me 
a bit of help with getting VoLTE ready for prime time! For my sanity's sake 
thank goodness there's still a tiny bit of radio at the end of all that high 
powered IP




Sincerely 73,

Joe W4WN - Amateur Radio Software E_N_D  U_S_E_R Extraordinaire  :-)  Heck I 
don't even load up Jim Reisert's stuff until everyone else has tried it out!




- Original Message - 
From: Rick Murphy k...@arrl.net

To: DX4WIN dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] New TQSL not ready for prime time



Joseph,
You're entitled to your opinion. However, to say it's Not ready for prime
time is incorrect, particularly for DX4WIN users.

The only serious problem found in 1.14 was for Mac users that are trying 
to

upload duplicate QSOs to LoTW. None of the testers reported this problem
prior to the final release.

Please note that the major performance problems with LoTW several months
ago were caused almost entirely by people uploading massive logs
repeatedly, so this defect really shouldn't matter unless someone is
deliberately trying to deny service to other users. There's an easy
workaround for people running in to this problem on MacOS.

Of the other problems you mention, the invalid zone problem is already
fixed with no TQSL update needed. The command line problem isn't anything
normal users would run in to, and has no impact whatsoever on DX4WIN 
users.

Actually, the Mac problem also has no impact for DX4WIN users, either.

So, sure, stay with what you have - you get no usable error messages when
certificate imports fail, you're allowed to upload QSOs with incorrect
zones without being warned, you can upload QSOs to Logbook as often as you
like, you can upload logs that'll get rejected by Logbook because your
certificate has expired, you can't upload directly to Logbook, and you'll
be allowed to upload using locations where there's no valid certificate
(which Logbook will reject). You won't be notified when the fixes for the
minor problems are available, and can't automatically update to fix any
defects.

If any of those problems are issues for you, there's an updated version of
TQSL available on the sourceforge site -
http://sourceforge.net/projects/trustedqsl/files/TrustedQSL/ - so please
give the update a try. We're