Original Message on Regression

2000-01-30 Thread David A. Heiser
Title: - Original Message -








- Original Message -
From: Zina Taran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Ailc1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2000 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Shareware for Computing Significance Level?


 just click on the field confidence level to have that field
checked in
the
 regression analysis menu (from data analysis) in Excel. That
one is the
 95% one though. if you want a different one, there are built-in functions
 which I don't remember off the top of my head.
 cheers,
 ZT

-
The EXCEL regression dialog box requests the following information: You have
to install the analysis ToolPak add-in macro to get this

About the Regression dialog box

Input Y Range
Enter the reference for the range of dependent data. The range must consist
of a single column of data.

Input X Range
Enter the reference for the range of independent data. Microsoft Excel
orders independent variables from this range in ascending order from left to
right. The maximum number of independent variables is 16.

Labels
Select if the first row or column of your input range or ranges contains
labels. Clear if your input has no labels; Microsoft Excel generates
appropriate data labels for the output table.

Confidence Level
Select to include an additional level in the summary output table. In the
box, enter the confidence level you want applied in addition to the default
95 percent level.

Constant is Zero
Select to force the regression line to pass through the origin.

Output Range
Enter the reference for the upper-left cell of the output table. Allow at
least seven columns for the summary output table, which includes an anova
table, coefficients, standard error of y estimate, r2 values, number of
observations, and standard error of coefficients.

New Worksheet Ply
Click to insert a new worksheet in the current workbook and paste the
results starting at cell A1 of the new worksheet. To name the new worksheet,
type a name in the box.

New Workbook
Click to create a new workbook and paste the results on a new worksheet in
the new workbook.

Residuals
Select to include residuals in the residuals output table.

Standardized Residuals
Select to include standardized residuals in the residuals output table.

Residual Plots
Select to generate a chart for each independent variable versus the
residual.

Line Fit Plots
Select to generate a chart for predicted values versus the observed values.

Normal Probability Plots
Select to generate a chart that plots normal probability.

---
>From above, the 95% is automatic, you have to enter another value, and you
will get results corresponing to the new value IN ADDITION.



For tests on the coefficients, apply the
TDIST function to the cells containing the standard error values of the
coefficients. TDIST has as inputs the cell containing the X value, the degrees
of freedom, and then whether you want one tail (1) or two tail(2) tests. The
function returns the p value

DAH








Re: Shareware for Computing Significance Level?

2000-01-30 Thread miller

On 01/29/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ailc1) said:
Anyone know of shareware that computes significance level given degrees of
freedom v1 and v2?

The program Cupid computes critical values and significance levels
(among other things) for many distributions, including the F, t, r,
and ChiSquare.

It is freeware for the PC, available at
   http://www.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/msdos/statstcs/
   http://garbo.uwasa.fi/pc/stat/

Look for cupid1_1.zip

Jeff

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://psy.otago.ac.nz:800/staff/miller/welcome.htm



===
  This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, people lacking respect
  for other members of the list send messages that are inappropriate
  or unrelated to the list's discussion topics. Please just delete the
  offensive email.

  For information concerning the list, please see the following web page:
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===



scoring semantic differential

2000-01-30 Thread Grover Proctor

After looking in Osgood, Suci, and Tannenbaum's "The Measurement of Meaning"
and Snider and Osgood's "Semantic Differential Technique," plus several of
Osgood's individual articles, I cannot find the answer to this simple
question:

In scoring the Semantic Differential, does one treat MISSING data (i.e., a
scale to which a subject failed to give a response) as "null" or do you
assign it the "middle value" of your scale (i.e, 4 on a 1-to-7 scale, or 0
in a -3-to-+3 scale)?

Clearly, Osgood hints that if the response is "not applicable" then the
middle scale is the answer. And NOT having any response (i.e., null)
distorts the computation of the Osgood D, which is at the center of my
research.

Has anyone seen anything in the literature, or has your own work delivered
any insights, which would cast light on this problem?

Thank you for a quick reply, either here or (better) direct to my e-mail
address!

Grover Proctor
Dean
Northwood University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





===
  This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, people lacking respect
  for other members of the list send messages that are inappropriate
  or unrelated to the list's discussion topics. Please just delete the
  offensive email.

  For information concerning the list, please see the following web page:
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===



Likert scale( nonmetric or metric scale)

2000-01-30 Thread boonlert

Dear all
I have seen articles in marketing and organization behavior journal
using a likert scale to test a hypothesis by applying it as a metric scale
(run regression as a dependent variable). In addition, some statistical
books are presented a likert scale as an ordinal scale while a few books are
represented it as an interval scale. Could anyone help me to make clear of
it so we can use a likert scale with the right analysis tools?
Any response will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Boonlert W.




===
  This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, people lacking respect
  for other members of the list send messages that are inappropriate
  or unrelated to the list's discussion topics. Please just delete the
  offensive email.

  For information concerning the list, please see the following web page:
  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
===