Re: [Elecraft] K3 - noise reduction query

2014-07-05 Thread Jim Brown

On 7/4/2014 10:13 PM, Johnny Siu wrote:

I find the noise reduction NR in KX3 is much easier to use and gives a better 
effect than NR in K3


This may be the result of the DSP used in the KX3, which was designed 
several years after the K3. Moore's Law, and so on.


My neighbor, W6GJB, feels that the KX3 decoders for RTTY and PSK work 
better than the K3 decoders. I don't have enough experience to offer a 
judgement call.


73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - noise reduction query

2014-07-05 Thread Laurent F6DEX
On 7/4/2014 10:13 PM, Johnny Siu wrote:

 I find the noise reduction NR in KX3 is much easier to use and gives a
 better effect than NR in K3 

KX3'NR is simple to use and gives immediatly good results. K3's NR is more
difficult to use but, with low settings like 1-1 or 5-1/5-2/5-3, I find it
excellent and it compares favourably (equivalent) with the KX3 and other
brands or rigs using mid-range settings. The more agressive settings are
very special to use...  

I tested a lot of NR with various brands. Overall, none is better than the
others but for some particular situation, one brand may give better results.
This may explain this particular result with the static noises.

Laurent F6DEX



-
Laurent F6DEX
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-noise-reduction-query-tp7590854p7590919.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread David Cutter
You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and 
choke.  A dual core balun that gives good cancellation of common mode 
currents at the feed point is essential and some folks add another choke on 
the ground with ground spike on the house side to drain off residual cmc. 
If you are particularly prone to local noise pickup on your long runs of 
coax, then another choke at the entry to your house is a good move.


Coverage of 160 to 6 is possible but the baluns and chokes need attention to 
cover that range, especially if suspended and running power unless sturdily 
supported.  Inverted V is easiest.  You might not get all the coverage you 
want in one wire but you can join another ocfd onto the original to get more 
coverage on difficult bands.


The ocfd gives your matching unit an easier time, ie reduced losses. 
Running your radio without a linear means you can have a lightweight aerial 
with small balun on fibreglass pole.


These gents have done a huge amount of work: http://hamwaves.com/cl-ocfd/ 
and here http://www.dj0ip.de/off-center-fed-dipole/ 
http://www.dj0ip.de/off-center-fed-dipole/80m-ocf/

and try the user group: www.windom_ante...@yahoogroups.com

73
David
G3UNA


- Original Message - 
From: Jim GM jim.gmfo...@gmail.com

To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?



What antenna lengths are you using on 160M with your KX3 or  KXPA100
internal tuner? What is best for 160-6 meters? I like making my own
antennas with wire.

I usually have to give up one band or another cause it just would not tune
up on a certain band.

I have tried to stay with in these guide lines.

--
Jim K9TF 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 FAST-PLAY field-test firmware now available (rev. 2.11)

2014-07-05 Thread G
Is there any documentation? All I could find was the firmware, and since
I am anxiously awaiting the delivery of my KX3 it would give me
something to do to pass the time.


On 07/04/2014 04:55 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
 Thanks for the report, Ken. I'm glad it's working well.

 Wayne
 N6KR

 On Jun 30, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Kenneth A Christiansen w...@i29.net wrote:

 Hi to the group. 
 I updated my KX3 to this FAST-PLAY firmware just hours before field day 
 started. I made 118 QRP battery contacts using the Fast-Play feature and had 
 no troubles with the download or the firmware. I was able to leave most of 
 the cables between my computer and the KX3 disconnected. I did use the KX3 
 to USB interface so the N3FJP software could log my frequency for each 
 contact. I found by using FAST-PLAY on the KX3 that I did not have to touch 
 the mouse as N3FJP just kept doing what I wanted and the KX3 was handy 
 beside the computer. A touch of 2 buttons completed most contacts. The built 
 in paddle was used about twice during the entire contest. Once again thanks 
 Wayne as I considered this a wonderful improvement to the firmware.

 Sent from my iPad

 On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Wayne Burdick n...@elecraft.com wrote:

 Several KX3 users have now tested the new fast-play feature (see 
 operating details below), so we're making the firmware available for those 
 who don't mind working with a field-test release. It'll be a great feature 
 for Field Day, but you'll want to get it downloaded and tested before hand. 

 The rev. 2.11 firmware can be found on this page:

  ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/KX3/firmware/beta/

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to owlg.o...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread Jim Brown

On 7/5/2014 2:05 AM, David Cutter wrote:
You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and 
choke.


Not if you're going to run power. An off center fed antenna generates 
high common mode voltage, which will fry even the best choke when 
running power. I wouldn't consider such an antenna at greater than 100W.


73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread Per-Tore Aasestrand
Hello,

I can recommend reading the following:

   http://hamwaves.com/cl-ocfd/index.html

The high common-mode signals are apparently well attended to.

Per-Tore / LA7NO


On 5 July 2014 16:24, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote:
 On 7/5/2014 2:05 AM, David Cutter wrote:

 You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and
 choke.


 Not if you're going to run power. An off center fed antenna generates high
 common mode voltage, which will fry even the best choke when running power.
 I wouldn't consider such an antenna at greater than 100W.

 73, Jim K9YC
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to p...@ieee.org
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 FAST-PLAY field-test firmware now available (rev. 2.11)

2014-07-05 Thread Wayne Burdick
MCU 2.11 / DSP 1.30, 6-26-2014

* FAST MESSAGE PLAY: A long-hold of MSG (~3 sec) puts the KX3 into FAST PLAY 
mode. In this mode, the BAND+, BAND-, and FREQ_ENT switches can be used to 
play/repeat messages 1, 2, and 3 immediately, without the need to first tap 
MSG. To turn off fast play, hold MSG for ~3 seconds again, or turn the KX3 off 
and back on. Notes: (1) In voice modes (using the built-in DVR), only messages 
1 and 2 are available, corresponding to BAND+ and BAND- in fast-play. (2) At 
present, message chaining is only available in CW modes (with both normal and 
fast-play).


Wayne
N6KR


On Jul 5, 2014, at 2:26 AM, G owlg.o...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is there any documentation? All I could find was the firmware, and since
 I am anxiously awaiting the delivery of my KX3 it would give me
 something to do to pass the time.
 
 
 On 07/04/2014 04:55 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
 Thanks for the report, Ken. I'm glad it's working well.
 
 Wayne
 N6KR
 
 On Jun 30, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Kenneth A Christiansen w...@i29.net wrote:
 
 Hi to the group. 
 I updated my KX3 to this FAST-PLAY firmware just hours before field day 
 started. I made 118 QRP battery contacts using the Fast-Play feature and 
 had no troubles with the download or the firmware. I was able to leave most 
 of the cables between my computer and the KX3 disconnected. I did use the 
 KX3 to USB interface so the N3FJP software could log my frequency for each 
 contact. I found by using FAST-PLAY on the KX3 that I did not have to touch 
 the mouse as N3FJP just kept doing what I wanted and the KX3 was handy 
 beside the computer. A touch of 2 buttons completed most contacts. The 
 built in paddle was used about twice during the entire contest. Once again 
 thanks Wayne as I considered this a wonderful improvement to the firmware.



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Antenna length

2014-07-05 Thread Alan Price
Gee, when I lived in the North East (Rochester, NY) I used the antenna rule:
 
If the antenna wire lasted through the winter, it was not long enough!
 
73
Alan
W1HYV
 
  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 FAST-PLAY field-test firmware now available (rev. 2.11)

2014-07-05 Thread Heinz Bärtschi
Wayne,

As suggested in my recent post it would be very useful if the KX3 user himself 
could decide which of the 3 switches he would donate for fast play!?

73,
Heinz HB9BCB



 Am 05.07.2014 um 18:06 schrieb Wayne Burdick n...@elecraft.com:
 
 MCU 2.11 / DSP 1.30, 6-26-2014
 
 * FAST MESSAGE PLAY: A long-hold of MSG (~3 sec) puts the KX3 into FAST PLAY 
 mode. In this mode, the BAND+, BAND-, and FREQ_ENT switches can be used to 
 play/repeat messages 1, 2, and 3 immediately, without the need to first tap 
 MSG. To turn off fast play, hold MSG for ~3 seconds again, or turn the KX3 
 off and back on. Notes: (1) In voice modes (using the built-in DVR), only 
 messages 1 and 2 are available, corresponding to BAND+ and BAND- in 
 fast-play. (2) At present, message chaining is only available in CW modes 
 (with both normal and fast-play).
 
 
 Wayne
 N6KR

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] A good antenna

2014-07-05 Thread Robin Bayer
For a year or more now I have been using a simple near but not resonant 40m
vertical delta loop with the peak at about 33feet and fed with a random
length of ladder line to a remote auto tuner contained in a water resistant
box. Tuner is a MFJ 993b I think.
Tunes well 6m through 160m. Not very great performance on 80 and 160m but
have made some contacts. I really only use 80m for the QRP fox hunts with
some success.  Easy to use except the tuner likes 15-20watts for fast
tuning. Hunts a little using 5w on some bands.

You can see my setup on my qrz page.

KA5QQA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread Dave
I tried a 40M OCFD for a while. I gave up on it and went back to a centre 
fed dipole instead.


Even on 40M it didn't seem very good and I was plagued with RF getting into 
PCs and them shutting down or periferals stopping working.  Plus, despite 
the hype, it didn't really seem to work well on other bands.  The Antenna 
analyser was very dismissive, showing resonances outside of the Amateur 
bands and, on some that it was supposed to work on, no sign of any resonance 
at all.


Dave (G0DJA)

- Original Message - 
From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?



On 7/5/2014 2:05 AM, David Cutter wrote:
You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and 
choke.


Not if you're going to run power. An off center fed antenna generates high 
common mode voltage, which will fry even the best choke when running 
power. I wouldn't consider such an antenna at greater than 100W.


73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to d...@g0dja.co.uk 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread WILLIS COOKE via Elecraft
Off center fed dipoles, Windoms and end fed half waves are primarily low power 
if not QRP antennas where you can do poorly with any antenna.  They are prone 
to arcing, heating and RF where you don't want it.  You are better off with 
conventional low radiation resistance antennas if you plan to use 100 watts or 
higher.  The search for an antenna that will make QRP sound like a kilowatt is 
futile.  The only way to do that is to have excellent conditions and infinite 
patience which will make anything sort of work.
 
Willis 'Cookie' Cooke, TDXS DX Chairman
K5EWJ  Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart


On Saturday, July 5, 2014 11:55 AM, Dave d...@g0dja.co.uk wrote:
 


I tried a 40M OCFD for a while. I gave up on it and went back to a centre 
fed dipole instead.

Even on 40M it didn't seem very good and I was plagued with RF getting into 
PCs and them shutting down or periferals stopping working.  Plus, despite 
the hype, it didn't really seem to work well on other bands.  The Antenna 
analyser was very dismissive, showing resonances outside of the Amateur 
bands and, on some that it was supposed to work on, no sign of any resonance 
at all.

Dave (G0DJA)

- Original Message - 
From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?


 On 7/5/2014 2:05 AM, David Cutter wrote:
 You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and 
 choke.

 Not if you're going to run power. An off center fed antenna generates high 
 common mode voltage, which will fry even the best choke when running 
 power. I wouldn't consider such an antenna at greater than 100W.

 73, Jim K9YC
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to d...@g0dja.co.uk 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to wrco...@yahoo.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread WILLIS COOKE via Elecraft


 
Willis 'Cookie' Cooke, TDXS DX Chairman
K5EWJ  Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart


On , WILLIS COOKE wrco...@yahoo.com wrote:
 


Off center fed dipoles, Windoms and end fed half waves are primarily low power 
if not QRP antennas where you can do poorly with any antenna.  They are prone 
to arcing, heating and RF where you don't want it.  You are better off with 
conventional low radiation resistance antennas if you plan to use 100 watts or 
higher.  The search for an antenna that will make QRP sound like a kilowatt is 
futile.  The only way to do that is to have excellent conditions and infinite 
patience which will make anything sort of work.
 
Willis 'Cookie' Cooke, TDXS DX Chairman
K5EWJ  Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart


On Saturday, July 5, 2014 11:55 AM, Dave d...@g0dja.co.uk wrote:
 


I tried a 40M OCFD for a while. I gave up on it and went back to a centre 
fed dipole instead.

Even on 40M it didn't seem very good and I was plagued with RF getting into 
PCs and them shutting down or
 periferals stopping working.  Plus, despite 
the hype, it didn't really seem to work well on other bands.  The Antenna 
analyser was very dismissive, showing resonances outside of the Amateur 
bands and, on some that it was supposed to work on, no sign of any resonance 
at all.

Dave (G0DJA)

- Original Message - 
From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?


 On 7/5/2014 2:05 AM, David Cutter wrote:
 You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and 
 choke.

 Not if you're going to run power. An off center fed antenna generates
 high 
 common mode voltage, which will fry even the best choke when running 
 power. I wouldn't consider such an antenna at greater than 100W.

 73, Jim K9YC
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to d...@g0dja.co.uk 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to wrco...@yahoo.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread K8JHR

Lots of guys have good results with OCF dipoles all over the world.

I run a weekly nationwide net for a Brand X radio model using a 40-6 
meter OCF dipole.   I am the loud signal and I hear all and they all 
hear me.  Of course it helps I am in the Midwest, but still, I run 700 
watts into it and NO CMC or other problems.  I can run more power, but 
don't because that is enough to get the job done.   Power is not an 
issue on my OCF dipole.


Best advice I ever received on OCF Dipoles comes from a guy who tested 
several OCF dipoles for common mode noise, and then found the right type 
of balun/choke to use.   IT DOES make a difference how you build and 
deploy it.   If you run the feed line closer to one side than the other, 
you get CMC.   If you use the wrong balun, you get CMC.


See here:  http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/

Using a proper DUAL Core balun - where the transformer is wound on a 
separate toroid from the choke wound on another toriod - it works fine 
and you have no CMC noise issue.


Stop by my shack and have a listen.  CMC can be a problem if you allow 
it to be, but not if you pay attention to what you are doing.  Again, 
don't believe me... stop by the shack or join my net some Wed evening 
and see.   (We don't care what brand rig you own - its is ham radio and 
it is all good)


Just MY take.  This antenna works better than the AlphaDelta and home 
brew fan dipoles I used to use... (although I cannot explain why the 
others did not work as well, they should have...but who knows what they 
were coupling with in my crowded little lot.)


Happy days.
- K8JHR  --



On 7/5/2014 12:50 PM, Dave wrote:

I tried a 40M OCFD for a while. I gave up on it and went back to a
centre fed dipole instead.



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread Mel Farrer via Elecraft
I have always found the the OCF antennas require a sufficient amount of 
feedline to mask the weird impedances it has.  I have successfully used 135 
foot 33% offset fed 4:1 balun with W1JR choke and 100 feet of coax necessary.  
I tried to use 22 feet and it was a total loss.  All with 100 watts of course 
like Jim suggests.  The added length does not add enough loss to account for 
the change.  


Mel, K6KBE



On Saturday, July 5, 2014 9:50 AM, Dave d...@g0dja.co.uk wrote:
 


I tried a 40M OCFD for a while. I gave up on it and went back to a centre 
fed dipole instead.

Even on 40M it didn't seem very good and I was plagued with RF getting into 
PCs and them shutting down or periferals stopping working.  Plus, despite 
the hype, it didn't really seem to work well on other bands.  The Antenna 
analyser was very dismissive, showing resonances outside of the Amateur 
bands and, on some that it was supposed to work on, no sign of any resonance 
at all.

Dave (G0DJA)

- Original Message - 
From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?


 On 7/5/2014 2:05 AM, David Cutter wrote:
 You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and 
 choke.

 Not if you're going to run power. An off center fed antenna generates high 
 common mode voltage, which will fry even the best choke when running 
 power. I wouldn't consider such an antenna at greater than 100W.

 73, Jim K9YC
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to d...@g0dja.co.uk 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to farrerfo...@yahoo.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread Dave
I was using QRP, 3 Watts from the KX3, and I tend to use less than 5W CW on 
most bands.

Even on receive it performed poorly, which is why I wnt back to a dipole.

Cheers - Dave (G0DJA)
  - Original Message - 
  To: Dave ; elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
  Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 5:10 PM
  Subject: Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?


  Off center fed dipoles, Windoms and end fed half waves are primarily low 
power if not QRP antennas where you can do poorly with any antenna.  They are 
prone to arcing, heating and RF where you don't want it.  You are better off 
with conventional low radiation resistance antennas if you plan to use 100 
watts or higher.  The search for an antenna that will make QRP sound like a 
kilowatt is futile.  The only way to do that is to have excellent conditions 
and infinite patience which will make anything sort of work.

  Willis 'Cookie' Cooke, TDXS DX Chairman
  K5EWJ  Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread David Cutter
Rick DJ0IP has performed many hundreds of cmc measurements over the last 
year or so.  He has yet to publish his complete findings but here is a 
taste:

http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/the-components/the-baluns/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/pre-test-preparation/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/results-test-data/ant-1-b0/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/test-configurations/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/results-test-data/ant-2-b5/


After many hundreds of measurements he has demonstrated that with a *dual 
core* Guanella 4:1 balun at the feed point, common mode current can be tamed 
even with deliberately poor antenna and feeder layout.


There are not many folks who would take the care and have the patience to do 
this sort of work.


David
G3UNA






- Original Message - 
From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?



On 7/5/2014 2:05 AM, David Cutter wrote:
You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and 
choke.


Not if you're going to run power. An off center fed antenna generates high 
common mode voltage, which will fry even the best choke when running 
power. I wouldn't consider such an antenna at greater than 100W.


73, Jim K9YC 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread Dick, K2ZR
Where can I find the results comparing these 4 antennas?
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/the-antennas/
Thanks and 73,
Dick, K2ZR
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of David
Cutter
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 1:30 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

Rick DJ0IP has performed many hundreds of cmc measurements over the last
year or so.  He has yet to publish his complete findings but here is a
taste:
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/the-components/the-baluns/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/pre-test-preparation/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/results-test-data/ant-1-b0/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/test-configurations/
http://www.dj0ip.de/cmc-test/results-test-data/ant-2-b5/


After many hundreds of measurements he has demonstrated that with a *dual
core* Guanella 4:1 balun at the feed point, common mode current can be tamed
even with deliberately poor antenna and feeder layout.

There are not many folks who would take the care and have the patience to do
this sort of work.

David
G3UNA






- Original Message -
From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?


 On 7/5/2014 2:05 AM, David Cutter wrote:
 You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and 
 choke.

 Not if you're going to run power. An off center fed antenna generates high

 common mode voltage, which will fry even the best choke when running 
 power. I wouldn't consider such an antenna at greater than 100W.

 73, Jim K9YC 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to k...@arrl.net

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread k3ndm
Jim, 
What you say can be correct. However, this need not happen all the time. When 
common mode issues arise one of the problems is that the wrong type of balun 
was chosen. Voltage baluns suffer when the VSWR gets too high. What you really 
need to use on these types of antennas is a current type balun. They have less 
of a problem than do the voltage type. 

I use a Carolina Windom here. That means I use a voltage type balun at the feed 
point, deliberately causing radiation from the shield of the vertical section 
of feed coax. 18 feet bellow the antenna feed point I place a 1:1 current 
balun, an RF choke, to prevent common mode problems. I have not had problems 
with common mode currents with this arrangement, and it will work at higher 
powers than the 100 Watts I normally use so long as the baluns and coax are 
rated for the power level you plan to run. 

73, 
Barry 
K3NDM 

- Original Message -

From: jim j...@audiosystemsgroup.com 
To: elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2014 10:24:19 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length? 

On 7/5/2014 2:05 AM, David Cutter wrote: 
 You might consider an off-centre-fed dipole with appropriate balun and 
 choke. 

Not if you're going to run power. An off center fed antenna generates 
high common mode voltage, which will fry even the best choke when 
running power. I wouldn't consider such an antenna at greater than 100W. 

73, Jim K9YC 
__ 
Elecraft mailing list 
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
Message delivered to k3...@comcast.net 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] KX3 FAST PLAY

2014-07-05 Thread K3WWP
In QRP contesting, I do a lot of band switching. If I understand FAST PLAY
correctly, having it on the band switch buttons is a big waste of time. It
would take a good 10-15 seconds to de-activate FP, switch bands, re-activate
FP. On the other hand, I virtually NEVER use the PRE/NR(1), ATTN/NB(2), and
APF/NTCH(3) buttons in contesting or otherwise. Personally I would much
sooner see these three buttons used for FP. I also like the idea of Heinz
HB9BCB about allowing the user to choose the buttons. What do other
contesters think?

* John K3WWP - 100% CW / QRP - Proudly promoting Morse Code:
*
* On the air with my KX3 #2325, K2 #6418, KX-1 #02101
*
* As NAQCC VP - # 0002 FC # 1 - http://naqcc.info/
*
* As FISTS Keynote QRP Columnist - # 2002 - http://www.fists.org/
*
* With my CW-QRP site - http://home.windstream.net/johnshan/

 







__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
An end-fed half wave inverted L (EFHWL) done properly works very well. It
needs to be tuned at the base of the wire against ground.

An EFHWL for 80m is an excellent antenna that has no nulls and has
vertically polarized low angle radiation equal to a decent 1/4 wave
vertical. The horizontal wire fills in the general pattern to a hemisphere
with a broad and mild null in the direction of the horizontal pull. It is
an ideal all-distance contest antenna, because there are no holes in
coverage in any direction or elevation.

I have used this antenna at 1.5 kW off and on across 50 years with
excellent results. The current max is at the bend, with a high resistance
feed at the ground, making the effective series resistance of the grounding
system of no consequence. Even a completely pathetic 100 ohm ground at the
base does little damage against a 1000-2000-3000 ohm feedpoint for the
wire.

It IS uncommon and requires tuning at the base of the antenna, and that
network requires components usually found in the output tuning networks of
tube based QRO amplifiers.  You can't feed the base of the antenna directly
from coax without a tuner, and you can't buy the tuner off the shelf
anywhere.

With some DPST relays, coil stock and a single well-chosen fixed value QRO
transmit capacitor, the antenna + tuning mechanism can cover the entire
3.5-4 ham band with less than 1.5:1 SWR anywhere.

With some further work in the tuning mechanism, and attention to a proper
160m counterpoise, the wire will work well on 160-80-40-30 with distance
from any tower(s).

In my experience with that over the years, the EFHWL always beat an 80
dipole or inverted vee for DX and was as good as or beat dipole and vee for
local and mid range. A 4-square would beat the EFHWL for DX.

73, Guy.


On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 1:10 PM, WILLIS COOKE via Elecraft 
elecraft@mailman.qth.net wrote:

 Off center fed dipoles, Windoms and end fed half waves are primarily low
 power if not QRP antennas where you can do poorly with any antenna.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Fwd: A good antenna Length

2014-07-05 Thread Robin Bayer
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robin Bayer rmbaye...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:50 AM
Subject: A good antenna
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net


For a year or more now I have been using a simple, near to 40m vertical
delta loop with the peak at about 33 feet and fed with a random length of
ladder lineby a remote auto tuner and BL2 4:1 Balun contained in a water
resistant box below the mast. Tuner is a MFJ 993b I think. Tunes well 6m
through 160m. Not very great performance on 80 and 160m but have made some
contacts. I really only use 80m for the QRP fox hunts with some success.
Easy to use except the tuner likes 20watts for fast tuning. SSometimes I
have to tune twice. Once to allow the KAT2 to lower the swr and allow full
output. Then the remote tunes. Then I retune or bypass the K2 tuner.  Hunts
a little a little while using 5w on some bands. Many evenings I will set
the K2 on a table under the K2 using its internal tuner and BL2 to directly
feed the ladder line and loop which is fed to a lower corner. K2  tunes
10-80m easily.

You can see my setup on my qrz page.



Robin

KA5QQA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread riese-k3djc
Hi Guy

same thing here I was going to use it on 160 but really like 75
makes a good DX antenna and when the band is open I have
no problems breaking pileups,,, up 40 Ft and out ? Horz
works OK on all other harmonic related bands ,,, did run some tests with 
a station 30 miles from me. I used to use a tuner at the base but I find
the
HB antenna tuner in the shack works well ,,,So what the heck ,,, Use a
series of ferrites on the
coax feed and run the feed about 50 Ft through the basement to the shack
not a QRP antenna ? use a Heath amp drive it wit a K3
bottom line
put up some wire and get on the air

Bob K3DJC


On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 16:08:19 -0400 Guy Olinger K2AV k2av@gmail.com
writes:
 An end-fed half wave inverted L (EFHWL) done properly works very 
 well. It
 needs to be tuned at the base of the wire against ground.
 
 An EFHWL for 80m is an excellent antenna that has no nulls and has
 vertically polarized low angle radiation equal to a decent 1/4 wave
 vertical. The horizontal wire fills in the general pattern to a 
 hemisphere
 with a broad and mild null in the direction of the horizontal pull. 
 It is
 an ideal all-distance contest antenna, because there are no holes 
 in
 coverage in any direction or elevation.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 FAST-PLAY field-test firmware now available (rev. 2.11)

2014-07-05 Thread G
Wayne,

That is awesome! Another reason I went with the KX3, upgradable
firmware. While most rigs can upgrade their firmware no one is going
outside the norm.

Now just time to decide if I should sell the TS-2000 LE to get the
KXPA100 :)

Thanks for the description. I look forward to getting it loaded up.


On 07/05/2014 12:37 PM, Heinz Bärtschi wrote:
 Wayne,

 As suggested in my recent post it would be very useful if the KX3 user 
 himself could decide which of the 3 switches he would donate for fast play!?

 73,
 Heinz HB9BCB



 Am 05.07.2014 um 18:06 schrieb Wayne Burdick n...@elecraft.com:

 MCU 2.11 / DSP 1.30, 6-26-2014

 * FAST MESSAGE PLAY: A long-hold of MSG (~3 sec) puts the KX3 into FAST PLAY 
 mode. In this mode, the BAND+, BAND-, and FREQ_ENT switches can be used to 
 play/repeat messages 1, 2, and 3 immediately, without the need to first tap 
 MSG. To turn off fast play, hold MSG for ~3 seconds again, or turn the KX3 
 off and back on. Notes: (1) In voice modes (using the built-in DVR), only 
 messages 1 and 2 are available, corresponding to BAND+ and BAND- in 
 fast-play. (2) At present, message chaining is only available in CW modes 
 (with both normal and fast-play).


 Wayne
 N6KR

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Announcement

2014-07-05 Thread Kevin

Good Evening,
   It has been almost a week since it last rained.  I have seen the sun 
for at least a few hours each day.  Maybe, just maybe, the dry season 
has arrived.  I won't hold my breath though.  There are some mosquitoes 
now but they are in no way as large as those I once met in Arkadelphia.  
They could syphon your blood in seconds flat.  These would require many 
hours to do the same.


   The sun is quite spotted and due for some flare activity. Hopefully 
conditions will be better than they were last weekend. While I gathered 
the information of over 500 stations I was only able to get 120 of them 
to reply.  Oh well, it was fun.  Now is the season to pull down last 
year's antennas and build new ones. Hook up the guy lines to the F-250, 
put it into 4WD low and try not to get a branch through the cab.  After 
only a month the lines heal into the bark of the tree necessitating the 
aforementioned procedure.


Please join us tomorrow.

14050 kHz at 2200z Sunday (3 PM PDT Sunday)
 7045 kHz at 0100z Monday (6 PM PDT Sunday)

73,
Kevin. KD5ONS

-
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] A Good Antenna Length?

2014-07-05 Thread Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft
We are well past the posting limit for a single topic. Let's give this one a 
rest for now. 

73,
Eric
List Moderator etc. 
elecraft.com
---
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com



[Elecraft] About Rose of Rose's Cases and Covers

2014-07-05 Thread Rose
This e-mail may reach you via several routes and/or mailing lists. I
apologize
if you receive multiple copies as I try to reach everyone.

Some of you are aware that a few weeks ago a small cancer was discovered
on the interior wall of my uterus.  Although all the women in my family
going
back several generations have suffered from breast cancer, I though that at
age 75 I'd made it OK.

The matter was addressed quickly and I had a complete hysterectomy within
just a few days.  The good news is that my oncologists tell me the small
cancer
had not escaped from within the uterus and that I'm cancer free.

I've had CT scans, X-rays and other tests and the oncologists tell me they
find
no sign of any remaining cancer.  However, they suggest that I have a
series
of chemotherapy treatments as a preventative matter.

Rather than receive the treatments on the usual three-week or monthly basis
I've elected to go for treatment once a week.  This means that I receive
smaller
infusions of the drugs each time with less impact on my body.  It's still
debilitating,
however. I've now had four treatments and they will continue for a total of
18.

My treatment is being done at a relatively new cancer center at Community
Hospital in Missoula, about 110 miles from here.  I couldn't ask for better
care.
A treatment takes 3 - 4 hours while in a large recliner chair.  No-cost
snacks
and drinks are provided, and there are free cancer-coping items like wigs
... I'm
starting to lose my hair ... hats, scarves, etc. available, courtesy of the
American
Cancer Society.

All this has severely impacted my sewing on case and cover orders, of
course.
It's looking like I'll be able to sew a couple of days a week, and I'll be
turning out
your orders as quickly as I can.  Your understanding has been heart-warming.
Thank you!

It's been my practice to acknowledge your order(s) and place them in my
queue
and then notify you when I'm about to start your order so you can make
payment.
There -are- several who have went ahead and made payment.  If you want to
confirm that all is well with your order, don't hesitate to inquire.  Ken
will be helping
with the order tracking and correspondence.

If you don't wish to wait for me to fill your order, feel free to
cancel.  FWIW, I -don't-
plan to quit my little business, but if you want to cancel your order, I
will certainly
understand.

73!  Rose - N7HKW
elecraftcov...@gmail.com
406.560.3738
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 sluggish keyer

2014-07-05 Thread AA4BQ

The problem, according to my own experience, is that the ground in
intermittent. Each paddle arm is the ground that makes contact with each
standoff. Without a good grounding, the contact action between the set screw
and the standoff is sometimes hit or miss. The reason the ground is
occasionally weak is because the contact with ground by each keying paddle
is designed to be via the pivot pins of each paddle arm. They are
independent and sometimes intermittent grounding occurs. This results is
missed dots or dashes (dits/dahs) being keyed. There are some solutions
outlined on the web whereby one does a little soldering of two small wires
to ground and then screw down the opposite ends of said wire under the heads
of each countersunk screw head on each respective paddle arm. (These screw
heads are the spring retainer screws.)

I developed another reliable solution whereby no soldering is required. (I
am good at soldering but the miniaturization of the solder pads here are
very delicate. I feel sure warranty issues come to mind as well. ) A great
alternative is to provide backup grounding. 

To do so, 

1. Disassemble as if changing springs.

2. The spring is coated for durability and anti-corrosion. So, on each end,
place the spring opening (each end alternatively) on a micro file (or very
fine emory board) and remove just the coating on the ends that contact the
arms.

3. Delicately, use a small screwdriver or tool to remove the paint where the
spring contacts each arm. Take your time. The paint is durable. Just remove
an amount about the size of a lock washer. This will, in effect connect each
paddle arm together.

4. When disassembling the key, you removed three allen screws. The heads of
these screws fit into a recessed hole. At the bottom of that recess, you
will need to remove the paint there as well. You need only do one but I did
all three to be sure. 

5. Reassemble the keyer.

This mod resulted in 100% keying. The original reliability was dependent on
the pivot arms of each paddle independently. This mod increases the
reliability by transferring a good ground (via the spring) over to the arm
that may be intermittently ungrounded. This method is still statistically
less than 100% over time, but whereas I was getting keying errors regularly,
they have completely disappeared. 

Happy keying.

73,
Bill, AA4BQ





-

73,
Bill - AA4BQ
Jupiter, FL.
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KX3-sluggish-keyer-tp7590116p7590946.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com