Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-10 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
 usable, but at the expense of
 simplicity. Every device added to the combination of things to put a
 signal on the air adds to the complexity of the entire setup. And that
 added complexity adds to the number of devices that can fail, and adds
 exponentially to the number of setup combinations that are possible -
 some combinations will work, others will almost work, and a lot of other
 combinations result in requests for help here on the Elecraft reflector.
 None of those combinations are a K3 problem, but are a result of the
 complexity of the various components in the users station setup.

 Since the K3 does support digital modes direct from a computer
 soundcard, it would be prudent IMHO for users to try that combination
 first before committing to the extra features afforded by an external
 interface box.

 In two cases in the last two days, we have encountered problems on
 this reflector where the user of an external interface box had problems
 because the audio levels presented to the K3 were at microphone level
 instead of line level - simply because the interface box manufacturer
 did not consider that any transceiver would be using line level inputs.
 Your Microham interface boxes may give consideration to line level input
 (I don't know one way or the other), but many do not even consider
 anything other than mic level input. I am not targeting the Microham
 products, but am simply indicating that many digital interface boxes do
 not consider line level audio input to the transceiver.

 Again with the KISS principle, the more functions that are placed in the
 interface box, the more complex the entire station operation becomes.
 Once properly set up, it can be a benefit, but for those who are
 initially venturing into digital modes, the variety of setup tools and
 menus for a particular interface box can be overwhelming. This is not a
 K3 problem. Set things up using the simplest connections possible, and
 determine that the K3 works. Then add the interface box - if it does not
 work, then it should be obvious that some setup parameter for the
 interface box is the problem and the user should direct his questions to
 the interface box reflector and not bring implications that the K3 is
 faulty.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 On 1/9/2011 8:06 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

 In other words (for those using a K3), an additional soundcard may be
 a better solution than one of the Digital Interface boxes.

 That depends entirely on the feature set the user needs.

 1) The K3 can not switch between soundcard input and microphone
 input based on PTT source to support DVK from logging software
 2) The K3 can not automatically control band switching in an Icom
 PW-1 or other CI-V compatible accessories.
 3) The K3 does not have a keyer compatible with the three major
 contest loggers and several major day to day loggers.

 I'm sure I can come up with two or three more features if pressed.
 In any case, dismissing the digital interfaces rather than helping
 K3 users make their equipment coexist properly is rather short
 sighted.

 73,

 ... Joe Subich, W4TV
 microHAM America, LLC.
 http://www.microHAM-USA.com
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM


 On 1/9/2011 7:29 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
 Bob,

 Your assertion that one does not have to use the normal computer
 soundcard is well received. BUT there is no need to use one of the
 Digital Interfaces just to get the soundcard function. There are
 plenty of external soundcards available at less cost than the digital
 interfaces, and for those with desktop computers, adding an internal
 soundcard (in addition to the normal Windows soundcard) is an easy thing
 to do. Most applications will let you select which soundcard should be
 used.

 In other words (for those using a K3), an additional soundcard may be a
 better solution than one of the Digital Interface boxes.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 On 1/9/2011 6:59 PM, Bob Naumann wrote:
 The TI-5 has a USB sound card in it. The idea is so you don't have to
 interfere with your normal computer's sound card.

 I have a TI-5 and it works nicely - although I do FSK RTTY so the
 transmit
 levels are not something I have to mess with.

 73,

 Bob W5OV

 -Original Message-
 From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
 [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tony Estep
 Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 2:50 PM
 To: Elecraft
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

 On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Don Wilhelmw3...@embarqmail.com
 wrote:

 ...With the K3, no digital interface is required...everything needed
 built-in, no need for a separate interface box.

 What Don said. Start out by hooking the K3 straight to the computer (3
 cables: serial, audio in, audio out) and get it working that way. It
 will do
 all digital modes, SSB, CW, and everything else without an
 interface. Then
 you will know everything works and can adjust levels, etc. After
 that you
 can insert an interface if for some reason you need one.

 Tony KT0NY

[Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-09 Thread Larry Boekeloo
Good afternoon everyone

I just received a RigExpert TI-5 with the factory-made cable for my K3.  I've 
installed it as directed and I get the K3 to transmit using MXWin software, I 
can get the frequency/mode to change on the K3 but not much else.

I have the Line-In on the K3 turned on,etc and just can't figure out why this 
won't work.  Anyone else have the RigExpert and the K3 that could point me to a 
configuration I might be missing on the K3?

Thanks.

Larry, KN8N
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-09 Thread Lyle Johnson
I use a RigExpert Plus, which appears to be very similar to the TI-5.  
You'll need to set the OUT pot to max and use a high setting on the 
windows slider control related to that output.  I don't know how that 
maps to usage with MixW; I'm using DM780.

The K3 requires more drive than some radios for sufficient transmit 
audio on Line In.

Be *sure* to set the drive to 4-5 bars of ALC.  I  know the conventional 
wisdom on PSK31 tells you to have no ALC indication on your transmitter 
or your Tx IMD will suffer, but the purveyors of that wisdom aren't 
using a K3 :-)  The ALC indication on the K3 is an audio input level 
indication until you get to 5 bars. It is *not* a Tx power has been 
reduced due to overdive indicator.

73,

Lyle KK7P

 I just received a RigExpert TI-5 with the factory-made cable for my K3.  I've 
 installed it as directed...

 I have the Line-In on the K3 turned on,etc and just can't figure out why this 
 won't work.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-09 Thread Don Wilhelm
  Larry,

We had a similar problem yesterday too.

Put the K3 into TX TEST and check the audio input level.  Are you 
getting at least 4 bars indicated on the ALC meter with the 5th bar 
flashing occasionally?  If not, the audio level is not high enough.

The RigExpert manual only addresses using microphone input to the 
transceiver, but there is a jumper to insert or remove a 10 dB 
attenuator - try it in the non-attenuated position and see if the level 
becomes high enough.  See Appendix A of the Rigexpert manual, the proper 
jumper is labeled OUT, but unfortunately the manual does not state how 
the jumper should be configured to remove the attenuator.

The level required by the K3 is the normal Line level available from a 
computer soundcard.  Several ham type digital interfaces apparently do 
not produce a line level because the manufacturer provides only 
microphone levels - mic level is down in the millivolt range while line 
level in in the low volts range.

You *could* use the microphone input to the K3 if worse comes to worse, 
but the TX EQ is in line with the microphone input and you would want to 
set all bands of the TX EQ to zero for digital use.

With the K3, no digital interface is required - just a computer 
soundcard.  Connect the soundcard Line Out to the K3 Line In, and the K3 
Line Out to the soundcard Line In using a pair of stereo cables with 
3.5mm stereo jacks and you can run DATA A or AFSK A (for RTTY) using 
VOX.  If your application can key the K3 using RS-232 commands, so much 
the better, and the K3 provides for DTR or RTS keying as well.  The K3 
has everything needed built-in, no need for a separate interface box.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/9/2011 2:48 PM, Larry Boekeloo wrote:
 Good afternoon everyone

 I just received a RigExpert TI-5 with the factory-made cable for my K3.  I've 
 installed it as directed and I get the K3 to transmit using MXWin software, I 
 can get the frequency/mode to change on the K3 but not much else.

 I have the Line-In on the K3 turned on,etc and just can't figure out why this 
 won't work.  Anyone else have the RigExpert and the K3 that could point me to 
 a configuration I might be missing on the K3?

 Thanks.

 Larry, KN8N

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-09 Thread Tony Estep
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 ...With the K3, no digital interface is required...everything needed
 built-in, no need for a separate interface box.


What Don said. Start out by hooking the K3 straight to the computer (3
cables: serial, audio in, audio out) and get it working that way. It will do
all digital modes, SSB, CW, and everything else without an interface. Then
you will know everything works and can adjust levels, etc. After that you
can insert an interface if for some reason you need one.

Tony KT0NY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-09 Thread Bob Naumann
The TI-5 has a USB sound card in it. The idea is so you don't have to
interfere with your normal computer's sound card.

I have a TI-5 and it works nicely - although I do FSK RTTY so the transmit
levels are not something I have to mess with.

73,

Bob W5OV

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tony Estep
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 2:50 PM
To: Elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 ...With the K3, no digital interface is required...everything needed
 built-in, no need for a separate interface box.


What Don said. Start out by hooking the K3 straight to the computer (3
cables: serial, audio in, audio out) and get it working that way. It will do
all digital modes, SSB, CW, and everything else without an interface. Then
you will know everything works and can adjust levels, etc. After that you
can insert an interface if for some reason you need one.

Tony KT0NY
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-09 Thread Don Wilhelm
  Bob,

Your assertion that one does not have to use the normal computer 
soundcard is well received.  BUT there is no need to use one of the 
Digital Interfaces just to get the soundcard function.  There are 
plenty of external soundcards available at less cost than the digital 
interfaces, and for those with desktop computers, adding an internal 
soundcard (in addition to the normal Windows soundcard) is an easy thing 
to do.  Most applications will let you select which soundcard should be 
used.

In other words (for those using a K3), an additional soundcard may be a 
better solution than one of the Digital Interface boxes.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/9/2011 6:59 PM, Bob Naumann wrote:
 The TI-5 has a USB sound card in it. The idea is so you don't have to
 interfere with your normal computer's sound card.

 I have a TI-5 and it works nicely - although I do FSK RTTY so the transmit
 levels are not something I have to mess with.

 73,

 Bob W5OV

 -Original Message-
 From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
 [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tony Estep
 Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 2:50 PM
 To: Elecraft
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

 On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Don Wilhelmw3...@embarqmail.com  wrote:

 ...With the K3, no digital interface is required...everything needed
 built-in, no need for a separate interface box.

 What Don said. Start out by hooking the K3 straight to the computer (3
 cables: serial, audio in, audio out) and get it working that way. It will do
 all digital modes, SSB, CW, and everything else without an interface. Then
 you will know everything works and can adjust levels, etc. After that you
 can insert an interface if for some reason you need one.

 Tony KT0NY
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-09 Thread Don Wilhelm
  Joe,

My apologies to your products, but I have been a long and strong 
believer in the KISS principle.  Keep It Simple Stupid.  Yes, there 
are accessories that make things more usable, but at the expense of 
simplicity.  Every device added to the combination of things to put a 
signal on the air adds to the complexity of the entire setup.  And that 
added complexity adds to the number of devices that can fail, and adds 
exponentially to the number of setup combinations that are possible - 
some combinations will work, others will almost work, and a lot of other 
combinations result in requests for help here on the Elecraft 
reflector.  None of those combinations are a K3 problem, but are a 
result of the complexity of the various components in the users station 
setup.

Since the K3 does support digital modes direct from a computer 
soundcard, it would be prudent IMHO for users to try that combination 
first before committing to the extra features afforded by an external 
interface box.

In two cases in the last two days, we have encountered problems on 
this reflector where the user of an external interface box had problems 
because the audio levels presented to the K3 were at microphone level 
instead of line level - simply because the interface box manufacturer 
did not consider that any transceiver would be using line level inputs.  
Your Microham interface boxes may give consideration to line level input 
(I don't know one way or the other), but many do not even consider 
anything other than mic level input.  I am not targeting the Microham 
products, but am simply indicating that many digital interface boxes do 
not consider line level audio input to the transceiver.

Again with the KISS principle, the more functions that are placed in the 
interface box, the more complex the entire station operation becomes.  
Once properly set up, it can be a benefit, but for those who are 
initially venturing into digital modes, the variety of setup tools and 
menus for a particular interface box can be overwhelming.  This is not a 
K3 problem.  Set things up using the simplest connections possible, and 
determine that the K3 works.  Then add the interface box - if it does 
not work, then it should be obvious that some setup parameter for the 
interface box is the problem and the user should direct his questions to 
the interface box reflector and not bring implications that the K3 is 
faulty.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/9/2011 8:06 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

 In other words (for those using a K3), an additional soundcard may be
 a better solution than one of the Digital Interface boxes.

 That depends entirely on the feature set the user needs.

 1) The K3 can not switch between soundcard input and microphone
input based on PTT source to support DVK from logging software
 2) The K3 can not automatically control band switching in an Icom
PW-1 or other CI-V compatible accessories.
 3) The K3 does not have a keyer compatible with the three major
contest loggers and several major day to day loggers.

 I'm sure I can come up with two or three more features if pressed.
 In any case, dismissing the digital interfaces rather than helping
 K3 users make their equipment coexist properly is rather short
 sighted.

 73,

... Joe Subich, W4TV
microHAM America, LLC.
http://www.microHAM-USA.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM


 On 1/9/2011 7:29 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
Bob,

 Your assertion that one does not have to use the normal computer
 soundcard is well received.  BUT there is no need to use one of the
 Digital Interfaces just to get the soundcard function.  There are
 plenty of external soundcards available at less cost than the digital
 interfaces, and for those with desktop computers, adding an internal
 soundcard (in addition to the normal Windows soundcard) is an easy thing
 to do.  Most applications will let you select which soundcard should be
 used.

 In other words (for those using a K3), an additional soundcard may be a
 better solution than one of the Digital Interface boxes.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 On 1/9/2011 6:59 PM, Bob Naumann wrote:
 The TI-5 has a USB sound card in it. The idea is so you don't have to
 interfere with your normal computer's sound card.

 I have a TI-5 and it works nicely - although I do FSK RTTY so the 
 transmit
 levels are not something I have to mess with.

 73,

 Bob W5OV

 -Original Message-
 From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
 [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tony Estep
 Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 2:50 PM
 To: Elecraft
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

 On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Don Wilhelmw3...@embarqmail.com   
 wrote:

 ...With the K3, no digital interface is required...everything needed
 built-in, no need for a separate interface box.

 What Don said. Start out by hooking the K3 straight to the computer (3
 cables: serial, audio in, audio out) and get it working that way

Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
: Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

 On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Don Wilhelmw3...@embarqmail.com
 wrote:

 ...With the K3, no digital interface is required...everything needed
 built-in, no need for a separate interface box.

 What Don said. Start out by hooking the K3 straight to the computer (3
 cables: serial, audio in, audio out) and get it working that way. It
 will do
 all digital modes, SSB, CW, and everything else without an
 interface. Then
 you will know everything works and can adjust levels, etc. After
 that you
 can insert an interface if for some reason you need one.

 Tony KT0NY

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html




-- 
Gary
VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile
http://www.qsl.net/vk4fd/
K3 #679, P3 #546
For everything else there's Mastercard!!!
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

2011-01-09 Thread Bob Naumann
Don,

I think it's fair to say that interfacing a K3 with a USB port is easily the
most commonly occurring issue on this reflector. The infinite messages and
inquiries about what driver will work with a KUSB and the apparent change of
the KUSB hardware from Prolific to FTDI chipsets while retaining the same
part number is obviously confusing to many users.

In the case of the interface that is the subject of this thread, it greatly
simplifies all of the interfacing for all modes with the K3 to a single USB
port. The TI-5, and other Rig Expert interfaces allow the user to have one
physical USB port drive the K3 with RS232, a WinKey, PTT/CW/Soft FSK for all
modes,  hard FSK for RTTY and not have to mess around with figuring all of
those different things. It's all built-in. One of the benefits of the Rig
Expert units is that you do not need to take them out of the line to use the
K3 utility or the P3 utility to manage your K3.

Again, I have not used mine to do any of the digital modes that require the
use of audio coming from the interface so there could be an issue there, but
I suspect that there is likely a simple resolution to that problem. And yes,
I agree that support for the use of the interface should be directed to the
interface manufacturer's reflector - not here.

73,

Bob W5OV

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 7:57 PM
To: Joe Subich, W4TV
Cc: 'Elecraft'; d...@w3fpr.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/RigExpert TI-5

  Joe,

My apologies to your products, but I have been a long and strong 
believer in the KISS principle.  Keep It Simple Stupid.  Yes, there 
are accessories that make things more usable, but at the expense of 
simplicity.  Every device added to the combination of things to put a 
signal on the air adds to the complexity of the entire setup.  And that 
added complexity adds to the number of devices that can fail, and adds 
exponentially to the number of setup combinations that are possible - 
some combinations will work, others will almost work, and a lot of other 
combinations result in requests for help here on the Elecraft 
reflector.  None of those combinations are a K3 problem, but are a 
result of the complexity of the various components in the users station 
setup.

Since the K3 does support digital modes direct from a computer 
soundcard, it would be prudent IMHO for users to try that combination 
first before committing to the extra features afforded by an external 
interface box.

In two cases in the last two days, we have encountered problems on 
this reflector where the user of an external interface box had problems 
because the audio levels presented to the K3 were at microphone level 
instead of line level - simply because the interface box manufacturer 
did not consider that any transceiver would be using line level inputs.  
Your Microham interface boxes may give consideration to line level input 
(I don't know one way or the other), but many do not even consider 
anything other than mic level input.  I am not targeting the Microham 
products, but am simply indicating that many digital interface boxes do 
not consider line level audio input to the transceiver.

Again with the KISS principle, the more functions that are placed in the 
interface box, the more complex the entire station operation becomes.  
Once properly set up, it can be a benefit, but for those who are 
initially venturing into digital modes, the variety of setup tools and 
menus for a particular interface box can be overwhelming.  This is not a 
K3 problem.  Set things up using the simplest connections possible, and 
determine that the K3 works.  Then add the interface box - if it does 
not work, then it should be obvious that some setup parameter for the 
interface box is the problem and the user should direct his questions to 
the interface box reflector and not bring implications that the K3 is 
faulty.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 1/9/2011 8:06 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

 In other words (for those using a K3), an additional soundcard may be
 a better solution than one of the Digital Interface boxes.

 That depends entirely on the feature set the user needs.

 1) The K3 can not switch between soundcard input and microphone
input based on PTT source to support DVK from logging software
 2) The K3 can not automatically control band switching in an Icom
PW-1 or other CI-V compatible accessories.
 3) The K3 does not have a keyer compatible with the three major
contest loggers and several major day to day loggers.

 I'm sure I can come up with two or three more features if pressed.
 In any case, dismissing the digital interfaces rather than helping
 K3 users make their equipment coexist properly is rather short
 sighted.

 73,

... Joe Subich, W4TV
microHAM America, LLC.
http://www.microHAM-USA.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microHAM


 On 1/9