Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-22 Thread Fred Smith
Thank You Guy I could not agree more with your statement, right on the
point.

73,
Fred/N0AZZ

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Guy Olinger K2AV
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:57 PM
To: vk4tux
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

Beta firmware should not be installable by accident.  Should have to go
somewhere else on purpose,  get it on purpose and install it quite on
purpose.  Same thing for retrograde firmware.

Needing to go backward on an Elecraft firmware release is really very rare.
 Your particular issue has two sides to it as I have seen on the reflector,
and maybe a dozen or two or three out of 6000+ owners going back to 4.48.
 That is not at all to diminish the complaints, but one needs to consider
the vast majority when putting up possibilities in the main utility program.
Mostly the utility has to be designed for new builders and newbie owners.

I note that via the reflector copies of 4.48 were very quickly available.
 You guys figured it out and fixed it quite quickly.  You did not appear to
really need anything else to get squared to your satisfaction.  Try that
with other brands.

Keep the utility safe for newbies and non-technical types.

73, Guy.

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:01 PM, vk4tux vk4...@bigpond.com wrote:

 I would assume the default K3Util firmware lookup would point to;

 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/

 Could an option in K3Util provide old and beta defaults with a menu 
 select, such that to revert firmware the k3Util would look at;

 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/old/

 or to try beta;

 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/beta/

 Like a user repository select function in K3Util, giving the user 
 quick easy selection of older, current or beta firmware. The 
 programming change should be simple to enable deault ftp url links to 
 menu description.

 Is this a good idea for simplicity?

 Some op's find the download , unzip then manual browsing for other 
 than current versions, etc a bit brainswelling.

 Adrian ... vk4tux



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3Util-version-history-tp5946045p
 7561442.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at 
 Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
 list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-22 Thread Adrian
I guess it seems to be a generally bad idea with no support, but it won't be
hard for me to make up
 a selectable redirect gui script to work with it either in Linux or
windows, so I will just do that.

EOT

Adrian ... vk4tux



-Original Message-
From: Fred Smith [mailto:m...@mo-net.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2012 4:46 PM
To: 'Guy Olinger K2AV'; 'vk4tux'
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

Thank You Guy I could not agree more with your statement, right on the
point.

73,
Fred/N0AZZ

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Guy Olinger K2AV
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:57 PM
To: vk4tux
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

Beta firmware should not be installable by accident.  Should have to go
somewhere else on purpose,  get it on purpose and install it quite on
purpose.  Same thing for retrograde firmware.

Needing to go backward on an Elecraft firmware release is really very rare.
 Your particular issue has two sides to it as I have seen on the reflector,
and maybe a dozen or two or three out of 6000+ owners going back to 4.48.
 That is not at all to diminish the complaints, but one needs to consider
the vast majority when putting up possibilities in the main utility program.
Mostly the utility has to be designed for new builders and newbie owners.

I note that via the reflector copies of 4.48 were very quickly available.
 You guys figured it out and fixed it quite quickly.  You did not appear to
really need anything else to get squared to your satisfaction.  Try that
with other brands.

Keep the utility safe for newbies and non-technical types.

73, Guy.

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:01 PM, vk4tux vk4...@bigpond.com wrote:

 I would assume the default K3Util firmware lookup would point to;

 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/

 Could an option in K3Util provide old and beta defaults with a menu 
 select, such that to revert firmware the k3Util would look at;

 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/old/

 or to try beta;

 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/beta/

 Like a user repository select function in K3Util, giving the user 
 quick easy selection of older, current or beta firmware. The 
 programming change should be simple to enable deault ftp url links to 
 menu description.

 Is this a good idea for simplicity?

 Some op's find the download , unzip then manual browsing for other 
 than current versions, etc a bit brainswelling.

 Adrian ... vk4tux



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3Util-version-history-tp5946045p
 7561442.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at 
 Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
 list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-22 Thread Gary Gregory
*I have watched the thread since it appeared and I do concur with Adrian's
thinking that if an Advanced menu was to be added then I see no issue for
the newer owners whether they be new to Elecraft or the hobby.

Protecting the 'innocent' should not mean standing in the way of
progress:-)

Mine is an opinion only, and it IS mine alone perhaps, but nonetheless, I
think Adrian's idea has merit.

73's and goodnight all...
*
On 22 August 2012 17:10, Adrian vk4...@bigpond.com wrote:

 I guess it seems to be a generally bad idea with no support, but it won't
 be
 hard for me to make up
  a selectable redirect gui script to work with it either in Linux or
 windows, so I will just do that.

 EOT

 Adrian ... vk4tux



 -Original Message-
 From: Fred Smith [mailto:m...@mo-net.com]
 Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2012 4:46 PM
 To: 'Guy Olinger K2AV'; 'vk4tux'
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

 Thank You Guy I could not agree more with your statement, right on the
 point.

 73,
 Fred/N0AZZ

 -Original Message-
 From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
 [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Guy Olinger K2AV
 Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:57 PM
 To: vk4tux
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

 Beta firmware should not be installable by accident.  Should have to go
 somewhere else on purpose,  get it on purpose and install it quite on
 purpose.  Same thing for retrograde firmware.

 Needing to go backward on an Elecraft firmware release is really very rare.
  Your particular issue has two sides to it as I have seen on the reflector,
 and maybe a dozen or two or three out of 6000+ owners going back to 4.48.
  That is not at all to diminish the complaints, but one needs to consider
 the vast majority when putting up possibilities in the main utility
 program.
 Mostly the utility has to be designed for new builders and newbie owners.

 I note that via the reflector copies of 4.48 were very quickly available.
  You guys figured it out and fixed it quite quickly.  You did not appear to
 really need anything else to get squared to your satisfaction.  Try that
 with other brands.

 Keep the utility safe for newbies and non-technical types.

 73, Guy.

 On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:01 PM, vk4tux vk4...@bigpond.com wrote:

  I would assume the default K3Util firmware lookup would point to;
 
  ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/
 
  Could an option in K3Util provide old and beta defaults with a menu
  select, such that to revert firmware the k3Util would look at;
 
  ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/old/
 
  or to try beta;
 
  ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/beta/
 
  Like a user repository select function in K3Util, giving the user
  quick easy selection of older, current or beta firmware. The
  programming change should be simple to enable deault ftp url links to
  menu description.
 
  Is this a good idea for simplicity?
 
  Some op's find the download , unzip then manual browsing for other
  than current versions, etc a bit brainswelling.
 
  Adrian ... vk4tux
 
 
 
  --
  View this message in context:
  http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3Util-version-history-tp5946045p
  7561442.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at
  Nabble.com.
  __
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
  list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html




-- 
*Gary*
*Start the day off slow, then taper off.*
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-22 Thread Bruce Beford
I agree with Dick on this one as well. Guy put it well in his reply-
Installing beta firmware should be a very deliberate process, taken on by
the user who knows he is trying something that is perhaps not ready for
prime time. The process for loading beta firmware, including downloading
files, unpacking and installing is all spelled out. Perhaps this procedure
could be re-written to make it clearer for some, but it has always been fine
for me. As for this comment:
 
 ~If you keep non-technical types wrapped up in cotton wool, then how
will
 they ever become technical or real hams?
 
My answer would be, by encouraging them to learn how things work, such as
the downloading and installing of trial firmware to their radio, instead of
spoon-feeding the process behind an automated menu.
 
I think the current system of firmware distribution works well. Those who
are interested in becoming early adopters, with all the potential risks and
benefits, would be better served by having them learn how to do it properly.
I do not believe the current process is excessively burdensome. The skills
required are basic computer skills. Of course, it's only my opinion. 
FWIW es 73,
Bruce, N1RX

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-22 Thread Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft
Lets end this thread at this time.

We purposely zip the beta releases to prevent the code from being super easy to 
download or mistakenly downloaded. This is also to prevent people loading it 
thinking it is a normal release. 

Thanks for the suggestions, but we will be leaving it as is for now. (We're 
really busy on other projects too :-)

73, 

Eric

www.elecraft.com
_..._



On Aug 22, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Bruce Beford bruce.bef...@myfairpoint.net 
wrote:

 I agree with Dick on this one as well. Guy put it well in his reply-
 Installing beta firmware should be a very deliberate process, taken on by
 the user who knows he is trying something that is perhaps not ready for
 prime time. The process for loading beta firmware, including downloading
 files, unpacking and installing is all spelled out. Perhaps this procedure
 could be re-written to make it clearer for some, but it has always been fine
 for me. As for this comment:
 
 ~If you keep non-technical types wrapped up in cotton wool, then how
 will
 they ever become technical or real hams?
 
 My answer would be, by encouraging them to learn how things work, such as
 the downloading and installing of trial firmware to their radio, instead of
 spoon-feeding the process behind an automated menu.
 
 I think the current system of firmware distribution works well. Those who
 are interested in becoming early adopters, with all the potential risks and
 benefits, would be better served by having them learn how to do it properly.
 I do not believe the current process is excessively burdensome. The skills
 required are basic computer skills. Of course, it's only my opinion. 
 FWIW es 73,
 Bruce, N1RX
 
 
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-21 Thread vk4tux
I would assume the default K3Util firmware lookup would point to;

ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/

Could an option in K3Util provide old and beta defaults with a menu select,
such that to revert firmware the k3Util would look at;

ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/old/

or to try beta;

ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/beta/

Like a user repository select function in K3Util, giving the user quick easy
selection of older, current or beta firmware. The programming change should
be simple to enable deault ftp url links to menu description.

Is this a good idea for simplicity?

Some op's find the download , unzip then manual browsing for other than
current versions, etc a bit brainswelling.

Adrian ... vk4tux



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3Util-version-history-tp5946045p7561442.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-21 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
Beta firmware should not be installable by accident.  Should have to go
somewhere else on purpose,  get it on purpose and install it quite on
purpose.  Same thing for retrograde firmware.

Needing to go backward on an Elecraft firmware release is really very rare.
 Your particular issue has two sides to it as I have seen on the reflector,
and maybe a dozen or two or three out of 6000+ owners going back to 4.48.
 That is not at all to diminish the complaints, but one needs to consider
the vast majority when putting up possibilities in the main utility
program.  Mostly the utility has to be designed for new builders and newbie
owners.

I note that via the reflector copies of 4.48 were very quickly available.
 You guys figured it out and fixed it quite quickly.  You did not appear to
really need anything else to get squared to your satisfaction.  Try that
with other brands.

Keep the utility safe for newbies and non-technical types.

73, Guy.

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:01 PM, vk4tux vk4...@bigpond.com wrote:

 I would assume the default K3Util firmware lookup would point to;

 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/

 Could an option in K3Util provide old and beta defaults with a menu select,
 such that to revert firmware the k3Util would look at;

 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/old/

 or to try beta;

 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/beta/

 Like a user repository select function in K3Util, giving the user quick
 easy
 selection of older, current or beta firmware. The programming change should
 be simple to enable deault ftp url links to menu description.

 Is this a good idea for simplicity?

 Some op's find the download , unzip then manual browsing for other than
 current versions, etc a bit brainswelling.

 Adrian ... vk4tux



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3Util-version-history-tp5946045p7561442.html
 Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-21 Thread vk4tux
Answered Inline;

Beta firmware should not be installable by accident.  Should have to go
somewhere else on purpose,  get it on purpose and install it quite on
purpose.  Same thing for retrograde firmware.

~The current firmware would remain the startup default and beta or old would
need to be user selected from K3Util advanced submenu, by the user.

Needing to go backward on an Elecraft firmware release is really very rare.

~Not lately

 Your particular issue has two sides to it as I have seen on the reflector,
and maybe a dozen or two or three out of 6000+ owners going back to 4.48.
 That is not at all to diminish the complaints, but one needs to consider
the vast majority when putting up possibilities in the main utility
program.  Mostly the utility has to be designed for new builders and newbie
owners.

~The k3Utility should be designed for any K3 owner. The user selects could
be a submenu of the advanced menu. Anytime new firmware does not meet
expectations, the user should be able to easily revert back.

I note that via the reflector copies of 4.48 were very quickly available.
 You guys figured it out and fixed it quite quickly.  You did not appear to
really need anything else to get squared to your satisfaction.  Try that
with other brands.

Keep the utility safe for newbies and non-technical types.

~If there is nothing in the ftp beta folder then it can not be selected.
Elecraft obviously decide when a beta is ready for general release beyond a
test group and control what is their server.

~#Reverting to older software without downloading, unzipping and browse
located to load etc is a nice convenience.

~I have done it like # many times, and is of no issue to me however I would
be surprised if the general K3 user would not appreciate the feature (which
needs to be selected) of reverting back or trying beta software that is
available for download otherwise at Elecrafts discretion  decision to have
it available.

~If you keep non-technical types wrapped up in cotton wool, then how will
they ever become technical or real hams?

~Adrian ... vk4tux



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3Util-version-history-tp5946045p7561448.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-21 Thread Dick Dievendorff


Dick


On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:01 PM, vk4tux vk4...@bigpond.com wrote:

 I would assume the default K3Util firmware lookup would point to;
 
 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/
 
 Could an option in K3Util provide old and beta defaults with a menu select,
 such that to revert firmware the k3Util would look at;
 
 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/old/
 
 or to try beta;
 
 ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/K3/firmware/beta/
 
 Like a user repository select function in K3Util, giving the user quick easy
 selection of older, current or beta firmware. The programming change should
 be simple to enable deault ftp url links to menu description.
 
 Is this a good idea for simplicity?
 
 Some op's find the download , unzip then manual browsing for other than
 current versions, etc a bit brainswelling.
 
 Adrian ... vk4tux
 
 
 
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3Util-version-history-tp5946045p7561442.html
 Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3Util Firmware version

2012-08-21 Thread Dick Dievendorff
I'm reluctant to go this way.  We can't do this without making the choices more 
daunting for those customers that choose not to be early adopters.  The unzip 
process for beta firmware is written up on our web site. 

Dick, K6KR


On Aug 21, 2012, at 7:27 PM, vk4tux vk4...@bigpond.com wrote:

 Answered Inline;
 
 Beta firmware should not be installable by accident.  Should have to go
 somewhere else on purpose,  get it on purpose and install it quite on
 purpose.  Same thing for retrograde firmware.
 
 ~The current firmware would remain the startup default and beta or old would
 need to be user selected from K3Util advanced submenu, by the user.
 
 Needing to go backward on an Elecraft firmware release is really very rare.
 
 ~Not lately
 
 Your particular issue has two sides to it as I have seen on the reflector,
 and maybe a dozen or two or three out of 6000+ owners going back to 4.48.
 That is not at all to diminish the complaints, but one needs to consider
 the vast majority when putting up possibilities in the main utility
 program.  Mostly the utility has to be designed for new builders and newbie
 owners.
 
 ~The k3Utility should be designed for any K3 owner. The user selects could
 be a submenu of the advanced menu. Anytime new firmware does not meet
 expectations, the user should be able to easily revert back.
 
 I note that via the reflector copies of 4.48 were very quickly available.
 You guys figured it out and fixed it quite quickly.  You did not appear to
 really need anything else to get squared to your satisfaction.  Try that
 with other brands.
 
 Keep the utility safe for newbies and non-technical types.
 
 ~If there is nothing in the ftp beta folder then it can not be selected.
 Elecraft obviously decide when a beta is ready for general release beyond a
 test group and control what is their server.
 
 ~#Reverting to older software without downloading, unzipping and browse
 located to load etc is a nice convenience.
 
 ~I have done it like # many times, and is of no issue to me however I would
 be surprised if the general K3 user would not appreciate the feature (which
 needs to be selected) of reverting back or trying beta software that is
 available for download otherwise at Elecrafts discretion  decision to have
 it available.
 
 ~If you keep non-technical types wrapped up in cotton wool, then how will
 they ever become technical or real hams?
 
 ~Adrian ... vk4tux
 
 
 
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3Util-version-history-tp5946045p7561448.html
 Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html