Re: [O] org.texi edits, patch attached

[Lambda Coder]

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Could you send an updated patch?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>


See attached patch for Exporting chapter against maint. Also my notes to
your comments.

--Lambda Coder.


0002-Editorial-revisions-to-the-manual.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


20161219CommentsFromNicolas.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: [O] Remove Org from Emacs repository?

[Lambda Coder]

+1 (keep it in)

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Xebar Saram  wrote:

> +1 for keeping it in
>
> i often debug my org based init config by launching emacs -Q and its great
> to have org built in for that :)
>
> Z
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Christian Moe 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> (= Keep it in.)
>>
>> Yours,
>> Christian
>>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > I'd hate to see Org removed from Emacs.  It took a lot of work to get it
>> > in, and I believe that the vast majority of Emacs users does not install
>> > packages.  For a newbie to get to Emacs and to be able to open a .org
>> file
>> > is a big plus.  So my vote goes toward keeping it in.
>> >
>> > Carsten
>> >
>> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:22 AM,  wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2 cents from me...
>> >>
>> >> Besides I continuously see many users praising Emacs just for Org
>> >> presence (they even may be completely non-technical users), I'm
>> >> personally think Org may be removed from Emacs distribution because:
>> >>
>> >> 1) all Reuben's argument seems sane;
>> >> 2) there are situations when someone wants particular version of Org,
>> >>and it may be not tne one bundled with Emacs. In this case someone
>> >>should perform extra steps to ensure things are going the right way.
>> >>When Org will be available only from ELPA, it will be SPOT for such
>> >> cases.
>> >>
>> >> Reuben Thomas  writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Now that Emacs has had package.el for some years, and Org is
>> installable
>> >> > directly from GNU ELPA, would it be a good idea to remove Org from
>> >> Emacs's
>> >> > source repository?
>> >> >
>> >> > The current situation is left over from before Emacs had package.el,
>> and
>> >> I
>> >> > see no compelling reason to keep it. Org is too big and distinct to
>> be
>> >> > swallowed by Emacs; it doesn't make much sense to keep its current
>> >> half-in,
>> >> > half-out state; so logically it seems sensible to take it out.
>> >> >
>> >> > I am asking this question from an Org point of view; I will ask the
>> Emacs
>> >> > maintainers separately for their perspective.
>> >> >
>> >> > I think it would benefit Emacs too, as there would be less code to
>> >> maintain
>> >> > (even though Org is quasi-external at present, it still has to build
>> >> > successfully as part of an Emacs build), and the Emacs distribution
>> would
>> >> > be slimmer for non-Org users.
>> >> >
>> >> > Of course, Emacs "distributions" would still be able to include Org
>> >> > out-of-the box if they wished.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > http://rrt.sc3d.org
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [O] org.texi edits, patch attached

[Lambda Coder]

Thanks.

I have more. I've just finished the Exporting chapter. See the attached
patch file against current maint branch.

Best wishes,

--Lambda Coder.

On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Lambda Coder <sjlam...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > See the attached patch file diff'd against maint.
>
> Applied. Thank you for all that work.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>


0001-Editorial-revisions-to-the-manual.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: [O] org.texi edits, patch attached

[Lambda Coder]

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

>
> Could you send an updated patch?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>


See the attached patch file diff'd against maint. I've also attached a
separate file that has your comments and my responses. Hope they are
self-explanatory.

--Lambda Coder.


0001-doc-org-texi.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


20161123CommentsFromNicolas.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: [O] org.texi edits, patch attached

[Lambda Coder]

Nicolas, attached is the revised edits for:

* Working with source code (2nd review)
* Miscellaneous
* Hacking
* MobileOrg

The patch is against maint branch from today.

Best wishes,

--Lambda Coder

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Lambda Coder <sjlam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Nicolas for pushing the 1st set of edits.
>
> Attached I have a 2nd set of edits for the same chapter. Cleaned up
> references mainly.
>
> This patch is based off maint branch. Hope it's easier for you this time.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> --Lambda Coder
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Lambda Coder <sjlam...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Do you prefer future edits against master or maint branch? It was not
>> clear
>> > when I asked the very first time.
>>
>> Documentation fixes usually go to maint, unless they refer to
>> a master-only feature, obviously.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas Goaziou
>>
>
>


0001.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: [O] org.texi edits, patch attached

[Lambda Coder]

Thanks Nicolas for pushing the 1st set of edits.

Attached I have a 2nd set of edits for the same chapter. Cleaned up
references mainly.

This patch is based off maint branch. Hope it's easier for you this time.

Best wishes,

--Lambda Coder


On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Lambda Coder <sjlam...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Do you prefer future edits against master or maint branch? It was not
> clear
> > when I asked the very first time.
>
> Documentation fixes usually go to maint, unless they refer to
> a master-only feature, obviously.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>


0001-Working-with-source-code-2nd-revision.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: [O] org.texi edits, patch attached

[Lambda Coder]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> It didn't so I used the latter and applied your changes. I also added
> a changelog.
>

Thanks.

Do you prefer future edits against master or maint branch? It was not clear
when I asked the very first time.

--Lambda Coder.

Re: [O] org.texi edits, patch attached

[Lambda Coder]

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

> Could you send an updated patch?
>
> Nicolas Goaziou
>

Yes, see attached patch 2.

--Lambda Coder.


0002-doc-org.texi-Editorial-revisions-to-the-manual.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: [O] org.texi edits, patch attached

[Lambda Coder]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:

>
> If your FSF papers are in order, could you send an updated patch?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>

I've attached an updated patch file to this msg.

--Lambda Coder.


0001-doc-org.texi-Editorial-revisions-to-the-manual.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data

[O] org.texi edits, patch attached

[Lambda Coder]

Attached is a patch submission for org.texi file. Sorry for the large size
of the attachment. I am posting to this list on Bastien's suggestion.

The edits mainly pertain to org-babel, which is where most of my time is
spent these days. This patch is an attempt to make the documentation more
consistent with the rest of gnu manuals. Comments and suggestions welcome.

--sjlam...@gmail.com


0001-Documentation-edits.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data