Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?

2013-06-10 Thread Carsten Dominik

On 10 jun. 2013, at 07:39, Andreas Röhler  wrote:

> Issue doesn't show up with Emacs built from trunk

Thank your for following up, Andreas.

- Carsten


> 
> GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.18) of 2013-06-07
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas
> 




Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?

2013-06-09 Thread Andreas Röhler

Issue doesn't show up with Emacs built from trunk

GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.18) of 2013-06-07

Thanks,

Andreas




Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?

2013-06-06 Thread Andreas Röhler

Am 06.06.2013 10:56, schrieb Carsten Dominik:





The star, `*', introducing the header below. Which get's killed.



I am not able to reproduce this.

- Carsten



Thanks,

Andreas






Okay, registered a kbd-macro which restores the star.  Fine for me.


I would still be interested if anyone else sees this problem.

- Carsten



Thanks again,

Andreas







Provided stars making a header --by replacing the diffs header--, but did not 
indent the following section. Might be related to this.

Andreas



Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?

2013-06-06 Thread Andreas Röhler

Am 06.06.2013 10:44, schrieb Carsten Dominik:


On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:30, Andreas Röhler  wrote:


Am 06.06.2013 10:11, schrieb Carsten Dominik:


On 6 jun. 2013, at 09:58, Andreas Röhler  wrote:


Hi,

I'm misusing org-mode for a review of (slightly transformed) diffs as below.
When done, want to delete the current section.

Unfortunatly a call of M-x `org-cut-subtree' not just deletes the current 
section, but also
deletes the header-start of section beneath.



Hi Andreas,

I am not sure I understand the problem.  What do you mean by header-start of 
section?

- Carsten




The star, `*', introducing the header below. Which get's killed.



I am not able to reproduce this.

- Carsten



Thanks,

Andreas






Okay, registered a kbd-macro which restores the star.  Fine for me.

Thanks again,

Andreas





Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?

2013-06-06 Thread Carsten Dominik

On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:56, Andreas Röhler  wrote:

> Am 06.06.2013 10:44, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
>> 
>> On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:30, Andreas Röhler  
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 06.06.2013 10:11, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
 
 On 6 jun. 2013, at 09:58, Andreas Röhler  
 wrote:
 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm misusing org-mode for a review of (slightly transformed) diffs as 
> below.
> When done, want to delete the current section.
> 
> Unfortunatly a call of M-x `org-cut-subtree' not just deletes the current 
> section, but also
> deletes the header-start of section beneath.
 
 
 Hi Andreas,
 
 I am not sure I understand the problem.  What do you mean by header-start 
 of section?
 
 - Carsten
 
 
>>> 
>>> The star, `*', introducing the header below. Which get's killed.
>> 
>> 
>> I am not able to reproduce this.
>> 
>> - Carsten
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Andreas
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Okay, registered a kbd-macro which restores the star.  Fine for me.

I would still be interested if anyone else sees this problem.

- Carsten

> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 




Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?

2013-06-06 Thread Carsten Dominik

On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:30, Andreas Röhler  wrote:

> Am 06.06.2013 10:11, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
>> 
>> On 6 jun. 2013, at 09:58, Andreas Röhler  
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I'm misusing org-mode for a review of (slightly transformed) diffs as below.
>>> When done, want to delete the current section.
>>> 
>>> Unfortunatly a call of M-x `org-cut-subtree' not just deletes the current 
>>> section, but also
>>> deletes the header-start of section beneath.
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Andreas,
>> 
>> I am not sure I understand the problem.  What do you mean by header-start of 
>> section?
>> 
>> - Carsten
>> 
>> 
> 
> The star, `*', introducing the header below. Which get's killed.


I am not able to reproduce this.

- Carsten

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas
> 




Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?

2013-06-06 Thread Andreas Röhler

Am 06.06.2013 10:11, schrieb Carsten Dominik:


On 6 jun. 2013, at 09:58, Andreas Röhler  wrote:


Hi,

I'm misusing org-mode for a review of (slightly transformed) diffs as below.
When done, want to delete the current section.

Unfortunatly a call of M-x `org-cut-subtree' not just deletes the current 
section, but also
deletes the header-start of section beneath.



Hi Andreas,

I am not sure I understand the problem.  What do you mean by header-start of 
section?

- Carsten




The star, `*', introducing the header below. Which get's killed.

Thanks,

Andreas




Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?

2013-06-06 Thread Carsten Dominik

On 6 jun. 2013, at 09:58, Andreas Röhler  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm misusing org-mode for a review of (slightly transformed) diffs as below.
> When done, want to delete the current section.
> 
> Unfortunatly a call of M-x `org-cut-subtree' not just deletes the current 
> section, but also
> deletes the header-start of section beneath.


Hi Andreas,

I am not sure I understand the problem.  What do you mean by header-start of 
section?

- Carsten


> 
> A bug? Better ways to do this?
> 
> TIA,
> 
> Andreas
> 
> ;;
> 
> * mlib_ImageAffineTransform_Fp.3mlib.vorher   2013-06-05 21:13:34.285757559 
> +0200
> +++ mlib_ImageAffineTransform_Fp.3mlib.nachher2013-06-05 
> 21:13:40.824756887 +0200
> 
> -   mtx   Transformation matrix. mtx[0] holds a; mtx[1] holds b; 
> mtx[2]
> - holds tx; mtx[3] holds c; mtx[4] holds d; mtx[5] holds ty.
> +   mtx   Transformation  matrix.   mtx[0]  holds  a;  mtx[1]  holds 
> b;
> + mtx[2] holds tx; mtx[3] holds c; mtx[4] holds d; mtx[5] 
> holds
> + ty.
> 
>filterType of resampling filter. It can be one of the following:
> 
> * mlib_ImageAffineTransform.3mlib.vorher  2013-06-05 21:36:17.119617652 
> +0200
> +++ mlib_ImageAffineTransform.3mlib.nachher   2013-06-05 21:36:19.487617409 
> +0200
> @@ -52,8 +52,9 @@
>src   Pointer to source image.
> 
> -   mtx   Transformation matrix. mtx[0] holds a; mtx[1] holds b; 
> mtx[2]
> - holds tx; mtx[3] holds c; mtx[4] holds d; mtx[5] holds ty.
> +   mtx   Transformation matrix.   mtx[0]  holds  a;  mtx[1]  holds  
> b;
> + mtx[2] holds tx; mtx[3] holds c; mtx[4] holds d; mtx[5] 
> holds
> + ty.
> 
>filterType of resampling filter. It can be one of the following:
> 




[O] org-cut-subtree, bug?

2013-06-06 Thread Andreas Röhler

Hi,

I'm misusing org-mode for a review of (slightly transformed) diffs as below.
When done, want to delete the current section.

Unfortunatly a call of M-x `org-cut-subtree' not just deletes the current 
section, but also
deletes the header-start of section beneath.

A bug? Better ways to do this?

TIA,

Andreas

;;

* mlib_ImageAffineTransform_Fp.3mlib.vorher 2013-06-05 21:13:34.285757559 
+0200
+++ mlib_ImageAffineTransform_Fp.3mlib.nachher  2013-06-05 21:13:40.824756887 
+0200

-   mtx   Transformation matrix. mtx[0] holds a; mtx[1] holds b; mtx[2]
- holds tx; mtx[3] holds c; mtx[4] holds d; mtx[5] holds ty.
+   mtx   Transformation  matrix.   mtx[0]  holds  a;  mtx[1]  holds b;
+ mtx[2] holds tx; mtx[3] holds c; mtx[4] holds d; mtx[5] holds
+ ty.

filterType of resampling filter. It can be one of the following:

* mlib_ImageAffineTransform.3mlib.vorher2013-06-05 21:36:17.119617652 
+0200
+++ mlib_ImageAffineTransform.3mlib.nachher 2013-06-05 21:36:19.487617409 
+0200
@@ -52,8 +52,9 @@
src   Pointer to source image.

-   mtx   Transformation matrix. mtx[0] holds a; mtx[1] holds b; mtx[2]
- holds tx; mtx[3] holds c; mtx[4] holds d; mtx[5] holds ty.
+   mtx   Transformation matrix.   mtx[0]  holds  a;  mtx[1]  holds  b;
+ mtx[2] holds tx; mtx[3] holds c; mtx[4] holds d; mtx[5] holds
+ ty.

filterType of resampling filter. It can be one of the following: