Upgrades
Please can you give me some opinions on the following. I have a customer who has one of our Scientific instruments that he wishes to upgrade. If I supply him with CE marked everything to allow him to carry out this up grade and I also provide him with a detailed manual on how to install and connect up these items to be emc compatible. Do my responsibilities end there and does the customer have to get the instrument re tested and CE mark it? Regards Brian Harlowe * opinions expressed here are personal and in no way reflect the position of VG Scientific - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: Upgrades
Brian, I have to assume that as the manufacturer, your company has taken on the responsibility of ensuring compliance with the directives, applied the CE mark and issued the Declaration. Now you want to sell an upgrade to the equipment. Nothing has changed. You the manufacture are still responsible for ensuring compliance of the upgraded equipment. If the original Declaration did not cover these options, then a new Declaration will be required for the upgraded equipment. Since the upgrades are expressly intended for use with your equipment and not sold on the open market, I don't believe that they need to be CE marked. -- From: Brian Harlowe [SMTP:bharl...@vgscientific.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 1999 11:57 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Upgrades Please can you give me some opinions on the following. I have a customer who has one of our Scientific instruments that he wishes to upgrade. If I supply him with CE marked everything to allow him to carry out this up grade and I also provide him with a detailed manual on how to install and connect up these items to be emc compatible. Do my responsibilities end there and does the customer have to get the instrument re tested and CE mark it? Regards Brian Harlowe * opinions expressed here are personal and in no way reflect the position of VG Scientific - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: Upgrades
Brian, I agree with Richard. However, I would like to add one thing. In ensuring continued compliance on your products, I would assume (only because this is what I do) that you at least verified (on a similar in-house sample of the product) that the upgrades did not detrimentily affect the product's original compliance. This should be well documented and placed in your product's compliance folder. John A. Juhasz Product Qualification Compliance Engr. Fiber Options, Inc. 80 Orville Dr. Suite 102 Bohemia, NY 11716 USA Tel: 516-567-8320 ext. 324 Fax: 516-567-8322 -Original Message- From: WOODS, RICHARD [mailto:wo...@sensormatic.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 1999 12:26 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Upgrades Brian, I have to assume that as the manufacturer, your company has taken on the responsibility of ensuring compliance with the directives, applied the CE mark and issued the Declaration. Now you want to sell an upgrade to the equipment. Nothing has changed. You the manufacture are still responsible for ensuring compliance of the upgraded equipment. If the original Declaration did not cover these options, then a new Declaration will be required for the upgraded equipment. Since the upgrades are expressly intended for use with your equipment and not sold on the open market, I don't believe that they need to be CE marked. -- From: Brian Harlowe [SMTP:bharl...@vgscientific.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 1999 11:57 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Upgrades Please can you give me some opinions on the following. I have a customer who has one of our Scientific instruments that he wishes to upgrade. If I supply him with CE marked everything to allow him to carry out this up grade and I also provide him with a detailed manual on how to install and connect up these items to be emc compatible. Do my responsibilities end there and does the customer have to get the instrument re tested and CE mark it? Regards Brian Harlowe * opinions expressed here are personal and in no way reflect the position of VG Scientific - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: That doesn't make any sense
A few years back with another company I was in one of these situations. Soon after the EMC Directive went into effect, I spent days at the direction of a manager trying to provide proof that our product legally only needed to meet Class A for Europe. In the end, none of this mattered, because the end customer (large telecom company) insisted on Class B and would accept nothing else. I have since found that regulatory issues are almost always customer issues. Managers and business people understand this. No one wants to be selling a product that doesn't meet all the applicable safety or EMC requirements. Competitors would have a heyday with it. Darrell Locke -- From: Schanker, Jack To: ri...@sdd.hp.com Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: That doesn't make any sense List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Friday, July 30, 1999 6:36AM Rich: I want to thank you, and compliment you, for so accurately describing managment reactions to regulatory problems in your July 20 posting to the emc-pstc. It completely mirrors my own past (and continuing) experiences. I have also gotten the reaction well, that doesn't make any sense in relation to an inconvenient rule in some international standard. Why did they do that ? is asked, like I should know. Then the big question: Can we get a waiver? Dialogue: No, I don't think so. Manager: Did you try? The years of experience and intuitive feel for what is and what is not possible, mean little to the uninformed arrogance of a manager who is used to having it his way (almost always his) and expecting the world to turn at his command. The bad news aspect also looms large, as you so aptly describe. Gotta get back to work. Jack Jacob Z. Schanker, P.E. Director of Agency Compliance Adaptive Broadband Corporation 175 Science Parkway Rochester, NY 14620 USA +716 242 8454 (voice) +716 241 5590 (fax) jschan...@adaptivebroadband.com The opinions expressed above are obviously someone else's. - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
FW: cost effective EMC facility
Hi, guys: Thanks you very much for your reply to my question regarding cost effective EMC facility. Your suggestions/opinions are very helpful for me to find out the right thing for our organization. It seems that compact anechoic chamber are favoured by many of you. I will try to look for more information about the chamber, in particular the cost, and see whether my manager are willing to invest the money. Best Regards Qu Pingyu - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: cost effective EMC facility
Arun: I was just struck by what you said about setup a Sea Plane or a salt water based site . Has anyone ever set up an OATS using salt water as the ground plane? Talk about excellent surface smoothness, easy to level and cheap material, plus simple repair! (Uhh, could we say it fixes itself?) Just what conductivity would be enough? Could we get enough conductivity before we reach salt saturation? I suppose the upper limit on surface area would be when we get to the point of the wind causing surface ripples. Or gravitational tides. Turntables might be a lot cheaper, too. Just a thin raft that floats. Seriously, has anyone tried this for an OATS? (I seem to recall the US Navy had a really big ship simulator here in San Diego, where they placed scale models of ships on a sheet-steel sea in order to model HF wire antennas.) Regards, Ed :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-): -):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-) Ed Price ed.pr...@cubic.com Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab Cubic Defense Systems San Diego, CA. USA 619-505-2780 (Voice) 619-505-1502 (Fax) Military Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-): -):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-) -Original Message- From: Arun Kaore [SMTP:kao...@sg.adi-limited.com.au] Sent: Sunday, August 01, 1999 6:05 PM To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org' Subject: FW: cost effective EMC facility IMHO, there is no cost effective EMC facility, but you don't have to spend all your bucks all in the one day. A sound and well managed EMC business growth program could see you through. Start off with pre compliance and eventually branch off into formal compliance (by drafting up a Quality System to ISO 25 or whatever, a few test procedures and a few Quality and third party Technical Audits) Buy a 2nd hand shielded room today with a view to lining it with ferrite tiles and/or RAM material such that you meet the Radiated Immunity 16 point check for immunity and alternative sites 3 m NSA for emissions. Initial RE prescans could be done here. Buy a 26 GHz cheap ($25000/-!!) analyser (without preselector) driven by software for now and then go for a $10/- preselectable receiver suitable for formal CISPR measurements and also MIL 462 related work. Start off with a chicken wire mesh car park OATS and improve later; not much hope in Singapore because of the ambients, but you could always go to Malaysia or setup a Sea Plane or a salt water based site (you will get very good NSA, probably won't need NSA). Lastly, performing ESD, EFT and Surge tests in a shielded room/ anechoic chamber will make you very popular among your colleagues because of the additional filtering within the shielded room. Regards Arun Kaore EMC Engineer ADI Limited Systems Group Test Evaluation Centre Forrester Road, St Marys NSW 2760 P O Box: 315, St Marys NSW 1790 Tel: 61 2 9673 8375 Fax: 61 2 9673 8321 Email: kao...@sg.adi-limited.com.au mailto:kao...@sg.adi-limited.com.au -Original Message- From: Qu Pingyu [SMTP:pin...@ime.org.sg] mailto:[SMTP:pin...@ime.org.sg] Sent: Friday, 30 July, 1999 18:38 To: 'emc' Subject: cost effective EMC facility Hello, everyone: I posted an question several weeks ago asking about GTEM. Thanks those who share with me your experience. I may not address my problem very clearly thus I would like to come back to you one more time. We are a R D orgnization in Singapore mainly dealing with semiconductor industry. Since there are some requirements from our industry partners in the area of EMC design, we are considering setting up some EMC measurement capabilities. At the intial stage, we will only consider equipment for radiated emission/susceptibility testing. Our objective is to evaluate the EMC performance of the product from our customers, being of PCB level or system level. Based on those results, we can help our customers to improve their product EMC design so that their product can pass the final compliance testing. The EUT could be small, such as integrated circuits on PCB, but it can also be large such as a PC. Due to our budget constraint, I think GTEM maybe a good choice. Do you guys agree ? If not, any other suggestions ? Thanks in advance. Best Regards Qu Pingyu - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org mailto:majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com mailto:ed.pr...@cubic.com , jim_bac...@monarch.com mailto:jim_bac...@monarch.com , ri...@sdd.hp.com mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com , or roger.volgst...@compaq.com mailto:roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This
RE: Rockwell Modem, need info.?
Hi George, I my experience, I have used the UL Yellow books to verify UL recognition and to determine which standards it is recognized to. If I still have trouble, I have called UL direct, and they have always been helpful. Ray rayruss...@gastmfg.com -Original Message- From: sparaci...@andovercontrols.com [mailto:sparaci...@andovercontrols.com] Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 10:43 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Rockwell Modem, need info.? Good Day Everyone, I'm having a heck of a time getting compliance information from Rockwell regarding one of their Socket Modems (SMV144AC series). We incorporratte this modem onto our motherboard. Simply, I need to know if the Rockwell modem that we use in our product has been recognized to either UL 1459 or UL 1950. I would like to treat the modem as a recognized component in my system. No compliance info on their literature, so I contacted the local Rockwell office in Littleton, Ma. and they referred me back to our distributor who has not been able to get a response back from Rockwell... Also, I contacted Rockwell headquarters in Newport Beach, CA ... they referred me to their local office in Littleton. Are we sensing a pattern here ?? If anyone has the name contact info of someone at Rockwell that can help, please forward to me. Thanks for any help you can give me have a Great Weekend. George - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: EMC Safety Standards
My comments are embedded below. -- From: Muriel Bittencourt de Liz [SMTP:mur...@grucad.ufsc.br] Sent: Monday, August 02, 1999 2:43 PM To: Lista de EMC da IEEE Subject: EMC Safety Standards Dear Group, I'm making a study on EMC Safety Standards, and some questions appeared. I'd like to post them to the group to see if someone can help me. The questions are: # Safety standards seem only to aim the protection the equipment... And the operator/user of the equipment? Is there any standard for protection of the user/operator? The international safety standard that is used for Information Technology Equipment and Business Equipment is IEC950. Many countries have adopted this standard as their national standard. The objective of the standard is to prevent all types of hazards including electrical shock, fire, mechanical, chemical, thermal and radiation hazards. The protection applies to the operator and to service persons. # The VCCI Standard is more restrictive than the European Norms (ENs)?? I understand that the VCCI standards are EMC standards. Japan has adopted IEC safety standards including IEC950. However, as many countries do, they have introduced national deviations. You would have to compare Japan's deviations to those of the EU to determine how they affect your equipment. All of these deviations may be found in the CB Bulletin which is published by the IEC. # Is there any standard which covers the effects of Non-Ionizing Radiation (Electromagnetic Radiation) on the human health? ICNIRP Guidelines:1998 IEEE C95.1:1991 ENV 50166-1:1995 ENV 50166-2:1995 NRPB Vol 4. No. 5:1993 VDE 0848-2:1982 VDE0848-4:1989 ACGIH Guidelines:1999 I think that's all... Thanks in advance for those who can help! Best Regards, Muriel -- == Muriel Bittencourt de Liz GRUCAD - Grupo de Concepção e Análise de Dispositivos Eletromagnéticos Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Caixa Postal - 476 88040-900 - Florianópolis - SC - BRASIL Fone: +55.48.331.9649 - Fax: +55.48.234.3790 e-mail: mur...@grucad.ufsc.br ICQ#: 9089332 - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
EMC Safety Standards
Dear Group, I'm making a study on EMC Safety Standards, and some questions appeared. I'd like to post them to the group to see if someone can help me. The questions are: # Safety standards seem only to aim the protection the equipment... And the operator/user of the equipment? Is there any standard for protection of the user/operator? # The VCCI Standard is more restrictive than the European Norms (ENs)?? # Is there any standard which covers the effects of Non-Ionizing Radiation (Electromagnetic Radiation) on the human health? I think that's all... Thanks in advance for those who can help! Best Regards, Muriel -- == Muriel Bittencourt de Liz GRUCAD - Grupo de Concepção e Análise de Dispositivos Eletromagnéticos Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Caixa Postal - 476 88040-900 - Florianópolis - SC - BRASIL Fone: +55.48.331.9649 - Fax: +55.48.234.3790 e-mail: mur...@grucad.ufsc.br ICQ#: 9089332 - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
Australia vs. New Zealand
Greetings, Does anyone know what the differences there are between the New Zealand and Australian EMC regulations? I know they are trying to harmonize but if someone could either tell me or point me to a web page it would certainly be appreciated. Thanks, Dan ___ Daniel W. Biggs Test Engineer HW Development Process Engineering Services daniel.bi...@cho.ge.com GE Fanuc Automation PO Box 8106 Charlottesville, VA 22906 PH: (804) 978-6946 Fax: (804) 978-5588 - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
Bellcore Production Requirements
All, I have been asked by my supervisor to find out if there is a Bellcore (Telcordia) specification for production procedures and practices. I know there was one at one time but am not sure if it remains. The question he asked me was Does the Bellcore specification for ambient temperature change during burn-in of equipment, that will be sale to a customer, limit the change to .5 degrees Celsius per minute? I know the requirements for GR-63 but am wondering about manufacturing requirements. Thanks for your time, Rob Graff rgr...@corvis.com - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: NSA (using acid)
Muriatic acid is made up of 50% HCl (hydrochloric acid) and 50% water. Diluting it with water is fine. Thanks, Mike Cantwell, PE RheinTexas, Inc. Suite 150 1701 East Plano Parkway Plano, TX 75074 mailto:mcantw...@rheintexas.com Web Site: http://www.RheinTech.com Tel: (972) 509-2566 Fax: (972) 509-0073 -Original Message- From: Brian At Work [SMTP:bkundew...@qtm.net] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 1999 3:20 PM To: EMC and Safety list Subject:Re: NSA (using acid) A quick question. Between the muriatic acid and the acid flux that is used to clean the screen material, will water dilute the acid good enough to stop its reaction or should you use something like soda to counteract it? One responder said not to use water but to just blow it off with compressed air. Won't the acid continue to eat away at the material? Thanks, Brian - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majordomo@ieee .org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: Public Telephone access
Doug, virtually every country in the world has its own regulations. My recommendation is that you obtain an external modem in each target country/area. The best source of information would be to contact a large modem company. Check Compliance Engineering magazine. I have seen some consultants listed there. -- From: POWELL, DOUG [SMTP:doug.pow...@aei.com] Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 7:19 PM To: 'emc-pstc' Subject: Public Telephone access Hello group, Recently I was reviewing a new product that my company plans to manufacture. It has an industrial CPU board and a modem daughter board. During the review my safety consultant brought up the concept that not all public access telephone systems are the same and we would need a modem card that is approved for use in each country where we sell our product. My compliance experience is mainly in power delivery system and this is new to me. The consultant said that an ISDN compatible card would take care of most of Europe but was unsure about the rest of the world. I was hoping one (or more) of you could tell me where I can begin searching for information on this topic, web or otherwise. Thanks, -doug === Douglas E. Powell, Compliance Engineer Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 USA --- 970-407-6410 (phone) 970-407-5410 (e-fax) mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com http://www.advanced-energy.com === - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
FW: cost effective EMC facility
IMHO, there is no cost effective EMC facility, but you don't have to spend all your bucks all in the one day. A sound and well managed EMC business growth program could see you through. Start off with pre compliance and eventually branch off into formal compliance (by drafting up a Quality System to ISO 25 or whatever, a few test procedures and a few Quality and third party Technical Audits) Buy a 2nd hand shielded room today with a view to lining it with ferrite tiles and/or RAM material such that you meet the Radiated Immunity 16 point check for immunity and alternative sites 3 m NSA for emissions. Initial RE prescans could be done here. Buy a 26 GHz cheap ($25000/-!!) analyser (without preselector) driven by software for now and then go for a $10/- preselectable receiver suitable for formal CISPR measurements and also MIL 462 related work. Start off with a chicken wire mesh car park OATS and improve later; not much hope in Singapore because of the ambients, but you could always go to Malaysia or setup a Sea Plane or a salt water based site (you will get very good NSA, probably won't need NSA). Lastly, performing ESD, EFT and Surge tests in a shielded room/ anechoic chamber will make you very popular among your colleagues because of the additional filtering within the shielded room. Regards Arun Kaore EMC Engineer ADI Limited Systems Group Test Evaluation Centre Forrester Road, St Marys NSW 2760 P O Box: 315, St Marys NSW 1790 Tel: 61 2 9673 8375 Fax: 61 2 9673 8321 Email: kao...@sg.adi-limited.com.au mailto:kao...@sg.adi-limited.com.au -Original Message- From: Qu Pingyu [SMTP:pin...@ime.org.sg] mailto:[SMTP:pin...@ime.org.sg] Sent: Friday, 30 July, 1999 18:38 To: 'emc' Subject:cost effective EMC facility Hello, everyone: I posted an question several weeks ago asking about GTEM. Thanks those who share with me your experience. I may not address my problem very clearly thus I would like to come back to you one more time. We are a R D orgnization in Singapore mainly dealing with semiconductor industry. Since there are some requirements from our industry partners in the area of EMC design, we are considering setting up some EMC measurement capabilities. At the intial stage, we will only consider equipment for radiated emission/susceptibility testing. Our objective is to evaluate the EMC performance of the product from our customers, being of PCB level or system level. Based on those results, we can help our customers to improve their product EMC design so that their product can pass the final compliance testing. The EUT could be small, such as integrated circuits on PCB, but it can also be large such as a PC. Due to our budget constraint, I think GTEM maybe a good choice. Do you guys agree ? If not, any other suggestions ? Thanks in advance. Best Regards Qu Pingyu - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org mailto:majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com mailto:ed.pr...@cubic.com , jim_bac...@monarch.com mailto:jim_bac...@monarch.com , ri...@sdd.hp.com mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com , or roger.volgst...@compaq.com mailto:roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
Reliability MIL HDBK 217
Hello all I am overwhelmed with the help I got from you all, this short note is to express my thanks !! Regards Arun Kaore EMC Engineer ADI Limited Systems Group Test Evaluation Centre Forrester Road, St Marys NSW 2760 P O Box: 315, St Marys NSW 1790 Tel: 61 2 9673 8375 Fax: 61 2 9673 8321 Email: kao...@sg.adi-limited.com.au mailto:kao...@sg.adi-limited.com.au - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
