Re: Flow Meter EMC requirements
For the US, it is likely that your equipment falls under Part 15 Subpart B or Part 18 of the rules. For the EU, it is likely that your equipment falls under the generic emission and immunity requirements. Further information about your product is required. Part 15 is for unintentional radiating digital devices that use timing signals in excess of 9kHz and uses digital techniques for the purpose of performing data processing functions such as electronic computations, data processing, storage, retrieval, transfer etc.. Does your flow meter perform these type of functions? Does it have or connect to a computer? If not it likely falls under part 18. Furthermore, and not withstanding the answers to the above, if the device is used exclusively as industrial, commercial, or medical test equipment, then it is exempt from part 15 and will fall under part 18. However, it is also likely that for this type of equipment, the test requirements (radiated and AC line conducted emissions) will be the same whether part 15 or 18, assuming that the device does not intentionally generate RF energy for the purpose of mechanical vibration, ionizing gases, accelerating particles etc.. To that end, I will guess that your device falls under Part 18 and is further classified under part 18.203(b) - non-consumer ISM equipment, which requires "verification" under part 2 subpart J. No evolvement by the FCC is required. For the EU: Your equipment falls under the product family standard EN 61326 (Electrical equipment for measurement, control and laboratory use - EMC requirements). Legally however, you may claim EMC compliance by applying the generic emission and immunity standards EN 50081-2 and EN 50082-2 until July 1, 2001. Further information about your product is necessary to determine all the tests that would be required. For example: is it AC and/or DC powered and does it have long distance lines or I/O cables longer than 3 meters? The above is for EMC compliance only. There is safety issues as well. The CE mark presumes compliance with all applicable directives. If you don't get further info you can call our lab 919-554-0901. Regards, Dale Albright President EMC International, Inc. -Original Message- From: chasgra...@aol.com To: emc-p...@ieee.org List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 3:04 PM Subject: Flow Meter EMC requirements > >Does anyone know what EMC standards are required >for flow meters? > >Does it fall under Part15 for FCC >CE Mark - What testing is required?? > >Thanks > >- >This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. >To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org >with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the >quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, >jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or >roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). > > - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: 90V & 47Hz - Is this a realistic combo
Ages ago when I worked at another company that shipped products to Japan, their unwritten rule was to design in power supplies that operated without problems at 85 Vac, and that had better be designed/tested down to 80 Vac, because of the continued brown-out conditions in Japan. It seems nothing much has changed. I don't remember what was stated about the frequency tolerance. Tania Grant, tgr...@lucent.com Lucent Technologies, Communications Applications Group -- From: geor...@lexmark.com [SMTP:geor...@lexmark.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 10:34 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: 90V & 47Hz - Is this a realistic combo See the website below for global mains voltage/frequencies: http://www.panelcomponents.com/guide.htm The most notable example listed would be Japan, 100V @ 50Hz, or 90V @ 47Hz under usual tolerances of -10% and -3Hz respectively. George Alspaugh Lexmark International Inc. -- Forwarded by George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark on 11/03/99 01:31 PM --- grassc%louisville.stortek@interlock.lexmark.com on 11/03/99 12:59:30 PM Please respond to grassc%louisville.stortek@interlock.lexmark.com To: emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: 90V & 47Hz - Is this a realistic combo Hello standards sages.. We have a product that "stumbles" when the input voltage/freq is 90V/47Hz. My question is.. Is this a reasonable test combo? Does anyone know of a country that falls in this range? - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
Re: 90V & 47Hz - Is this a realistic combo
Hi Chaz, I'm sure the folks in Japan would certainly think it to be reasonable. Power there is supplied at 100V 50Hz & 100V 60Hz depending where in Japan you happen to be. Common input test conditions at 100V 50Hz line voltage would be +6% (106V 53Hz) and -10% (90V 47Hz). As you can see, very realistic. I also believe that Japan is the only country with such a power distribution. Best regards, Ron Pickard rpick...@hypercom.com "Grasso, Charles (Chaz)" To: "'EMC Group'" Subject: 90V & 47Hz - Is this a realistic combo Sent by: owner-emc-pstc@ieee.o rg 11/03/99 10:59 AM Please respond to "Grasso, Charles (Chaz)" Hello standards sages.. We have a product that "stumbles" when the input voltage/freq is 90V/47Hz. My question is.. Is this a reasonable test combo? Does anyone know of a country that falls in this range? - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: Modem FCC type approval
If I am not mistaken, I believe your friend will need FCC Part 68. Best regards, Henry E. Green Gateway -Original Message- From: Terry Meck [mailto:tjm...@accusort.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 1:31 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject:Modem FCC type approval Hello all: A friend asked me today if he could purchase a transformer that has `FCC type approval' and use it to connect to the phone line. He's an old AM Radio engineer. I told him about the safety issues as outlined in the Sept/Oct `Compliance / Engineering' Magazine but he was more interested in the FCC regulations on connecting to the phone line. On this I am ignorant. We have avoided designing modems always purchase approved parts. Any input will be appreciated. Thanks! Best regards, Terry J. Meck Senior Compliance/Test Engineer Phone:215-721-5280 Fax:215-721-5551 hard copy; Fax PC: 215.799.1650 To my desk PC tjm...@accusort.com Accu-Sort Systems Inc. 511 School House Rd. Telford, PA 18969-1196 USA - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
Flame retardants; PBBs, PBDEs etc...
PSNet, et al, This arguement over the use of Brominated flame retaredants has been going on for over 10 years... Yes, some Euro environmentalists have been pushing on this for a long time... The technical issue is that any replacement materials don't seem to work as well or are considerably more expensive... so the practical resolution hinges upon continuing development of appropriate additives to plastic materials, including circuit boards, to maintain the fire retardant properties needed for protection in the equipment... There is no doubt that this will be eventually worked out... so far, manufacturers do not seem to be jumping at the use of expensive, alternative materials available... From an equipment manufacturer's point of view don't panic, one should probably wait and let the materials suppliers work thru the political and technical issues for some time... Europeans won't shut down progress overnite... besides, there's plenty of market in the rest of the world - which isn't so fussy at this point... - - - - - Peter E Perkins Principal Product Safety Consultant Tigard, ORe 97281-3427 +1/503/452-1201 phone/fax p.perk...@ieee.org email visit our website: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/peperkins - - - - - - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
Re: 90V & 47Hz - Is this a realistic combo
Charles, 47 Hz is a bit silly, since no power grid in the world uses this frequency. Perhaps a private motor generator ... But if you are using a switching power supply, the input frequency is not usually important. However, 90 V is reasonable. Some countries, like Japan, have a nominal voltage of 100 V, so you would be expected to operate normally at -10% (at least). In fact, Std. 950, and others, require testing at -10%. Cheers, Egon :-) At 03:59 PM 03/11/1999 , you wrote: Hello standards sages.. We have a product that "stumbles" when the input voltage/freq is 90V/47Hz. My question is.. Is this a reasonable test combo? Does anyone know of a country that falls in this range? __ Egon H. Varju, PEng E.H. Varju & Associates Ltd. North Vancouver, Canada Tel: 1 604 985 5710 HAVE MODEM Fax: 1 604 273 5815 WILL TRAVEL E-mail: e...@varju.bc.ca var...@csa.ca __ - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
Re: Chamber Grounding
Here's my two cents worth: 1) If I interpret you correctly, a green wire connection from the power grid has not been made to the room. This could conceivably be a safety issue. If you don't believe me, measure resistance between your dedicated chamber ground rod and the facility rod closest to you (I've done this, and even after a good rain I measure open circuit). In my chamber, I connected the power grid safety ground to the room AT THE SAME POINT at which I connected the ground rod. You can say it is a ground loop, but it does not generate power frequency currents flowing on the room surface, which is the only reason I can think of for maintaining an spg. There is absolutely no reason for maintaining a chamber spg for measurements made between 30 - 1000 MHz. 2) If you plan on running magnetic measurements at power frequencies per MIL-STD-461 RE01 or commercial variations thereof, then an spg is mandatory in order not to pollute your ambient. Of course, you also have to watch your instrumentation grounding if the room has another connection to earth ground. You cannot both connect coax at a grounded chamber feedthrough connector and to a grounded spectrum analyzer chassis outside the chamber. -- >From: umbdenst...@sensormatic.com >To: emc-p...@ieee.org >Subject: FW: Chamber Grounding >Date: Wed, Nov 3, 1999, 6:25 AM > > > >> Our chamber is grounded/isolated per the instructions of the vendor. We >> have one copper clad ground rod installed through a hole drilled in the >> slab adjacent to the corner of the semi-anechoic chamber. Other grounds >> are isolated from the chamber (conduits, air pipes, water pipes, service >> entrance safety ground, etc.). The ground comes from the ground rod, not >> the service entrance. >> >> 1) Is "single-point-ground" as described above for Tempest? Is the >> degree of isolation useful for typical commercial work? The chamber spec >> is 100 dB isolation. For our immediate work, 60 dB of isolation is >> adequate. Is there any correlation between chamber isolation and >> effectiveness of the ferrites for the uniform field required for immunity >> testing? Is there some other observable sensitivity such as degraded RF >> measurements that would result from not observing the isolation? What >> would the manifestations be? >> >> 2) Using the isolation as described above, has anyone experience ground >> loop problems between the service entrance power and the local chamber >> power distribution due to the "single point ground" concept defined above? >> >> >> >> Don Umbdenstock >> Sensormatic >> > > - > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, > jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or > roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). > > - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
RE: PBBs (Polybrominated Biphenyls), and PBDEs (polybrominated d iphe nyl ethers).
Yes, these are used as flame retardants in some plastics. Check with the resin manufacturers, they should know about it. GE Plastics for instance, has published a document stating which plastics have the PBBs. Darrell Locke Advanced Input Devices -- From: Crane, Lauren To: s...@world.std.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: PBBs (Polybrominated Biphenyls), and PBDEs (polybrominated diphe nyl ethers). List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 8:56AM The European Commission is contemplating a directive (the WEEE directive) that, in its current draft, will require a phase out of the use of some substances typically found in electronic devices, including PBBs (Polybrominated Biphenyls), and PBDEs (polybrominated diphenyl ethers). I wonder if these chemicals are the ones typically used to provide printed circuit boards with their flame retardant qualities (i.e. UL 94-V0 rating). Does anyone out there know? Best Regards, Lauren Crane Eaton Corporation. - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
Re: Flow Meter EMC requirements
The definition of a Digital deveice per FCC part 15.3 is: " Digital device. (Previously defined as a computing device.) An unintentional radiator (device or system) that generates and uses timing signals or pulses at a rate in excess of 9,000 pulses (cycles) per second and uses digital techniques; inclusive of telephone equipment that uses digital techniques or any device or system that generates and uses radio frequency energy for the purpose of performing data processing functions, such as electronic computations, operations, transformations, recording, filing, sorting, storage, retrieval, or transfer. A radio frequency device that is specifically subject to an emanation requirement in any other FCC Rule part or an intentional radiator subject to Subpart C of this part that contains a digital device is not subject to the standards for digital devices, provided the digital device is used only to enable operation of the radio frequency device and the digital device does not control additional functions or capabilities." If your flow meter matches this definition and does not fall into the exemption listed in: "15.103 Exempted devices. - The following devices are subject only to the general conditions of operation in ยงยง15.5 and 15.29 and are exempt from the specific technical standards and other requirements contained in this part. The operator of the exempted device shall be required to stop operating the device upon a finding by the Commission or its representative that the device is causing harmful interference. Operation shall not resume until the condition causing the harmful interference has been corrected. Although not mandatory, it is strongly recommended that the manufacturer of an exempted device endeavor to have the device meet the specific technical standards in this part. (a) A digital device utilized exclusively in any transportation vehicle including motor vehicles and aircraft. (b) A digital device used exclusively as an electronic control or power system utilized by a public utility or in an industrial plant. The term public utility includes equipment only to the extent that it is in a dedicated building or large room owned or leased by the utility and does not extend to equipment installed in a subscriber's facility. (c) A digital device used exclusively as industrial, commercial, or medical test equipment. (d) A digital device utilized exclusively in an appliance, e.g., microwave oven, dishwasher, clothes dryer, air conditioner (central or window), etc. (e) Specialized medical digital devices (generally used at the direction of or under the supervision of a licensed health care practitioner) whether used in a patient's home or a health care facility. Non-specialized medical devices, i.e., devices marketed through retail channels for use by the general public, are not exempted. This exemption also does not apply to digital devices used for record keeping or any purpose not directly connected with medical treatment. (f) Digital devices that have a power consumption not exceeding 6 nW. (g) Joystick controllers or similar devices, such as a mouse, used with digital devices but which contain only non-digital circuitry or a simple circuit to convert the signal to the format required (e.g., an integrated circuit for analog to digital conversion) are viewed as passive add-on devices, not themselves directly subject to the technical standards or the equipment authorization requirements. (h) Digital devices in which both the highest frequency generated and the highest frequency used are less than 1.705 MHz and which do not operate from the AC power lines or contain provisions for operation while connected to the AC power lines. Digital devices that include, or make provision for the use of, battery eliminators, AC adaptors or battery chargers which permit operation while charging or that connect to the AC power lines indirectly obtaining their power through another device which is connected to the AC power lines, do not fall under this exemption. (i) Responsible parties should note that equipment containing more than one device is not exempt from the technical standards in this part unless all of the devices in the equipment meet the criteria for exemption. If only one of the included devices qualifies for exemption, the remainder of the equipment must comply with any applicable regulations. If a device performs more than one function and all of those functions do not meet the criteria for exemption, the device does not qualify for inclusion under the exemptions." Then FCC Part 15 applies, and EMI testing in accordance with ANSI C63.4 is required. Regards, chasgra...@aol.com on 11/03/99 12:08:12 PM Please respond to chasgra...@aol.com Sent by: chasgra...@aol.com To: emc-p...@ieee.org cc:(Wolfgang Josenhans/MW/US/3Com) Subject
RE: Chamber Grounding
Don, scott has a good point: if you use a single point grount you might as well use an isolation transformer to put the room on its own ground. This is a great way to set up yur room, but it can lead to the problems scott mentioned and one other big one: if your room is on its own ground (i.e. has its own power) and the rest of your lab runs off the building's power, you can ruin a receiver or spectrum analyzer when you try to connect it to a feed thru on the room's wall. In our lab, we took extreme measures to avoid this. You would have to REALLY TRY to power an instrument from anything other than the shielded room's power. You would have to move a safe or a refrigerator before you could do it wrong. We have had lots of clients thru our lab in the ten plus years we've been in there, and have never had a problem. Most of these are young "hands on" type engineers too. They like to twist knobs and try things, vs. just watching us work. We encourage them to do that but brief them when they come in, then we make it almost impossible for them to mess up. So far, so good! :) lou At 10:49 AM 11/3/1999 -0500, you wrote: > >Don, > >One other point that needs mentioning re. chamber grounding is the safety >issue. When our chamber was installed, the electrician connected a #6 ground >wire to an existing bus block that is wired to a driven rod in the basement. >While working above the chamber he got a nasty shock when he came into >contact with a metal air-conditioning duct. A piece of metal conduit with >one end pressing against the chamber wall would exhibit a fat blue spark >when the other end touched any grounded metal. It turned out that the ground >rod clamp had become corroded. The leakage current from the line filters >supplying the chamber is several amperes, which certainly could be lethal. > >Your single-point ground should be carefully checked (and periodically >rechecked). I would recommend connecting the wire to the rod using TWO >clamps of the one-piece type for redundancy. Conductive grease helps prevent >corrosion. > >Scott Lacey > > -Original Message- > From: umbdenst...@sensormatic.com >[SMTP:umbdenst...@sensormatic.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 9:25 AM > To: emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject:FW: Chamber Grounding > > > > > Our chamber is grounded/isolated per the instructions of the >vendor. We > > have one copper clad ground rod installed through a hole drilled >in the > > slab adjacent to the corner of the semi-anechoic chamber. Other >grounds > > are isolated from the chamber (conduits, air pipes, water pipes, >service > > entrance safety ground, etc.). The ground comes from the ground >rod, not > > the service entrance. > > > > 1) Is "single-point-ground" as described above for Tempest? Is >the > > degree of isolation useful for typical commercial work? The >chamber spec > > is 100 dB isolation. For our immediate work, 60 dB of isolation >is > > adequate. Is there any correlation between chamber isolation and > > effectiveness of the ferrites for the uniform field required for >immunity > > testing? Is there some other observable sensitivity such as >degraded RF > > measurements that would result from not observing the isolation? >What > > would the manifestations be? > > > > 2) Using the isolation as described above, has anyone experience >ground > > loop problems between the service entrance power and the local >chamber > > power distribution due to the "single point ground" concept >defined above? > > > > > > > > Don Umbdenstock > > Sensormatic > > > > - > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, > jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or > roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). > > >- >This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. >To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org >with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the >quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, >jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or >roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). > > - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
NPSS 5th Annual Vendors' Night - Two Weeks from Today
Hello fellow PSTC'ers, It's only two weeks until the 5th Annual Vendor's Night will be held at the Holiday Inn in Marlborough MA. If you or your colleagues are in the area - don't miss the singularly best Product Safety Show in the USA. Lot's of EMC resources too. Our tables (50 of them) are Sold-Out!!! The general announcement below has been updated (check it out to see who's exhibiting). We'd truly hope this will be a memorable event for both visitors and exhibitors. Your presence will contribute to success of the evening. The Buffet Dinner is Free to NPSS Members and available at a nominal cost to others. You can register on our Webpages at: Regards, Art Michael, President - Northeast Product Safety Society, Inc. - The NORTHEAST PRODUCT SAFETY SOCIETY, Inc. Invites you to attend our 5th Annual Vendors' Night November 17, 1999 FREE Admission!! SAVE THIS DATE!! 5:00 p.m. Registration & FREE Appetizers, Courtesy - Intertek Testing Services 5:30Exhibition Opens 6:00-7:30 Buffet Dinner, Registration Info Below 9:00Exhibition Closes - Deli Buffet, Coffee and Dessert FREE to NPSS Members and at a Reduced Rate to others Holiday Inn Hotel and Suites 265 Lakeside Ave, Marlborough MA Junction of Routes I-495 and US20, Exit 24A, - Visit with Agencies, Test Labs, Consultants & Suppliers of product safety & EMC components, materials, services and test equipment. The following list includes nearly all of this year's exhibitors and is offered to give you a sense of the quality and breadth of exhibitors who support our event. APM, AFI LLC, Associated Research, Bell Controls, BSI Testing, CE Magazine, CSA International, Chomerics - Seal Div. Compliance Worldwide, Conformity Magazine, Conti-Younger/Corcom, Connors Co., Contact East, Curtis-Straus, Detecon, Educated Design & Dev't, EMC Test Systems, EmScan, Entela, Ergonomics, Inc., EuroPort/EUROCONSULT, FairRite Products, FM Research, Haefely Trench, Boston IEEE-EMC Society, Integrity Design & Test, Int'l Product Safety News, Intertek Testing Services, KeyTek, Lucent Technologies, M.Swank Associates, Marathon Sales, M.A.Lamothe & Associates, National Technical Systems, Olsen Technical Sales/Panel Components Corp, Panashield, QuadTech, Quantum Change EMC Systems, Quest Engineering, Retlif Testing Labs, San-O Industrial Corp., Schaffner, Schlegel Systesm, Scientific Devices NE, Stratus Test Labs, Synergistic Component Sales, Tektronix, TuV Essen, TuV Product Service, TuV Rheinland of NA, UL, Voltech Instruments, Wayne Kerr Electronics, WW Wilson Associates's and more __ Meet and network with your friends, colleagues and vendors. For additional information visit NPSS's Website: http://www.safetylink.com/#NPSS * For Buffet reservations; To reserve your place at the Deli Buffet, just go to and complete the Dinner Reservation form found there. * Vendors: To reserve your table/s, or for further information; Contact, Robert O. Chaplis, NPSS Treasurer and Chair for this event. Additional Vendor information can be found at the website address noted above. Ph (978) 589-7597, Fx (978) 589-7007, Em chapl...@genrad.com NPSS, Inc. (a 501(3)(c) Corp.) REF:vnite1199.txt (11/02/99) Please post or distribute a copy of this notice wherever others who might be interested in attending the show will see it. ThanX, AEM/NPSS, Inc. - This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
