[PSES] Canada/IC Import Restrictions Compared to US/FCC

2013-07-10 Thread Schroeder, Ian
Hello All-
I am looking for information regarding any import restrictions Canada/IC may 
have that are similar to the US/FCC rules from Part 2.
Specifically the importation of devices that are not fully tested or certified 
but will not be offered for sale (ex: fill the local warehouse in preparation 
of distribution and sale).

In the US FCC Part 2 allows importation of 4000 units prior to equipment 
authorization, just wondering if Canada/IC have a similar law on the books.

Thanks

Ian Schroeder

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


[PSES]

2013-07-10 Thread Paasche, Dieter
SET EMC-PSTC MAIL


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


[PSES] Fixed Installation vs Apparatus

2013-07-10 Thread Paasche, Dieter
Hi group,

At which point could you define a piece of machinery a fixed Installation?

What are the differences in reference to EMC testing? It looks to me that 
regardless of a piece of machinery being  considered an apparatus or a fixed 
installation, it still has to be tested to comply with EMC requirements.

Thanks

Dieter Paasche


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] Fixed Installation vs Apparatus

2013-07-10 Thread John Woodgate
In message 99532047d6a52847ab271f822ae9efdcacc10...@cktexmb01.cds.int, 
dated Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Paasche, Dieter 
dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com writes:


At which point could you define a piece of machinery a fixed 
Installation?


 

What are the differences in reference to EMC testing? It looks to me 
that regardless of a piece of machinery being  considered an apparatus 
or a fixed installation, it still has to be tested to comply with EMC 
requirements.


 
The Directive and the Guide make it quite reasonably clear about the 
difference between a product (one of a kind) and a fixed installation 
(something unique).

--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Why is the stapler always empty just when you want it?

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] Fixed Installation vs Apparatus

2013-07-10 Thread Paasche, Dieter
Hi ,

I have the feeling I am still in the grey area, mainly in the definition of 
what is a mobile system.

Also, the guidelines mentions in section 1.3.1 (4th Paragraph) that Large 
machines, in the usual sense of this term, are normally apparatus and have to 
be treated as such.

In my opinion, if the machine has its own control panel and can operate its 
function independently, then it is to be considered as an apparatus. Am I wrong?

It looks however from John's comments that a machine is a fixed installation, 
if it is custom made and there will never be another machine like that in 
another place. So, if I have two of the same machines in different locations, 
then they are not fixed installation. Is that correct?

In any case, apparatus and fixed installation reference Article 5, so strictly 
speaking from the testing point of view, both have to be tested for EMC. Is 
that correct?

Thanks

Dieter Paasche


From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@complianceinsight.ca]
Sent: July 10, 2013 2:37 PM
To: Paasche, Dieter
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fixed Installation vs Apparatus

Dieter,

Have a look at the attached Guidance document from the EC. On page 15, Section 
1.1.5 and flowchart 2 show how to determine whether the equipment is apparatus 
or a fixed installation.

Regards,

Doug NIX, C.E.T.
Compliance InSight Consulting Inc.

Know Risk... Design Safety

Office: +1 (519) 650-4753
Mobile: +1 (519) 729-5704
Skype: cic-inc
email: d...@complianceinsight.camailto:d...@complianceinsight.ca
Want to meet?http://doodle.com/DougNix

On 10-July-2013, at 14:22, Paasche, Dieter 
dieter.paas...@christiedigital.commailto:dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com 
wrote:


Hi group,

At which point could you define a piece of machinery a fixed Installation?

What are the differences in reference to EMC testing? It looks to me that 
regardless of a piece of machinery being  considered an apparatus or a fixed 
installation, it still has to be tested to comply with EMC requirements.

Thanks

Dieter Paasche

-


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.orgmailto:emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.netmailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.orgmailto:mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.orgmailto:j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.commailto:dhe...@gmail.com


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] Fixed Installation vs Apparatus

2013-07-10 Thread Douglas Nix
Dieter,

IMO, the key words are ...intended to be used permanently at a predefined 
location. If the machine could be purchased by any customer and used in any 
location, even if it's a one-off, then it is apparatus under the definitions in 
the directive. If it can only be installed in one location and is designed 
specifically for that location and application, then it would be a fixed 
installation under the definition.

Based on my knowledge of your company's products, I don't think anything you 
normally build would meet the definition for a fixed installation. I am 
available to discuss on the phone if you want to chat about it.

Regards,

Doug NIX, C.E.T.
Compliance InSight Consulting Inc.

Know Risk... Design Safety

Office: +1 (519) 650-4753
Mobile: +1 (519) 729-5704
Skype: cic-inc
email: d...@complianceinsight.ca
Want to meet?

On 10-July-2013, at 16:49, Paasche, Dieter 
dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com wrote:

 Hi ,
  
 I have the feeling I am still in the grey area, mainly in the definition of 
 what is a mobile system.
  
 Also, the guidelines mentions in section 1.3.1 (4th Paragraph) that “Large 
 machines, in the usual sense of this term, are normally apparatus and have to 
 be treated as such.”
  
 In my opinion, if the machine has its own control panel and can operate its 
 function independently, then it is to be considered as an apparatus. Am I 
 wrong?
  
 It looks however from John’s comments that a machine is a fixed installation, 
 if it is custom made and there will never be another machine like that in 
 another place. So, if I have two of the same machines in different locations, 
 then they are not fixed installation. Is that correct?
  
 In any case, apparatus and fixed installation reference Article 5, so 
 strictly speaking from the testing point of view, both have to be tested for 
 EMC. Is that correct?
  
 Thanks
  
 Dieter Paasche
  
  
 From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@complianceinsight.ca] 
 Sent: July 10, 2013 2:37 PM
 To: Paasche, Dieter
 Subject: Re: [PSES] Fixed Installation vs Apparatus
  
 Dieter,
  
 Have a look at the attached Guidance document from the EC. On page 15, 
 Section 1.1.5 and flowchart 2 show how to determine whether the equipment is 
 apparatus or a fixed installation.
  
 Regards,
  
 Doug NIX, C.E.T.
 Compliance InSight Consulting Inc.
  
 Know Risk... Design Safety
  
 Office: +1 (519) 650-4753
 Mobile: +1 (519) 729-5704
 Skype: cic-inc
 email: d...@complianceinsight.ca
 Want to meet?
  
 On 10-July-2013, at 14:22, Paasche, Dieter 
 dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com wrote:
 
 
 Hi group,
  
 At which point could you define a piece of machinery a fixed Installation?
  
 What are the differences in reference to EMC testing? It looks to me that 
 regardless of a piece of machinery being  considered an apparatus or a fixed 
 installation, it still has to be tested to comply with EMC requirements.
  
 Thanks
  
 Dieter Paasche
  
 -
 
 This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
 discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
 emc-p...@ieee.org
 
 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
 http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
 
 Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
 http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
 formats), large files, etc.
 
 Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
 Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
 List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
 Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
 Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
 David Heald dhe...@gmail.com
 
  
 -
 
 This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
 discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
 emc-p...@ieee.org
 
 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
 http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
 
 Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
 http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
 formats), large files, etc.
 
 Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
 Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
 List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
 Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
 Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org
 David Heald dhe...@gmail.com
 


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All 

[PSES] Keytek PK1001D diff probe

2013-07-10 Thread Doug Powell
All,

Does anyone happen to know where I can find a specificaiton or data sheet
for the Keytek PK1001D 6kV differential probe that includes the input
impedance?

I thought this would be easy but it's turning into a challenge.

Thanks,

-doug

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com