RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-21 Thread Peter Tarver

Doug -

I was in no way implying the flaw was yours.  The flaw lies
in the practical implementation of the system.

Peter

 -Original Message-
 From: Massey, Doug C. [mailto:masse...@ems-t.com]
 Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:40 AM

 Peter - I humbly submit that there is no 'flaw'
 in reminding folks that
 audits do happen and that they may be subject to
 one, however rare they may
 be.

 Doug Massey


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-21 Thread Massey, Doug C.

Peter - I humbly submit that there is no 'flaw' in reminding folks that
audits do happen and that they may be subject to one, however rare they may
be. I don't argue that the agency is understaffed and overworked, and is
more concerned with laser light shows and medical device lasers than with
low-power, visible laser devices.

Regards,

Doug Massey
Lead Regulatory Engineer
LXE, Inc.

-Original Message-
From: Peter Tarver [mailto:peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:52 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Cc: Massey, Doug C.
Subject: RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions


All -

The only flaw with this is that, based on my previous
discussions with CDRH folks, they have very few auditors and
no budget to hire more (this was a few years ago).
Therefore, by their admission, the primary methods of
keeping manufacturers and importers honest is

1) trust in the manufacturer's basic honesty

2) complaints from competitors, customers, etc.

3) field incidents

Their primary concern was keeping up with the laser light
shows, which they said they could not set aside auditing on
(and for good reason).

As a test of the presumption, has anyone on this list ever
had a CDRH auditor in their facility, other than related to
a laser light show?


Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Massey, Doug C.
 Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:51 AM

 Hi Jeffrey,
 I've seen answers to this post regarding
 enforcement of the IEC standard, as
 well as to the CDRH rules. However, no one has
 mentioned FDA audits.

 The FDA does conduct periodic audits at the
 manufacturer's location as
 reported in the Product Reports and Annual
 Reports submitted to them. The
 auditor will check record keeping, quality
 control, and product design
 aspects such as proper labeling. My company has
 been producing laser
 products for many years, and only one audit has
 been conducted, that anyone
 can remember. I was the representative during
 that audit, and I commend the
 auditor on his professionalism and thoroughness.
 The auditor was a pleasure
 to work with, but he was very thorough. Rather
 than a 'let me see what I can
 nail you on' attitude, the auditor I dealt with
 had a 'let me see if I can
 help you improve your compliance process'
 attitude. The auditor will call
 ahead and let you know the date for the audit -
 an appreciated courtesy, but
 the date is not negotiable.

 Note that the FDA only has jurisdiction over
 manufacturing locations within
 the US. That's why it falls largely to customs to
 enforce imported goods, I
 presume. It is also noteworthy that the FDA has a
 very broad scope and
 generally has much bigger fish to fry than a
 manufacturer of low-power laser
 devices - I think that's why the frequency of
 audits for manufacturers like
 us is so low. You may never have the pleasure.

 For complete information about penalties and
 other administrative topics,
 check
 http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/radhlth/fdcact5c.html ,
 the Electronic Product
 Radiation Control section of the Federal Food,
 Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
 Section 360pp covers Enforcement and Penalties.

 Hope this helps.

 Doug Massey
 Lead Regulatory Engineer
 LXE, Inc.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-14 Thread Peter Tarver

All -

The only flaw with this is that, based on my previous
discussions with CDRH folks, they have very few auditors and
no budget to hire more (this was a few years ago).
Therefore, by their admission, the primary methods of
keeping manufacturers and importers honest is

1) trust in the manufacturer's basic honesty

2) complaints from competitors, customers, etc.

3) field incidents

Their primary concern was keeping up with the laser light
shows, which they said they could not set aside auditing on
(and for good reason).

As a test of the presumption, has anyone on this list ever
had a CDRH auditor in their facility, other than related to
a laser light show?


Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Massey, Doug C.
 Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:51 AM

 Hi Jeffrey,
 I've seen answers to this post regarding
 enforcement of the IEC standard, as
 well as to the CDRH rules. However, no one has
 mentioned FDA audits.

 The FDA does conduct periodic audits at the
 manufacturer's location as
 reported in the Product Reports and Annual
 Reports submitted to them. The
 auditor will check record keeping, quality
 control, and product design
 aspects such as proper labeling. My company has
 been producing laser
 products for many years, and only one audit has
 been conducted, that anyone
 can remember. I was the representative during
 that audit, and I commend the
 auditor on his professionalism and thoroughness.
 The auditor was a pleasure
 to work with, but he was very thorough. Rather
 than a 'let me see what I can
 nail you on' attitude, the auditor I dealt with
 had a 'let me see if I can
 help you improve your compliance process'
 attitude. The auditor will call
 ahead and let you know the date for the audit -
 an appreciated courtesy, but
 the date is not negotiable.

 Note that the FDA only has jurisdiction over
 manufacturing locations within
 the US. That's why it falls largely to customs to
 enforce imported goods, I
 presume. It is also noteworthy that the FDA has a
 very broad scope and
 generally has much bigger fish to fry than a
 manufacturer of low-power laser
 devices - I think that's why the frequency of
 audits for manufacturers like
 us is so low. You may never have the pleasure.

 For complete information about penalties and
 other administrative topics,
 check
 http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/radhlth/fdcact5c.html ,
 the Electronic Product
 Radiation Control section of the Federal Food,
 Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
 Section 360pp covers Enforcement and Penalties.

 Hope this helps.

 Doug Massey
 Lead Regulatory Engineer
 LXE, Inc.


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-13 Thread Massey, Doug C.

Hi Jeffrey,
I've seen answers to this post regarding enforcement of the IEC standard, as
well as to the CDRH rules. However, no one has mentioned FDA audits.

The FDA does conduct periodic audits at the manufacturer's location as
reported in the Product Reports and Annual Reports submitted to them. The
auditor will check record keeping, quality control, and product design
aspects such as proper labeling. My company has been producing laser
products for many years, and only one audit has been conducted, that anyone
can remember. I was the representative during that audit, and I commend the
auditor on his professionalism and thoroughness. The auditor was a pleasure
to work with, but he was very thorough. Rather than a 'let me see what I can
nail you on' attitude, the auditor I dealt with had a 'let me see if I can
help you improve your compliance process' attitude. The auditor will call
ahead and let you know the date for the audit - an appreciated courtesy, but
the date is not negotiable. 

Note that the FDA only has jurisdiction over manufacturing locations within
the US. That's why it falls largely to customs to enforce imported goods, I
presume. It is also noteworthy that the FDA has a very broad scope and
generally has much bigger fish to fry than a manufacturer of low-power laser
devices - I think that's why the frequency of audits for manufacturers like
us is so low. You may never have the pleasure. 

For complete information about penalties and other administrative topics,
check http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/radhlth/fdcact5c.html , the Electronic Product
Radiation Control section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Section 360pp covers Enforcement and Penalties.

Hope this helps.


Re: (More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-12 Thread John Juhasz

With regards to EN-60825, I would tend to believe (I did not want to say
'assume') that the
enforcement parallels the that for CE marking - customs, market
surveillance, customer/competitor
complaints, etc. 

In the US I would say it's 'the Feds'  -  21CFR 1040 is a 'Code of Federal
Regulations'. In this
case it would be agents from the FDA. But taking Doug McKean's response into
consideration,
focusing on OFCS, we can also include NRTLs in enforcement of compliance -
at least with
respect to the 'initial' compliance of the product. 

In the ITE standards (950, 1950, 60950) section 4.3.12 references lasers,
and notes that
equipment shall be so designed that harmful effects to persons and
materials affecting
safety are prevented  . . .or something of that sort. In this case the NRTL
(at least the
big one that I use) would want to verify this - using 21CFR 1040 and EN
60825 as
their guide. I have had to provide not only the 'document received' letter
with accession
number from the CDRH, but also with the report that I filed. My listing was
contingent upon providing that supporting info. If you going to incorporate,
and not
modify an already classified laser, you would have submit that component
manufacturer's
supporting data.

While perhaps a definitive enforcement 'Agency X' does not exist, there are
hurdles that
need to be cleared. And considering today's economy, I wouldn't think any of
our employers would want to have trouble with 'the Feds'.

Just my own opinions . . . .

John Juhasz
Fiber Options
Div. of GE Interlogix
Bohemia, NY

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-12 Thread Peter Tarver

Jeffery -

I have no answer to the enforcement question for the US, but
I suspect it's complaint and incident driven, as the EMC
regulations historically have been.

For NRTLs, the acceptance of previously certified Class I
lasers incorporated into other equipment is based on CDRH
Laser Notice 42, available as a part of all Laser Notices at

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/radhlth/pdf/laspol01.pdf

Links to other useful information is available at

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/radhlth/index.html


Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com

 -Original Message-
 From: Collins, Jeffrey
 Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 7:32 PM

 Hello Group,

 There was a lot of good dialog recently regarding
 laser safety. Thanks to
 all that participated

 Questions:

 Who enforces the FDA CDRH 1040.1 laser safety
 standards in the US?

 How is it enforced?

 What are the penalties for noncompliance?

 Who enforces the IEC or EN 60825 laser safety
 standards in Europe /
 Globally?

 How is it enforced?

 What are the penalties for noncompliance?


 My questions are stemming from the Class 1 or 1M
 laser safety requirements
 particularly in Telecom networks.
 Some NRTL's and CAB's do not require or do not
 enforce their clients doing a
 submittal ( To the FDA ) for installing these
 types of laser products in
 your equipment. Their decision was based on your
 company using a class 1
 laser that carries a current NRTL / CAB safety
 certification which was not
 modified from it's original design when installed
 into your products.

 Thanks in advance,

 Jeffrey Collins


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: ( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-12 Thread Doug McKean

I don't know.  That's a very interesting question. 

For each separate title in the CFRs there's a 
separate federal enforcement agency. 
CFR Title 47 Telecommunications is the FCC. 
CFR Title 29 Labor (or workplace stuff) is OSHA, etc ... 
and thus CFR Title 21 Food and Drugs is FDA. 

That's what happens when new laws come into 
effect - they try to determine if an enforcement 
agency already exists.  If there is none, then they 
have to start up a whole new agency. That's why 
the FCC was started (as were others) when the 
law was passed regarding telecommunications. 
So that's why CFR Title 47 is FCC country and 
CFR Title 21 is FDA country and the two don't mix. 

Keep in mind that although the laser laws are 
obviously written for laser safety, much of it is 
actually for the medical field as well as experimental 
scientific stuff where the potential for immediate 
and permanent harm is present. 

The OSHA requirement specifically addresses 
equipment being approved by an NRTL. But, 
with laser products and systems, you apply to 
the FDA. The FDA is not an NRTL. And it 
will never be since NRTLs are approved by 
OSHA.  The FDA and OSHA are enforcement 
federal agencies in parallel with each other and 
don'tapprove each other's methods. 

And you get nothing back from the FDA except some 
letter acknowledging your submittal.  Nothing else. 
There's no approval to speak of.  Certainly if you 
misrepresent your laser product or system and some 
unfortunate incident were to happen, you would most 
likely be charged with something from the FDA itself. 
But not limited to the FDA. 

The radiological side of things are also touched on 
by something like 1950 which probably does borrow 
from the FDA.  And since 1950 is used by NRTLs 
for product compliance, maybe that's how OSHA 
might also get involved. 

It sounds as though if you're unfortunate to have 
some accident befall you, you could potentially get 
multiple hits from several different federal agencies. 

I don't know Jeff.  Like to hear the others about this. 

Regards, Doug McKean 



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: ( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-12 Thread CherryClough
Don't forget the European Product Liability Directive (85/374/EEC amended by 
99/34/EC) and General Product Safety Directive (92/59/EEC).

Neither of these require any approvals or markings, but both require that the 
state of the art in safety engineering is applied, and this implies the use 
of all relevant standards, whether harmonised or not, and world-class expert 
knowledge where international standards are incomplete or inappropriate.

Note that both of them include civil liability requirements that can see 
companies held liable for unlimited financial penalties without the injured 
party having to prove that the product actually caused the injury. 
This is variously known as no-fault liability or strict liability, and 
the larger your company is, the more likely it is to be a target for no-win 
no-fee lawyers.

Whether you complied with these directives or not is determined by a court 
while you are being sued. It is getting more and more difficult, I am told, 
for manufacturer to make a successful defence.

The UK's implementation of the Product Liability directive is the 1987 
Consumer Protection Act. A useful guide to this used to be found at: 
http://www.lowpay.gov.uk/access/consumer/intro.html. 

The UK's implementation of the GPSD is the 'General Product Safety 
Regulations 1994', and a guide used to be available at: 
http://www.dti.gov.uk/access/safreg94/foreword.html#1 .

All the very best!
Keith Armstrong
www.cherryclough.com

In a message dated 12/03/02 15:30:57 GMT Standard Time, 
andrew_car...@uk.xyratex.com writes:

 Subj:RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions
 Date:12/03/02 15:30:57 GMT Standard Time
 From:andrew_car...@uk.xyratex.com (Andrew Carson)
 Sender:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
 Reply-to: A 
 HREF=mailto:andrew_car...@uk.xyratex.com;andrew_car...@uk.xyratex.com/A 
 (Andrew Carson)
 To:jcoll...@ciena.com (Collins, Jeffrey), emc-p...@ieee.org
 
 Jeff
 
 In response the second part of your question on who enforces EN60825
 within Europe. If the laser device is used on a product that falls under
 on of the CE (or New Approach Directives ) eg. The LVD. Then the
 enforcement will be like any other CE marked goods. Which varies from
 country to country, bt for the UK the CE mark is watched over by the
 Depeartment of Trade and Industy and the The Office of Trading
 Standards. 
 
 Now complaice to a CE marking directive carries penalities ranging from
 Finess, porduct recal and worst case upto 2 years jail time for the
 person signing the DOC. The enforcement is made agaist the perosn, not
 the company.
 
 Starngely though, if your Laser porduct does not fall under a CE
 directive, there is no piece of European legistation saying it needs to
 meet EN60825, beyond the old Product Safety Directive (Which does not
 require a CE mark).
 
 In your case, if you are incororating an already CDRH registered Class 1
 device into your product without alteration. Then you do not need to re
 register your overall product. This is covered by a CDRH notice to the
 laser industry No. 42.
 
 Andrew Carson - Senior Compliance Engineer, Xyratex, UK
 
 Phone: +44 (0)23 9249 6855 Fax: +44 (0)23 9249 6014
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com] 
 Sent: 12 March 2002 13:22
 To: Collins, Jeffrey; emc-p...@ieee.org
 Subject: RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions
 
 
 I believe that OSHA enforces the CDRH laser safety guidelines in the
 workplace.  I'm not sure about consumer goods...Possibly the Consumer
 Product Safety Commission?
 
 Penalties for non-compliance would be the typical fines, recalls ...
 handed out by OSHA or CPSC.
 
  -Original Message-
  From:Collins, Jeffrey [SMTP:jcoll...@ciena.com]
  Sent:Monday, March 11, 2002 10:32 PM
  To:'emc-p...@ieee.org'
  Subject:( More)  Laser Safety Questions
  
  
  Hello Group,
  
  There was a lot of good dialog recently regarding laser safety. Thanks
  to
  all that participated 
  
  Questions:
  
  Who enforces the FDA CDRH 1040.1 laser safety standards in the US?  
  
  How is it enforced? 
  
  What are the penalties for noncompliance?
  
  Who enforces the IEC or EN 60825 laser safety standards in Europe /
  Globally?
  
  How is it enforced? 
  
  What are the penalties for noncompliance? 
  
  
  My questions are stemming from the Class 1 or 1M laser safety
  requirements
  particularly in Telecom networks.
  Some NRTL's and CAB's do not require or do not enforce their clients
  doing a
  submittal ( To the FDA ) for installing these types of laser products
  in
  your equipment. Their decision was based on your company using a class
  1
  laser that carries a current NRTL / CAB safety certification which was
  not
  modified from it's original design when installed into your products. 
  
  
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  Jeffrey Collins
  Sr. HW Engineering Manager 
  EMC/ NEBS/ Safety/ Reliability
  CIENA  Core Switching Division
  10480 Ridgeview Court

RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-12 Thread Andrew Carson



Jeff

In response the second part of your question on who enforces EN60825
within Europe. If the laser device is used on a product that falls under
on of the CE (or New Approach Directives ) eg. The LVD. Then the
enforcement will be like any other CE marked goods. Which varies from
country to country, bt for the UK the CE mark is watched over by the
Depeartment of Trade and Industy and the The Office of Trading
Standards. 

Now complaice to a CE marking directive carries penalities ranging from
Finess, porduct recal and worst case upto 2 years jail time for the
person signing the DOC. The enforcement is made agaist the perosn, not
the company.

Starngely though, if your Laser porduct does not fall under a CE
directive, there is no piece of European legistation saying it needs to
meet EN60825, beyond the old Product Safety Directive (Which does not
require a CE mark).

In your case, if you are incororating an already CDRH registered Class 1
device into your product without alteration. Then you do not need to re
register your overall product. This is covered by a CDRH notice to the
laser industry No. 42.

Andrew Carson - Senior Compliance Engineer, Xyratex, UK

Phone: +44 (0)23 9249 6855 Fax: +44 (0)23 9249 6014


-Original Message-
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com] 
Sent: 12 March 2002 13:22
To: Collins, Jeffrey; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions


I believe that OSHA enforces the CDRH laser safety guidelines in the
workplace.  I'm not sure about consumer goods...Possibly the Consumer
Product Safety Commission?

Penalties for non-compliance would be the typical fines, recalls ...
handed out by OSHA or CPSC.

 -Original Message-
 From: Collins, Jeffrey [SMTP:jcoll...@ciena.com]
 Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:32 PM
 To:   'emc-p...@ieee.org'
 Subject:  ( More)  Laser Safety Questions
 
 
 Hello Group,
 
 There was a lot of good dialog recently regarding laser safety. Thanks
 to
 all that participated 
 
 Questions:
 
 Who enforces the FDA CDRH 1040.1 laser safety standards in the US?  
 
 How is it enforced? 
 
 What are the penalties for noncompliance?
 
 Who enforces the IEC or EN 60825 laser safety standards in Europe /
 Globally?
 
 How is it enforced? 
 
 What are the penalties for noncompliance? 
 
 
 My questions are stemming from the Class 1 or 1M laser safety
 requirements
 particularly in Telecom networks.
 Some NRTL's and CAB's do not require or do not enforce their clients
 doing a
 submittal ( To the FDA ) for installing these types of laser products
 in
 your equipment. Their decision was based on your company using a class
 1
 laser that carries a current NRTL / CAB safety certification which was
 not
 modified from it's original design when installed into your products. 
 
 
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Jeffrey Collins
 Sr. HW Engineering Manager 
 EMC/ NEBS/ Safety/ Reliability
 CIENA  Core Switching Division
 10480 Ridgeview Court, Cupertino, CA. 95014
 (408) 366-4806, Fax (408) 366-4866
 jcoll...@ciena.com
 http://www.ciena.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
  Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
 
 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
 Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail

RE: ( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-12 Thread Chris Maxwell

I believe that OSHA enforces the CDRH laser safety guidelines in the
workplace.  I'm not sure about consumer goods...Possibly the Consumer
Product Safety Commission?

Penalties for non-compliance would be the typical fines, recalls ...
handed out by OSHA or CPSC.

 -Original Message-
 From: Collins, Jeffrey [SMTP:jcoll...@ciena.com]
 Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:32 PM
 To:   'emc-p...@ieee.org'
 Subject:  ( More)  Laser Safety Questions
 
 
 Hello Group,
 
 There was a lot of good dialog recently regarding laser safety. Thanks
 to
 all that participated 
 
 Questions:
 
 Who enforces the FDA CDRH 1040.1 laser safety standards in the US?  
 
 How is it enforced? 
 
 What are the penalties for noncompliance?
 
 Who enforces the IEC or EN 60825 laser safety standards in Europe /
 Globally?
 
 How is it enforced? 
 
 What are the penalties for noncompliance? 
 
 
 My questions are stemming from the Class 1 or 1M laser safety
 requirements
 particularly in Telecom networks.
 Some NRTL's and CAB's do not require or do not enforce their clients
 doing a
 submittal ( To the FDA ) for installing these types of laser products
 in
 your equipment. Their decision was based on your company using a class
 1
 laser that carries a current NRTL / CAB safety certification which was
 not
 modified from it's original design when installed into your products. 
 
 
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Jeffrey Collins
 Sr. HW Engineering Manager 
 EMC/ NEBS/ Safety/ Reliability
 CIENA  Core Switching Division
 10480 Ridgeview Court, Cupertino, CA. 95014
 (408) 366-4806, Fax (408) 366-4866
 jcoll...@ciena.com
 http://www.ciena.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
  Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
  Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
 
 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
 Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


( More) Laser Safety Questions

2002-03-12 Thread Collins, Jeffrey

Hello Group,

There was a lot of good dialog recently regarding laser safety. Thanks to
all that participated 

Questions:

Who enforces the FDA CDRH 1040.1 laser safety standards in the US?  

How is it enforced? 

What are the penalties for noncompliance?

Who enforces the IEC or EN 60825 laser safety standards in Europe /
Globally?

How is it enforced? 

What are the penalties for noncompliance? 


My questions are stemming from the Class 1 or 1M laser safety requirements
particularly in Telecom networks.
Some NRTL's and CAB's do not require or do not enforce their clients doing a
submittal ( To the FDA ) for installing these types of laser products in
your equipment. Their decision was based on your company using a class 1
laser that carries a current NRTL / CAB safety certification which was not
modified from it's original design when installed into your products. 



Thanks in advance,

Jeffrey Collins
Sr. HW Engineering Manager 
EMC/ NEBS/ Safety/ Reliability
CIENA  Core Switching Division
10480 Ridgeview Court, Cupertino, CA. 95014
(408) 366-4806, Fax (408) 366-4866
jcoll...@ciena.com
http://www.ciena.com









---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list