R: R: R: Voltage Breakdown

2000-07-14 Thread Paolo Roncone

Hi Rich and all others: 

Thanks a lot for clarifying this issue. I was living with one wrong idea about 
electro-static build-up mechanisms until you guys got me the right explanation. 
This to me is another confirmation of the value of this forum.

Thank you again,

Paolo 

-Messaggio originale-
Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Inviato:mercoledì 12 luglio 2000 18.40
A:  paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
Oggetto:Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown




Hi Paolo:


From the other responses to your question, it appears
that there are several phenomena that apply.

Upon reading the other responses, and reading the 
referenced web sites, it appears that, in a humid
atmosphere, build-up of electrostatic charge is 
limited by micro-condensation on material surfaces,
which tend to bleed off charge before it can build
to a value sufficient to break down the electric
strength of the air.

So, there appears to be no conflict between the fact
that humid air has a slightly higher dielectric
strength than dry air, and the fact that humid air
limits the build-up of surface charge compared to
dry air.

(I have not copied the list with this response, but
I did want to reply to you personally since you had
ask a question of me personally.)


Best regards,
Rich




   

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: R: R: Voltage Breakdown

2000-07-12 Thread David_Sterner

 For many topical staticides (on IC tubes and containers) to function, 
 the RH must be  25%.
 
 David Sterner
 Ademco
 Syosset NY


__ Reply Separator
_
Subject: Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown
Author:  Jim Hulbert SMTP:hulbe...@pb.com at ADEMCONET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:7/12/2000 8:40 AM


I must admit I am also confused.  It is a fairly common practice and has
proved 
quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce
the 
propensity for static electricity generation.  Why does this work?
 
Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer
Pitney Bowes
 
 
 
 
 
Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it on 07/12/2000 04:39:08 AM
 
Please respond to Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
 
To:   'Rich Nute' ri...@sdd.hp.com
cc:   'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim
Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI)
 
Subject:  R: R: Voltage Breakdown
 
 
 
 
Hi Rich:
 
thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. 
Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more
chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a
common 
experience that anyone can confirm.
I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so 
higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge.
Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD
standard 
EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control

during ESD tests.
 
Regards,
 
Paolo
 
-Messaggio originale-
Da:  Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com] 
Inviato:  marted

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: R: Voltage Breakdown

2000-07-12 Thread POWELL, DOUG

Paolo,

I would suggest while in an air gap humidity does not contribute that much,
on an insulating surface the surface resistivity would be lowered, making it
dissipative if not conductive.  This in effect, removes the ESD build up of
potential.  The differences between gaps and surfaces are similar to those
that are seen in creepage and clearance issues when dealing with insulation
of hazardous voltages.  The breakdown mechanisms are not the same.  In the
ESD case we prevent breakdown by providing a discharge path and in the
second case we prevent breakdown by improving the insulation.

-doug

=
Douglas E. Powell
Regulatory Compliance Engineer
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 
1625 Sharp Point Dr.
Ft. Collins, Co 80525

mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com
http:\\www.advanced-energy.com\
=


-Original Message-
From: Paolo Roncone [mailto:paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 2:39 AM
To: 'Rich Nute'
Cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
Subject: R: R: Voltage Breakdown



Hi Rich:

thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. 
Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more
chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a
common experience that anyone can confirm.
I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so
higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge.
Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD
standard EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions
to control during ESD tests.

Regards,

Paolo

-Messaggio originale-
Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Inviato:martedì 11 luglio 2000 19.39
A:  paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
Cc: Product Safety Technical Committee
Oggetto:Re: R: Voltage Breakdown




Hi Paolo:


   what about relative humidity of air ?
   I believe breakdown voltage depends also on humidity content of air.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, the water 
content of air, humidity, actually increases
the dielectric strength of air by a slight 
amount.  (Sorry, but I cannot cite where I
read this.)  As I recall, the increase is so
small as to be negligible compared to all of
the other factors affecting dielectric 
strength of air.

Note that liquid water and gaseous water
(water vapor) have entirely different physical
properties.  It is not unreasonable for water
vapor to have a greater electric strength 
than air.  

For gases, according to the Standard Handbook 
for Electrical Engineers:

The relative dielectric strength, with few
exceptions, tends upward with increasing
molecular weight.

The noble atomic gases (helium, argon, neon,
etc.) are poorest... and have the lowest
dielectric strengths.

If we applied this generality (contrary to my
initial assertion), then the electric strength 
of water vapor, H2O, should be less than that 
of either oxygen, O2, or nitrogen, N2.  However, 
note that the actual number of molecules of 
water vapor in air at any temperature is very 
small compared to the number of molecules of 
oxygen and nitrogen.  So, the reduction of 
dielectric strength by the presence of water 
vapor, if any, will be very small.



Regards,
Rich



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: R: R: Voltage Breakdown

2000-07-12 Thread rfm

There are several references that talk about humidity control in handling
ESD sensitive items:

ESD Association - Electrostatic Discharge Control Handbook
-  The effects of humidity are most noticeable in garments, plastic
packaging material, process tooling, fixtures, furniture, etc., which are
non-metallic and may be easily charged. Low humidity indicates a lack of
water vapor in the atmosphere. This lack of water
 vapor causes both volume and surface resistance to increase in most
materials. Low 
humidity may also cause an increase in leakage resistance to the
ground in the case of 
furniture and fixtures that are not hard grounded through a metallic
path.

EN100015-1 (1992) Protection of electrostatic sensitive parts
- Low humidity severely reduces the dissipation effectiveness of
materials used in 
certain types of worksurfaces, packaging and clothing.

DOD-HDBK-263 ESD control handbook for protection of electrical and
electronic parts, assemblies and equipment...
- Humid air helps to dissipate electrostatic charges by keeping the
surfaces moist, 
therefore increasing surface conductivity. Substantial electrostatic
voltage levels 
can accumulate with a decrease in relative humidity (see table III).
However, it is 
also evident from Table III that significant electrostatic voltages
can still be
generated with relative humidity as high as 90 percent. .  
Table III lists various events such as walking across a carpet and
corresponding 
ES voltage levels at 10-20% RH, and 65-90% RH.

There are a number of other EOS/ESD documents that I can't lay my hands on
right now. The bottom line of all of these is that the phenomenon is not so
much breakdown of air as it is dissipation of electrostatic charge. That is,
the increased 'conductivity' of the air with higher water content dissipates
the charge quicker and therefore the discharges are less intense (and less
perceptible).

Bob Martin, PE, NCE

Sr. Technical Manager
Intertek Testing Services
http://www.etlsemko.com
(978)263-2662
fax(978)263-7086
r...@itsqs.com

The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my
employer.


-Original Message-
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:hulbe...@pb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 8:41 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown




I must admit I am also confused.  It is a fairly common practice and has
proved
quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce
the
propensity for static electricity generation.  Why does this work?

Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer
Pitney Bowes





Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it on 07/12/2000 04:39:08 AM

Please respond to Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it

To:   'Rich Nute' ri...@sdd.hp.com
cc:   'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim
Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI)

Subject:  R: R: Voltage Breakdown




Hi Rich:

thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused.
Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more
chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a
common
experience that anyone can confirm.
I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so
higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge.
Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD
standard
EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control
during ESD tests.

Regards,

Paolo

-Messaggio originale-
Da:  Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Inviato:  marted

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: R: R: Voltage Breakdown

2000-07-12 Thread Steve Grobe

In a quick search I found this:
http://www.esdsystems.com/newsletters/v1issue3.htm

It looks like a higher RH affects the ability of a surface to hold a charge.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:hulbe...@pb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 7:41 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown




I must admit I am also confused.  It is a fairly common practice and has
proved
quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce
the
propensity for static electricity generation.  Why does this work?

Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer
Pitney Bowes





Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it on 07/12/2000 04:39:08 AM

Please respond to Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it

To:   'Rich Nute' ri...@sdd.hp.com
cc:   'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim
Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI)

Subject:  R: R: Voltage Breakdown




Hi Rich:

thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused.
Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more
chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a
common
experience that anyone can confirm.
I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so
higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge.
Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD
standard
EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control
during ESD tests.

Regards,

Paolo

-Messaggio originale-
Da:  Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Inviato:  marted

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: R: R: Voltage Breakdown

2000-07-12 Thread Jim Hulbert


I must admit I am also confused.  It is a fairly common practice and has proved
quite effective to install humidifiers in enclosed environments to reduce the
propensity for static electricity generation.  Why does this work?

Jim Hulbert
Senior Engineer
Pitney Bowes





Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it on 07/12/2000 04:39:08 AM

Please respond to Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it

To:   'Rich Nute' ri...@sdd.hp.com
cc:   'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI)

Subject:  R: R: Voltage Breakdown




Hi Rich:

thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused.
Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more
chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a common
experience that anyone can confirm.
I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so
higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge.
Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD standard
EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control
during ESD tests.

Regards,

Paolo

-Messaggio originale-
Da:  Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Inviato:  marted
ì 11 luglio 2000 19.39
A:   paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
Cc:  Product Safety Technical Committee
Oggetto:  Re: R: Voltage Breakdown




Hi Paolo:


   what about relative humidity of air ?
   I believe breakdown voltage depends also on humidity content of air.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, the water
content of air, humidity, actually increases
the dielectric strength of air by a slight
amount.  (Sorry, but I cannot cite where I
read this.)  As I recall, the increase is so
small as to be negligible compared to all of
the other factors affecting dielectric
strength of air.

Note that liquid water and gaseous water
(water vapor) have entirely different physical
properties.  It is not unreasonable for water
vapor to have a greater electric strength
than air.

For gases, according to the Standard Handbook
for Electrical Engineers:

The relative dielectric strength, with few
exceptions, tends upward with increasing
molecular weight.

The noble atomic gases (helium, argon, neon,
etc.) are poorest... and have the lowest
dielectric strengths.

If we applied this generality (contrary to my
initial assertion), then the electric strength
of water vapor, H2O, should be less than that
of either oxygen, O2, or nitrogen, N2.  However,
note that the actual number of molecules of
water vapor in air at any temperature is very
small compared to the number of molecules of
oxygen and nitrogen.  So, the reduction of
dielectric strength by the presence of water
vapor, if any, will be very small.



Regards,
Rich



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org








R: R: Voltage Breakdown

2000-07-12 Thread Paolo Roncone

Hi Rich:

thanks for your reply. Now I regret to say that I am a bit confused. 
Based on what you say I don't understand why in dry weather you have more 
chances of high voltage ESD than in humid weather. As I said this is a common 
experience that anyone can confirm.
I thought the explanation is that dry air has higher dielectric strength so 
higher electrostatic fields need to build up before a discharge.
Another point suggesting the dependence from humidity is that the ESD standard 
EN 61000-4-2 specifies relative humidity among ambient conditions to control 
during ESD tests.

Regards,

Paolo

-Messaggio originale-
Da: Rich Nute [SMTP:ri...@sdd.hp.com]
Inviato:martedì 11 luglio 2000 19.39
A:  paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
Cc: Product Safety Technical Committee
Oggetto:Re: R: Voltage Breakdown




Hi Paolo:


   what about relative humidity of air ?
   I believe breakdown voltage depends also on humidity content of air.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, the water 
content of air, humidity, actually increases
the dielectric strength of air by a slight 
amount.  (Sorry, but I cannot cite where I
read this.)  As I recall, the increase is so
small as to be negligible compared to all of
the other factors affecting dielectric 
strength of air.

Note that liquid water and gaseous water
(water vapor) have entirely different physical
properties.  It is not unreasonable for water
vapor to have a greater electric strength 
than air.  

For gases, according to the Standard Handbook 
for Electrical Engineers:

The relative dielectric strength, with few
exceptions, tends upward with increasing
molecular weight.

The noble atomic gases (helium, argon, neon,
etc.) are poorest... and have the lowest
dielectric strengths.

If we applied this generality (contrary to my
initial assertion), then the electric strength 
of water vapor, H2O, should be less than that 
of either oxygen, O2, or nitrogen, N2.  However, 
note that the actual number of molecules of 
water vapor in air at any temperature is very 
small compared to the number of molecules of 
oxygen and nitrogen.  So, the reduction of 
dielectric strength by the presence of water 
vapor, if any, will be very small.



Regards,
Rich



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



R: Voltage Breakdown

2000-07-11 Thread Paolo Roncone

Hi,
what about relative humidity of air ?
I believe breakdown voltage depends also on humidity content of air.
One thing anybody can experience is the much higher frequency of ESD jolts one 
gets in dry weather vs. humid weather.  Anyone knows a quantitative relation or 
formula ?

my penny's worth...
Regards

Paolo Roncone

-Messaggio originale-
Da: bogdan matoga [SMTP:bogda...@pacbell.net]
Inviato:sabato 8 luglio 2000 22.57
A:  Rich Nute
Cc: allen_tu...@pairgain.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
Oggetto:Re: Voltage Breakdown


Gentlemen:
Let me add my penny's worth to Rich's information.
a. Parallel plates provide a homogenous field only in their center, the
field fringes at the edges. (One could configure the plates according to
Rogowski form).
b. The breakdown voltage is not a linear function, even for spherical
electrodes. What applies is Paschen's law, which gives the voltage as a
function of distance x atmospheric
pressure.
Have fun!
Regards,
Bogdan.

Rich Nute wrote:

 Hi Allen:

 The voltage breakdown of air is presented in
 IEC 664.

 There is no fixed number (i.e., mm/kV) that
 describes or predicts voltage breakdown of air.

 The principle factor that affects voltage
 breakdown is the shape of the electrodes
 (degree of homogeneousness of the electric
 field between the two electrodes).  The more
 homogeneous the field, the higher the breakdown
 voltage, and vice versa.

 For example, at 2 mm, the breakdown of an
 inhomogeneous field is about 2.5 kV, while the
 breakdown of an homogeneous field is almost 8
 kv!

 An homogeneous field is created by two parallel
 planes.  An inhomogeneous field is created by
 a needle-point and a plane.

 The second factor that affects voltage
 breakdown of air is the voltage waveshape.  The
 more impulse-type waveshape, the higher the
 breakdown voltage; the more sinusoidal-type
 waveshape, the lower the breakdown voltage.

 The third factor that affects voltage breakdown
 of air is the air pressure.  The higher the air
 pressure, the higher the breakdown voltage, and
 vice-versa (Paschen's Law).

 There are still other factors such as temperature,
 but these are minor effects compared to the first
 three.

 If you are interested, I can send a Powerpoint
 4.0 file of the voltage-distance curves of the
 homogeneousness effect.  It covers the distance
 range from 0 to 2 mm for both homogeneous and
 inhomogeneous fields for sinsoidal waveforms.
 The data is taken from IEC 664.

 Best regards,
 Rich

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org