RE: Cell phones and humans

2000-09-25 Thread georgea

Paolo,

In my opinion, I agree with the "null" theory.  I did some work in the
'70's with a digital RG system operating at an assigned experimental
frequency of 939+mHz.  At this frequency, "line of sight" is extremely
important, unlike lower frequency AM/FM radio signals, which often "bend"
over the earth's curvature.  We also experienced problems with isolated
nulls.

One of two things could have happened.  She could have stepped into a
null due to a blocked line of sight (and no strong refleced signal), or
a null caused by an out-of-phase reflected signal.


George



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: Cell phones and humans

2000-09-25 Thread Price, Ed

Paolo:

Assuming that she was not wearing shoes at the time, then as she stepped
back, with her feet already wet, she was likely still reasonably well
grounded to the conductive concrete pool edge. I'll bet the explanation is
more likely to be multipath cancellation; the RF null created by the
addition of multiple signal reflections. Proving this might be difficult,
since the null would be the product of ever reflection present in the pool
vicinity that day. The position of every conductive object would need to be
recreated.

Regards,

Ed


:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
Ed  Price
ed.pr...@cubic.com
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Systems
San Diego, CA.  USA
858-505-2780 (Voice)
858-505-1583 (Fax)
Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)



> -Original Message-
> From: Roncone Paolo [mailto:paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it]
> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 3:19 PM
> To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org '
> Subject: Cell phones and humans
> 
> 
> 
> Group,
> the subject of possible biological effects of cell phones is 
> having a lot of
> attention these days and it was already touched in this 
> forum. I'd like to
> get opinions about  what my wife just told me. I don't know 
> if this should
> be classified as "influence of cell phones on humans" or "influence of
> humans on cell phones". The story is as follows:
> my wife was talking on her cell phone while walking by a 
> swimming pool. As
> she steppen right on the wet border of the pool (she was bare 
> foot) the line
> went down. But just after stepping back on dry ground (just a 
> step or two
> back, so the signal level shouldn't have changed so much) the 
> line got back
> and she was able to resume her conversation. She told me she 
> didn't step
> back again on the water,  just to check if the phenomenon was 
> repeatable. I
> honestly don't know if this is even worth of attention 
> because of course
> it's not a "laboratory" or just even a "controlled" experiment. But if
> anyone out there has any guess or thinks there is an 
> explanation... that
> would be welcome !! 
> 
> Paolo
> 
> ---
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>  majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>  unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
>  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
> 
> 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: Cell phones and humans

2000-09-24 Thread Scott Lacey

Paolo,

This sounds like something worthy of investigation.

My guess would be the effect of the wet concrete grounding the highly
capacitive human body, effectively eliminating the bottom half of the dipole
(The built in antenna is the top half). Of course, this probably only
happens
in marginal signal areas, as I've many times seen cell phones used in and
around pools.

Some time back I did some informal experiments with hand-held transceivers
and portable receivers of various types. Some radios worked better with an
earth ground wire attached to the chassis, and some worked worse. In some
cases touching an earthed piece of metal with the free hand was enough to
cause dramatic change in signal quality.

Scott Lacey

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf
Of Roncone Paolo
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 6:19 PM
To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org '
Subject: Cell phones and humans



Group,
the subject of possible biological effects of cell phones is having a lot of
attention these days and it was already touched in this forum. I'd like to
get opinions about  what my wife just told me. I don't know if this should
be classified as "influence of cell phones on humans" or "influence of
humans on cell phones". The story is as follows:
my wife was talking on her cell phone while walking by a swimming pool. As
she steppen right on the wet border of the pool (she was bare foot) the line
went down. But just after stepping back on dry ground (just a step or two
back, so the signal level shouldn't have changed so much) the line got back
and she was able to resume her conversation. She told me she didn't step
back again on the water,  just to check if the phenomenon was repeatable. I
honestly don't know if this is even worth of attention because of course
it's not a "laboratory" or just even a "controlled" experiment. But if
anyone out there has any guess or thinks there is an explanation... that
would be welcome !!

Paolo

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org