Re: Using a network analyser for EN61000-3-2 6 testing

2003-09-09 Thread lfresea...@aol.com
In a message dated 9/9/2003 10:29:03 AM Central Daylight Time,
don_borow...@selinc.com writes:






When I think of a network analyzer, I think of a device that injects a
signal into a network, and then receives the signal after processing by the
network using a receiver tuned to the original frequency. This type of
network analyzer rejects harmonics.




I was thinking more s the NA being a source with 3 simultaneous tracking
receivers. Not using the source leaves me 3 tracking receivers.

Derek.



Re: Using a network analyser for EN61000-3-2 6 testing

2003-09-09 Thread Ken Javor

I don't know which machine Derek has, but an HP4195 covers 5 Hz - 500 MHz,
and it can be used in network analyzer mode, or spectrum analyzer mode.  In
network mode you can look at amplitude response, or amplitude and phase.  If
you are just wanting to measure harmonic currents drawn by some non-linear
load, you could use the machine as a spectrum analyzer.  It has RBW down to
1 Hz, per my recollection.

 From: drcuthb...@micron.com
 Reply-To: drcuthb...@micron.com
 Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:56:35 -0600
 To: don_borow...@selinc.com, emc-p...@ieee.org
 Subject: RE: Using a network analyser for EN61000-3-2 6 testing
 
 
 Interesting use of a Network Analyzer. If it is a Vector Network Analyzer
this
 might work. Cal it, then do an S21 measurement with Port 1 not connected.
Port
 2 connects to the DUT and gives the Port 2 amplitude referenced to Port R
 (equal to the incident signal). Calibrating at 0 dBm could provide a nice
 reference amplitude.
 
 Now the VNA might not have been designed to be as robust as a Spectrum
 Analyzer. It may not be as good for IP3 and all of that. I suppose one could
 characterize it with a two-tone signal in the frequency range of interest.
 
 An oscilloscope operating in the FFT mode could work if the limited dynamic
 range is acceptable. I have done this for measuring AC line harmonic
currents.
 
 Dave Cuthbert
 Micron Technology
 
 -Original Message-
 From: don_borow...@selinc.com [mailto:don_borow...@selinc.com]
 Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:44 AM
 To: emc-p...@ieee.org
 Subject: Re: Using a network analyser for EN61000-3-2 6 testing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 When I think of a network analyzer, I think of a device that injects a
 signal into a network, and then receives the signal after processing by the
 network using a receiver tuned to the original frequency. This type of
 network analyzer rejects harmonics.
 
 There are some inexpensive network analyzers that use broadband
 detectors. These detectors receive the total signal coming out of the
 network, fundamental and harmonics.
 
 I know that Agilent Technologies (and probably others) now make network
 analyzers that can be configured to not only receive the fundamental of the
 excitation, but can be set to receive harmonics and offset frequencies (for
 testing mixers).
 
 I don't see what the advantage of using a network analyzer would be, unless
 there is some information to be gained by knowing the phase of the
 harmonics.
 
 Don Borowski
 Schweitzer Engineering Labs
 Pullman, WA
 
 
 
 
 lfresea...@aol.co
 m
 Sent by:   To
 owner-emc-pstc@ma emc-p...@ieee.org
 jordomo.ieee.org   cc
 
 Subject 
 09/07/03 04:10 PM Using a network analyser for
 EN61000-3-2 6 testing
 
 Please respond to
 lfresea...@aol.co
 m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Hi folks,
 
 I was wondering if anyone had looked into using a network analyser for
 measuring current harmonics?
 
 I have an analyser that will go down to 5 Hz, it seems a perfect instrument
 for this.
 
 Thoughts welcome.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Derek Walton.
 
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
 
 Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
 
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
 
 Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
 



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

RE: Using a network analyser for EN61000-3-2 6 testing

2003-09-09 Thread drcuthb...@micron.com

Interesting use of a Network Analyzer. If it is a Vector Network Analyzer this
might work. Cal it, then do an S21 measurement with Port 1 not connected. Port
2 connects to the DUT and gives the Port 2 amplitude referenced to Port R
(equal to the incident signal). Calibrating at 0 dBm could provide a nice
reference amplitude. 

Now the VNA might not have been designed to be as robust as a Spectrum
Analyzer. It may not be as good for IP3 and all of that. I suppose one could
characterize it with a two-tone signal in the frequency range of interest.

An oscilloscope operating in the FFT mode could work if the limited dynamic
range is acceptable. I have done this for measuring AC line harmonic currents.

   Dave Cuthbert
   Micron Technology 


From: don_borow...@selinc.com [mailto:don_borow...@selinc.com]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:44 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Using a network analyser for EN61000-3-2 6 testing








When I think of a network analyzer, I think of a device that injects a
signal into a network, and then receives the signal after processing by the
network using a receiver tuned to the original frequency. This type of
network analyzer rejects harmonics.

There are some inexpensive network analyzers that use broadband
detectors. These detectors receive the total signal coming out of the
network, fundamental and harmonics.

I know that Agilent Technologies (and probably others) now make network
analyzers that can be configured to not only receive the fundamental of the
excitation, but can be set to receive harmonics and offset frequencies (for
testing mixers).

I don't see what the advantage of using a network analyzer would be, unless
there is some information to be gained by knowing the phase of the
harmonics.

Don Borowski
Schweitzer Engineering Labs
Pullman, WA



   
 lfresea...@aol.co 
 m 
 Sent by:   To 
 owner-emc-pstc@ma emc-p...@ieee.org   
 jordomo.ieee.org   cc 
   
   Subject 
 09/07/03 04:10 PM Using a network analyser for
   EN61000-3-2 6 testing   
   
 Please respond to 
 lfresea...@aol.co 
 m 
   
   




Hi folks,

I was wondering if anyone had looked into using a network analyser for
measuring current harmonics?

I have an analyser that will go down to 5 Hz, it seems a perfect instrument
for this.

Thoughts welcome.

Thanks,

Derek Walton.



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



Re: Using a network analyser for EN61000-3-2 6 testing

2003-09-09 Thread don_borow...@selinc.com






When I think of a network analyzer, I think of a device that injects a
signal into a network, and then receives the signal after processing by the
network using a receiver tuned to the original frequency. This type of
network analyzer rejects harmonics.

There are some inexpensive network analyzers that use broadband
detectors. These detectors receive the total signal coming out of the
network, fundamental and harmonics.

I know that Agilent Technologies (and probably others) now make network
analyzers that can be configured to not only receive the fundamental of the
excitation, but can be set to receive harmonics and offset frequencies (for
testing mixers).

I don't see what the advantage of using a network analyzer would be, unless
there is some information to be gained by knowing the phase of the
harmonics.

Don Borowski
Schweitzer Engineering Labs
Pullman, WA



   
 lfresea...@aol.co 
 m 
 Sent by:   To 
 owner-emc-pstc@ma emc-p...@ieee.org   
 jordomo.ieee.org   cc 
   
   Subject 
 09/07/03 04:10 PM Using a network analyser for
   EN61000-3-2 6 testing   
   
 Please respond to 
 lfresea...@aol.co 
 m 
   
   




Hi folks,

I was wondering if anyone had looked into using a network analyser for
measuring current harmonics?

I have an analyser that will go down to 5 Hz, it seems a perfect instrument
for this.

Thoughts welcome.

Thanks,

Derek Walton.



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   emc_p...@symbol.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



Using a network analyser for EN61000-3-2 6 testing

2003-09-07 Thread lfresea...@aol.com
Hi folks,

I was wondering if anyone had looked into using a network analyser for
measuring current harmonics?

I have an analyser that will go down to 5 Hz, it seems a perfect instrument
for this.

Thoughts welcome.

Thanks,

Derek Walton.