Re: [PSES] safety 60950 and surge suppression circuits

2013-05-12 Thread Richard Nute

Hi Bill:


SPDs, regardless of configuration, are notorious for being
prone to failure, either short-circuit or open-circuit or
any value of resistance between those two extremes.  (One
cannot predict the energy the SPD will be required to
dissipate.)

From a safety point of view, all such failures must be
accounted for such that the safety of the equipment is not
compromised by any failure of the SPD.

If the SPD should fail open-circuit, then expected
transients that are therefore not attenuated, must not
cause the insulation to fail.  Hence, the insulation must
pass the hi-pot test without the SPD in place.

As for the requirement for the GDT to pass the hi-pot test...
???  I don't have any rationale for this.


Best regards,
Rich





On 5/10/2013 10:11 AM, Bill Owsley wrote:
I'm running into a dilemma.   Not being a Safety Engineer myself, but 
rubbing elbows with them...
On a piece of ITE equipment, I need some surge suppression for 
worldwide markets with one annoying requirement for 4 kV, otherwise 
just 2 kV line to earth, and using either plugable cords or permanent 
connection, whichever is worse.
Now the Safety guys  tell me that MOV's alone cannot bridge the 
insulation (Basic or Functional, I forget.)  between primary and 
earth, when using one of power cable options mentioned above.
But a proper qualified (GDT) gas discharge tube can do the bridging. 
 So we figured to use them in series.

On a quick and dirty bench test it works to 4 kV.
Then the Safety guys pull out the rest of the story and point out 
5.2.2 which seems to indicate that the GDT is to meet the Hi-Pot test, 
1500 vac.
Previously, section, 1.5.9.4 (?)  indicates that the surge protection 
devices can be removed during the Hi-Pot test.
But now I have a Surge suppression circuit that has to withstand the 
same Hi-Pot as the rest of the board.
Question is how does a surge protection circuit protect the board when 
it has to meet the same Hi-Pot test?
In other words, when a surge comes along, which is going to break over 
first?

The surge protection or the board?
Is the purpose of surge suppression is to keep the clamped voltage 
below a problem level?

What am I missing in this?

Thanks...
- Bill

-


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your 
e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html


Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities 
site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for 
graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc.


Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net mailto:emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org mailto:mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher j.bac...@ieee.org mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald dhe...@gmail.com mailto:dhe...@gmail.com



-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] safety 60950 and surge suppression circuits

2013-05-12 Thread John Woodgate
In message 518feba9.7000...@ieee.org, dated Sun, 12 May 2013, Richard 
Nute ri...@ieee.org writes:



As for the requirement for the GDT to pass the hi-pot test...
???  I don't have any rationale for this.


If its seal was broken, letting the magic gas out, would it arc over at 
a lower voltage?

--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
They took me to a specialist burns unit - and made me learn 'To a haggis'.

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] safety 60950 and surge suppression circuits

2013-05-12 Thread Richard Nute

On 5/12/2013 12:39 PM, John Woodgate wrote:
In message 518feba9.7000...@ieee.org, dated Sun, 12 May 2013, 
Richard Nute ri...@ieee.org writes:



As for the requirement for the GDT to pass the hi-pot test...
???  I don't have any rationale for this.


If its seal was broken, letting the magic gas out, would it arc over 
at a lower voltage?


Depends on what's left in the GDT, if anything.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] safety 60950 and surge suppression circuits

2013-05-12 Thread Brian Oconnell
Assuming no tracking from impurities, GDT failure mode is typically open.
And personal (anecdotal) experience bears this as correct.

But have seen test reports where simulated lightning strikes with enough
energy cause failure of body such that CTI adversely affected enough to stay
lo-Z.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 12:40 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: safety 60950 and surge suppression circuits

In message 518feba9.7000...@ieee.org, dated Sun, 12 May 2013, Richard
Nute ri...@ieee.org writes:

As for the requirement for the GDT to pass the hi-pot test...
???  I don't have any rationale for this.

If its seal was broken, letting the magic gas out, would it arc over at
a lower voltage?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
They took me to a specialist burns unit - and made me learn 'To a haggis'.

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] safety 60950 and surge suppression circuits - GDTs

2013-05-12 Thread Mick Maytum

John,
It is true that people used to worry about GDTs 
venting. In venting the GDT sparkover voltage greatly 
increased. In fact, there was a US trend to include a 
Back-Up (air) Gap (BUG) across the GDT component in case 
this happens. In fact, due to contamination, these BUGs were 
more unreliable than the GDTs they protected.
 UL came to the rescue and came up with a standard and 
expensive testing so that a BUG was unnecessary. Although 
the term is not much used today, these qualified components 
were known as Bugless GDTs.
I've worked with many major GDT manufacturers and the 
main life concern these days is voltage degradation with 
surging. The so-called fast GDTs do degrade in sparkover 
voltage a lot faster than (well made) standard GDTs. One 
service provider was replacing SPDs using fast GDTs every 
two years because of this problem.
Surge Protective Devices (SPDs) are complete assemblies 
made up from terminals, bases, housings and surge protective 
components (SPCs - GDTs, MOVs, ABDs etc.). I've notice that 
people wrongly use SPD when they are really talking about a 
surge protective component, SPC.


Regards
Mick


On 12/05/2013 20:39, John Woodgate wrote:
In message 518feba9.7000...@ieee.org, dated Sun, 12 May 
2013, Richard Nute ri...@ieee.org writes:


As for the requirement for the GDT to pass the hi-pot 
test...

???  I don't have any rationale for this.


If its seal was broken, letting the magic gas out, would 
it arc over at a lower voltage?


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com