Re: [Emc-users] ClassicLadder error
so what was wrong? were hangin here :) -- jeremy youngs -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] ClassicLadder error
2012/10/28 Fernando Mederos : > Hi, > You can not multiplex coils, as inactive coils will force a 0 to the > signal. With internal coils will happen the same. > >> Or should I put all the possible >> inputs for certain output in one rung > > This is one way to do it. > > You may also use set/reset coils instead of normal coils, these you can put > a many as you want, but the logic may get more complicated. > Thank You, guys, a lot! I think that I finally got, what did I do wrong. -- Viesturs If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] ClassicLadder error
Hi, You can not multiplex coils, as inactive coils will force a 0 to the signal. With internal coils will happen the same. > Or should I put all the possible > inputs for certain output in one rung This is one way to do it. You may also use set/reset coils instead of normal coils, these you can put a many as you want, but the logic may get more complicated. Regards! Fernando -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] Stupid LinuxCNC Tricks
> The ultimate goal of all this is to make a delta-arm 3D printer and > use kinematics in LinuxCNC for the tricky math bits that are hard to > do on the AVR micro-controllers most 3D printers use for control. http://reprap.org/wiki/Rostock_MAX -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] ClassicLadder error
Sorry, posted from my phone (didn't see the video). On Oct 28, 2012 3:44 AM, "Viesturs Lācis" wrote: > 2012/10/28 Jason Burton : > > Crosstalk between spindle power lines and solenoid control lines perhaps? > > As it can be seen in that video, it is purely in software. > > 2012/10/28 sam sokolik : > > I have not had that happen that I know of... Some things to check on > > is if you have enough objects allocated in your hal file.. (ie loadrt > > classicladder_rt numRungs=12 numBits=100 numWords=10 numTimers=10 > > numMonostables=10 numCounters=10 numPhysInputs?=10 numPhysOutputs?=10 > > numArithmExpr?=100 > > numSections=4 numSymbols=200 ...) > > > > Funky things happen when you try to add something and there isn't enough > > allocated.. > > I did at least try to check for that. I did run out of IEC Timers, and > I was also informed about that with error message, so I fixed that. > I feel pretty confident that everything should be fine about this. > > > Also - don't have an output (coil) in more than one place.. > Ok, I definitely have violated this one. I have outputs being turned > on by timers or by pyvcp buttons, connected to ladder inputs. A > hardware switch selects it. > > What is the best approach to fix that? Should I simply leave overall > scheme as it is and use internal coils (%Bnn) so that they turn the > real output on/off only in one place? Or should I put all the possible > inputs for certain output in one rung (or two with some internal coil) > and not as they are now - scattered all in different places according > to sequence of how all the things were added. > > -- > Viesturs > > If you can't fix it, you don't own it. > http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto > > > -- > WINDOWS 8 is here. > Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. > Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. > http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ > join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ > ___ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
[Emc-users] Contact Ickgucklive
Hello. I'm looking for contact with Ickgucklive. Can some body help me. -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] ClassicLadder error
Sam was talking about a classicladder output. You never have more than one output in a ladder logic as the status of the last one wins and that will be the state of the output when they are updated. John On 10/28/2012 3:38 AM, Viesturs Lācis wrote: > 2012/10/28 Jason Burton : >> Crosstalk between spindle power lines and solenoid control lines perhaps? > As it can be seen in that video, it is purely in software. > > 2012/10/28 sam sokolik : >>I have not had that happen that I know of... Some things to check on >> is if you have enough objects allocated in your hal file.. (ie loadrt >> classicladder_rt numRungs=12 numBits=100 numWords=10 numTimers=10 >> numMonostables=10 numCounters=10 numPhysInputs?=10 numPhysOutputs?=10 >> numArithmExpr?=100 >> numSections=4 numSymbols=200 ...) >> >> Funky things happen when you try to add something and there isn't enough >> allocated.. > I did at least try to check for that. I did run out of IEC Timers, and > I was also informed about that with error message, so I fixed that. > I feel pretty confident that everything should be fine about this. > >> Also - don't have an output (coil) in more than one place.. > Ok, I definitely have violated this one. I have outputs being turned > on by timers or by pyvcp buttons, connected to ladder inputs. A > hardware switch selects it. > > What is the best approach to fix that? Should I simply leave overall > scheme as it is and use internal coils (%Bnn) so that they turn the > real output on/off only in one place? Or should I put all the possible > inputs for certain output in one rung (or two with some internal coil) > and not as they are now - scattered all in different places according > to sequence of how all the things were added. > -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] ClassicLadder error
A copy of the ladder file would be a big clue to look at. John On 10/27/2012 6:32 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote: > Hello! > > While working in premises of my customer to add new automatic material > loading/unloading module for one of my machines, I have encountered > strange error in ClassicLadder. I took a video on my phone with it: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YjkGbpuT50 > > I will try to explain: > The idea is to use classicladder to control valves for pneumatics that > load the material in machine, hold it in place and then unload. > When I started working on the ladder logic, everything was working > fine, but then, at one moment, I think at the moment, when I linked > one of classicladder input pins to motion.spindle-on, it just stopped > turning the outputs on and off in a correct manner. Some of outputs > are working fine, but others are doing I do not know what - seems like > turning on for a very small amount of time at random moments. > It is 2.5~pre, installed from buildbot package some time almost a year > ago. I did copy all the config files, so I can share them, if that > helps. > I tried to workaround this with M62/M63 and M64/M65 commands and G4 > inbetween them to specify correct time distances between any 2 events, > but that did not work out nicely - I did not notice any difference > after changing almost all P values for G4 command from 0,5 to 3,5. > Restarting system for several times did not help either. I do not > know, how many times did I restart LinuxCNC... > > Does anyone has any idea, what went wrong? > -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] What should I do to get the performance back?
2012/10/25 Kent A. Reed > ...[snip]... > With this in mind (and you did mentioned graphics first), have you tried > my favorite trick and run your LinuxCNC host in headless mode, using > another computer to provide X services? A quick test would confirm if > you are being undone by your host's graphics subsystem. > > Regards, > Kent > > Unfortunately the graphics card didn't like me playing around with the drivers and it got really hot. I replaced it with a dirt cheap card just to get the PC back up again. Did a remote X session test five minutes ago. ssh -X connection from my CAM workstation, played Youtube videos, downloaded LinuxCNC, copied files locally in Nautilus. Latency maxed out at 10 200 ns. Performance increase 55 %. I'm starting to believe that Torvalds' Nvidia ranting is justified... /S -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
Re: [Emc-users] ClassicLadder error
2012/10/28 Jason Burton : > Crosstalk between spindle power lines and solenoid control lines perhaps? As it can be seen in that video, it is purely in software. 2012/10/28 sam sokolik : > I have not had that happen that I know of... Some things to check on > is if you have enough objects allocated in your hal file.. (ie loadrt > classicladder_rt numRungs=12 numBits=100 numWords=10 numTimers=10 > numMonostables=10 numCounters=10 numPhysInputs?=10 numPhysOutputs?=10 > numArithmExpr?=100 > numSections=4 numSymbols=200 ...) > > Funky things happen when you try to add something and there isn't enough > allocated.. I did at least try to check for that. I did run out of IEC Timers, and I was also informed about that with error message, so I fixed that. I feel pretty confident that everything should be fine about this. > Also - don't have an output (coil) in more than one place.. Ok, I definitely have violated this one. I have outputs being turned on by timers or by pyvcp buttons, connected to ladder inputs. A hardware switch selects it. What is the best approach to fix that? Should I simply leave overall scheme as it is and use internal coils (%Bnn) so that they turn the real output on/off only in one place? Or should I put all the possible inputs for certain output in one rung (or two with some internal coil) and not as they are now - scattered all in different places according to sequence of how all the things were added. -- Viesturs If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto -- WINDOWS 8 is here. Millions of people. Your app in 30 days. Visit The Windows 8 Center at Sourceforge for all your go to resources. http://windows8center.sourceforge.net/ join-generation-app-and-make-money-coding-fast/ ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
