Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-18 Thread John Thornton
We picked up a free oversized transformer for our shop 3 phase and the inrush
would trip the breaker so it was useless to us.

John


On 17 Oct 2007 at 11:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mark already said that the transformers are at least twice as
 big has he really needs.
 
 But they are free (other than shipping), so he's asking us what
 gotchas there might be in using an oversize transformer.
 
 As long as there aren't any technical issues, an oversize but
 free part often beats a right-sized but expensive one.  In this
 case however, I think inrush current is a significant technical
 issue.
 
 Regards,
 
 John Kasunich



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-18 Thread John Kasunich
Jim Coleman wrote:
 i was thinking the light bulb idea when i read it, i remember reading an
 article on a homebuilt 1000 watt audio amp, he did that because of the
 inrush current tripping a breaker.  i was just wondering how many bulbs in
 parallel it would take to handle the current without blowing instantly?
 thinking of standard 100 watt incandescents.

If you have a 120V line and 120V bulbs, you don't have to worry about 
them blowing.  Even if the load looks like a dead short at turn on, the
lights never see more than 120V.

What the number of lights does change is the charge time.  Each bulb 
provides a certain amount of current.  More bulbs in parallel means more 
current and faster charging of the capacitors.  I think a single 100W 
lamp would be fine for the power levels we're talking about.

Regards,

John Kasunich

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-18 Thread rehenry


It should be possible to use a slightly higher current breaker or one with 
longer time delay for magnetic devices?  Failing that a knife switch with time 
delay fuses should handle the job.

Rayh


On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 06:06:15 -0500, Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) 
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net said:
We picked up a free oversized transformer for our shop 3 phase and the inrush
would trip the breaker so it was useless to us.

John


On 17 Oct 2007 at 11:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mark already said that the transformers are at least twice as
 big has he really needs.
 
 But they are free (other than shipping), so he's asking us what
 gotchas there might be in using an oversize transformer.
 
 As long as there aren't any technical issues, an oversize but
 free part often beats a right-sized but expensive one.  In this
 case however, I think inrush current is a significant technical
 issue.
 
 Regards,
 
 John Kasunich



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-18 Thread Jon Elson
John Thornton wrote:
 We picked up a free oversized transformer for our shop 3 phase and the inrush
 would trip the breaker so it was useless to us.
You could probably put light bulbs or reistors in series to 
magnetize the transformer core in sync with the line, then shunt 
the resistance out.  (Of course, this would not be a standard, 
off the shelf NEMA setup.)

Jon

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Pictor
6.67kva 120v primary, 120v secondary
I'd prefer 240v primary, but the nice thing about this one is that
it's cheap (aside from the shipping).  I don't yet have the weight,
I am guessing from the weight of similarly-rated transformers.

He's got three, and he said they are free for pickup - but
California is a little far away to drive :)

130 miles E of San Diego, if anyone nearby is interested - I can
put you in contact.

Mark

--- Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mark Pictor wrote:
  What are the drawbacks of an oversized transformer?  Bulky, not
 as
  efficient, ???
  
  The one I am looking at is a little over 2 times the size I
  guesstimated that I need.  At $100+ for shipping, I'm not sure
 if
  it's worth it or not.  It would allow future expansion, but
 would
  probably still be overkill.
 There are lots of transformers out there.  I sure wouldn't pay 
 $100 shipping for a transformer except in very special cases!
 There HAS to be a better deal somewhere, unless this is a 5+ KVA
 transformer, or you need it FedEx'ed next day.
 
 Jon
 

-
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
 Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
 Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a
 browser.
 Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
 


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread rehenry


With the price of copper these days... I assume from shipping that this is 
copper and probably potted.  

Is this intended for isolation or what?

Rayh


On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:00:28 -0700 (PDT), Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) 
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net said:
6.67kva 120v primary, 120v secondary
I'd prefer 240v primary, but the nice thing about this one is that
it's cheap (aside from the shipping).  I don't yet have the weight,
I am guessing from the weight of similarly-rated transformers.

He's got three, and he said they are free for pickup - but
California is a little far away to drive :)

130 miles E of San Diego, if anyone nearby is interested - I can
put you in contact.

Mark

--- Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mark Pictor wrote:
  What are the drawbacks of an oversized transformer?  Bulky, not
 as
  efficient, ???
  
  The one I am looking at is a little over 2 times the size I
  guesstimated that I need.  At $100+ for shipping, I'm not sure
 if
  it's worth it or not.  It would allow future expansion, but
 would
  probably still be overkill.
 There are lots of transformers out there.  I sure wouldn't pay 
 $100 shipping for a transformer except in very special cases!
 There HAS to be a better deal somewhere, unless this is a 5+ KVA
 transformer, or you need it FedEx'ed next day.
 
 Jon
 

-
 This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
 Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
 Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a
 browser.
 Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
 ___
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
 


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread John Kasunich
Mark Pictor wrote:
 6.67kva 120v primary, 120v secondary
 I'd prefer 240v primary, but the nice thing about this one is that
 it's cheap (aside from the shipping).  I don't yet have the weight,
 I am guessing from the weight of similarly-rated transformers.

6.67kVA at 120V is 55 amps.  The inrush current is going to be fierce,
probably 200-500A for the first couple of cycles.  I agree that a 240V
primary would be better.  If I only needed a couple kVA, I would look
for something that is a better fit to the application.

Regards,

John Kasunich


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread Jon Elson
Mark Pictor wrote:
 6.67kva 120v primary, 120v secondary
 I'd prefer 240v primary, but the nice thing about this one is that
 it's cheap (aside from the shipping).  I don't yet have the weight,
 I am guessing from the weight of similarly-rated transformers.
What the HE** do you need a 6.67 KVA transformer for?  This 
can't be for a servo motor power supply unless you have a 50 
foot KearneyTrecker bed mill.  You should be able to find step 
down transformers at the local scrap yard.  You'll have to pay 
scrap price for them, which is going up lately.  These usually 
can be set for 220 or 440 in, and 120 or 240 out.

Jon

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread John Kasunich
Jon Elson wrote:
 Mark Pictor wrote:
 6.67kva 120v primary, 120v secondary

 What the HE** do you need a 6.67 KVA transformer for?

Mark already said that the transformers are at least twice as
big has he really needs.

But they are free (other than shipping), so he's asking us what
gotchas there might be in using an oversize transformer.

As long as there aren't any technical issues, an oversize but
free part often beats a right-sized but expensive one.  In this
case however, I think inrush current is a significant technical
issue.

Regards,

John Kasunich


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Pictor
I knew there would be inrush current to the capacitors, but I
didn't realize that the transformer, in and of itself, would have
an inrush current.  Guess that shows how much I know!

I was planning to use one or more motor run capacitors to limit
inrush current - use a relay in parallel with the cap, and close
the relay a few seconds after applying power.

Now that Jon brought it up, I think I will visit the local junkyard
instead.

Mark
--- John Kasunich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jon Elson wrote:
  Mark Pictor wrote:
  6.67kva 120v primary, 120v secondary
 
  What the HE** do you need a 6.67 KVA transformer for?
 
 Mark already said that the transformers are at least twice as
 big has he really needs.
 
 But they are free (other than shipping), so he's asking us what
 gotchas there might be in using an oversize transformer.
 
 As long as there aren't any technical issues, an oversize but
 free part often beats a right-sized but expensive one.  In this
 case however, I think inrush current is a significant technical
 issue.
 
 Regards,
 
 John Kasunich


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Pictor
I don't have my figures, but I remember looking for a 3kva
isolation transformer before.  This is a little more than twice
that size, as I mentioned in the OP.  Now that I think about it, my
3kva figure was probably conservative.

I hadn't thought of the scrap yard.  That would probably be a lot
cheaper.

Mark

--- Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What the HE** do you need a 6.67 KVA transformer for?  This 
 can't be for a servo motor power supply unless you have a 50 
 foot KearneyTrecker bed mill.  You should be able to find step 
 down transformers at the local scrap yard.  You'll have to pay 
 scrap price for them, which is going up lately.  These usually 
 can be set for 220 or 440 in, and 120 or 240 out.
 
 Jon
 
 

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread Andre' Blanchard
At 01:17 PM 10/17/2007, you wrote:
I knew there would be inrush current to the capacitors, but I
didn't realize that the transformer, in and of itself, would have
an inrush current.  Guess that shows how much I know!

I was planning to use one or more motor run capacitors to limit
inrush current - use a relay in parallel with the cap, and close
the relay a few seconds after applying power.

Now that Jon brought it up, I think I will visit the local junkyard
instead.

Mark
--- John Kasunich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Jon Elson wrote:
   Mark Pictor wrote:
   6.67kva 120v primary, 120v secondary
 
   What the HE** do you need a 6.67 KVA transformer for?
 
  Mark already said that the transformers are at least twice as
  big has he really needs.
 
  But they are free (other than shipping), so he's asking us what
  gotchas there might be in using an oversize transformer.
 
  As long as there aren't any technical issues, an oversize but
  free part often beats a right-sized but expensive one.  In this
  case however, I think inrush current is a significant technical
  issue.
 
  Regards,
 
  John Kasunich

Put a light bulb in series with the primary.
Flip the switch and the bulb flashes and gets dim as things charge up, then 
flip a second switch to short out the light bulb.
__
Andre' B.  Clear Lake, Wi.



-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread Jon Elson
Mark Pictor wrote:
 I knew there would be inrush current to the capacitors, but I
 didn't realize that the transformer, in and of itself, would have
 an inrush current.  Guess that shows how much I know!
 
Yup.  It varies with the transformer design, and if you end up 
using a 240 V primary winding on 120 V, the inrush will be 
very small.  What is going on is that the transformer integrates 
volts times time, and the iron in the core is designed to just 
handle the rated conditions, where the magnetic field builds in 
one half cycle, and is cancelled out in the next half-cycle.

But, when you close the switch, the power line phase at that 
moment could be anything.  If it happens to be right at the 
voltage zero crossing, then it gets a complete half cycle of the 
same polarity starting from zero magnetic field, and that 
saturates the core.  The transformer will make a huge buzz for a 
half second, and the current will be enormous.
 I was planning to use one or more motor run capacitors to limit
 inrush current - use a relay in parallel with the cap, and close
 the relay a few seconds after applying power.
 
This will kill your relay.  Shorting a capacitor bank charged to 
168 V peak will cause a minor explosion, and the L-C circuit 
will never settle.  You need to use a low-value resistor, not 
capacitor, for this purpose.
 Now that Jon brought it up, I think I will visit the local junkyard
 instead.
Depends entirely on the junkyard, of course, but almost any 
instance where old machinery is torn out of a plant, they get 
these transformers.

Jon

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-17 Thread Jim Coleman
i was thinking the light bulb idea when i read it, i remember reading an
article on a homebuilt 1000 watt audio amp, he did that because of the
inrush current tripping a breaker.  i was just wondering how many bulbs in
parallel it would take to handle the current without blowing instantly?
thinking of standard 100 watt incandescents.

off topic, i bet that would look like a scene from an old horror movie when
he turns it on haha.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-16 Thread Mark Pictor
What are the drawbacks of an oversized transformer?  Bulky, not as
efficient, ???

The one I am looking at is a little over 2 times the size I
guesstimated that I need.  At $100+ for shipping, I'm not sure if
it's worth it or not.  It would allow future expansion, but would
probably still be overkill.

Thanks
Mark

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] oversize transformer question

2007-10-16 Thread Jon Elson
Mark Pictor wrote:
 What are the drawbacks of an oversized transformer?  Bulky, not as
 efficient, ???
 
 The one I am looking at is a little over 2 times the size I
 guesstimated that I need.  At $100+ for shipping, I'm not sure if
 it's worth it or not.  It would allow future expansion, but would
 probably still be overkill.
There are lots of transformers out there.  I sure wouldn't pay 
$100 shipping for a transformer except in very special cases!
There HAS to be a better deal somewhere, unless this is a 5+ KVA
transformer, or you need it FedEx'ed next day.

Jon

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users