Re: Asset licensing guidelines

[Nuritzi Sanchez]

Ok, great. We can talk about this in the Engagement team meeting today.
This will impact our social media posting strategy moving forward.

Thanks again for looking into this, Allan! And for drafting the guidelines!

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Allan Day  wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:11 PM,  wrote:
>
>> Great, thanks for the update! What are next steps for this? Can we take
>> that as a decision to move forward with posting to social media then?
>>
>
> I've removed the clause about social media from the licensing guidelines
> that I've been working on [1] and I'm happy to leave it at that. I guess
> someone could object of course - no one's really in charge here.
>
> Allan
>
> [1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Engagement/AssetLicensing
>



-- 


.

*Nuritzi Sanchez*  |  +1.650.218.7388 |  Endless 


[image: --]

Nuritzi Sanchez
[image: https://]about.me/nuritzi

___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: Asset licensing guidelines

[Allan Day]

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:11 PM,  wrote:

> Great, thanks for the update! What are next steps for this? Can we take
> that as a decision to move forward with posting to social media then?
>

I've removed the clause about social media from the licensing guidelines
that I've been working on [1] and I'm happy to leave it at that. I guess
someone could object of course - no one's really in charge here.

Allan

[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Engagement/AssetLicensing
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: Asset licensing guidelines

[nuritzis]

Great, thanks for the update! What are next steps for this? Can we take that as 
a decision to move forward with posting to social media then? 

..

Nuritzi Sanchez  |  +1.650.218.7388 |  Endless 

> On Jul 22, 2016, at 4:14 AM, Allan Day  wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Allan Day  wrote:
>> Tobias Mueller  wrote:
>> ... 
>>> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:32:36PM +, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>>> > Oh, interesting I didn't think of that.  That said, the share-alike 
>>> > license
>>> > does grant Facebook and Twitter rights to duplicate which is all they are
>>> > asking anyways.
>>> Last time I've checked Facebook ToS they wanted rights to sublicence 
>>> assests with their terms.
>> 
>> That's still the case.
>>  
>>> That is, of course, not compatible with any share-alike licence.
>> 
>> Which is also the view that at least one person gave me when I asked on 
>> #creativecommons a little while ago.
> 
> I've received some information from the Senior Counsel at Creative Commons. 
> (As you'd expect, this can't be treated as concrete legal advice.) The main 
> message is that, while the terms of service of social media sites do 
> technically contravene the terms of Creative Commons licenses, in practical 
> terms it probably isn't too much to worry about.
> 
> Allan
> ___
> engagement-list mailing list
> engagement-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Re: Asset licensing guidelines

[Allan Day]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Allan Day  wrote:

> Tobias Mueller  wrote:
> ...
>
>> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:32:36PM +, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>> > Oh, interesting I didn't think of that.  That said, the share-alike
>> license
>> > does grant Facebook and Twitter rights to duplicate which is all they
>> are
>> > asking anyways.
>> Last time I've checked Facebook ToS they wanted rights to sublicence
>> assests with their terms.
>>
>
> That's still the case.
>
>
>> That is, of course, not compatible with any share-alike licence.
>
>
> Which is also the view that at least one person gave me when I asked on
> #creativecommons a little while ago.
>

I've received some information from the Senior Counsel at Creative Commons.
(As you'd expect, this can't be treated as concrete legal advice.) The main
message is that, while the terms of service of social media sites do
technically contravene the terms of Creative Commons licenses, in practical
terms it probably isn't too much to worry about.

Allan
___
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list