Re: [Enigmail] Is it possible to avoid migration to Thunderbird's P/GP/G implementation?

2020-09-09 Thread Dr. Simon Donkey via enigmail-users
--- Begin Message ---
On 9/9/2020 8:17 PM, li...@datenritter.de wrote:
> Have you considered using interlink?
> (I'm not sure if that'd be a good idea in the long term. Mozilla had
> their reasons to give up the XUL stuff. Maybe they could be convinced to
> boost security a bit...)
>
AFAIK the only security-related reason for dropping XUL was that XUL
addons were written in the browser's own language and had access to too
many things, including files on user's hard drive. The security problem
in XUL was rogue add-ons which won't be a problem if you only use
Interlink with Enigmail and the few other addons that have been approved
for Interlink.

The WebExtensions which replaced XUL also aren't impervious to rogue
developers:
https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/02/stylish-browser-extension-steals-your-internet-history/



--- End Message ---
___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net


Re: [Enigmail] Is it possible to avoid migration to Thunderbird's P/GP/G implementation?

2020-09-09 Thread lists
Am 09.09.20 um 11:35 schrieb Lachezar Dobrev:>   I have not had any
experience with the new Thunderbird, and I wonder
> if it will be possible to completely skip migrating from Enigmail and
> start all-over without touching the infrastructure I have built?

Have you considered using interlink?

(I'm not sure if that'd be a good idea in the long term. Mozilla had
their reasons to give up the XUL stuff. Maybe they could be convinced to
boost security a bit...)

Also, from what I read, you can still use gnupg and don't need to keep
your private keys in TB...?!


>   I am thinking of creating new P/GP/G keys for use with Thunderbird
> only. And *somehow* I should have a way to sign those with a key that
> is *not* in Thunderbird.

You should be able to create such a keypair, then sign it, then import
it into TB.



___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net


Re: [Enigmail] Is it possible to avoid migration to Thunderbird's P/GP/G implementation?

2020-09-09 Thread Kai Engert

On 09.09.20 11:35, Lachezar Dobrev wrote:

   Hey all.
   After reading the messages on this mailing list, I'm contemplating
whether I should completely separate the P/GP/G for day to day use
(code signing, file crypto, etc.) with the one for email. That way
whatever trust I bestow in Thunderbird's P/GP/G implementation will
not interfere with the other tools that I use.

   I have not had any experience with the new Thunderbird, and I wonder
if it will be possible to completely skip migrating from Enigmail and
start all-over without touching the infrastructure I have built?

   I am thinking of creating new P/GP/G keys for use with Thunderbird
only. And *somehow* I should have a way to sign those with a key that
is *not* in Thunderbird.


That's possible.

You aren't forced to perform a migration with Enigmail, you may cancel 
the offer.


To do what you want to do, you could create a new key pair in TB 78. 
Then use TB 78 key manager to export your public key. Then use your 
existing setup to sign your new key with your old key. Export your 
signed pub key from gnupg. Use TB 78 to import your signed pub key. The 
signature you've made will not be automatically used by TB 78, but if 
your correspondents import your new pub key, they can see the signature 
in key details, certifications tab.


Kai


___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net