Hi,
this pretty much tells the problem. the ONLY test it seems to properly
accelerate is the textblock intl test. unless something drastic went wrong
here, but those numbers are very low for accelerated rendering on any
device -
that smells like software. very bad software too.
try software_x11 or fb egnine of evas to compare with pure software:
expedite -e x11
expedite -e fb
I tried with expedite -e fb and got better results. I didn't enable x11
related options while compiling thats why i only tried with fb. Here are
some results.
3.35 , Image Blend Unscaled
5.49 , Image Data ARGB Alpha
25.00 , Image Blend Solid Unscaled
2.00 , Rect Blend
7.61 , Image Crossfade
So the same results are slower when ran with DirectFB engine. When you said
very bad software you meaned the DirectFB libraries are bad or something
else?
I may recompile after i installed a new version of DirectFB.
--
Oğuz Yarımtepe
www.loopbacking.info
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel