Re: [E-devel] E SVN: IN trunk/E16/e: sample-scripts scripts

2008-08-19 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:41:52 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:32:16 +0200 Kim Woelders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 babbled:
 
  On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:42:19 +0200, Michael Jennings
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 15:20:35 (-0300),
   Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
  
  ...
   2 - bit pointless to keep .cvsignore, let's remove them
   altogether?
  
   Subversion supports both.  Personally I like the files way better
   than the propset way, so I'd vote to keep it.
  
  I have about 5 minutes of experience with svn so I might got it
  wrong but it looks to me like svn does not support .cvsignore and
  that the .cvsignore files have been converted to props in the
  cvs-svn conversion process.
  
  If that is correct we might as well remove the .cvsignore's. If not
  I'd like to know how to configure svn to use the .cvsignore files.
  
 
 it supports both - on IMPORT svn also set the properties for ignore
 based on .cvsignore files... it kept the .cvsignore files (as i told
 it to) :)
 

My vote is to keep them.  B-)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: IN trunk/E16/e: sample-scripts scripts

2008-08-18 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
2 things:

1 - reply-all to enlightenment-svn lacks enlightenment-devel
2 - bit pointless to keep .cvsignore, let's remove them altogether?

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:04 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Author:   kwo
 Date: 2008-08-18 11:04:11 -0700 (Mon, 18 Aug 2008)
 New Revision: 35557

 Removed:
  trunk/E16/e/sample-scripts/.cvsignore
 Modified:
  trunk/E16/e/scripts/.cvsignore
 Log:

 Cleanups (.cvsignore).

 Deleted: trunk/E16/e/sample-scripts/.cvsignore

 Modified: trunk/E16/e/scripts/.cvsignore
 ===
 --- trunk/E16/e/scripts/.cvsignore  2008-08-18 17:18:47 UTC (rev 35556)
 +++ trunk/E16/e/scripts/.cvsignore  2008-08-18 18:04:11 UTC (rev 35557)
 @@ -1,4 +1,2 @@
 -.icons
  Makefile.in
  Makefile
 -enlightenment.install


 -
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
 Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
 Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
 http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
 ___
 enlightenment-svn mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-svn




-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: IN trunk/E16/e: sample-scripts scripts

2008-08-18 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 15:20:35 (-0300),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:

 1 - reply-all to enlightenment-svn lacks enlightenment-devel

Fixed.

 2 - bit pointless to keep .cvsignore, let's remove them altogether?

Subversion supports both.  Personally I like the files way better than
the propset way, so I'd vote to keep it.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov   Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
---
 The trouble with doing something right the first time is that nobody
  appreciates how difficult it was.  -- Walt West

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: IN trunk/E16/e: sample-scripts scripts

2008-08-18 Thread Kim Woelders
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:42:19 +0200, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:

 On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 15:20:35 (-0300),
 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:

...
 2 - bit pointless to keep .cvsignore, let's remove them altogether?

 Subversion supports both.  Personally I like the files way better than
 the propset way, so I'd vote to keep it.

I have about 5 minutes of experience with svn so I might got it wrong but  
it looks to me like svn does not support .cvsignore and that the  
.cvsignore files have been converted to props in the cvs-svn conversion  
process.

If that is correct we might as well remove the .cvsignore's. If not I'd  
like to know how to configure svn to use the .cvsignore files.

/Kim

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E SVN: IN trunk/E16/e: sample-scripts scripts

2008-08-18 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:32:16 +0200 Kim Woelders [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:

 On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:42:19 +0200, Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 wrote:
 
  On Monday, 18 August 2008, at 15:20:35 (-0300),
  Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
 
 ...
  2 - bit pointless to keep .cvsignore, let's remove them altogether?
 
  Subversion supports both.  Personally I like the files way better than
  the propset way, so I'd vote to keep it.
 
 I have about 5 minutes of experience with svn so I might got it wrong but  
 it looks to me like svn does not support .cvsignore and that the  
 .cvsignore files have been converted to props in the cvs-svn conversion  
 process.
 
 If that is correct we might as well remove the .cvsignore's. If not I'd  
 like to know how to configure svn to use the .cvsignore files.
 

it supports both - on IMPORT svn also set the properties for ignore based
on .cvsignore files... it kept the .cvsignore files (as i told it to) :)

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel