Re: [E-devel] [e-users] [website] What would you like to see on the new site?

2008-08-06 Thread Toma
I'd like to see a new forum. The current one is pretty lame :(
Perhaps something a little more standard or as folks like to say, Better.
:)

Toma

2008/8/5 Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 whoops messed up on the link it's
 http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png

 On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 04/08/2008, Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  absolutely and I believe in redoing the navigation would involve redoing
  the
  site. If anyone would like to share any other mock ups other than mekius
  go
  ahead. I personally like simple site designs like this:
 
  http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png(flame
  me if you want)
  minus the fact that I think the inkscape in brief section should be
  just a
  wider news section and take the little news box off the side. but I like
  designs like that because they list all the links to the different web
  software. Songbird does this on their site too but their site is a
  little too busy http://getsongbird.com/
  just my thoughts
 

 I like the Inkscape mockup. Looks professional and has all the content
 at a place thats very easy to see. The icons help too for those that
 dont know english and cant be bothered switching to their language
 translation. Songbird one give me the idea of using some cool ajax for
 the icons. Since EFL and all can do cool animations, maybe something
 neat like that could make its way into the website?

 Toma

  On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
  
   On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:
  
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
   
   
Ian Caldwell wrote:
   
Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on
all pages
that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new
site is make
it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of
static
content around it.
   
   
This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig
through a
ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be
able to
filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try
and
find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is
how my
brain works anyway.
   
   
we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify
content, only
put up what we absolutely need on the e.org brochure site (it's
meant to be a
simple couple of pages brochure/flier like set of pages with just
the minimum
needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get
it).
   
the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is
intended for
large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki
especially) is READILY
accessible to people to edit.
   
   
Yes, I realize this, most of the links in the submenus will just
point
to the wiki/tracker/etc.  But people found it hard to even find
these
things on the current site.  So it would be nice to point them to
where
they need to look instead of them having to decode links that don't
necessarily match anything they are looking for.  So the changes to
navigation are nothing stellar, just reorganizing the menu and
making
the submenu a little more visible so people immediately see things
to
click on.  At least this is what I did with my mockup, haven't seen
anyone else come forward with anything yet.
   
  
   I'm with Mekius. The number one complaint that I get about the website
   is that the navigation sucks. If we can do something to make it easier
   for people to find stuff then it's a win.
  
   dan
  
  
  
  
   -
   This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
   challenge
   Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
   prizes
   Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
   world
   http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
   ___
   enlightenment-devel mailing list
   enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
  
 
  -
  This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
  challenge
  Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
  prizes
  Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
  world
  http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
  ___
  enlightenment-devel mailing list
  

Re: [E-devel] [e-users] [website] What would you like to see on the new site?

2008-08-06 Thread Sthithaprajna Garapaty
I dont think the forums are getting much use. Few, if any, of the devs
look at it, and while a bunch of users seem to post questions, there
are very few answers.
I'd like to see the forums turned off (made read-only) and the mailing
lists really emphasized as the main location for discussions/support
(apart from IRC).

Eventually, we could install lurker on the server
http://lurker.sourceforge.net/ tweak it to fit the website's style and
add a web form so that people can send messages to the mailing list
through the interface. (kinda like a hybrid mailing-list/forum)

But for now, (k-s's suggestion) we could just link here
http://www.mail-archive.com/enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/
Its at least more usable than sourceforge's UI.



On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'd like to see a new forum. The current one is pretty lame :(
 Perhaps something a little more standard or as folks like to say, Better.
 :)

 Toma

 2008/8/5 Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 whoops messed up on the link it's
 http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png

 On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 04/08/2008, Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  absolutely and I believe in redoing the navigation would involve redoing
  the
  site. If anyone would like to share any other mock ups other than mekius
  go
  ahead. I personally like simple site designs like this:
 
  http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png(flame
  me if you want)
  minus the fact that I think the inkscape in brief section should be
  just a
  wider news section and take the little news box off the side. but I like
  designs like that because they list all the links to the different web
  software. Songbird does this on their site too but their site is a
  little too busy http://getsongbird.com/
  just my thoughts
 

 I like the Inkscape mockup. Looks professional and has all the content
 at a place thats very easy to see. The icons help too for those that
 dont know english and cant be bothered switching to their language
 translation. Songbird one give me the idea of using some cool ajax for
 the icons. Since EFL and all can do cool animations, maybe something
 neat like that could make its way into the website?

 Toma

  On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
  
   On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:
  
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
   
   
Ian Caldwell wrote:
   
Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on
all pages
that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new
site is make
it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of
static
content around it.
   
   
This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig
through a
ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be
able to
filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try
and
find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is
how my
brain works anyway.
   
   
we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify
content, only
put up what we absolutely need on the e.org brochure site (it's
meant to be a
simple couple of pages brochure/flier like set of pages with just
the minimum
needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get
it).
   
the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is
intended for
large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki
especially) is READILY
accessible to people to edit.
   
   
Yes, I realize this, most of the links in the submenus will just
point
to the wiki/tracker/etc.  But people found it hard to even find
these
things on the current site.  So it would be nice to point them to
where
they need to look instead of them having to decode links that don't
necessarily match anything they are looking for.  So the changes to
navigation are nothing stellar, just reorganizing the menu and
making
the submenu a little more visible so people immediately see things
to
click on.  At least this is what I did with my mockup, haven't seen
anyone else come forward with anything yet.
   
  
   I'm with Mekius. The number one complaint that I get about the website
   is that the navigation sucks. If we can do something to make it easier
   for people to find stuff then it's a win.
  
   dan
  
  
  
  
   -
   This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
   challenge
   Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
   prizes
   Grand prize 

Re: [E-devel] [e-users] [website] What would you like to see on the new site?

2008-08-04 Thread Toma
On 04/08/2008, Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 absolutely and I believe in redoing the navigation would involve redoing the
 site. If anyone would like to share any other mock ups other than mekius go
 ahead. I personally like simple site designs like this:
 http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png(flame
 me if you want)
 minus the fact that I think the inkscape in brief section should be just a
 wider news section and take the little news box off the side. but I like
 designs like that because they list all the links to the different web
 software. Songbird does this on their site too but their site is a
 little too busy http://getsongbird.com/
 just my thoughts


I like the Inkscape mockup. Looks professional and has all the content
at a place thats very easy to see. The icons help too for those that
dont know english and cant be bothered switching to their language
translation. Songbird one give me the idea of using some cool ajax for
the icons. Since EFL and all can do cool animations, maybe something
neat like that could make its way into the website?

Toma

 On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:
 
   Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
   On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   babbled:
  
  
   Ian Caldwell wrote:
  
   Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on
   all pages
   that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new
   site is make
   it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of
   static
   content around it.
  
  
   This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig
   through a
   ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be
   able to
   filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try and
   find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is
   how my
   brain works anyway.
  
  
   we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify
   content, only
   put up what we absolutely need on the e.org brochure site (it's
   meant to be a
   simple couple of pages brochure/flier like set of pages with just
   the minimum
   needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get it).
  
   the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is
   intended for
   large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki
   especially) is READILY
   accessible to people to edit.
  
  
   Yes, I realize this, most of the links in the submenus will just point
   to the wiki/tracker/etc.  But people found it hard to even find these
   things on the current site.  So it would be nice to point them to
   where
   they need to look instead of them having to decode links that don't
   necessarily match anything they are looking for.  So the changes to
   navigation are nothing stellar, just reorganizing the menu and making
   the submenu a little more visible so people immediately see things to
   click on.  At least this is what I did with my mockup, haven't seen
   anyone else come forward with anything yet.
  
 
  I'm with Mekius. The number one complaint that I get about the website
  is that the navigation sucks. If we can do something to make it easier
  for people to find stuff then it's a win.
 
  dan
 
 
 
  -
  This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
  challenge
  Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
  prizes
  Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
  http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
  ___
  enlightenment-devel mailing list
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 
 -
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
 Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
 Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
 http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list

Re: [E-devel] [e-users] [website] What would you like to see on the new site?

2008-08-04 Thread Ian Caldwell
whoops messed up on the link it's
http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 04/08/2008, Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  absolutely and I believe in redoing the navigation would involve redoing
 the
  site. If anyone would like to share any other mock ups other than mekius
 go
  ahead. I personally like simple site designs like this:
 
 http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png(flamehttp://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png%28flame
  me if you want)
  minus the fact that I think the inkscape in brief section should be
 just a
  wider news section and take the little news box off the side. but I like
  designs like that because they list all the links to the different web
  software. Songbird does this on their site too but their site is a
  little too busy http://getsongbird.com/
  just my thoughts
 

 I like the Inkscape mockup. Looks professional and has all the content
 at a place thats very easy to see. The icons help too for those that
 dont know english and cant be bothered switching to their language
 translation. Songbird one give me the idea of using some cool ajax for
 the icons. Since EFL and all can do cool animations, maybe something
 neat like that could make its way into the website?

 Toma

  On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  
   On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:
  
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
   
   
Ian Caldwell wrote:
   
Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on
all pages
that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new
site is make
it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of
static
content around it.
   
   
This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig
through a
ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be
able to
filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try
 and
find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is
how my
brain works anyway.
   
   
we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify
content, only
put up what we absolutely need on the e.org brochure site (it's
meant to be a
simple couple of pages brochure/flier like set of pages with just
the minimum
needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get it).
   
the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is
intended for
large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki
especially) is READILY
accessible to people to edit.
   
   
Yes, I realize this, most of the links in the submenus will just
 point
to the wiki/tracker/etc.  But people found it hard to even find these
things on the current site.  So it would be nice to point them to
where
they need to look instead of them having to decode links that don't
necessarily match anything they are looking for.  So the changes to
navigation are nothing stellar, just reorganizing the menu and making
the submenu a little more visible so people immediately see things to
click on.  At least this is what I did with my mockup, haven't seen
anyone else come forward with anything yet.
   
  
   I'm with Mekius. The number one complaint that I get about the website
   is that the navigation sucks. If we can do something to make it easier
   for people to find stuff then it's a win.
  
   dan
  
  
  
  
 -
   This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
   challenge
   Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
   prizes
   Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
 world
   http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
   ___
   enlightenment-devel mailing list
   enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
  
  -
  This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
 challenge
  Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
 prizes
  Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
 world
  http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
  ___
  enlightenment-devel mailing list
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 


Re: [E-devel] [e-users] [website] What would you like to see on the new site?

2008-08-03 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:

 Ian Caldwell wrote:
  Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on all pages
  that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new site is make
  it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of static
  content around it.

 This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig through a 
 ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be able to 
 filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try and 
 find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is how my 
 brain works anyway.

we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify content, only
put up what we absolutely need on the e.org brochure site (it's meant to be a
simple couple of pages brochure/flier like set of pages with just the minimum
needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get it).

the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is intended for
large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki especially) is READILY
accessible to people to edit.

  On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Zachary Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
 

  On 8/1/08, Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  What would you like to see on the new website? What goals do you think it
  should have.
  My personal views are this is what we need to see differently. Feel free

  to
  
  chime in and add to what you'd like to see on the new site
 
  *1.   Create links to all the software ( wiki, bug tracker, forums,
  source browser etc)*
 
  *2.   Make the website more user oriented. A lot of the content can

  be
  
  moved to the wiki. We need the website to be a lot more static. *
 
  *3.   Separate developer sections from user.*
 
  *4.   Create a feature list page in order to make E more of a product
  that we're trying to talk about*
 
  *5.   weekly or biweekly articles*
 
  *a.   We will have a submission article system in which we will stack

  up
  
  articles and release one a week regarding E.  *
 
  *b.  This will allow users who aren't good at coding or able to help

  in
  
  that way to keep track of what's happening and write articles regarding

  the
  
  progress.*
 
  *c.   This will also help people who are writing applications be able

  to
  
  follow development and get inspiration from other application

  developers.*
  
  *d.  Or just content such as user guides for different things*
 
  *6.Translations*
 
  *a.   Allow people to have the website content translated into

  multiple
  
  languages.*
 
  *7.   One login to rule them all*
 
  *a.   Having 10 different logins for all the different software isn't
  working it would be really nice to see a lot of them consolidated

  into a
  
  login api such as openid or google accounts.*
  All in all the website needs to me more of a pamphlet than a handbook for
  everything under the sun.
 
  *Note* Please do not start on any designs That will come later and we
  have plans for making prizes for it. Stay tuned.
  --Ian Inc
  -
  This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's

  challenge
  
  Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great

  prizes
  
  Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the

  world
  
  http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
  ___
  enlightenment-devel mailing list
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 

 
  The current site has a huge usability problem : theres 3 menus and
  they're all in different styles and in different places.  One
  navigation system which is obvious should be sufficient.
 
  -Zach
 
  
  -
  This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
  Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
  prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in
  the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
  ___
  enlightenment-devel mailing list
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

 
 
 -
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
 Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
 Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event 

Re: [E-devel] [e-users] [website] What would you like to see on the new site?

2008-08-03 Thread Ian Caldwell
defiantly but, The site should have links to all those resources so that you
know where they are. I think that's one of the major down falls of the
current site.

On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 3:27 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 babbled:

  Ian Caldwell wrote:
   Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on all
 pages
   that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new site is
 make
   it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of static
   content around it.
  
  This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig through a
  ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be able to
  filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try and
  find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is how my
  brain works anyway.

 we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify content,
 only
 put up what we absolutely need on the e.org brochure site (it's meant to
 be a
 simple couple of pages brochure/flier like set of pages with just the
 minimum
 needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get it).

 the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is intended
 for
 large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki especially) is
 READILY
 accessible to people to edit.

   On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Zachary Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  
  
   On 8/1/08, Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   What would you like to see on the new website? What goals do you
 think it
   should have.
   My personal views are this is what we need to see differently. Feel
 free
  
   to
  
   chime in and add to what you'd like to see on the new site
  
   *1.   Create links to all the software ( wiki, bug tracker,
 forums,
   source browser etc)*
  
   *2.   Make the website more user oriented. A lot of the content
 can
  
   be
  
   moved to the wiki. We need the website to be a lot more static. *
  
   *3.   Separate developer sections from user.*
  
   *4.   Create a feature list page in order to make E more of a
 product
   that we're trying to talk about*
  
   *5.   weekly or biweekly articles*
  
   *a.   We will have a submission article system in which we will
 stack
  
   up
  
   articles and release one a week regarding E.  *
  
   *b.  This will allow users who aren't good at coding or able to
 help
  
   in
  
   that way to keep track of what's happening and write articles
 regarding
  
   the
  
   progress.*
  
   *c.   This will also help people who are writing applications be
 able
  
   to
  
   follow development and get inspiration from other application
  
   developers.*
  
   *d.  Or just content such as user guides for different things*
  
   *6.Translations*
  
   *a.   Allow people to have the website content translated into
  
   multiple
  
   languages.*
  
   *7.   One login to rule them all*
  
   *a.   Having 10 different logins for all the different software
 isn't
   working it would be really nice to see a lot of them consolidated
  
   into a
  
   login api such as openid or google accounts.*
   All in all the website needs to me more of a pamphlet than a handbook
 for
   everything under the sun.
  
   *Note* Please do not start on any designs That will come later
 and we
   have plans for making prizes for it. Stay tuned.
   --Ian Inc
  
 -
   This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
  
   challenge
  
   Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win
 great
  
   prizes
  
   Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
  
   world
  
   http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
   ___
   enlightenment-devel mailing list
   enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
  
  
  
   The current site has a huge usability problem : theres 3 menus and
   they're all in different styles and in different places.  One
   navigation system which is obvious should be sufficient.
  
   -Zach
  
  
  
 -
   This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
 challenge
   Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
   prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere
 in
   the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
   ___
   enlightenment-devel mailing list
   enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
  
 
 
  

Re: [E-devel] [e-users] [website] What would you like to see on the new site?

2008-08-03 Thread dan sinclair

On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:

 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
 On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 babbled:


 Ian Caldwell wrote:

 Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on  
 all pages
 that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new  
 site is make
 it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of  
 static
 content around it.


 This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig  
 through a
 ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be  
 able to
 filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try and
 find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is  
 how my
 brain works anyway.


 we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify  
 content, only
 put up what we absolutely need on the e.org brochure site (it's  
 meant to be a
 simple couple of pages brochure/flier like set of pages with just  
 the minimum
 needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get it).

 the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is  
 intended for
 large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki  
 especially) is READILY
 accessible to people to edit.


 Yes, I realize this, most of the links in the submenus will just point
 to the wiki/tracker/etc.  But people found it hard to even find these
 things on the current site.  So it would be nice to point them to  
 where
 they need to look instead of them having to decode links that don't
 necessarily match anything they are looking for.  So the changes to
 navigation are nothing stellar, just reorganizing the menu and making
 the submenu a little more visible so people immediately see things to
 click on.  At least this is what I did with my mockup, haven't seen
 anyone else come forward with anything yet.


I'm with Mekius. The number one complaint that I get about the website  
is that the navigation sucks. If we can do something to make it easier  
for people to find stuff then it's a win.

dan



-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] [e-users] [website] What would you like to see on the new site?

2008-08-03 Thread Ian Caldwell
absolutely and I believe in redoing the navigation would involve redoing the
site. If anyone would like to share any other mock ups other than mekius go
ahead. I personally like simple site designs like this:
http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png(flame
me if you want)
minus the fact that I think the inkscape in brief section should be just a
wider news section and take the little news box off the side. but I like
designs like that because they list all the links to the different web
software. Songbird does this on their site too but their site is a
little too busy http://getsongbird.com/
just my thoughts

On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:

  Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
  On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  babbled:
 
 
  Ian Caldwell wrote:
 
  Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on
  all pages
  that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new
  site is make
  it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of
  static
  content around it.
 
 
  This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig
  through a
  ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be
  able to
  filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try and
  find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is
  how my
  brain works anyway.
 
 
  we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify
  content, only
  put up what we absolutely need on the e.org brochure site (it's
  meant to be a
  simple couple of pages brochure/flier like set of pages with just
  the minimum
  needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get it).
 
  the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is
  intended for
  large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki
  especially) is READILY
  accessible to people to edit.
 
 
  Yes, I realize this, most of the links in the submenus will just point
  to the wiki/tracker/etc.  But people found it hard to even find these
  things on the current site.  So it would be nice to point them to
  where
  they need to look instead of them having to decode links that don't
  necessarily match anything they are looking for.  So the changes to
  navigation are nothing stellar, just reorganizing the menu and making
  the submenu a little more visible so people immediately see things to
  click on.  At least this is what I did with my mockup, haven't seen
  anyone else come forward with anything yet.
 

 I'm with Mekius. The number one complaint that I get about the website
 is that the navigation sucks. If we can do something to make it easier
 for people to find stuff then it's a win.

 dan



 -
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
 challenge
 Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
 prizes
 Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
 http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] [e-users] [website] What would you like to see on the new site?

2008-08-03 Thread Ian Caldwell
minus the horrible color scheme.

On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 absolutely and I believe in redoing the navigation would involve redoing
 the site. If anyone would like to share any other mock ups other than mekius
 go ahead. I personally like simple site designs like this:

 http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs30/i/2008/126/3/0/Inkscape_Site_develfront_by_duckgoesoink.png(flame
  me if you want)
 minus the fact that I think the inkscape in brief section should be just
 a wider news section and take the little news box off the side. but I like
 designs like that because they list all the links to the different web
 software. Songbird does this on their site too but their site is a
 little too busy http://getsongbird.com/
 just my thoughts


 On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:06 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:


 On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:

  Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
  On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  babbled:
 
 
  Ian Caldwell wrote:
 
  Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on
  all pages
  that has links to pretty much everything.  The goal of the new
  site is make
  it a lot more usable. With regularly updated news, and a lot of
  static
  content around it.
 
 
  This is bad design imo, it leads to overload.  Having to dig
  through a
  ton of links to find the one you want is crazy, it's best to be
  able to
  filter towards your goal IMO.  Much easier to filter then to try and
  find a link among many that sounds like what you want.  This is
  how my
  brain works anyway.
 
 
  we don't need some new navigation system... we need to simplify
  content, only
  put up what we absolutely need on the e.org brochure site (it's
  meant to be a
  simple couple of pages brochure/flier like set of pages with just
  the minimum
  needed to find out what e is, who is involved, how/where to get it).
 
  the other bits (trac/bugzilla, wiki, docs etc. etc.) are what is
  intended for
  large-scale documentation and info - and those (the wiki
  especially) is READILY
  accessible to people to edit.
 
 
  Yes, I realize this, most of the links in the submenus will just point
  to the wiki/tracker/etc.  But people found it hard to even find these
  things on the current site.  So it would be nice to point them to
  where
  they need to look instead of them having to decode links that don't
  necessarily match anything they are looking for.  So the changes to
  navigation are nothing stellar, just reorganizing the menu and making
  the submenu a little more visible so people immediately see things to
  click on.  At least this is what I did with my mockup, haven't seen
  anyone else come forward with anything yet.
 

 I'm with Mekius. The number one complaint that I get about the website
 is that the navigation sucks. If we can do something to make it easier
 for people to find stuff then it's a win.

 dan



 -
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
 challenge
 Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great
 prizes
 Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
 world
 http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel



-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel