RE: [E-devel] HI! EveryBody (and E on Win32)
I have a VM With a linux on my WinNT system, But I can make a partition and Put it to boot, because the computer is in the office, not is my machine (or almost... not in the way that i LIKE to be). Maybe I think to use a Cygwin to start... in that way I think is more easily and less demoralize to myself :D With the Cygwin, The X server is running Actually... I try it and later make some tricks to usea as the main interface. > -Mensaje original- > De: Robert G. Werner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: Miércoles 29 de Enero de 2003 18:10 > Para: Brizuela Ezequiel Hector > CC: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Asunto: Re: [E-devel] HI! EveryBody (and E on Win32) > > Brizuela Ezequiel Hector wrote: > > Hi!, i'm new in the list and i wan't to make some questions. > > > > Someone knows a port or patch or whatever to make a E on win32 > platform???. > > I'm downloading(E17) the files to try to compile. > > > > I'm make me worried about don't have the PERFECT interface of E on > Win32, > > and I REALLY wan't to "port" it. > > > [snip] > > Take a look at the enlightenment project page (www.enlightenment.org, > IIRC). It is clearly stated there that E will never be ported to run > on Win32 (at least by raster). I've never heard of anyone making it > work under Win32. Besides, you would need to have an Xserver > installed on your Win* box and by the time you went to all that > trouble, why not just set up another partition on your hard drive and > dual boot into linux or some other free OS that it runs natively on. > > -- > Robert G. Werner > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2001/9/11 > > This generation doesn't have emotional baggage. We have emotional > moving vans. > -- Bruce Feirstein --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
RE: [E-devel] HI! EveryBody (and E on Win32)
> -Mensaje original- > De: Wil Reichert [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: Miércoles 29 de Enero de 2003 19:01 > > > > Someone knows a port or patch or whatever to make a E on win32 > > platform???. > E-sense - http://www.kjofol.org/e/, homepage is dysfunctional tho. > Looks like the project is way dead. > > Want E? 3 ways. > > - hack the windows gui code. Its been done lots (Litestep, evwm,...) JEJE.. I try it.. but slowly.. actually i have too much proyecs around :D > - Use Cygwin's X server & *nix env.. Yes I try it... and make some trick to put as Main interface. > - Get Windowblinds and download an E theme. PUAJJJ It's a really really lack of memory > But really, just use linux. Yes.. But in the office I can :S --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] E on Win32 - related question
i think having evas on win32 is something that really should be considered. the whole UI war, in my opinion, is what is holding linux back. to have a truely helpful and successful widget set i think a win32 version is needed. but, of course, this is a problem we should probably deal with later. Tony Peguero wrote: Hi all. I have a related question. I don't see much point in running the whole of E on Win32, but I am interested in using Evas as part of a GUI in a cross platform game that I'm working on. Would it be possible to do that? Is it practical? What would be required? Thanks. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] [enlightenment - General] e16.4 or e16.5 version number wierdness
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=1854432 By: stanbey I just tried to install ETerm (Eterm-0.9.2-1.i386.rpm) and got some failed dependencies: libast.so.1, linImlib2.so.1 and libutempter.so.0) I thought I must have an old version of Enlightenment, so I tried to download the latest stable version. What *is* the latest stable version? Every version I have been able to download from sourceforge is older than the one I have installed (enlightenment-0.16.5-85). Even wierder, 16.4 seems to be more recent (judging by timestamps) than 16.5. What's going on? And what do I need to install to get Eterm to install? __ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/monitor.php?forum_id=41043 --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] Eterm installation
Hi all, Probably a simple question for you. I downloaded eterm and libast. Installed libast under the normal path (usr/local) So my files are in /usr/local/lib/usr/local/bin and also in /usr/local/include i believe. But when i ./configure the eterm program it always says: ERROR:you need libast 0.5 or higher to build. But the libast-confif says it is version 0.5 so this is a problem with the path. How can i correct it ? Regards, Philippe Dhont --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] small bug in evas
Since the add of smart object the loading of image in evas has a small bug: if you add two times '/' in a path evas bug strangely in e/src/icons.c ,icon_update_state if I had : --- sprintf(icon,"%s/%s",e_config_user_dir(),"icon/icons.db"); ... evas_object_image_file_set(ic->obj.icon, icon, key); => /home/*/.e//icon/icon.db => BUG - sprintf(icon,"%s%s",e_config_user_dir(),"icon/icons.db"); ... evas_object_image_file_set(ic->obj.icon, icon, key); => /home/*/.e//icon/icon.db => no bug Regards PS : the add of smart object is unrelated with this bug -- vanuxem gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] efsd - listdir and sort
/*--*/ I have tried efsd and when I want monitor a dir with 'op_list_sort' I never receive some 'file created', when I had new file, due to the fact that efsd wait a 'end exist'. I have looking for in the code, and I have found that in efds_main.c (handler of FAM event) contain a param, 'sort_files' that is never used. It's just an indication no the bug. Actually when I use listdir sorted but I have added some event (created deleted, execute ...(!*Exist*)) in the test (!m->dir || !m->sorted) /**/ Another thing, when I want to monitor some reaaly big dir (about 2000 dir in) A lot of thread sleep and i never receive too the result. I have searched why and found that sometimes the error for the send command is ESPIPE 29 /* Illegal seek */ What to do : wait and see or break the connection... Really sorry for my poor english. -- vanuxem gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] evas font path API
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 07:13, Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:19:55PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > > yes.. if renaming is to happen.. NOW is the time. i don't want duplicate fn > > calls for "compatability" i'd like to keep it simple. i'd prefer to make people > > have to change their code than add #defines or compat symbols (at this stage) > > > > but is this warranting a change? that is the question... i'll be happy with a > > vote of some sort. i'm of 2 minds so i the event on indecision i'll do nothing. > > if enough peolpe think its worth a change.. change it shall. > > > > I'm in favor of the rename. IMHO, evas_object_* should all have an object > parameter or return an object, whereas anything that globally effects an evas > or all evas' should be evas_*. > > My two cents. :-) > I second that :) Espen Nilsen --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
