[e-users] exebuf preload?
Hi, shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While this wait time E is frozen. This is very bad for a fast application starting tool. Isn't it possible to improve this situation? regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:40 +0100 Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Hi, shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While this wait time E is frozen. This is very bad for a fast application starting tool. Isn't it possible to improve this situation? could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it immediately first). ? for me exebuf always comes up instantaneously. regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While this wait time E is frozen. This is very bad for a fast application starting tool. Isn't it possible to improve this situation? could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it immediately first). ? for me exebuf always comes up instantaneously. Sure, but I never used oprofile before. It's in Gentoo portage, so I've installed it now. But what exactly do you need? How should I execute it to create this dump? regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:51:15 +0100 Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While this wait time E is frozen. This is very bad for a fast application starting tool. Isn't it possible to improve this situation? could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it immediately first). ? for me exebuf always comes up instantaneously. Sure, but I never used oprofile before. It's in Gentoo portage, so I've installed it now. But what exactly do you need? How should I execute it to create this dump? there is an oprofile gui (written using qt) and you can start/stop profiling using that (on debian its oprof_start run it as root) there is a command-line tool you can get a profile dump with: opreport --symbol regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 20:44:59 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it immediately first). ? for me exebuf always comes up instantaneously. Sure, but I never used oprofile before. It's in Gentoo portage, so I've installed it now. But what exactly do you need? How should I execute it to create this dump? there is an oprofile gui (written using qt) and you can start/stop profiling using that (on debian its oprof_start run it as root) there is a command-line tool you can get a profile dump with: opreport --symbol I start oprof_start as root and this dialog warns me: -- /usr/bin/opcontrol return 1 Failed: FATAL: Module oprofile not found FATAL: Module oprofile not found Kernel doesn't support oprofile Command was: /usr/bin/opcontrol --init -- So do I need to activate something in the kernel and recompile? What should I do? regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:50:39 +0100 Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 20:44:59 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it immediately first). ? for me exebuf always comes up instantaneously. Sure, but I never used oprofile before. It's in Gentoo portage, so I've installed it now. But what exactly do you need? How should I execute it to create this dump? there is an oprofile gui (written using qt) and you can start/stop profiling using that (on debian its oprof_start run it as root) there is a command-line tool you can get a profile dump with: opreport --symbol I start oprof_start as root and this dialog warns me: -- /usr/bin/opcontrol return 1 Failed: FATAL: Module oprofile not found FATAL: Module oprofile not found Kernel doesn't support oprofile Command was: /usr/bin/opcontrol --init -- So do I need to activate something in the kernel and recompile? What should I do? well it says your kernel doesnt support oprofile! take a guess! :) regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] Continuing... Anonymous CVS Servers - YOU CAN HELP!
Just for the hell of it, I called Monarch Computer her in Georgia and talked to them about the possibility of either donating hardware or reducing the cost for the sake of an open source project. That being said, I was told that I should send an email to the marketing department. It makes sense to me, but I'm not someone who would such a decision, although I'm sure the Enlightenment developers and users wouldn't turn down a deal if it was offered. So, the question is, should I go for it, should someone else do this? What can we offer in return? Links off the E website? Let me know folks? -- Until later, Geoffrey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On 03/02/06, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While this wait time E is frozen. This is very bad for a fast application starting tool. Isn't it possible to improve this situation? I've got the same behaviour. It takes forever to load and you can hear the hard drive reading the entire time. -Dusik --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid3432bid#0486dat1642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:40:33 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): So do I need to activate something in the kernel and recompile? What should I do? well it says your kernel doesnt support oprofile! take a guess! :) Sorry for my stupid questions, but I never used oprofile and I've a little in hurry currently. Now I found the option in kernel config and recompiled the kernel with oprofile support. oprof_start works now. I started the profiler, started exebuf, stoped the profiles and pressed save and quit. But what now? What should I send you? Where is the dump file? Please help me. I've currently not the time to read many docs. If you couldn't provide a 5 line tutorial I'll try it again next week... regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:40 +0100 Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Hi, shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While this wait time E is frozen. This is very bad for a fast application starting tool. Isn't it possible to improve this situation? could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it immediately first). ? for me exebuf always comes up instantaneously. It used to start up slowly for me to. So I whip out oprofile to test, and now it starts up instantly. Did you fix this when I wasn't looking? pgpwMqT341qlu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:54:19 +0100 Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Am Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:40:33 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): So do I need to activate something in the kernel and recompile? What should I do? well it says your kernel doesnt support oprofile! take a guess! :) Sorry for my stupid questions, but I never used oprofile and I've a little in hurry currently. Now I found the option in kernel config and recompiled the kernel with oprofile support. oprof_start works now. I started the profiler, started exebuf, stoped the profiles and pressed save and quit. But what now? What should I send you? Where is the dump file? Please help me. I've currently not the time to read many docs. If you couldn't provide a 5 line tutorial I'll try it again next week... i quote from my previous mail: there is a command-line tool you can get a profile dump with: opreport --symbols regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:49:46 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:32:40 +0100 Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Hi, shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While this wait time E is frozen. This is very bad for a fast application starting tool. Isn't it possible to improve this situation? could u use oprofile and get us an oprofile dump for the time just before exebuf is brough up until it is ready (close it immediately first). ? for me exebuf always comes up instantaneously. It used to start up slowly for me to. So I whip out oprofile to test, and now it starts up instantly. Did you fix this when I wasn't looking? no??? -maybe reboot the machine (or flush all disk caches etc. etc.) and restart e to make sure nothing is loaded try? really all it does at startup is load some theme data (as e is doing ALL the time while it runs - nothing new) and it lists all files in your $PATH so it has a list of all executables to hunt through (as it will need this soon enough). the reason it loads it then is this list may change as u may install thing in between. i am suspectin g doing this listing is what';s slow - but why? how can simply LISTING the constents of maybe 10 directories (in your $PATH) take up 10 seconds? thats why i want to see the oprofile info. the other options are to literally go into the code for the exebuf show call and put printfs every 2nd line that print out a timestamp (from ecore_time_get()) as a delta from the previous timestampe they got and then see which call takes the most wall-clock time then go from there. -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:48:10 -0500 Dusik [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On 03/02/06, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: shortly I started to work with exebuf and think it's a really cool feature. More as a simple starting dialog. But if I start the exebuf for the first time in an E session or not for a long time while an E session the exebuf needs some time to load (here: up to 10sec). While this wait time E is frozen. This is very bad for a fast application starting tool. Isn't it possible to improve this situation? I've got the same behaviour. It takes forever to load and you can hear the hard drive reading the entire time. as i said in my last mail. ALL it does it LISt the contents of each directior in your $PATH - your disk or $PATH is very fucked to take forever just to list their contents. exebuf needs the contents to be able to do matches. if you want to find out where the time is going modify the code in e_exebuf.c in e_exebuf_show() so that you have: double t = 0.0; at the top then regularly do: printf(time point X: %3.3f\n, (t = ecore_time_get() - t)); paste this line in a few places form beginning to end of the function - the place with the big time gamp is whats using the time. i suspect it'll be ecore_file_app_list(); - that line. if you check the code thete - all it is doing is listing all contents, then callign stat on the file to see if its executable or not or a directory or not. the 2 stat calls shoudl be not much more than the cost of 1 as the data is already loaded and cached. somehow the work of loading then stat()ing all the executable in your path is death on your machine. either you have so many things installed that literally reading this data is so heavy it has an impact, or your disk is so fragmented and the directory contents and file inodes are so scattered it causes this - consider reformatting your system and re-installign cleanly, or using a filing system that is more efficient, or stop re-installing/upgrading your system every 2 days as this will lead to badly fragmented file tables etc. etc. -Dusik --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:30:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: It used to start up slowly for me to. So I whip out oprofile to test, and now it starts up instantly. Did you fix this when I wasn't looking? no??? -maybe reboot the machine (or flush all disk caches etc. etc.) and restart e to make sure nothing is loaded try? really all it does at startup is load some theme data (as e is doing ALL the time while it runs - nothing new) and it lists all files in your $PATH so it has a list of all executables to hunt through (as it will need this soon enough). the reason it loads it then is this list may change as u may install thing in between. i am suspectin g doing this listing is what';s slow - but why? how can simply LISTING the constents of maybe 10 directories (in your $PATH) take up 10 seconds? thats why i want to see the oprofile info. the other options are to literally go into the code for the exebuf show call and put printfs every 2nd line that print out a timestamp (from ecore_time_get()) as a delta from the previous timestampe they got and then see which call takes the most wall-clock time then go from there. Well, I'm updating now, so when that is finished I'll see what happens after a reboot. pgp0zgdfMUyKK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:56:27 +1000 David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:30:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: It used to start up slowly for me to. So I whip out oprofile to test, and now it starts up instantly. Did you fix this when I wasn't looking? no??? -maybe reboot the machine (or flush all disk caches etc. etc.) and restart e to make sure nothing is loaded try? really all it does at startup is load some theme data (as e is doing ALL the time while it runs - nothing new) and it lists all files in your $PATH so it has a list of all executables to hunt through (as it will need this soon enough). the reason it loads it then is this list may change as u may install thing in between. i am suspectin g doing this listing is what';s slow - but why? how can simply LISTING the constents of maybe 10 directories (in your $PATH) take up 10 seconds? thats why i want to see the oprofile info. the other options are to literally go into the code for the exebuf show call and put printfs every 2nd line that print out a timestamp (from ecore_time_get()) as a delta from the previous timestampe they got and then see which call takes the most wall-clock time then go from there. Well, I'm updating now, so when that is finished I'll see what happens after a reboot. Got the delay, profiled it, hope this helps. oprofiled.log.bz2 Description: application/bzip pgpv4gEt8nc4T.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:28:03 +1000 David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:56:27 +1000 David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:30:09 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 04:16:28 +1000 David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: It used to start up slowly for me to. So I whip out oprofile to test, and now it starts up instantly. Did you fix this when I wasn't looking? no??? -maybe reboot the machine (or flush all disk caches etc. etc.) and restart e to make sure nothing is loaded try? really all it does at startup is load some theme data (as e is doing ALL the time while it runs - nothing new) and it lists all files in your $PATH so it has a list of all executables to hunt through (as it will need this soon enough). the reason it loads it then is this list may change as u may install thing in between. i am suspectin g doing this listing is what';s slow - but why? how can simply LISTING the constents of maybe 10 directories (in your $PATH) take up 10 seconds? thats why i want to see the oprofile info. the other options are to literally go into the code for the exebuf show call and put printfs every 2nd line that print out a timestamp (from ecore_time_get()) as a delta from the previous timestampe they got and then see which call takes the most wall-clock time then go from there. Well, I'm updating now, so when that is finished I'll see what happens after a reboot. Got the delay, profiled it, hope this helps. unfortrunately thats nopt really in a usable form :( can u do: opreport --symbols ? :) -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:50:29 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unfortrunately thats nopt really in a usable form :( can u do: opreport --symbols Pretty sure this will be useless to. Gotta recompile my kernel to get kernel symbols I think. I'm currently using the standard kernel that comes with this distro, which is the usual heavily patched, recently updated to the current security patch from the distro, god knows if I can recreate it from source, version. I've been up since 2AM hacking away at genmenu, too tired to screw with this today. oprofile.txt.bz2 Description: application/bzip pgpFkKaw5uHml.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [e-users] Continuing... Anonymous CVS Servers - YOU CAN HELP!
On 1/30/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PowerEdge 850 (1u): Pentium D Dual core 3.2Ghz 2x1MB L2 Cache, 2GB 667MHz DDRRAM, SATA Raid Controller, 2x250GB SATA 7200rpm Drives, 24x speed CD. Standardnext business day on site warranty support (nothing special) = $2744 PowerEdge 1850 (2u): 3Ghz Xeon 2MB L2 Cache x 2, 2GB 400Mhz DDR RAM, SCSI RaidController, 2x146GB SCSI 1rpm Drives, 24x speed CDROM. Standard nextbusiness day on site warranty support (nothing special)= $4272 In the spirit of checking different vendors, I went to Penguin Computing and messed around a bit: Altus 1300 (1U) Single AMD Opteron 265 (Dual Core) / 2GB / 2 x 250GB SATA (7200RPM) / Slim 24X CD-ROM / Fedora Core 4 / STD 3-YR WTY / 3-YR, Next-Day, OSS -- $2,602.00
