Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
Am Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:26:42 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): i quote from my previous mail: there is a command-line tool you can get a profile dump with: opreport --symbols I was sure I tested it before and it failed. But now it works. Sorry for troubling you. Here is the dump file. I hope you could use it: http://brachttal.net/tmp/exebuf_dump regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
[e-users] errors compiling e-modules
Hi again :) While compiling e_modules i get a huge amount of errors: In file included from /usr/include/enlightenment/e.h:39, from e_mod_main.c:1: /usr/include/enlightenment/config.h:47:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from e_mod_main.h:4, from e_mod_config.h:5, from e_mod_main.h:3, from e_mod_main.c:2: ../../../config.h:50:1: warning: PACKAGE_LIB_DIR redefined In file included from /usr/include/enlightenment/e.h:39, from e_mod_main.c:1: /usr/include/enlightenment/config.h:50:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from e_mod_main.h:4, from e_mod_config.h:5, from e_mod_main.h:3, from e_mod_main.c:2: ../../../config.h:68:1: warning: VERSION redefined In file included from /usr/include/enlightenment/e.h:39, from e_mod_main.c:1: /usr/include/enlightenment/config.h:68:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from e_mod_main.h:2, from e_mod_main.c:2: easy_menu.h:30: error: syntax error before E_Menu_Category_Callback easy_menu.h:30: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union easy_menu.h:37: error: syntax error before '}' token In file included from e_mod_config.h:5, from e_mod_main.h:3, from e_mod_main.c:2: e_mod_main.h:35: error: syntax error before E_Gadget_Api e_mod_main.h:35: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union e_mod_main.h:45: error: syntax error before '}' token e_mod_main.h:63: error: syntax error before Ecore_Exe_Event_Data_Line e_mod_main.h:63: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union e_mod_main.h:66: error: syntax error before '}' token e_mod_main.c: In function `e_modapi_init': e_mod_main.c:182: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to incomplete type `e_mod_main.h' e_mod_main.c:190: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:191: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:192: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:193: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:194: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:195: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:196: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:197: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:198: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:198: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:198: error: too few arguments to function `e_gadget_new' e_mod_main.c:200: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:201: error: `ECORE_EXE_EVENT_DEL' undeclared (first use in this function) e_mod_main.c:201: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once e_mod_main.c:201: error: for each function it appears in.) e_mod_main.c:202: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:204: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:204: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c: In function `e_modapi_shutdown': e_mod_main.c:257: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:258: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:259: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c:260: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type e_mod_main.c: In function `_emu_face_init': e_mod_main.c:296: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to incomplete type `e_mod_main.h' Is this just a temporary state of the CVS version, or something else? Cheers-- Fernando Meira(blog - http://nandinhojr.blogspot.com)
Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] Continuing... Anonymous CVS Servers - YOU CAN HELP!
Geoffrey wrote: Just for the hell of it, I called Monarch Computer her in Georgia and Well, I've not seen much response regarding me contacting Monarch. Is there an objection? Should I take the silence as a recommendation for or against? I'm not sure who would be the one to make this 'decision.' Just the same, I sent an email message to the marketing folks at Monarch to see what the might have to say. -- Until later, Geoffrey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] Continuing... Anonymous CVS Servers - YOU CAN HELP!
My feeling is that it's worth exploring, but we can't do much more than put a sponsoring logo on the website and put a few plugs for them on some blogs.On 2/4/06, Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geoffrey wrote: Just for the hell of it, I called Monarch Computer her in Georgia andWell, I've not seen much response regarding me contacting Monarch.Isthere an objection?Should I take the silence as a recommendation for or against?I'm not sure who would be the one to make this 'decision.'Just the same, I sent an email message to the marketing folks at Monarchto see what the might have to say.--Until later, Geoffrey
[e-users] e17 mount module
I havent had much joy with this module I think its because Fedora Core 4 uses the following line in /etc/fstab to mount my cd drive: /dev/hdd/media/cdrecorder auto pamconsole,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 (hdd, not hdc is my cd drive label) It looks like Fedora looks to the pamconsole for permissions. README file for the mount module indicates that I need users in the options. Wouldnt the pamconsole be cleaner? Maybe its an issue with other distros if use pamconsole. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
[e-users] e17 calendar module - minor bug?
I note that ~5 seconds after this module is enabled the year changes from 2006 to 106. If I advance a month then back to Feb the correct year shows properly, only to revert to 106 again after ~5 seconds. Perhaps this is only an oddity with my system. Im running udated Fedora Core 4. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] Continuing... Anonymous CVS Servers - YOU CAN HELP!
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:01:53 -0500 Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Geoffrey wrote: Just for the hell of it, I called Monarch Computer her in Georgia and Well, I've not seen much response regarding me contacting Monarch. Is there an objection? Should I take the silence as a recommendation for or against? I'm not sure who would be the one to make this 'decision.' Just the same, I sent an email message to the marketing folks at Monarch to see what the might have to say. I would say give them a ping and see - there's more than one thing in the pipe atm. i'm aqctually TRYING to write code for once - but it seems that the moment i try - people get antsy that i dont do my email! :) -- Until later, Geoffrey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:09:18 +0100 Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Am Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:26:42 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): i quote from my previous mail: there is a command-line tool you can get a profile dump with: opreport --symbols I was sure I tested it before and it failed. But now it works. Sorry for troubling you. Here is the dump file. I hope you could use it: http://brachttal.net/tmp/exebuf_dump so basically it looks like your system is spending most of its time inside libc (you have no debug symbols so we cant say any mroe than that) and the kernel. as i mailed in another mail - try modifying the source (see my other mails in thsi thread) and put in printf's with timestamps to idnetify the areas of the show routine thata re using up all the wall-clock time. regards Andreas --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users -- - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am -- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] e17 calendar module - minor bug?
Interesting. I'm running Arch Linux and it takes about 90 seconds before switching from 2006 to 106. Jim Laurence Vanek wrote: I note that ~5 seconds after this module is enabled the year changes from 2006 to 106. If I advance a month then back to Feb the correct year shows properly, only to revert to 106 again after ~5 seconds. Perhaps this is only an oddity with my system. Im running udated Fedora Core 4. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] Continuing... Anonymous CVS Servers - YOU CAN HELP!
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:01:53 -0500 Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Geoffrey wrote: Just for the hell of it, I called Monarch Computer her in Georgia and Well, I've not seen much response regarding me contacting Monarch. Is there an objection? Should I take the silence as a recommendation for or against? I'm not sure who would be the one to make this 'decision.' Just the same, I sent an email message to the marketing folks at Monarch to see what the might have to say. I would say give them a ping and see - there's more than one thing in the pipe atm. i'm aqctually TRYING to write code for once - but it seems that the moment i try - people get antsy that i dont do my email! :) Well I would much rather you write code. :) Ping of Monarch has gone out. -- Until later, Geoffrey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
