[e-users] Re: [E-devel] Asparagus Gets its first press... and an idea.

2004-08-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 10:02 am, Peter Lundqvist wrote:
 Anyway - what I'm upset about is not who did what. It's the bad attitude.
 You don't have to badmouth anyone just because you disagree.
 A simple Obviously she's wrong; here is why is more than sufficient.

i wasnt bad mouthing her because i disagree with her, hell i read her comments 
after i posted mine her

i bad mouth her because, in my opinion of course, ive very seldom seen her 
produce quality works
-mike


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
___
enlightenment-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users


[e-users] Re: [E-devel] Asparagus Gets its first press... and an idea.

2004-08-03 Thread Peter Lundqvist
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
   Let's see whether we agree on the basics then, shall we.
   Looking at OSNews, the comments from the E-team, as far as they can
   easily be identified, are +1 Informative.  The Eugenia's comments
   -1 Troll.  If we agree this far, then it's not intuitively obvious
   to me why you are writing to us rather than her.

Eugenias comment (My take) is perhaps not informative - neither a troll.
It is not hard to cough up differences between GNOME/KDE and E wich seems
to be the usability buzz these days. E is different.

Anyway - what I'm upset about is not who did what. It's the bad attitude.
You don't have to badmouth anyone just because you disagree.
A simple Obviously she's wrong; here is why is more than sufficient.

And another thing - this discussion is perhaps better fitted for the user
list?

...http://www.update.uu.se/~peterl.
Peter Lundqvist  /'\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Studentv. 32:22B \ / No HTML/RTF in email
752 34 UppsalaƗ  No Word docs in email
Sweden   / \ Respect for open standards
--

I had a feeling once about mathematics -- that I saw it all.
Depth beyond depth was revealed to me -- the Byss and the Abyss.
I saw -- as one might see the transit of Venus or even
the Lord Mayor's Show -- a quantity passing through infinity
and changing its sign from plus to minus.
I saw exactly why it happened and why tergiversation was
inevitable -- but it was after dinner and I let it go.

 -- Winston Churchill


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
___
enlightenment-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users


[e-users] Re: [E-devel] Asparagus Gets its first press... and an idea.

2004-08-03 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:02:08 +0200 (CEST) Peter Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
(BLet's see whether we agree on the basics then, shall we.
(BLooking at OSNews, the comments from the E-team, as far as they can
(Beasily be identified, are +1 Informative.  The Eugenia's comments
(B-1 Troll.  If we agree this far, then it's not intuitively obvious
(Bto me why you are writing to us rather than her.
(B 
(B Eugenias comment (My take) is perhaps not informative - neither a troll.
(B It is not hard to cough up differences between GNOME/KDE and E wich seems
(B to be the usability buzz these days. E is different.
(B 
(B Anyway - what I'm upset about is not who did what. It's the bad attitude.
(B You don't have to badmouth anyone just because you disagree.
(B A simple "Obviously she's wrong; here is why" is more than sufficient.
(B
(BActually the amazingly bad thing is it was an underhanded way of mis-reporting
(Bjournalism. in the article she got it all factual and correct - then instantly
(Bposted a comment to the article to swing the topic around. as a journalist she
(Bshould report fairly and accurately. she did this only "just". the article did
(Bnot discuss a WM. it  mentioned a future one, but it was about an EFL release,
(Bnot e16 vs gnome, or e17's WM.
(B
(Bthe comment was completely off-topic and not warranted. the fact that a
(Bjournalist goes and then posts comments to her OWN articles as the 3rd comment
(B35 minutes later trying to steer the topic into a flamewar is a disappointing
(Bshow of professionalism. if people were discussing the quality of the article or
(Bher reporting style, sure she has a right to defend herself, but her tack here
(Bwas completely off. it's like she didnt even know what she reported on, and
(Bjournalism showing such ignorance even of their OWN reports is a sad thing to
(Bsee. it was like reporting on a new bmw 530 series then commenting how you don't
(Blike the shape of bmw bikes and find them ugly.
(B
(Bi'm just disappointed to see this kind of quality in reporting, as her comment
(BIMHO does not lie in the category of objective comments, but as part of the
(Barticle.
(B
(B-- 
(B- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
$B7'<*(B - $Bhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users