Return values from callbacks?

2012-06-21 Thread Hemanth H.M
Hello Hackers,

If there was a easy way to wrap an asynchronous in a synchronous API would
it not be easy? Because we can wrap it that way any API will need to accept
a callback to return proceed values.

I bit be speaking absolute non sense here, but just felt something like
that might makes things easier, while I was coding
THIShttps://github.com/hemanth/node-rsj/commit/051c6c45c15e2cebc88dae20b28ffe3335823335

-- 
*'I am what I am because of who we all are'*
h3manth.com http://www.h3manth.com
*-- Hemanth HM *
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss


Re: Return values from callbacks?

2012-06-21 Thread Brendan Eich
See dherman's http://taskjs.org/ for one way that ES6 will support, but 
which requires expliciti 'yield' usage when you wrap to make the 
preemption point clear.


/be

Hemanth H.M wrote:

Hello Hackers,

If there was a easy way to wrap an asynchronous in a synchronous API 
would it not be easy? Because we can wrap it that way any API will 
need to accept a callback to return proceed values.


I bit be speaking absolute non sense here, but just felt something 
like that might makes things easier, while I was coding THIS 
https://github.com/hemanth/node-rsj/commit/051c6c45c15e2cebc88dae20b28ffe3335823335


--
/'I am what I am because of who we all are'/
h3manth.com http://www.h3manth.com
/-- Hemanth HM/
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss


Re: Return values from callbacks?

2012-06-21 Thread Hemanth H.M
WOW! Ok, thank you.

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org wrote:

 See dherman's http://taskjs.org/ for one way that ES6 will support, but
 which requires expliciti 'yield' usage when you wrap to make the
 preemption point clear.

 /be

 Hemanth H.M wrote:

 Hello Hackers,

 If there was a easy way to wrap an asynchronous in a synchronous API
 would it not be easy? Because we can wrap it that way any API will need to
 accept a callback to return proceed values.

 I bit be speaking absolute non sense here, but just felt something like
 that might makes things easier, while I was coding THIS 
 https://github.com/hemanth/**node-rsj/commit/**
 051c6c45c15e2cebc88dae20b28ffe**3335823335https://github.com/hemanth/node-rsj/commit/051c6c45c15e2cebc88dae20b28ffe3335823335
 

 --
 /'I am what I am because of who we all are'/
 h3manth.com http://www.h3manth.com
 /-- Hemanth HM/
 __**_
 es-discuss mailing list
 es-discuss@mozilla.org
 https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discusshttps://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss




-- 
*'I am what I am because of who we all are'*
h3manth.com http://www.h3manth.com
*-- Hemanth HM *
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss