RE: [Evangelism] plone dot com
+1 There are more open source communities that have this setup. It would be nice to have a dot com site with a marketing story That way, those deciding won't get confused with versions of addons or documentation they don't understand. Kind regards, bc. Bas Roijen Technisch Applicatiebeheerder COFELY EXPERTS BV Information & Communication Technology GDF SUEZ ENERGY SERVICES Amerikalaan 35, 6199 AE Maastricht-Airport - THE NETHERLANDS PO Box 304, 6199 ZN Maastricht-Airport - THE NETHERLANDS Tel. : +31 (0)43 367 52 09 Fax. : +31 (0)43 367 59 90 Mob. : +31 (0)6 388 260 15 bas.roi...@cofely-gdfsuez.nl www.cofely-gdfsuez.nl -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: evangelism-boun...@lists.plone.org [mailto:evangelism-boun...@lists.plone.org] Namens Dylan Jay Verzonden: maandag 23 november 2009 6:39 Aan: evangelism@lists.plone.org Onderwerp: [Evangelism] plone dot com hi, I know Limi mentioned something about wrestling that domain back but I just wanted note my observations on something I like about what drupal has done: giving different messages to different people. I discovered drupal.com the other day which is a slick marketing type site emphasising case studies of drupals use. That is probably targeting those deciding which CMS to use, or media. With the dot org it's more about engaging with people who will download and "participate" in opensource. So the dot com and the dot org kind of separate out those that understand community opensource and those that don't. That's pretty cool. For Plone, - plone dot com (how cool is plone), - plone.org (how to get involved) - plone.net (who can I sue/get a solution quickly) would be a great separation of messages (although I think plone.net could be folded back into dot org or dot com to increase it's link juice) --- Dylan Jay, Plone Solutions Manager www.pretaweb.com tel:+61299552830 mob:+61421477460 skype:dylan_jay ___ Evangelism mailing list Evangelism@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt, wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. ___ Evangelism mailing list Evangelism@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism
RE: [Evangelism] Hack Plone! Win a Mac!
Should become something like "Entworfen fur sicherheit"? Translations will be no problem. I don't know in what countries translations are a must (never guessed Germany would be one), but the main goal is to get a clear message across. Kind regards, bc. Bas Roijen Technisch Applicatiebeheerder COFELY EXPERTS BV Information & Communication Technology GDF SUEZ ENERGY SERVICES Amerikalaan 35, 6199 AE Maastricht-Airport - THE NETHERLANDS PO Box 304, 6199 ZN Maastricht-Airport - THE NETHERLANDS Tel. : +31 (0)43 367 52 09 Fax. : +31 (0)43 367 59 90 Mob. : +31 (0)6 388 260 15 bas.roi...@cofely-gdfsuez.nl www.cofely-gdfsuez.nl -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: evangelism-boun...@lists.plone.org [mailto:evangelism-boun...@lists.plone.org] Namens Jan Ulrich Hasecke Verzonden: zondag 29 november 2009 10:31 Aan: Mark A Corum CC: evangelism@lists.plone.org Onderwerp: Re: [Evangelism] Hack Plone! Win a Mac! Am 28.11.2009 um 20:38 schrieb Mark A Corum: > +1 on a legitimate slogan like "Secure by Design" or something else > that reflects the fact. Although I'd like such a claim, please keep in mind that we need it translated. English claims are often misunderstood in Germany as recent studies showed. juh De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt, wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. ___ Evangelism mailing list Evangelism@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism
RE: [Evangelism] Strategy focus decisions - Plone-the-product vs. Plone-the-platform - Discovering a blog entry by Paul Everitt from 2008
We're currently serving about 500GB of data with our intranet. I only know it's Plone 2.1 with (I believe) ATManagedFile for filesystem support and a few other addons. In a few weeks I have to move it to another server and get it up to Plone 3, so then I can see how plone.app.blob will perform. Kind regards, bc. Bas Roijen Technisch Applicatiebeheerder COFELY EXPERTS BV Information & Communication Technology GDF SUEZ ENERGY SERVICES Amerikalaan 35, 6199 AE Maastricht-Airport - THE NETHERLANDS PO Box 304, 6199 ZN Maastricht-Airport - THE NETHERLANDS Tel. : +31 (0)43 367 52 09 Fax. : +31 (0)43 367 59 90 Mob. : +31 (0)6 388 260 15 bas.roi...@cofely-gdfsuez.nl www.cofely-gdfsuez.nl -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: evangelism-boun...@lists.plone.org [mailto:evangelism-boun...@lists.plone.org] Namens Nate Aune Verzonden: dinsdag 1 december 2009 18:57 Aan: Ken Wasetis [Contextual Corp.] CC: Sally Kleinfeldt; off...@valentinewebsystems.se; evangelism@lists.plone.org Onderwerp: Re: [Evangelism] Strategy focus decisions - Plone-the-product vs. Plone-the-platform - Discovering a blog entry by Paul Everitt from 2008 > b) CMIS: > > http://www.optaros.com/blogs/alfresco-drupal-cmis-integration-availabl > e Did you see Sally's blog post on CMIS and Plone? http://blog.jazkarta.com/2009/10/27/plone-web-services-what-about-cmis/ > 5) Terabyte storage solutions. Documentum and their DMS-based ilk > have handled this for years. How many large-scale storage Plone case > studies are there on plone.net? Many a time, Plone integrators can't > discuss the few successes that may exist here. Hopefully, this story > improves with BLOB storage in Plone 4. Sasha recently wrote a blog post about large repositories of data being served up from Plone using plone.app.blob. http://valentinewebsystems.com/en/blog/plone-powers-50gb-of-environmental-data We're currently working on a project to build a digital asset management system using Plone, which will be serving terabytes of data. Nate > Matt Hamilton wrote: >> >> On 30 Nov 2009, at 09:18 PM, Dylan Jay wrote: >> >>> These are awesome points. I think unique and challenging reality is >>> that plone is both product and a platform but we've been trying >>> market both through the same channels which is why the message has >>> sometimes been confusing. Eg we say plone is easy to install but in >>> reality only in drvrloment mode not production mode so that is >>> really a platfom message not a product message. >>> Drupal delivers drupal the product message via it's dot com site and >>> it's platform message via it's dot org site. >>> >>> I am also thinking we are better off concentrating on selling plone >>> as a platform. Not just because we need more develepers and >>> integrators to gain greater momentum but recently I've been >>> discovering plone doest sell well as a product. >>> If someone comes to us (as PretaWeb) and says >>> A) we need a website that can blah blah then plone is easy to sell. >>> If a customer comes to us and says >>> B) we're considering to purchase plone as a cms or intranet it's a >>> really hard sell. >>> This is even though we sell training and support and that both >>> solutions would need to be equally customized. Why? >>> People picking products tend to pick product companies. Makes them >>> more comfortable. They feel like they can sue them and that will act >>> more to help them to protect the reputation of the product etc. >>> Plone has no product company. >>> I guess this is why open source works better for platforms than products. >> >> I'm at a show so only a brief reply now, but just say that CMS Watch >> recently recategorised their vendor listings and now split by >> platform vs product and by size. IIRC Plone is in the Mid-range >> Platform category. Along with Drupal and Typo3. Alfresco is in >> Upper-range platform. Joomla and >> Terminal4 are in Simpler Products. >> >> The CMS Watch stand is near us at the show I'll try and get some >> feedback on their views as to what went into categorising them. >> >> -Matt >> ___ >> Evangelism mailing list >> Evangelism@lists.plone.org >> http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism >> >> > > ___ > Evangelism mailing list > Evangelism@lists.plone.org > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism > -- Nate Aune - na...@jazkarta.com http://www.jazkarta.com http://card.ly/natea +1 (617) 517-4953 ___ Evangelism mailing list Evangelism@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/evangelism De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt, wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
