Re: Testable TOE

2003-06-12 Thread qwest
In case it's not yet old news to everyone, Reg's URL was faulty; should be:

http://www.scieng.flinders.edu.au/cpes/people/cahill_r/processphysics.html


Whilst probing the fundamental nature of the cosmos, error correction does
indeed count!

Cheers
CMR

--enter gratuitous quotation that implies my profundity here--

- Original Message -
From: Reg Cahill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:10 PM
Subject: Testable TOE


 Hi,

 Members might be interested in  the following paper which deals with
 a testable TOE.


 PROCESS PHYSICS: FROM INFORMATION THEORY  TO QUANTUM SPACE  AND MATTER

 by Reginald T Cahill

 Available at


http://www.scieng.flinders.edu.au/cpes/people/cahill\_r/processphysics.html

 Abstract: A  review of the new information-theoretic  Process
 Physics.  The fundamental assumption is that  reality is to be
 modelled as self-organising  semantic  or relational information
 using a self-referentially limited neural network model, where the
 information-theoretic limitations are implemented via
 self-referential noise. This modelling was motivated by the discovery
 that such stochastic neural networks are foundational to known
 quantum field theories. In  Process Physics  time is a distinct
 non-geometric process while space and quantum physics  are emergent
 and unified. Quantum phenomena  are caused by fractal topological
 defects   embedded in and forming a growing  three-dimensional
 fractal process-space, which is essentially a quantum foam.   Other
 features are the emergence ofquantum field theory with  flavour
 and  confined colour, limited causality and  the Born quantum
 measurement metarule,  inertia,  time-dilation effects, gravity and
 the equivalence principle, a growing universe with   a cosmological
 constant,  black holes and event horizons, and the emergence of
 classicality. The unification of the quantum foam structure   of
 space with the quantum nature of matter amounts to the discovery of
 quantum gravity. Gravity is essentially an in-flow effect associated
 with the loss of information.   A new  theory of gravity for the
 classical limit  is proposed, and shown to pass the key tests.  A
 detailed analysis of various experiments demonstrates that absolute
 motion with respect to this space of quantum foam has been observed
 experimentally by Michelson and Morley, Miller, Illingworth, DeWitte
 and others.  The  Dayton Miller and Roland DeWitte data also reveal
 the in-flow of space into matter which manifests as  gravity.The
 in-flow also  manifests turbulence and the experimental data confirms
 this as well, which amounts to the observation of a gravitational
 wave phenomena. The Einstein assumptions leading to the Special and
 General Theory of Relativity are shown to be falsified by the
 extensive experimental data.  Contrary to the Einstein assumptions
 absolute motion is consistent with relativistic effects, which are
 caused by actual dynamical effects of absolute motion through the
 quantum foam, so that it is Lorentzian  relativity that is seen to be
 essentially  correct. The success of this new physics has profound
 implications for our comprehension of reality.

 Reg Cahill
 --

 A/Prof  Reginald T.  Cahill (Phone: (618) or (08) 8201 2417
 Physicist  School  Deputy Head (MobPhone: 041 882 5 882
 School of Chemistry, Physics and Earth Sciences (Fax: (618) or (08) 8201
2905
 Faculty of Science and Engineering(email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Flinders University, GPO Box 2100 Adelaide 5001 Australia
 http://www.scieng.flinders.edu.au/cpes/people/cahill_r/processphysics.html







Re: are we in a simulation?

2003-06-12 Thread George Levy
Hi Stephen,



Stephen Paul King wrote:

Dear Friends,
 
Does computational complexity (such as NP-Completeness, etc.) 
and computational power requirements factor into the idea of 
simulated worlds?
 
 
It may. Also important is the issue that Tegmark raised in the 
Scientific American article about the ordering of an infinite set. The 
probability of the occurence of an element of any subset (say the even 
numbers) can be altered depending on how the element of the set (say the 
natural numbers) are ordered.

So if we assume that the multiworlds are an infinite set, to compute the 
probability of any event we need to know how the multiwords are ordered. 
I conjecture that the ordering should be anthropy related.

Let's consider a double slit diffraction experiment. The multiworlds are 
ordered according to the output diffraction pattern.  Since the phases 
add up to produce this pattern, it seems that the process is linear, 
(thus simplifying computation) so computational complexity and 
computational power do seem to be of relevance.

George.