RE: Inter organisation and scheduling
Ed, Thanks for responding. We have tried unsuccessfully with interorg, From what I can see Interorg is for syncing the GAL between organisations. We tried this however we have some 38 to 45,000 users in the new merged company GAL and it just did not work for us. We are in talks with Microsoft re using an LDAP product they have instead. However I do not believe this will do scheduling. I know when I used pop3/imapi for another client that they could share their calendars via the internet however I can't see this option in Exchange. Anybody else shared calendars and scheduling across organisations? Thanks Regards Jase -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 August 2001 00:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inter organisation and scheduling The only tool I know of to share anything between organizations is the InterOrg tool that comes (I believe) with the Back Office Resource Kit. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wilkins, Jason (BIS) Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inter organisation and scheduling Hi, I have tried searching archieves but have come up blank looking for organisation and calendar/scheduling We have merged with another company and our Exchange organisations are not merged yet. Is there away to share calendar and schedule meeting between two exchange organisations? Regards Jase ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Contents, which do not relate to formal Billiton business, are not endorsed by the company. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] EOM NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MVP (was: RE: 36gb Drives in RAID 5 array?)
What does the MVP stand for? Denis Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster
Any thoughts/problems/suggestions associated with installing SP2 onto a 2 node exchange 2000 cluster? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster
1. Move all the VS's to one node (Node 0). 2. Run update on the inactive node (Node 1), reboot when done. 3. Move all the VS's again (to Node 1). 4. Run update on the inactive node (Node 0), reboot when done. 5. Move all VS's to where you want them. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster Any thoughts/problems/suggestions associated with installing SP2 onto a 2 node exchange 2000 cluster? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
attachment size
Good afternoon, Where do I adjust the attachment size in Exchange? We would like for the average user to have 3000K attachment limits but there are a few super users that need more. Is this default setting adjustable by user? Thanks, Mike Mitchell System eMAIL Administration Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster
Thanks for your input. I've now successfully deployed SP2 onto a live cluster (albeit with no mailboxes on it.) No problems so far. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster It does not matter. So long as you've got sufficient permissions to install the service pack, you're good to go. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster Is it best to logon with any specific account, e.g. the cluster service account? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Alex Seigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster 1. Move all the VS's to one node (Node 0). 2. Run update on the inactive node (Node 1), reboot when done. 3. Move all the VS's again (to Node 1). 4. Run update on the inactive node (Node 0), reboot when done. 5. Move all VS's to where you want them. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: applying win2kSP2 to exchange cluster Any thoughts/problems/suggestions associated with installing SP2 onto a 2 node exchange 2000 cluster? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes
Good morning all, Wow what a wonderful world. What do you use to backup an Exchange Server 5.0 with Outlook 98? We are interested in being able to backup/restore single mailboxes. Regards, Mike Mitchell System eMAIL Administration Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook 2000
Hi, Pat. He's running NT 4, SP5. He is in our Chesapeake, VA office. I couldn't get to his event log. His assistant sent us the dump file that was created. But, there was nothing helpful, just a bunch of numbers and State Dump of Thread Id 0xeb statements. You have a user with his own email server? I'm jealous! :) What OS? Is the event log reporting anything? - Original Message - From: Farquharson, Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:48 AM Subject: Outlook 2000 I have a user in one of our field offices. They have their own Exchange server. This particular user is getting a Dr. Watson error message when he opens his Outlook. It happens shortly after opening Outlook. I went into Outlook as him with no problem. What could be causing him to get this error message? What else can I look for? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Webmail
So tell her to use OWA instead of Domino WebMail. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Webmail I have a user that can reply to a message if it is sent to her but when she tries to create a new mail message in Webmail she gets the error messageYour message body is too large, webmail only supports up to 100k. When she is sending a new mail message she isn't attaching any files and she is only sending text with a few sentences. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Webmail
She can't use OWA because she is on a different network behind a firewall. Webmail is the only solution for her to access her email. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Webmail So tell her to use OWA instead of Domino WebMail. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Webmail I have a user that can reply to a message if it is sent to her but when she tries to create a new mail message in Webmail she gets the error messageYour message body is too large, webmail only supports up to 100k. When she is sending a new mail message she isn't attaching any files and she is only sending text with a few sentences. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange-aware restores not writing 'restore in progress' reg key
Hi all! It's been a while since I've asked for assistance, but this one's got us AND PSS stumped. This past Sunday, we decided to increase disk space on our Exchange server by swapping disk drives out with larger ones. We went from an 8 gig volume to an 18 gig (3 9-gig drives/RAID5). All worked well. We used Veritas Backup Exec version 8.5 with the Exchange agent and Intelligent Disaster Recovery option. This seemed to backup and restore just fine. However, the IS did NOT come up. Had service specific error 4294966768 when it tried to start. Tried running ESEUTIL /r, but that did nothing. We tried on our own to do ESEUTIL /P which did work, but then the MTA did not start - inconsistent and a Windows NT internal error 2140 occurred. We restored all over again with PSS helping us. They had us do exactly what we did prior, but we added ISINTEG -fix to both the priv and pub.edb files, then ISINTEG - patch. We also were able to restore the MTA, which again did not work, by copying the mtadata directory DAT files from the 5.5 CD. All of this worked, although rebooting caused us to have to run the ISINTEG - patch. We had error 1011 when trying to start the IS. Anyway, all was ok, but we're still left with the mind-boggling question why are these ONLINE Exchange-aware restores NOT providing us with a 'restore in progress' key?. As per PSS, this should happen BEFORE the .PAT file creation in the MDBDATA directory. Ok...any ideas? Anyone else experience these oddities? Many thanks, Larry Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. In addition, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. The sender of this message does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message that arise as a result of e-mail transmission. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: distribution list
What does your Exchange administrator say? - Original Message - From: Aristotle Zoulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:06 AM Subject: distribution list Exchange 5.5. I neeed to take someone off a distribution list. Where can I do This. TIA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes
Cool... Thanks guys.. Please let me know when I have enough tenure on this site so I can to badger people. I think that would be fun... Have a great day. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes Nah! Nobody here would mention that he really ought to upgrade to at least Exchange 5.5, if not 2000. Or that Outlook 98 is totally irrelevant to his backup strategy. And of course, nobody would say how BAD and useless single mailbox backup and restores really are. Nope... nobody here is going to say all that. Lori already told him to read the FAQ, so 'nuff said! Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes This should be fun -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes Buckle up. Oh, and FAQ as well. Did you read our FAQ yet Mike? Look at the link at the bottom. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: What do you use to backup/restore your exchange boxes Good morning all, Wow what a wonderful world. What do you use to backup an Exchange Server 5.0 with Outlook 98? We are interested in being able to backup/restore single mailboxes. Regards, Mike Mitchell System eMAIL Administration Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 4.0 to 5.5
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in Exchange 4.0 there isn't a Routing tab, is there? In that case, you need not make any configuration changes to the IMS. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 4.0 to 5.5 You can run as many domains as you want. Just set up the mx records in your external DNS, set the users' SMTP address, set your IMC to accept mail for all of them (or just *) and you're good to go. Tom Meunier Network Administrator State of Texas Office of Court Administration (512) 463-0282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ah, a bear in his natural habitat. A Studebaker. -Fozzy Bear -Original Message- From: Nick Goodman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, August 13, 2001 03:44 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 4.0 to 5.5 Subject: Exchange 4.0 to 5.5 First of all yes I am still on Exchange 4.0, scary scary. Ok I've looked and read the list, checked the archive and still cannot find a definitive answer to my question. Current setup, 200 users on exchange on 1 server in 1 site. Most users have the @americanexcelsior addresses, but basically my company is 4 small companies. Since we are on 4.0 I have a seperate smtp server and internet mail service on each outlook client. I want to go through exchange completely now. So I will have 4 different internet mail domains being delivered to my exchange server, for the virtual companies so to speak. Do I just need one internet mail service running, or how can I do this? I hope I provided all the info you need. Nick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails
See Q197180 for all switches, sometimes I've had to use both /cleanfreebusy and /cleanreminders, and sometimes more than once, to get it right. You're right, that should have more to do with calendar issues, but I've had Outlook just get so hosed by calendar problems that it declines to run at all. If that doesn't do it, you might see a parallel thread today about some success at resolving weirdness by recreating the profile. I don't believe it matters about which server your free/busy info is stored on. David -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails If I remember correctly I tried this on the last user, with no effect. Even so, this would be to take care of the calendar issues, not the bounced emails. Is there a way to clean the freebusy for the whole site? Also should the Freebusy be on a certain Ex Server in the site? It is currently not on our main Exchange server and is not hidden. W -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails You've tried starting the client's Outlook with the /cleanfreebusy switch? There are several other switches you might try as well, don't have them at hand at this second. David -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails Odd problem... Win2K SP1 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2000 SR1 User on separate subnet User behind an internal firewall A user came to me complaining that evertime that he tried to accept a meeting request his outlook would freeze.(program not responding). We let this problem go for a while while we tried to troubleshoot it because he could accept his meetings and work with his email through OWA. Eventually when he went to just look at his calendar, outlook would freeze. He'd click on the calendar folder in the folder list and outlook would lock up. So I backed up his mail folders into a PST except for his calendar. Blew away his mailbox, created a new one, and added the mail folders back. He doesn't have trouble with his calendar anymore but intermittently emails to his account get bounced. Postmaster is not notified, he only knows when the sender (on the same Ex server and GAL) FWD's the email to him at the same address, which usually goes through. Note 1: This user doesn't have all that much data in his mailbox. I have a few users with over a gig (yes I know) that have no problem. Note 2: I am getting a error in the app log on the Ex server about every 10 mins. Another Ex server in the same site holds the Free/Busy unhidden.: 1038 - MSExchangeFB Unable to access the Microsoft Schedule+ Free/Busy Information folder. Ensure that the (hidden) Microsoft Schedule+ Free/Busy Information folder exists. Open the Recipients container and select View.HiddenRecipients. Note 3: This is the second user with a problem similar to this, but recreating her mailbox and blowing away her calendar fix her problem. Any ideas? William L. Smith Systems Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails
Ok thanks. If freebusy supposed to be hidden? If so how? W -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails See Q197180 for all switches, sometimes I've had to use both /cleanfreebusy and /cleanreminders, and sometimes more than once, to get it right. You're right, that should have more to do with calendar issues, but I've had Outlook just get so hosed by calendar problems that it declines to run at all. If that doesn't do it, you might see a parallel thread today about some success at resolving weirdness by recreating the profile. I don't believe it matters about which server your free/busy info is stored on. David -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails If I remember correctly I tried this on the last user, with no effect. Even so, this would be to take care of the calendar issues, not the bounced emails. Is there a way to clean the freebusy for the whole site? Also should the Freebusy be on a certain Ex Server in the site? It is currently not on our main Exchange server and is not hidden. W -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails You've tried starting the client's Outlook with the /cleanfreebusy switch? There are several other switches you might try as well, don't have them at hand at this second. David -Original Message- From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Corruption and Bouncing Emails Odd problem... Win2K SP1 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2000 SR1 User on separate subnet User behind an internal firewall A user came to me complaining that evertime that he tried to accept a meeting request his outlook would freeze.(program not responding). We let this problem go for a while while we tried to troubleshoot it because he could accept his meetings and work with his email through OWA. Eventually when he went to just look at his calendar, outlook would freeze. He'd click on the calendar folder in the folder list and outlook would lock up. So I backed up his mail folders into a PST except for his calendar. Blew away his mailbox, created a new one, and added the mail folders back. He doesn't have trouble with his calendar anymore but intermittently emails to his account get bounced. Postmaster is not notified, he only knows when the sender (on the same Ex server and GAL) FWD's the email to him at the same address, which usually goes through. Note 1: This user doesn't have all that much data in his mailbox. I have a few users with over a gig (yes I know) that have no problem. Note 2: I am getting a error in the app log on the Ex server about every 10 mins. Another Ex server in the same site holds the Free/Busy unhidden.: 1038 - MSExchangeFB Unable to access the Microsoft Schedule+ Free/Busy Information folder. Ensure that the (hidden) Microsoft Schedule+ Free/Busy Information folder exists. Open the Recipients container and select View.HiddenRecipients. Note 3: This is the second user with a problem similar to this, but recreating her mailbox and blowing away her calendar fix her problem. Any ideas? William L. Smith Systems Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Help with Undeliverable
The new exchange server was installed in our domain. Our Exchange 5.5 server was OFF the network, in a closest. Never brought online during or since the installation of 2000. Our new Org Name is MPDINC on E2K. ForestPrep and DomainPrep was ran on the E2k machine. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with Undeliverable I really thought the comma was an invalid character for an E2K org name[1]... Did someone use your production AD for testing of E2K betas at any point? The only way I could see that not generating an error during Exchange setup would be if someone had run forestprep and/or domainprep with a version of E2K prior to RC2. Did this ever work? When and how was this new Exchange 2000 install completed exactly? [1]So I double checked, and it is... Q289671. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with Undeliverable The comma was from the old 55 setup. Yes, it happens on all replies of anyone internal to our system. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with Undeliverable I didn't think a comma was a valid character for an org name in E2K Interesting. Is this a server added to an existing organization or a pristine E2K install? How was the original message addressed? Is this happening with all replies? * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 * -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help with Undeliverable I installed a New Exchange 2000 and now when someone replies to an internal email we are getting Undeliverable Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. The following recipients(s) could not reached: /0=MPD, Inc./OU=Domain1/CN=Recipients/CN=User_Name on 8/14/2001 The email address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again. exchange.ourdomainname.com #5.1.0 Any suggestions on how to add this in Exchange 2000. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Inter organisation and scheduling
Actually, there are two InterOrg tools - the InterOrg Directory Synchronization tool, which was in the BORK, and the InterOrg Public Folder Replication tool, which was released with SP2 (maybe 3, but I think 2) for Exchange 5.5. Oh - and if you're looking for DirSynch, LDSU from Compaq works marvelously. Missy Koslosky Tech Consultant Compaq Computer - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:04 PM Subject: RE: Inter organisation and scheduling InterOrg will replicate public folder content as well. Actually scheduling will work fine between organizations as long as recipients are both rich-text. But users in one organization will not be able to view calendars of users in the other organization. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wilkins, Jason (BIS) Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inter organisation and scheduling Ed, Thanks for responding. We have tried unsuccessfully with interorg, From what I can see Interorg is for syncing the GAL between organisations. We tried this however we have some 38 to 45,000 users in the new merged company GAL and it just did not work for us. We are in talks with Microsoft re using an LDAP product they have instead. However I do not believe this will do scheduling. I know when I used pop3/imapi for another client that they could share their calendars via the internet however I can't see this option in Exchange. Anybody else shared calendars and scheduling across organisations? Thanks Regards Jase -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 August 2001 00:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inter organisation and scheduling The only tool I know of to share anything between organizations is the InterOrg tool that comes (I believe) with the Back Office Resource Kit. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wilkins, Jason (BIS) Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inter organisation and scheduling Hi, I have tried searching archieves but have come up blank looking for organisation and calendar/scheduling We have merged with another company and our Exchange organisations are not merged yet. Is there away to share calendar and schedule meeting between two exchange organisations? Regards Jase ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Contents, which do not relate to formal Billiton business, are not endorsed by the company. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] EOM NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.
If I understood you correctly: The way each office connects to the internet should not matter for the VPN. And, the router at each office (the main router, one that sits between the office and internet) should handle VPN. Just make sure each router supports each other for VPN. And, you would only need 1 Exchange server to be on a public IP (only the pop3 and smtp ports open). The non-public exchange servers would communicate with the 'main' exchange server over the VPN. (of course, each router would need a public IP) At the company I work at now, at one point we had VPN going between Frame Relay (main office), DSL (other office) and Cable and DSL residential services. Each VPN location is treated as a different subnet. Once you have VPN working, you can setup your network to use the subnets... Multiple Exchange Sites etc just pretend it's a normal, subnetted network. Exchange does not need to know about the VPN at all. I hope this made sense, and I hope I read your question correctly. Also, there are probably some better ways of doing this, and I'm sure this group will let you and me know about it real quick ;) Andre -Original Message- From: John Shi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Hi, Everyone The Technology is changing very fast. I was more comfortable with Frame Relay then T1 Internet VPN technology. We have one central site and 4 remotes sites. Originally, I was thinking to keep the frame Relay, but my boss thought the each site has its own T1 line and VPN to our central stie is good as well. The issue is pricing is about the same on T1 to the Internet and frame Relay. On the remote site, we are going to have W2K DC and Exchange 2000 server 10 months from now. The frame Relay contract is going to expire within 9 months. I want to find out if I should re-evaluate the T1 Internet and VPN options or I should keep Frame Relay. How would the W2K DC replication work on the VPN at the different locations? I did not need to think about this when we are in the Frame relay. If I go with VPN through T1 Internet. How would my Exchange server on each site commmunicate with each other throuh VPN? Does anyone see any need that I should keep my Frame Relay based on our situation? If we use Internet VPN on each site, does that mean we need to have public IP address on the exchange server on each site. Thanks John Shi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.
Then yes, it's a one-to-one relationship. More clients, bigger hardware on the OWA box. You can use SSL. Or if you want to skip the OWA box, just have them VPN in (you ARE implementing the technology, after all) and let them use an IMAP client or Outlook. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:28 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Hi, Tom We have Exchange server 5.5 right now. John Shi -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. I'll take the OWA one. :) The only version info I saw in the email was one reference to one Exchange 2000 server. You'd use a frontend-backend scenario. You'll have to buy Exchange Enterprise for your frontend server. Other than that, you can use Standard version if it suits all your other needs. The frontend server will find the server that contains the users' mailboxes. If you REALLY wanted them to access OWA at their own sites, you'd need to put an OWA server in each place. Sizing considerations are left to the reader. But that's ten months from now. You didn't say what you have NOW. So I'm assuming Exchange 2k. -Original Message- From: Andre Toussaint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 5:26 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. John, Replication should work fine... Once the VPN is up and running, you should be able to do whatever you want with win2k, and exchange etc. Getting the VPN setup is mainly just getting TCP/IP to work with all the sites together, in a virtually private way. Once that is working, you should be able to play around with multiple domains and their trusts, and other stuff, because that stuff all uses TCP/IP. You see, Win2k doesn't really need to know there is a VPN at all, it will just use normal TCP/IP operations to communicate across the VPN. To NT, the other VPN site will just be like another subnet. I should note, that theoretically (and maybe someone else can shed some light here) the VPN connection will be slower. Because they are encrypting all the data, so the router/VPN device must encrypt the data(some time wasted there) and once the data is encrypted, it has some overhead. So, you may have to play with replication a little bit, but I think it would work fine. As for your OWA question: That is a good question... Translated= Hmmm, I don't know. I guess at the office, the users could type the internal machine name of the exchange box they want to get to for OWA. But, what if they are at home, ant want to OWA to check their mail? Maybe set up a machine to just serve the OWA, and everyone use the same one? I don't have any real experience with OWA in a multiple Exchange site environment. Anyone else care to shed some light here? Andre -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Hi, Andre How about Replication between all the W2K DC on different sites? If you change some configuratin on W2K DC on the central stie, how would this replicate to the remote sites through VPN? If I want everyone remoste site to get to the OWA on their sites, how would this work if you have the private IP address? Currently, we have an external IP address for pop 3 for a remote site Exchange server. Thanks John Shi -Original Message- From: Andre Toussaint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. If I understood you correctly: The way each office connects to the internet should not matter for the VPN. And, the router at each office (the main router, one that sits between the office and internet) should handle VPN. Just make sure each router supports each other for VPN. And, you would only need 1 Exchange server to be on a public IP (only the pop3 and smtp ports open). The non-public exchange servers would communicate with the 'main' exchange server over the VPN. (of course, each router would need a public IP) At the company I work at now, at one point we had VPN going between Frame Relay (main office), DSL (other office) and Cable and DSL residential services. Each VPN location is treated as a different subnet. Once you have VPN working, you can setup your network to use the subnets... Multiple Exchange Sites etc just pretend it's a normal, subnetted network. Exchange does not need to know about the VPN at all. I hope this made sense, and I hope I read your question correctly. Also, there are probably some better ways of doing this, and I'm sure this group will let you and me know about it
RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.
Hi, Tom The central Exchange server has 200 users and all the romote site servers have less than 25 users. How do you think? Thanks John Shi -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Depends. But yes, in Exchange 2000, technically speaking, you can set up one front-end server and have it handle all of your back-end clients. I don't know whether you have 100 users per server, or 10,000. You really need to go look at the whitepapers at www.microsoft.com/exchange. Nobody here can cover this in the detail it needs. And again, if you're putting the vpn in, OWA is probably unnecessary. Especially 5.x. Sizing on OWA 5.x is done with the simple formula of [number of simultaneous clients] x [resources needed for an Outlook session] = [necessary OWA sizing]. That's oversimplification, and wildly inaccurate, but good enough to give an idea. The users love OWA 2000. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:29 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Hi, Tom Are you saying I only need to set up a OWA server and have all the remote users share with that? Thanks JOhn -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. I'll take the OWA one. :) The only version info I saw in the email was one reference to one Exchange 2000 server. You'd use a frontend-backend scenario. You'll have to buy Exchange Enterprise for your frontend server. Other than that, you can use Standard version if it suits all your other needs. The frontend server will find the server that contains the users' mailboxes. If you REALLY wanted them to access OWA at their own sites, you'd need to put an OWA server in each place. Sizing considerations are left to the reader. But that's ten months from now. You didn't say what you have NOW. So I'm assuming Exchange 2k. -Original Message- From: Andre Toussaint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 5:26 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. John, Replication should work fine... Once the VPN is up and running, you should be able to do whatever you want with win2k, and exchange etc. Getting the VPN setup is mainly just getting TCP/IP to work with all the sites together, in a virtually private way. Once that is working, you should be able to play around with multiple domains and their trusts, and other stuff, because that stuff all uses TCP/IP. You see, Win2k doesn't really need to know there is a VPN at all, it will just use normal TCP/IP operations to communicate across the VPN. To NT, the other VPN site will just be like another subnet. I should note, that theoretically (and maybe someone else can shed some light here) the VPN connection will be slower. Because they are encrypting all the data, so the router/VPN device must encrypt the data(some time wasted there) and once the data is encrypted, it has some overhead. So, you may have to play with replication a little bit, but I think it would work fine. As for your OWA question: That is a good question... Translated= Hmmm, I don't know. I guess at the office, the users could type the internal machine name of the exchange box they want to get to for OWA. But, what if they are at home, ant want to OWA to check their mail? Maybe set up a machine to just serve the OWA, and everyone use the same one? I don't have any real experience with OWA in a multiple Exchange site environment. Anyone else care to shed some light here? Andre -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. Hi, Andre How about Replication between all the W2K DC on different sites? If you change some configuratin on W2K DC on the central stie, how would this replicate to the remote sites through VPN? If I want everyone remoste site to get to the OWA on their sites, how would this work if you have the private IP address? Currently, we have an external IP address for pop 3 for a remote site Exchange server. Thanks John Shi -Original Message- From: Andre Toussaint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. If I understood you correctly: The way each office connects to the internet should not matter for the VPN. And, the router at each office (the main router, one that sits between the office and internet) should handle VPN. Just make sure each router supports each other for VPN. And, you would only
RE: ColdFusion (CFMail) running on Exchange 5.5 SP4
What are your current settings in IMS Address Space and your settings in the Routing tab? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ColdFusion (CFMail) running on Exchange 5.5 SP4 SMTP is SMTP. Does CF log it's activities? If so, what does the log say? Have you turned up logging on the IMS? If so, what does the log say? What address is CF attempting to send to? If it is not part of your domain, has the IMS been set to relay? $275/hour plus TE and I'll fix this for you. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:18 AM Subject: ColdFusion (CFMail) running on Exchange 5.5 SP4 We have an Exchange 5.5 (SP4) server, on which is running ColdFusion web software. Part of ColdFusion is a process called CFMail, which basically sends SMTP mail via a server you specify. We have configured CFMail with the IP address of the Exchange server (it's own address) and port 25. However the IMS of Exchange is not sending the mail. We have tried various settings in Routing / Routing Restrictions in IMS but the mail still will not go. (Exchange can send / receive mail without any problem for the local domain). Has anyone had experience with ColdFusion, and specifically CFMail running and trying to use the IMS of Exchange on the same server. If so, what settings did you use for the IMS ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
