Searching Public Folders

[Halliday S (ISeLS)]

Hi all,

I am trying to use Advanced Find on a Public Folder to also search it's sub
folders, however, when I try to select the sub-folders it comes up with the
message:  the folder you selected does not allow you to search other
folders.

It doesn't work like this on a mailbox it allows you to search
sub-foldersany ideas?

Thanks in advance.
Stephanie.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: additional display name?

[Roger Seielstad]

PF's can't forward mail out, they can only receive mail, at least not
without some coding.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:22 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: additional display name?
 
 
 IMHO Or you could instead create a PF that directs all email 
 to the recipients renamed Emailbox and have the PF display 
 the old maiden name in brackets (if you wish)
 
 Cheers
 
 Paul
 
 Standards are like toothbrushes,
 everyone wants one but not yours
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 09 June 2003 18:57
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: additional display name?
 
 
 We do that too.. Forgot to include it.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: additional display name?
  
  
  Additionally, we create a new SMTP addy for their married
  name, set it as the reply to address and leave the old one.
  
  That way, people can still reply to her old e-mails and at
  some point, they will start to see the new display name.
  
  I.E.  Paula J Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) now becomes Paula J
  Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED])
  
  Works for us...YMMV.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:43 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: additional display name?
  
  
  We traditionally change the user to the married name (at
  their request, of
  course) then add in parenthesis their maiden name:
  
  Paula Jones (Smith)
  
  Tends to work well.
  
  The only way to do what you want would be to create a second
  mailbox and set the main mailbox as an alternate recipient. 
  That's pretty kludgy to me.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:24 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: additional display name?
   
   
   Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and
  married name
   appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them
  both point
   to the same account?
   
   E2ksp3
   
   Thanks,
   Gordon
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   ___NOTICE_
   This electronic mail transmission contains confidential 
 information
   intended only for the person(s) named.  Any use, 
  distribution, copying
   or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited.  If you
   received this transmission in error, please notify the 
  sender by reply
   e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions,
  conclusions, and other
   information in this message that do not relate to the
   official business of Bain  Company shall be understood to be 
   neither given nor endorsed by the Company.  When addressed to 
   Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is 
   subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client 
   contract. ___
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Web Interface:
   http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Roger Seielstad]

We have what I consider a finely tuned AV system, utilizing multiple vendors
and multiple layers. I'm also willing to share that in the 4 years since
we've implemented our current approach, we have not been the victims of any
major virus outbreaks. That's not to say we don't get hit with the
occasional virus, but we've never had to enter firedrill mode to contain
them.

I do get administrative virus notifications. But considering I see between
100 and 1000 virus notifications a day from inbound mail, the added
assurance of my user being notified is worth it. Maybe I'm just lucky that
most of my users will pick up the phone and ask why they got the message in
the first place.

With regards to spoofed source addresses, there are relatively few that
actually spoof source address. Looking over my recent notifications, I'm
seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and Fizzer the most, none of which are spoofed
source addresses. The only one that currently spoofs source is Sobig, but
that's no longer high traffic. So, I honestly thing that you're overstating
the impact of notifications being sent to hapless victims of spoofing.

As someone else said, its obvious we're not going to change each other's
minds.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:44 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still 
 have the wrong Sender address, we'd still be sending 
 notifications to a bunch of people that didn't send any 
 viruses, and it's still a bad idea. In fact it's a worse idea 
 for internal infections because then everyone would get 
 bombarded with both viruses and virus warnings.
 
 In our case, I do get notified when viruses are blocked, and 
 the notifications contain the complete headers of the blocked 
 messages, so we can keep an eye on things and act accordingly.
 
 -Peter
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:27
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 Here's the problem with not performing sender notifications:
 
 What if your user is the sender?
 
 Don't say it doesn't happen. It does, and sometimes that's 
 the best way for you to know it happened.
 
 Roger
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:03 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
  
  
  We don't send sender notifications. It is bad Netiquette in
  the current Trojan environment. It is bad for email lists, it 
  is bad for IT departments and it is bad for individual users.
  
  However, we do look at the recipient and administrative
  notifications. If it is klez, sobig, etc. we pretty much 
  ignore it. If it is something else we look at the headers and 
  see if we can trace it. If we can, we send a notification.
  
  A little extra work for us, but we are not causing extra work
  for others by doing it this way. That is where the above bad 
  Netiquette comment comes from.
  
  Best Regards,
  
  Dan Bartley
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:56
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  A simple change in the notification could solve this problem.
  You could say your system might possibly be infected with a  
  virus or something along those line. But the problem of 
  spoofing your trying to get across is more of a problem with 
  e-mail in general then with anti-virus software. What going 
  to happen when p*rn spammers start sending messages to users 
  as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
  Harmer, Michael
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:49 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
  
  
  Ah, but Don't send me viruses and I won't send you those
  notifications in the first place. is the flaw. They did not 
  send you the virus. They mearly were member of some 
  distribution list, had their e-mail on a web site, or 
  corrisponded with the person that was actually infected. 
  Unfortunatly, in your desire to 'assist' those that have no 
  technical ability(A noble cause), you send many messages to 
  people who have done you no wrong. 99 out of 100 times your 
  sending someone a message that indicates that they are 
  infected. This causes any responsible person to panic, scan 
  their system, and find nothing. In the end this has as much 
  or more 'cost' as most of the viruses put together. There is 
  nothing 

RE: OWA and Palms

[Erik Sojka]

I honestly don't know how the browser on the Palm devices renders content.
There are some alternatives if the graphics of OWA don't work.  We use the
WAP and PDA products from http://www.leederbyshire.com/ for our Pocket PC
folks.  It works well and is a very tight interface for the small screen.  

Also, as announced at MecEd last week, the forthcoming Exchange 2003 OWA will
be able to display a smaller screen version of OWA if the FE server detects a
small browser.  Again, I don't know how the graphics would look on a Palm's
screen but it may be worth a shot.



 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:27 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Anyone know how functional Exchange 2000's OWA is when 
 accessing it from
 a Palm? Is there one browser that works better than another, 
 or does it
 pretty much suck no matter what?
 
 Jason
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sending Alert Pages

[Brian Ko]

I have not use the PageMaster.  However, I've setup and been using the
Pagegate from http://www.notepage.com which is a lot better than other
paging software I've used in the past.

Brian

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Sending Alert Pages
Importance: High


Hi all,

has anyone used this software called PageMaster to send NetIQ alerts
from
Exchange to a pager or mobile phone?

http://www.omnitrend.com/pm.html

I am just looking for opinions.

Thanks,

Andrey Fyodorov


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Help on Q327378

[Rob Hackney]

Hi,
I've been reading q327378 about changing mailbox size limits in a
reasonable time and have added the value for the exchangeIS.
Should I be concerned that there is not the value  for
Dsaccess\Instance0\CacheTTLUser in my registry or one for Mailbox cache
limit?
If not concerned I can just go ahead and add it, right?
Thanks
Rob

Support Analyst
TKC Group Ltd
Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est
Keynsham
BS31 1TZ
UK
0117 916 1320


This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to 
whom it is addressed.  It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract 
between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted.  Any 
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of TKC Group Ltd.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do 
not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete 
the email.

intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Exmerge in Batch mode

[exchangelist]

I am trying to set up Exmerge to export specific mailboxes from an
Exchange 2000 server in batch mode.  I have most of everything set up
except the mailbox.txt file.  I am having trouble with the format of it. 
Everytime i run it get Error Creating EntryID CN=  Can some one help
with the correct format.  Thanks in advance

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Searching User Mailboxes

[Chris Scharff]

Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which
potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make
more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I
think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably
better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. 

OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes
Subject: Searching User Mailboxes


Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on
Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders,
but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am
thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes
by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past
dealing with X subject . . .

Anyone know of one?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Searching Public Folders

[Chris Scharff]

It's a feature. www.slipstick.com might list some 3rd party products
which allowed one to do this.

-Original Message-
From: Halliday S (ISeLS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:12 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching Public Folders
Subject: Searching Public Folders


Hi all,

I am trying to use Advanced Find on a Public Folder to also search it's
sub folders, however, when I try to select the sub-folders it comes up
with the
message:  the folder you selected does not allow you to search other
folders.

It doesn't work like this on a mailbox it allows you to search
sub-foldersany ideas?

Thanks in advance.
Stephanie.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA and Palms

[Chris Scharff]

Can I avoid the question as asked and recommend E2K3 and OMA?

-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:37 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA and Palms
Subject: RE: OWA and Palms


I honestly don't know how the browser on the Palm devices renders
content. There are some alternatives if the graphics of OWA don't work.
We use the WAP and PDA products from http://www.leederbyshire.com/ for
our Pocket PC folks.  It works well and is a very tight interface for
the small screen.  

Also, as announced at MecEd last week, the forthcoming Exchange 2003 OWA
will be able to display a smaller screen version of OWA if the FE server
detects a small browser.  Again, I don't know how the graphics would
look on a Palm's screen but it may be worth a shot.



 
 -Original Message-
 From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:27 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Anyone know how functional Exchange 2000's OWA is when
 accessing it from
 a Palm? Is there one browser that works better than another, 
 or does it
 pretty much suck no matter what?
 
 Jason
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OWA Public folders

[Mustafa Ibrahim]

Hi all,

I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server also
runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book meetings in our
public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called Meetings Rooms,
under that are several calendars each named after a specific meeting or
conference room so people can book their sessions through there and everyone
else can check for availability. 

The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook client. I
can book rooms and make entries as required without any problems. However,
if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for instance) it will not
let me book rooms. I can see all the public folders, but it doesn't show the
calendar contents, i.e. scheduled meetings, etc. When I drill down to this
public folder called meeting rooms and click on a specific room to make an
entry it simply shows my personal calendar. Any ideas?

Many thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Petschow, Jeff]

  I'm seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and Fizzer the most, none of which are 
 spoofed source addresses. 

You might want to take another look at these as they all spoof the sender
address. Klez and Bugbear are the reason we turned off to notify the sender.

Jeff


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OWA Spellchecker

[David N. Precht]

http://www.owaspellchecker.com
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Iadarola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 15:25
Subject: OWA Spellchecker


Checked the FAQs and did not see anything.  Anyone using a Spellcheck add-on
for E2K OWA?  Are there any that the list recommends?  Outside of waiting
for
Exchange 2003.

TIA,

Steve Iadarola

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Searching User Mailboxes

[Chris H]

Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out. One person suggested
OnTrack's product which looks really intriguing as well as its ability to do
bricked restore from non-bricked backups. Licensing blows though. You have
to license ALL mailboxes. Resource mailboxes too. And we easily have about
200 conference rooms and pieces of equipment with mailboxes.

Thanks! My first drag to boot too! Thanks for a great party. Beer and
cookies. Umm ;)

Chris (The other white meat)

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes


Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which
potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make
more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I
think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably
better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO.

OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes
Subject: Searching User Mailboxes


Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on
Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders,
but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am
thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes
by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past
dealing with X subject . . .

Anyone know of one?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exmerge in Batch mode

[Tony Hlabse]

The Exmerge readme file gives exact examples to follow

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exmerge in Batch mode
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:09:21 -0700
I am trying to set up Exmerge to export specific mailboxes from an
Exchange 2000 server in batch mode.  I have most of everything set up
except the mailbox.txt file.  I am having trouble with the format of it.
Everytime i run it get Error Creating EntryID CN=  Can some one help
with the correct format.  Thanks in advance
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Public folders

[Chris Scharff]

Upgrade to E2K/E2K3.

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA Public folders
Subject: OWA Public folders


Hi all,

I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server
also runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book
meetings in our public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called
Meetings Rooms, under that are several calendars each named after a
specific meeting or conference room so people can book their sessions
through there and everyone else can check for availability. 

The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook
client. I can book rooms and make entries as required without any
problems. However, if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for
instance) it will not let me book rooms. I can see all the public
folders, but it doesn't show the calendar contents, i.e. scheduled
meetings, etc. When I drill down to this public folder called meeting
rooms and click on a specific room to make an entry it simply shows my
personal calendar. Any ideas?

Many thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Blunt, James H (Jim)]

Roger,

This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you on...however, see
below:

Klez -
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.klez.gen.html
Email spoofing
Some variants of this worm use a technique known as spoofing. If so, the
worm randomly selects an address that it finds on an infected computer. It
uses this address as the From address that it uses when it performs its
mass-mailing routine. Numerous cases have been reported in which users of
uninfected computers received complaints that they sent an infected message
to someone else.

Bugbear -
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
l
Uses its own SMTP engine to send itself to all the email addresses it finds.
As part of the routine, the worm spoofs the From: address.

Fizzer -
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tml
Retrieves the email addresses from the Windows Address Book, cookie files,
Internet temporary files, and from files in your personal folder. The worm
sends itself to all the email addresses it finds. The worm may spoof the
sender's name and email address.

Not even counting:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tml
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.aspam.trojan.b.h
tml
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
html
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

and on and on and on...unfortunately.  :0)

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


We have what I consider a finely tuned AV system, utilizing multiple vendors
and multiple layers. I'm also willing to share that in the 4 years since
we've implemented our current approach, we have not been the victims of any
major virus outbreaks. That's not to say we don't get hit with the
occasional virus, but we've never had to enter firedrill mode to contain
them.

I do get administrative virus notifications. But considering I see between
100 and 1000 virus notifications a day from inbound mail, the added
assurance of my user being notified is worth it. Maybe I'm just lucky that
most of my users will pick up the phone and ask why they got the message in
the first place.

With regards to spoofed source addresses, there are relatively few that
actually spoof source address. Looking over my recent notifications, I'm
seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and Fizzer the most, none of which are spoofed
source addresses. The only one that currently spoofs source is Sobig, but
that's no longer high traffic. So, I honestly thing that you're overstating
the impact of notifications being sent to hapless victims of spoofing.

As someone else said, its obvious we're not going to change each other's
minds.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:44 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still
 have the wrong Sender address, we'd still be sending 
 notifications to a bunch of people that didn't send any 
 viruses, and it's still a bad idea. In fact it's a worse idea 
 for internal infections because then everyone would get 
 bombarded with both viruses and virus warnings.
 
 In our case, I do get notified when viruses are blocked, and
 the notifications contain the complete headers of the blocked 
 messages, so we can keep an eye on things and act accordingly.
 
 -Peter
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:27
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 Here's the problem with not performing sender notifications:
 
 What if your user is the sender?
 
 Don't say it doesn't happen. It does, and sometimes that's
 the best way for you to know it happened.
 
 Roger
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:03 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
  
  
  We don't send sender notifications. It is bad Netiquette in the 
  current Trojan environment. It is bad for email lists, it is bad for 
  IT departments and it is bad for individual users.
  
  However, we do look at the recipient and administrative 
  notifications. If it is klez, sobig, etc. we pretty much ignore it. 
  If it is something else we look at the headers and see if we can 
  

RE: Searching User Mailboxes

[Chris Scharff]

Just from my experience[1]... The cost of software licenses is
inconsequential when you get to the total cost for compliance with many
subpoenas. 

[1] Anecdotal as it may be.

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:25 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes
Subject: Re: Searching User Mailboxes


Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out. One person suggested
OnTrack's product which looks really intriguing as well as its ability
to do bricked restore from non-bricked backups. Licensing blows
though. You have to license ALL mailboxes. Resource mailboxes too. And
we easily have about 200 conference rooms and pieces of equipment with
mailboxes.

Thanks! My first drag to boot too! Thanks for a great party. Beer and
cookies. Umm ;)

Chris (The other white meat)

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes


Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which
potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make
more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I
think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably
better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO.

OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes
Subject: Searching User Mailboxes


Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on
Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders,
but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am
thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes
by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past
dealing with X subject . . .

Anyone know of one?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Roger Seielstad]

Hmmm.. Two interesting things are that a) none of the other sources I
checked talked about spoofed sender addresses, and b) my experience has been
that the ones I have bird dogged were indeed NOT spoofed, and came from the
sender in question.

I'll stand corrected on the spoofing issue, but I still feel sender
notifications are worth doing.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:43 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 Roger,
 
 This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you 
 on...however, see
 below:
 
 Klez - 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.kl
 ez.gen.html
 Email spoofing
 Some variants of this worm use a technique known as 
 spoofing. If so, the worm randomly selects an address that 
 it finds on an infected computer. It uses this address as the 
 From address that it uses when it performs its mass-mailing 
 routine. Numerous cases have been reported in which users of 
 uninfected computers received complaints that they sent an 
 infected message to someone else.
 
 Bugbear - 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.bu
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 l
 Uses its own SMTP engine to send itself to all the email 
 addresses it finds. As part of the routine, the worm spoofs 
 the From: address.
 
 Fizzer - 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 tml
 Retrieves the email addresses from the Windows Address Book, 
 cookie files, Internet temporary files, and from files in 
 your personal folder. The worm sends itself to all the email 
 addresses it finds. The worm may spoof the sender's name and 
 email address.
 
 Not even counting: 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 tml 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.so
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.as
 pam.trojan.b.h
 tml 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 html 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.ya
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 and on and on and on...unfortunately.  :0)
 
 Jim
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:05 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 We have what I consider a finely tuned AV system, utilizing 
 multiple vendors and multiple layers. I'm also willing to 
 share that in the 4 years since we've implemented our current 
 approach, we have not been the victims of any major virus 
 outbreaks. That's not to say we don't get hit with the 
 occasional virus, but we've never had to enter firedrill mode 
 to contain them.
 
 I do get administrative virus notifications. But considering 
 I see between 100 and 1000 virus notifications a day from 
 inbound mail, the added assurance of my user being notified 
 is worth it. Maybe I'm just lucky that most of my users will 
 pick up the phone and ask why they got the message in the first place.
 
 With regards to spoofed source addresses, there are 
 relatively few that actually spoof source address. Looking 
 over my recent notifications, I'm seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and 
 Fizzer the most, none of which are spoofed source addresses. 
 The only one that currently spoofs source is Sobig, but 
 that's no longer high traffic. So, I honestly thing that 
 you're overstating the impact of notifications being sent to 
 hapless victims of spoofing.
 
 As someone else said, its obvious we're not going to change 
 each other's minds.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:44 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
  
  
  If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still have the 
  wrong Sender address, we'd still be sending notifications 
 to a bunch 
  of people that didn't send any viruses, and it's still a 
 bad idea. In 
  fact it's a worse idea for internal infections because then 
 everyone 
  would get bombarded with both viruses and virus warnings.
  
  In our case, I do get notified when viruses are blocked, and the 
  notifications contain the complete headers of the blocked 
 messages, so 
  we can keep an eye on things and act accordingly.
  
  -Peter
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:27
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
  
  
  Here's the problem with not performing sender 

Re: Exmerge in Batch mode

[exchangelist]

I guess what i really need to know is how to construct the DN for the
mailboxes.  The readme seems to be a little vague.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Chris Scharff]

There's really no 'right' answer to this question IMO. At $vbc we didn't
send notifications to the sender, but we did to the intended recipient.
At other companies we did the opposite and at 1 we notified everyone and
their monkey. 

Horses for courses I guess.

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:46 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


Hmmm.. Two interesting things are that a) none of the other sources I
checked talked about spoofed sender addresses, and b) my experience has
been that the ones I have bird dogged were indeed NOT spoofed, and came
from the sender in question.

I'll stand corrected on the spoofing issue, but I still feel sender
notifications are worth doing.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:43 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 Roger,
 
 This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you
 on...however, see
 below:
 
 Klez -
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.kl
 ez.gen.html
 Email spoofing
 Some variants of this worm use a technique known as 
 spoofing. If so, the worm randomly selects an address that 
 it finds on an infected computer. It uses this address as the 
 From address that it uses when it performs its mass-mailing 
 routine. Numerous cases have been reported in which users of 
 uninfected computers received complaints that they sent an 
 infected message to someone else.
 
 Bugbear -
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.bu
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 l
 Uses its own SMTP engine to send itself to all the email 
 addresses it finds. As part of the routine, the worm spoofs 
 the From: address.
 
 Fizzer -
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 tml
 Retrieves the email addresses from the Windows Address Book, 
 cookie files, Internet temporary files, and from files in 
 your personal folder. The worm sends itself to all the email 
 addresses it finds. The worm may spoof the sender's name and 
 email address.
 
 Not even counting:
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 tml 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.so
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.as
 pam.trojan.b.h
 tml 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.hl
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 html 
 http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.ya
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 and on and on and on...unfortunately.  :0)
 
 Jim
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:05 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
 
 
 We have what I consider a finely tuned AV system, utilizing
 multiple vendors and multiple layers. I'm also willing to 
 share that in the 4 years since we've implemented our current 
 approach, we have not been the victims of any major virus 
 outbreaks. That's not to say we don't get hit with the 
 occasional virus, but we've never had to enter firedrill mode 
 to contain them.
 
 I do get administrative virus notifications. But considering
 I see between 100 and 1000 virus notifications a day from 
 inbound mail, the added assurance of my user being notified 
 is worth it. Maybe I'm just lucky that most of my users will 
 pick up the phone and ask why they got the message in the first place.
 
 With regards to spoofed source addresses, there are
 relatively few that actually spoof source address. Looking 
 over my recent notifications, I'm seeing BugBear.B, Klez, and 
 Fizzer the most, none of which are spoofed source addresses. 
 The only one that currently spoofs source is Sobig, but 
 that's no longer high traffic. So, I honestly thing that 
 you're overstating the impact of notifications being sent to 
 hapless victims of spoofing.
 
 As someone else said, its obvious we're not going to change
 each other's minds.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:44 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
  
  
  If our user is the sender then all the e-mails will still have the
  wrong Sender address, we'd still be sending notifications 
 to a bunch
  of people that didn't send any viruses, and it's still a
 bad idea. In
  fact it's a worse idea for internal infections because then
 everyone
  would get bombarded with both viruses and virus 

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Tom Meunier]

I forward all my virus notifications to Roger.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:43 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


Roger,

This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you on...however, see
below:

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Strange Question

[Avi Smith-Rapaport]

My boss asked me this morning.

Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will 
resend the email let's say every 20 minutes 

until they respond to you?

He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral 
issues etc.

Avi


We run exchange 2k and outlook client



_
Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
Star Supply Co.
1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exmerge in Batch mode

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

LegacyExchangeDN

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exmerge in Batch mode


I guess what i really need to know is how to construct the DN for the
mailboxes.  The readme seems to be a little vague.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Christopher Hummert]

A mailbomber? Sounds like an excellent way to get everyone to hate your
company.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question


My boss asked me this morning.

Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an
email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes 

until they respond to you?

He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about
the behavoral issues etc.

Avi


We run exchange 2k and outlook client



_
Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
Star Supply Co.
1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Couch, Nate]

There may be something like this, but I will tell you this.  If someone did
that to me I would just set up a rule to permanently delete all of their
messages.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

 --
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:22
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  Strange Question
 
 My boss asked me this morning.
 
 Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an
 email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes 
 
 until they respond to you?
 
 He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about
 the behavoral issues etc.
 
 Avi
 
 
 We run exchange 2k and outlook client
 
 
 
 _
 Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
 Star Supply Co.
 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la
 ng=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Public folders

[Mustafa Ibrahim]

Chris, is there no workaround?

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 15:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders


Upgrade to E2K/E2K3.

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA Public folders
Subject: OWA Public folders


Hi all,

I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server
also runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book
meetings in our public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called
Meetings Rooms, under that are several calendars each named after a
specific meeting or conference room so people can book their sessions
through there and everyone else can check for availability. 

The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook
client. I can book rooms and make entries as required without any
problems. However, if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for
instance) it will not let me book rooms. I can see all the public
folders, but it doesn't show the calendar contents, i.e. scheduled
meetings, etc. When I drill down to this public folder called meeting
rooms and click on a specific room to make an entry it simply shows my
personal calendar. Any ideas?

Many thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Mustafa Ibrahim]

Sounds like a mail spamming question to me. 

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question


My boss asked me this morning.

Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email,
it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes 

until they respond to you?

He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the
behavoral issues etc.

Avi


We run exchange 2k and outlook client



_
Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
Star Supply Co.
1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Exmerge in Batch mode

[Exchange Server]

Thanks for the help
 

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:25 AM
Posted To: Exchange Server
Conversation: Exmerge in Batch mode
Subject: RE: Exmerge in Batch mode

LegacyExchangeDN

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exmerge in Batch mode


I guess what i really need to know is how to construct the DN for the
mailboxes.  The readme seems to be a little vague.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Steck, Herb]

Tell your boss it's a great way to get blacklisted.

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Sounds like a mail spamming question to me. 

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question


My boss asked me this morning.

Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email,
it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes 

until they respond to you?

He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the
behavoral issues etc.

Avi


We run exchange 2k and outlook client



_
Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
Star Supply Co.
1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Strange Question

[Andy David]

Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.

- Original Message - 
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: Strange Question


My boss asked me this morning.

Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email,
it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes

until they respond to you?

He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the
behavoral issues etc.

Avi


We run exchange 2k and outlook client



_
Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
Star Supply Co.
1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Public folders

[Chris Scharff]

That is the workaround, unless you'd like to rewrite the Exchange 5.5
OWA ASP scripts to provide functionality not inherent in the product.
Ought to be possible theoretically.

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:30 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA Public folders
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders


Chris, is there no workaround?

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 15:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders


Upgrade to E2K/E2K3.

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA Public folders
Subject: OWA Public folders


Hi all,

I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server
also runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book
meetings in our public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called
Meetings Rooms, under that are several calendars each named after a
specific meeting or conference room so people can book their sessions
through there and everyone else can check for availability. 

The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook
client. I can book rooms and make entries as required without any
problems. However, if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for
instance) it will not let me book rooms. I can see all the public
folders, but it doesn't show the calendar contents, i.e. scheduled
meetings, etc. When I drill down to this public folder called meeting
rooms and click on a specific room to make an entry it simply shows my
personal calendar. Any ideas?

Many thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OWA Public folders

[Mustafa Ibrahim]

Thanks very much for the tips Chris. Much appreciated.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders


That is the workaround, unless you'd like to rewrite the Exchange 5.5
OWA ASP scripts to provide functionality not inherent in the product.
Ought to be possible theoretically.

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:30 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA Public folders
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders


Chris, is there no workaround?

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 15:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Public folders


Upgrade to E2K/E2K3.

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:15 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: OWA Public folders
Subject: OWA Public folders


Hi all,

I have a simple setup, Win2k server with Exchange on it. This server
also runs OWA. Everything works fine, except when I try and book
meetings in our public folders using OWA. I have a public folder called
Meetings Rooms, under that are several calendars each named after a
specific meeting or conference room so people can book their sessions
through there and everyone else can check for availability. 

The problem is this feature works fine when I am using my outlook
client. I can book rooms and make entries as required without any
problems. However, if I connect to our server using OWA (from home for
instance) it will not let me book rooms. I can see all the public
folders, but it doesn't show the calendar contents, i.e. scheduled
meetings, etc. When I drill down to this public folder called meeting
rooms and click on a specific room to make an entry it simply shows my
personal calendar. Any ideas?

Many thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Couch, Nate]

Lol.  Good answer Andy.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Question


Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.

- Original Message - 
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: Strange Question


My boss asked me this morning.

Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email,
it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes

until they respond to you?

He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the
behavoral issues etc.

Avi


We run exchange 2k and outlook client



_
Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
Star Supply Co.
1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Steck, Herb]

Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone 
every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting 
a raise.


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Lol.  Good answer Andy.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Question


Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.

- Original Message - 
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: Strange Question


My boss asked me this morning.

Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email,
it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes

until they respond to you?

He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the
behavoral issues etc.

Avi


We run exchange 2k and outlook client



_
Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
Star Supply Co.
1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Avi Smith-Rapaport]

I am loving this.
I think I will put together a nice document for him.

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on his cel phone 
every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds until he replies about you getting 
a raise.


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Lol.  Good answer Andy.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Question


Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.

- Original Message - 
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: Strange Question


My boss asked me this morning.

Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email,
it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes

until they respond to you?

He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the
behavoral issues etc.

Avi


We run exchange 2k and outlook client



_
Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
Star Supply Co.
1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

AV User Interface Recommendations

[darrenjohnson22]

I was wondering your opinions on the preferred UI for AV software.  I have
been trying to weigh all of the current AV solutions out there, and I
can't decide which is the best, which have problems, etc.  Any
recommendations?

-Darren Johnson

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Archiving Solutions

[Hurst, Paul]

Carmila,

ON the KVS front it just adds 'stubs' in place of the emails and it is the
client that does the redirection retrieval. So no change at the Exchange
end.

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours


-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 19:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archiving Solutions


Thanks for the replies.  

Does anyone actually have first hand experience using these things?  My
major concern is in the area of disaster recovery.  How easy/hard is it
to restore exchange with these 3rd party solutions?  I'm concerned about
introducing an SQL server into the picture.  Exchange is complicated
enough and I'm squirmish about maintaining a SQL server at the same
time.

Thanks,
Carmila
 


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 6:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

KVS and AttachStor are technologies worth looking at.
www.mail-resources.com has a number of other 3rd party tools listed in
the web links | server | archival section I believe.

-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:02 PM Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Archiving Solutions
Subject: Archiving Solutions


Does anyone have any experience with archiving solutions like veritas
storage migrator for exchange?

We currently do not impose hard limits on our users due to a lot of
regulations that we need to comply with.  We have users who have
mailboxes close to 3GB.  On one exchange server that has 180 users, the
total size of the store is already at a 110GB.

I'm interested to know what solutions you have in place to keep down the
size of user's mailboxes.

Thanks,
Carmila




This email message may contain information that is confidential and
proprietary to Babcock  Brown or a third party.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original
and any copies of the original message.  Babcock  Brown takes measures
to protect the content of its communications.  However, Babcock  Brown
cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third
parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





This email message may contain information that is confidential and
proprietary to Babcock  Brown or a third party.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and
any copies of the original message.  Babcock  Brown takes measures to
protect the content of its communications.  However, Babcock  Brown cannot
guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or
that email messages will be free of errors or viruses.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


***
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be 
confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any 
disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this 
communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The 
views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of 
Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. 

This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited.
(04)
***


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Searching User Mailboxes

[Hurst, Paul]

Well KVS will index right up to phrases if you really want it too and
archive off the Email journaling system.

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours


-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 15:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Searching User Mailboxes


Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out. One person suggested
OnTrack's product which looks really intriguing as well as its ability to do
bricked restore from non-bricked backups. Licensing blows though. You have
to license ALL mailboxes. Resource mailboxes too. And we easily have about
200 conference rooms and pieces of equipment with mailboxes.

Thanks! My first drag to boot too! Thanks for a great party. Beer and
cookies. Umm ;)

Chris (The other white meat)

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes


Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which
potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make
more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I
think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably
better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO.

OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes
Subject: Searching User Mailboxes


Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on
Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders,
but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am
thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes
by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past
dealing with X subject . . .

Anyone know of one?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


***
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be 
confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any 
disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this 
communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The 
views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of 
Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. 

This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited.
(6)
***


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Avi Smith-Rapaport]

Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.

2 willing participants.
Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request from me so if 
I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't 
respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc 
whatever.
The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no?
It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to 
some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that would set the 
reminder intervals.
confused?


Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then 
 call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Lol.  Good answer Andy.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Strange Question
 
 
 Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes 
 until you get
 answer.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
 Subject: Strange Question
 
 
 My boss asked me this morning.
 
 Is there any type of program or something that if you send 
 someone an email,
 it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
 
 until they respond to you?
 
 He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the 
 discussion about the
 behavoral issues etc.
 
 Avi
 
 
 We run exchange 2k and outlook client
 
 
 
 _
 Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
 Star Supply Co.
 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Strange Question

[Andy David]

Hells Bells.
Sign them all up for AOL.

- Original Message - 
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.

2 willing participants.
Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request
from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20
min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email,
or pop up a window on his pc whatever.
The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no?
It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it
to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person
that would set the reminder intervals.
confused?


Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?


 -Original Message-
 From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions

 Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
 call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every
 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.


 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question


 Lol.  Good answer Andy.

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Strange Question


 Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
 until you get
 answer.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
 Subject: Strange Question


 My boss asked me this morning.

 Is there any type of program or something that if you send
 someone an email,
 it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes

 until they respond to you?

 He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the
 discussion about the
 behavoral issues etc.

 Avi


 We run exchange 2k and outlook client



 _
 Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
 Star Supply Co.
 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 

Perrmission denied??

[Tony Hlabse]

I have a user that is a owner of a public folder and he has send as and 
send on behalf permissions. The send as was added later but was decided 
to keep the send on behalf, as it wouldn't hurt anything. The PF mail 
address is hidden from the GAL. Receives mail fine. But when the user goes 
to send as he gets you do not have permissions. However if I unhide the 
PF mail address from the GAL he can send as just fine no errors. Is this a 
bug. Do I need to remove the send on behalf for it to function in the 
hidden mode.

_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Christopher Hummert]

Just let him know that you'll probably be blacklisted if he goes forward
with this. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.

2 willing participants.
Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request
from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond
in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will
re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me
like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that
would set the reminder intervals. confused?


Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
 call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Lol.  Good answer Andy.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Strange Question
 
 
 Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
 until you get
 answer.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
 Subject: Strange Question
 
 
 My boss asked me this morning.
 
 Is there any type of program or something that if you send
 someone an email,
 it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
 
 until they respond to you?
 
 He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the
 discussion about the
 behavoral issues etc.
 
 Avi
 
 
 We run exchange 2k and outlook client
 
 
 
 _
 Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
 Star Supply Co.
 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:  

RE: additional display name?

[Hurst, Paul]

True, you cannot forward out of the company unless you set up a CR, but
internal email is OK to forward with the folder assistant.

Cheers

Paul

Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 12:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: additional display name?


PF's can't forward mail out, they can only receive mail, at least not
without some coding.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:22 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: additional display name?
 
 
 IMHO Or you could instead create a PF that directs all email 
 to the recipients renamed Emailbox and have the PF display 
 the old maiden name in brackets (if you wish)
 
 Cheers
 
 Paul
 
 Standards are like toothbrushes,
 everyone wants one but not yours
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 09 June 2003 18:57
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: additional display name?
 
 
 We do that too.. Forgot to include it.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: additional display name?
  
  
  Additionally, we create a new SMTP addy for their married
  name, set it as the reply to address and leave the old one.
  
  That way, people can still reply to her old e-mails and at
  some point, they will start to see the new display name.
  
  I.E.  Paula J Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) now becomes Paula J
  Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED])
  
  Works for us...YMMV.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:43 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: additional display name?
  
  
  We traditionally change the user to the married name (at
  their request, of
  course) then add in parenthesis their maiden name:
  
  Paula Jones (Smith)
  
  Tends to work well.
  
  The only way to do what you want would be to create a second
  mailbox and set the main mailbox as an alternate recipient. 
  That's pretty kludgy to me.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:24 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: additional display name?
   
   
   Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and
  married name
   appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them
  both point
   to the same account?
   
   E2ksp3
   
   Thanks,
   Gordon
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   ___NOTICE_
   This electronic mail transmission contains confidential 
 information
   intended only for the person(s) named.  Any use, 
  distribution, copying
   or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited.  If you
   received this transmission in error, please notify the 
  sender by reply
   e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions,
  conclusions, and other
   information in this message that do not relate to the
   official business of Bain  Company shall be understood to be 
   neither given nor endorsed by the Company.  When addressed to 
   Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is 
   subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client 
   contract. ___
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Web Interface:
   http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:

RE: Strange Question

[Erik Sojka]

Can you clarify if it will be internal willing recipients or external
willing recipients?


 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type 
 of request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email 
 and mark it, respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 
 20 minutes to me then it will re-email, or pop up a window on 
 his pc whatever.
 The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no?
 It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain 
 people he wants it to go to some reminder type of a system 
 although the sender is the person that would set the reminder 
 intervals.
 confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then 
  call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
  30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Lol.  Good answer Andy.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: Strange Question
  
  
  Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes 
  until you get
  answer.
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
  Subject: Strange Question
  
  
  My boss asked me this morning.
  
  Is there any type of program or something that if you send 
  someone an email,
  it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
  
  until they respond to you?
  
  He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the 
  discussion about the
  behavoral issues etc.
  
  Avi
  
  
  We run exchange 2k and outlook client
  
  
  
  _
  Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
  Star Supply Co.
  1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
  Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang
  =english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang
  =english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange 

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Durkee, Peter]

I think it's worth pointing out that everyone who does send notification to virus 
senders participated in what almost amounted to a DOS attack against Microsoft. You'll 
recall that all sobig-b virus messages report that they came from [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
and I noticed significant delays in getting mail delivered to Microsoft during the 
week or so when that virus was popular.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


I forward all my virus notifications to Roger.

-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:43 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


Roger,

This is the FIRST topic I have ever disagreed with you on...however, see
below:

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Perrmission denied??

[Tony Hlabse]

Forgot. E2K SP3 One single PF store
,
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Perrmission denied??
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:41:39 -0400
I have a user that is a owner of a public folder and he has send as and 
send on behalf permissions. The send as was added later but was decided 
to keep the send on behalf, as it wouldn't hurt anything. The PF mail 
address is hidden from the GAL. Receives mail fine. But when the user goes 
to send as he gets you do not have permissions. However if I unhide the 
PF mail address from the GAL he can send as just fine no errors. Is this a 
bug. Do I need to remove the send on behalf for it to function in the 
hidden mode.

_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Ken Cornetet]

I envision a solution like this:

Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever)
where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app
sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file,
database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.

The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.

Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes)
checks for flags and resends reminders.



-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.

2 willing participants.
Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request
from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond
in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will
re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me
like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that
would set the reminder intervals. confused?


Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
 call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Lol.  Good answer Andy.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Strange Question
 
 
 Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
 until you get
 answer.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
 Subject: Strange Question
 
 
 My boss asked me this morning.
 
 Is there any type of program or something that if you send
 someone an email,
 it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
 
 until they respond to you?
 
 He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the
 discussion about the
 behavoral issues etc.
 
 Avi
 
 
 We run exchange 2k and outlook client
 
 
 
 _
 Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
 Star Supply Co.
 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To 

RE: Strange Question

[Christopher Hummert]

What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message - Junk
E-mail - Add to Junk Senders?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.

2 willing participants.
Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request
from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond
in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will
re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me
like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that
would set the reminder intervals. confused?


Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
 call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Lol.  Good answer Andy.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Strange Question
 
 
 Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
 until you get
 answer.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
 Subject: Strange Question
 
 
 My boss asked me this morning.
 
 Is there any type of program or something that if you send
 someone an email,
 it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
 
 until they respond to you?
 
 He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the
 discussion about the
 behavoral issues etc.
 
 Avi
 
 
 We run exchange 2k and outlook client
 
 
 
 _
 Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
 Star Supply Co.
 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List 

Re: Strange Question

[Martin Tuip [MVP]]

After 2 reminders the custom application written by the user automatically
sends resume of user to monsterboard.com

**  Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

- Original Message - 
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:46 PM
Subject: RE: Strange Question


I envision a solution like this:

Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, whatever)
where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app
sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file,
database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.

The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.

Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few minutes)
checks for flags and resends reminders.



-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.

2 willing participants.
Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request
from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond
in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will
re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me
like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that
would set the reminder intervals. confused?


Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?


 -Original Message-
 From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions

 Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
 call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every
 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.


 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question


 Lol.  Good answer Andy.

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Strange Question


 Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
 until you get
 answer.

 - Original Message -
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
 Subject: Strange Question


 My boss asked me this morning.

 Is there any type of program or something that if you send
 someone an email,
 it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes

 until they respond to you?

 He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the
 discussion about the
 behavoral issues etc.

 Avi


 We run exchange 2k and outlook client



 _
 Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
 Star Supply Co.
 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

RE: Strange Question

[Erik Sojka]

As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished
here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk?  To ensure that
emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes?  What is
the business goal that is to be accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better
solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, 
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file,
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every 
 few minutes)
 checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type 
 of request
 from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond
 in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will
 re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
 participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me
 like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
 some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that
 would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
  call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
  30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Lol.  Good answer Andy.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: Strange Question
  
  
  Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
  until you get
  answer.
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
  Subject: Strange Question
  
  
  My boss asked me this morning.
  
  Is there any type of program or something that if you send
  someone an email,
  it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
  
  until they respond to you?
  
  He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the
  discussion about the
  behavoral issues etc.
  
  Avi
  
  
  We run exchange 2k and outlook client
  
  
  
  _
  Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
  Star Supply Co.
  1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
  Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang
  =english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang
  =english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe)]

I appreciate all the feedback.  After reviewing the posts, I guess we will
have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages.  I'm starting to lean
toward turning the notification off.  Or possibly a combination of both?
Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ
and then turn the notification back on when it subsides.  As I re-read this,
that doesn't sound good either.  Time to make a decision and stick with it I
guess.

-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender?

Off topic.

With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we
are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender
notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually
send any virus.  I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who
are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected.  Kind of a
catch 22.  I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding
notification messages to the sender.  Have you disabled sender notifications
or are you just living with it?

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax -   (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Avi Smith-Rapaport]

The fact that the two parties consented to this.
Please don't get me wrong, I am completely in agreement with what the Great Crowley 
says about behavioral issues and all of that, just following up for the boss.

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message - Junk
E-mail - Add to Junk Senders?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.

2 willing participants.
Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request
from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond
in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will
re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me
like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that
would set the reminder intervals. confused?


Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
 call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Lol.  Good answer Andy.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Strange Question
 
 
 Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
 until you get
 answer.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
 Subject: Strange Question
 
 
 My boss asked me this morning.
 
 Is there any type of program or something that if you send
 someone an email,
 it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
 
 until they respond to you?
 
 He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the
 discussion about the
 behavoral issues etc.
 
 Avi
 
 
 We run exchange 2k and outlook client
 
 
 
 _
 Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
 Star Supply Co.
 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

replication issue

[dave]

Situation:  Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on NT4 (sp6a). System needs replaced.
 Built 2000 server installed Exchange 5.5 into the site.  Site will not
replicate so I can't move mailboxes. Errors are:

Event ID: 1059
Source: MSExchangeDS
Description:
Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error
22.

Event ID: 1083
Source: MSExchangeDS
Description:
Replication warning: The directory replication agent (DRA) couldn't
synchronize naming context /o='ORG'/ou='SITE' with naming context on
directory 'FIRST-SERVER'.


Nothing on Microsoft support is giving any clues to the issue except that
DRA error 22 is a JET error.
I have removed the added server, cleared its existance, and re-installed.
outcome = identical issues.

Thoughts?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: additional display name?

[Roger Seielstad]

But can the PF Folder assistant still access the GAL? Strikes me that it
shouldn't be able to, much like Inbox Assistant/Rules Wizard rules can't.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:43 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: additional display name?
 
 
 True, you cannot forward out of the company unless you set up 
 a CR, but internal email is OK to forward with the folder assistant.
 
 Cheers
 
 Paul
 
 Standards are like toothbrushes,
 everyone wants one but not yours
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 11 June 2003 12:35
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: additional display name?
 
 
 PF's can't forward mail out, they can only receive mail, at 
 least not without some coding.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:22 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: additional display name?
  
  
  IMHO Or you could instead create a PF that directs all email
  to the recipients renamed Emailbox and have the PF display 
  the old maiden name in brackets (if you wish)
  
  Cheers
  
  Paul
  
  Standards are like toothbrushes,
  everyone wants one but not yours
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 09 June 2003 18:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: additional display name?
  
  
  We do that too.. Forgot to include it.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: additional display name?
   
   
   Additionally, we create a new SMTP addy for their married 
 name, set 
   it as the reply to address and leave the old one.
   
   That way, people can still reply to her old e-mails and at some 
   point, they will start to see the new display name.
   
   I.E.  Paula J Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) now becomes 
 Paula J Jones 
   ([EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED])
   
   Works for us...YMMV.
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:43 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: additional display name?
   
   
   We traditionally change the user to the married name (at their 
   request, of
   course) then add in parenthesis their maiden name:
   
   Paula Jones (Smith)
   
   Tends to work well.
   
   The only way to do what you want would be to create a 
 second mailbox 
   and set the main mailbox as an alternate recipient. That's pretty 
   kludgy to me.
   
   --
   Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
   Sr. Systems Administrator
   Inovis Inc.
   
   
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: additional display name?


Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and
   married name
appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them
   both point
to the same account?

E2ksp3

Thanks,
Gordon


























___NOTICE_
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential
  information
intended only for the person(s) named.  Any use,
   distribution, copying
or disclosure by any other person is strictly 
 prohibited.  If you 
received this transmission in error, please notify the
   sender by reply
e-mail and then destroy the message.  Opinions,
   conclusions, and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official 
business of Bain  Company shall be understood to be 
 neither given 
nor endorsed by the Company.  When addressed to Bain 
 clients, any 
information contained in this e-mail is subject to the 
 terms and 
conditions in the governing client contract. 
___


 _
List posting FAQ:   
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
   ext_mode=lang=english
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:

Re: replication issue

[Andy David]

Looks like a name resolution error. When you added the 2nd server into the
existing site, didnt you get some error messages?
Try adding the names of the other Exch server into each respective server's
hosts files.
RPCPing is also your friend.

- Original Message - 
From: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: replication issue


 Situation:  Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on NT4 (sp6a). System needs replaced.
  Built 2000 server installed Exchange 5.5 into the site.  Site will not
 replicate so I can't move mailboxes. Errors are:

 Event ID: 1059
 Source: MSExchangeDS
 Description:
 Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error
 22.

 Event ID: 1083
 Source: MSExchangeDS
 Description:
 Replication warning: The directory replication agent (DRA) couldn't
 synchronize naming context /o='ORG'/ou='SITE' with naming context on
 directory 'FIRST-SERVER'.


 Nothing on Microsoft support is giving any clues to the issue except that
 DRA error 22 is a JET error.
 I have removed the added server, cleared its existance, and re-installed.
 outcome = identical issues.

 Thoughts?

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Durkee, Peter]

Actually, a reasonable compromise for Antigen users is to disable notifications for 
worm senders, which includes all the sender spoofing mass mailers, but enable 
notifications for virus senders, which covers the macro viruses that still turn up 
sporadically.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


I appreciate all the feedback.  After reviewing the posts, I guess we will
have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages.  I'm starting to lean
toward turning the notification off.  Or possibly a combination of both?
Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ
and then turn the notification back on when it subsides.  As I re-read this,
that doesn't sound good either.  Time to make a decision and stick with it I
guess.

-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender?

Off topic.

With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we
are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender
notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually
send any virus.  I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who
are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected.  Kind of a
catch 22.  I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding
notification messages to the sender.  Have you disabled sender notifications
or are you just living with it?

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax -   (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

[Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe)]

Running Trends ScanMail, so we don't have an option to send notifications
based on virus type.  Good idea though!

-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?

Actually, a reasonable compromise for Antigen users is to disable
notifications for worm senders, which includes all the sender spoofing mass
mailers, but enable notifications for virus senders, which covers the macro
viruses that still turn up sporadically.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?


I appreciate all the feedback.  After reviewing the posts, I guess we will
have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages.  I'm starting to lean
toward turning the notification off.  Or possibly a combination of both?
Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ
and then turn the notification back on when it subsides.  As I re-read this,
that doesn't sound good either.  Time to make a decision and stick with it I
guess.

-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender?

Off topic.

With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we
are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender
notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually
send any virus.  I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who
are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected.  Kind of a
catch 22.  I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding
notification messages to the sender.  Have you disabled sender notifications
or are you just living with it?

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax -   (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
this message to anyone else. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Use the flag

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.

2 willing participants.
Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of request
from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond in 20
min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will re-email,
or pop up a window on his pc whatever.
The two willing participants definitely seems more like something, no?
It seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it
to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person
that would set the reminder intervals.
confused?


Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
Can we go to mount Splashmore? 

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then 
 call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
 30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Lol.  Good answer Andy.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Strange Question
 
 
 Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes 
 until you get
 answer.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
 Subject: Strange Question
 
 
 My boss asked me this morning.
 
 Is there any type of program or something that if you send 
 someone an email,
 it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
 
 until they respond to you?
 
 He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the 
 discussion about the
 behavoral issues etc.
 
 Avi
 
 
 We run exchange 2k and outlook client
 
 
 
 _
 Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
 Star Supply Co.
 1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
 Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 

Mail Marshall users

[John Matteson]

Sorry for the semi off topic post.

Would anyone who is the administrator of a Mail Marshall service, please
contact me off list.

I'm looking for some real - world information about it's operation and
reliability.

Thanks.

John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Avi Smith-Rapaport]

I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it would pop up 
in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke.  To me it just seems like a 
crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email if that is part 
of their responsibilities.

I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive reason, I know I 
know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, 
this is where I am asking for advice for the gurus.  You guys read minds right?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be accomplished
here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk?  To ensure that
emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done within 20 minutes?  What is
the business goal that is to be accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better
solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, 
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file,
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every 
 few minutes)
 checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type 
 of request
 from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond
 in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will
 re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
 participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me
 like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
 some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that
 would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
  call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
  30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Lol.  Good answer Andy.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: Strange Question
  
  
  Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
  until you get
  answer.
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
  Subject: Strange Question
  
  
  My boss asked me this morning.
  
  Is there any type of program or something that if you send
  someone an email,
  it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
  
  until they respond to you?
  
  He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the
  discussion about the
  behavoral issues etc.
  
  Avi
  
  
  We run exchange 2k and outlook client
  
  
  
  _
  Avi Smith-Rapaport / MIS Director
  Star Supply Co.
  1040 State Street * New Haven, CT 06511
  Voice: 203.772.2240 * Fax: 203.865.7827
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   

RE: Strange Question

[Christopher Hummert]

If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it
would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke.
To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work
in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities.

I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive
reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I
don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for
the gurus.  You guys read minds right?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be
accomplished here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her
desk?  To ensure that emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done
within 20 minutes?  What is the business goal that is to be
accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered
instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file,
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to 
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every
 few minutes)
 checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type
 of request
 from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond
 in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will
 re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
 participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me
 like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
 some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that
 would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on 
  his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds 
  until he replies about you getting a raise.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Lol.  Good answer Andy.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: Strange Question
  
  
  Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until 
  you get answer.
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
  Subject: Strange Question
  
  
  My boss asked me this morning.
  
  Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone 
  an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
  
  until they respond to you?
  
  He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion 
  about the behavoral issues etc.
  
  Avi
  
  
  We run exchange 2k and outlook client
  
  
  
  

RE: Strange Question

[Avi Smith-Rapaport]

Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it
would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke.
To me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work
in keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities.

I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive
reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I
don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for
the gurus.  You guys read minds right?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be
accomplished here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her
desk?  To ensure that emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done
within 20 minutes?  What is the business goal that is to be
accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered
instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file,
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to 
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every
 few minutes)
 checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type
 of request
 from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it, respond
 in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then it will
 re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
 participants definitely seems more like something, no? It seems to me
 like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
 some reminder type of a system although the sender is the person that
 would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on 
  his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds 
  until he replies about you getting a raise.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Lol.  Good answer Andy.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: Strange Question
  
  
  Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until 
  you get answer.
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
  Subject: Strange Question
  
  
  My boss asked me this morning.
  
  Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone 
  an email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
 

RE: Strange Question

[Ben Schorr]

Have the boss just set the reminder flag for Follow up on the e-mail with
the date/time for 20 minutes hence.  It should pop up if the other guy is
using Outlook.

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4
Director of Information Services
Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
http://www.hawaiilawyer.com
 

 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:49
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.
 
 Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to 
 be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending 
 him an idiotic joke.  To me it just seems like a crutch for 
 someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email 
 if that is part of their responsibilities.
 
 I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever 
 secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I 
 give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is 
 where I am asking for advice for the gurus.  You guys read 
 minds right?
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.
 
 The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to 
 be accomplished here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting 
 at his/her desk?  To ensure that emails get read?  To ensure 
 that tasks get done within 20 minutes?  What is the business 
 goal that is to be accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better 
 solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge.
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  I envision a solution like this:
  
  Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
  whatever)
  where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered 
 recipient - that 
  would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app 
  sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag 
 (flat file, 
  database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
  
  The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient 
 clicks on to 
  acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
  
  Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few 
  minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders.
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Alright...
  That didn't go over so well.
  He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
  
  2 willing participants.
  Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of 
  request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email 
 and mark it, 
  respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes 
 to me then 
  it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two 
  willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It 
  seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people 
 he wants 
  it to go to some reminder type of a system although the 
 sender is the 
  person that would set the reminder intervals. confused?
  
  
  Avi
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   
   Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, 
 then call on 
   his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds 
   until he replies about you getting a raise.
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Strange Question
   
   
   Lol.  Good answer Andy.
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: Strange Question
   
   
   Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 
 minutes until 
   you get answer.
   
   - Original Message -
   From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
   Subject: Strange Question
   
   
   My boss asked me this 

RE: Strange Question

[David J. Culliton]

If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on
the desktop informing of the important email?

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it
would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To
me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in
keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities.

I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive
reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I
don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for
the gurus.  You guys read minds right?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be
accomplished here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her
desk?  To ensure that emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done
within 20 minutes?  What is the business goal that is to be
accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered
instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that 
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app 
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, 
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few 
 minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of 
 request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it,

 respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then

 it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two 
 willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It 
 seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants 
 it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the 
 person that would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on
  his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds 
  until he replies about you getting a raise.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Lol.  Good answer Andy.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: Strange Question
  
  
  Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until
  you get answer.
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL 

RE: Strange Question

[Avi Smith-Rapaport]

All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want this so I 
can give him what he wants.
Will pry further.

Avi


-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on
the desktop informing of the important email?

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it
would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To
me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in
keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities.

I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive
reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I
don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for
the gurus.  You guys read minds right?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be
accomplished here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her
desk?  To ensure that emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done
within 20 minutes?  What is the business goal that is to be
accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered
instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that 
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app 
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, 
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few 
 minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of 
 request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it,

 respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then

 it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two 
 willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It 
 seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants 
 it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the 
 person that would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on
  his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 30 seconds 
  until he replies about you getting a raise.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Lol.  Good answer Andy.
  
  -Original 

RE: Strange Question

[Christopher Hummert]

Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said it wasn't possible. Case
close, it's not worth waiting the time on.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he
want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further.

Avi


-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on
the desktop informing of the important email?

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it
would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To
me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in
keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities.

I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive
reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I
don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for
the gurus.  You guys read minds right?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be
accomplished here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her
desk?  To ensure that emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done
within 20 minutes?  What is the business goal that is to be
accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered
instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app 
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, 
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to 
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few
 minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of
 request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it,

 respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then

 it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two
 willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It 
 seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants 
 it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the 
 person that would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then call on 
  his cel phone every minute, then send 

RE: Strange Question

[Christopher Hummert]

Wasting...damn spell checker :)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said it wasn't possible. Case
close, it's not worth waiting the time on.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he
want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further.

Avi


-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on
the desktop informing of the important email?

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it
would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To
me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in
keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities.

I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive
reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I
don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for
the gurus.  You guys read minds right?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be
accomplished here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her
desk?  To ensure that emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done
within 20 minutes?  What is the business goal that is to be
accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered
instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that 
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app 
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, 
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few
 minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of 
 request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it,

 respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then

 it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two 
 willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It 
 seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants 
 it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the 
 person that would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  

RE: Strange Question

[Dan Bartley]

Outlook 2003 will make this possible (as well as user specified sounds,
etc.), current versions do not. He will have to wait.

Best Regards, 

Dan Bartley

-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 15:26
To: Exchange Discussions

Wasting...damn spell checker :)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said it wasn't possible. Case
close, it's not worth waiting the time on.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he
want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further.

Avi


-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on
the desktop informing of the important email?

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it
would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To
me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in
keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities.

I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive
reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I
don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for
the gurus.  You guys read minds right?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be
accomplished here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her
desk?  To ensure that emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done
within 20 minutes?  What is the business goal that is to be
accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered
instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that 
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app 
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, 
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few
 minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of 
 request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it,

 respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then

 it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two 
 willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It 
 seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants 
 it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the 
 person that would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: 

Question about public folders

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Hi all,

I need a brain refresh...

here is the scenario:

there is an Exchange 2000 server (server A) that only holds users' maiboxes,
it does not have a PF store.

there are two Exchange 2000 servers (server C and server D) with PF stores.

All the servers are in the same Admin group and in the same Routing group.

A user whose mailbox is on server A sends a message to a mail-enabled public
folder. The message always wants to be delivered to server B (according to
message tracking).

How does Exchange decide which PF server to deliver message to? Is it
supposed to be random or is there some preference set up somewhere?

Thanks,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging  Collaboration
Spherion Corporation

P.S. the real kicker is that server B does not have a replica of that
mail-enabled PF. Only server C has it.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Question about public folders

[Hutchins, Mike]

Right Click Database and look at the box that says default public folder
server.


-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Hi all,

I need a brain refresh...

here is the scenario:

there is an Exchange 2000 server (server A) that only holds users'
maiboxes, it does not have a PF store.

there are two Exchange 2000 servers (server C and server D) with PF
stores.

All the servers are in the same Admin group and in the same Routing
group.

A user whose mailbox is on server A sends a message to a mail-enabled
public folder. The message always wants to be delivered to server B
(according to message tracking).

How does Exchange decide which PF server to deliver message to? Is it
supposed to be random or is there some preference set up somewhere?

Thanks,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging  Collaboration
Spherion Corporation

P.S. the real kicker is that server B does not have a replica of that
mail-enabled PF. Only server C has it.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[Bailey, Matthew]

You have any opening there?  This sounds like the kind of boss I would
*love* to work for. :-)

- Matt





 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.
 
 Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to 
 be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending 
 him an idiotic joke.  To me it just seems like a crutch for 
 someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email 
 if that is part of their responsibilities.
 
 I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever 
 secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I 
 give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is 
 where I am asking for advice for the gurus.  You guys read 
 minds right?
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.
 
 The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to 
 be accomplished
 here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk? 
  To ensure that
 emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done within 20 
 minutes?  What is
 the business goal that is to be accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better
 solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge.
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  I envision a solution like this:
  
  Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb, 
  whatever)
  where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
  would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app
  sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file,
  database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
  
  The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
  acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
  
  Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every 
  few minutes)
  checks for flags and resends reminders.
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Alright...
  That didn't go over so well.
  He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
  
  2 willing participants.
  Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type 
  of request
  from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark 
 it, respond
  in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me 
 then it will
  re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
  participants definitely seems more like something, no? It 
 seems to me
  like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
  some reminder type of a system although the sender is the 
 person that
  would set the reminder intervals. confused?
  
  
  Avi
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
  
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   
   Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
   call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every 
   30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Strange Question
   
   
   Lol.  Good answer Andy.
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: Strange Question
   
   
   Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
   until you get
   answer.
   
   - Original Message -
   From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
   Subject: Strange Question
   
   
   My boss asked me this morning.
   
   Is there any type of program or something that if you send
   someone an email,
   it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
   
   until they respond to you?
   
   He has not 

Top 10 things overheard at TechEd

[Martin Tuip [MVP]]

10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on
Windows XP ? - one attendee joking



**  Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Strange Question

[The Geek Q]

tell him you need to upgrade to E2K3 and OLK2K3. It has cool flags and rules 
for better message management. Then you could use OMI to alert him on his 
mobile device.
You will need one as well   ;-P

- John Q Jr.

From: Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:48:44 -0700
You have any opening there?  This sounds like the kind of boss I would
*love* to work for. :-)
- Matt





 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question


 I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

 Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to
 be done it would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending
 him an idiotic joke.  To me it just seems like a crutch for
 someone who isn't doing their work in keeping up with email
 if that is part of their responsibilities.

 I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever
 secretive reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I
 give someone what I don't know they want, but alas, this is
 where I am asking for advice for the gurus.  You guys read
 minds right?

 Avi



 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question


 As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

 The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to
 be accomplished
 here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her desk?
  To ensure that
 emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done within 20
 minutes?  What is
 the business goal that is to be accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better
 solution that can be offered instead of an email kludge.

 
  -Original Message-
  From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  I envision a solution like this:
 
  Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
  whatever)
  where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that
  would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app
  sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file,
  database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
  The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
  acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
  Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every
  few minutes)
  checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
  Alright...
  That didn't go over so well.
  He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
  2 willing participants.
  Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type
  of request
  from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark
 it, respond
  in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me
 then it will
  re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two willing
  participants definitely seems more like something, no? It
 seems to me
  like when he gets and email from certain people he wants it to go to
  some reminder type of a system although the sender is the
 person that
  would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
  Avi
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
  Can we go to mount Splashmore?
  Can we go to mount Splashmore?
  Can we go to mount Splashmore?
  Can we go to mount Splashmore?
  Can we go to mount Splashmore?
  Can we go to mount Splashmore?
  Can we go to mount Splashmore?
  Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
  
   Then tell him you will send him pages every 2 minutes, then
   call on his cel phone every minute, then send him a fax every
   30 seconds until he replies about you getting a raise.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:45 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Strange Question
  
  
   Lol.  Good answer Andy.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: Strange Question
  
  
   Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes
   until you get
   answer.
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: 

RE: Strange Question

[Mellott, Bill]

Make him carry a pager...wire it too him so it can shock him.

write a rule that forwards e-mails from identified VIPS to the pager.
thus he will know about it when it forwards to the pagerprovided you
wire him correctly..

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want
this so I can give him what he wants.
Will pry further.

Avi


-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on
the desktop informing of the important email?

-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.



-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.

Like if the owner emailed to my boss something that needed to be done it
would pop up in his mail box vs. someone sending him an idiotic joke. To
me it just seems like a crutch for someone who isn't doing their work in
keeping up with email if that is part of their responsibilities.

I am not to know the true reason behind this, for whatever secretive
reason, I know I know how ridiculous and how can I give someone what I
don't know they want, but alas, this is where I am asking for advice for
the gurus.  You guys read minds right?

Avi



-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question


As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.

The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss is what is to be
accomplished here?  Is it to track that a user is sitting at his/her
desk?  To ensure that emails get read?  To ensure that tasks get done
within 20 minutes?  What is the business goal that is to be
accomplished?  Mebbe there is a better solution that can be offered
instead of an email kludge.

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:46 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 I envision a solution like this:
 
 Boss points browser to a web server with a CGI app (perl, vb,
 whatever)
 where he enters a recipient (or picks a pre-entered recipient - that 
 would help ensure it wasn't abused) and types his message. This app 
 sends the message (via CDO or SMTP) and creates a flag (flat file, 
 database record, etc) that records the time sent and the recipient.
 
 The app appends a URL to another app that the recipient clicks on to
 acknowledge the message. This deletes the flag.
 
 Yet another app (not web based, but scheduled to run every few 
 minutes) checks for flags and resends reminders.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Alright...
 That didn't go over so well.
 He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
 
 2 willing participants.
 Meaning, let's say that Erik decides he will accept this type of 
 request from me so if I choose to I can send him an email and mark it,

 respond in 20 min, then if he doesn't respond in 20 minutes to me then

 it will re-email, or pop up a window on his pc whatever. The two 
 willing participants definitely seems more like something, no? It 
 seems to me like when he gets and email from certain people he wants 
 it to go to some reminder type of a system although the sender is the 
 person that would set the reminder intervals. confused?
 
 
 Avi
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Strange Question
 
 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore?
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 Can we go to mount Splashmore? 
 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  Then tell him you 

RE: Question about public folders

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

That was my first thought. The Default PF store is set up correctly.

-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question about public folders


Right Click Database and look at the box that says default public folder
server.


-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

Hi all,

I need a brain refresh...

here is the scenario:

there is an Exchange 2000 server (server A) that only holds users'
maiboxes, it does not have a PF store.

there are two Exchange 2000 servers (server C and server D) with PF
stores.

All the servers are in the same Admin group and in the same Routing
group.

A user whose mailbox is on server A sends a message to a mail-enabled
public folder. The message always wants to be delivered to server B
(according to message tracking).

How does Exchange decide which PF server to deliver message to? Is it
supposed to be random or is there some preference set up somewhere?

Thanks,

Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging  Collaboration
Spherion Corporation

P.S. the real kicker is that server B does not have a replica of that
mail-enabled PF. Only server C has it.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd

[Martin Blackstone]

9. What the hell died in there? 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on
Windows XP ? - one attendee joking



**  Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd

[Mark Jeremy]

8. *snore* *mumbling..*

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd


9. What the hell died in there? 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on
Windows XP ? - one attendee joking



**  Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
Exchange 2003 **
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: replication issue

[Fyodorov, Andrey]

Once I had a hairy migration from 5.5 to 2000.

I could not do an in-place migration because 5.5 server was the only one
that the organization had.

when I installed a new Exchange 2000 server and joined it to the existing
5.5 org, everything seemed to work fine, but in the end the 5.5 server was
not available in the Servers container on the Ex2K side, and vice versa -
the Ex2K server was not visible from the Ex5.5 side.

I finally quit tryin to join a 2000 server to existing 5.5 org. Instead I
installed a dummy 5.5 server into the same 5.5 org and joined the site. That
worked out well. Then I did an in-place upgrade of the dummy 5.5 server to
Ex2K. It worked. Then I installed a real Ex2K server into the org, moved all
the users over, then killed the original 5.5 server and then killed the
dummy Ex2K server.

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: replication issue


Looks like a name resolution error. When you added the 2nd server into the
existing site, didnt you get some error messages?
Try adding the names of the other Exch server into each respective server's
hosts files.
RPCPing is also your friend.

- Original Message - 
From: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: replication issue


 Situation:  Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on NT4 (sp6a). System needs replaced.
  Built 2000 server installed Exchange 5.5 into the site.  Site will not
 replicate so I can't move mailboxes. Errors are:

 Event ID: 1059
 Source: MSExchangeDS
 Description:
 Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error
 22.

 Event ID: 1083
 Source: MSExchangeDS
 Description:
 Replication warning: The directory replication agent (DRA) couldn't
 synchronize naming context /o='ORG'/ou='SITE' with naming context on
 directory 'FIRST-SERVER'.


 Nothing on Microsoft support is giving any clues to the issue except that
 DRA error 22 is a JET error.
 I have removed the added server, cleared its existance, and re-installed.
 outcome = identical issues.

 Thoughts?

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd

[Martin Tuip [MVP]]

8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ?


- Original Message - 
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM
Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd


 9. What the hell died in there?


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions

 10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on
 Windows XP ? - one attendee joking



 **  Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
 Exchange 2003 **
 --
 Martin Tuip
 MVP Exchange
 Exchange 2000 List owner
 www.exchange-mail.org
 www.sharepointserver.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd

[Anthony Sollars]

7. Is that a Blackberry in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here?

Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way, Renton Wa., 98055
*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(  425.254.4845
)   425.681.4190
2   425.793.6000
 
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ?


- Original Message - 
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM
Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd


 9. What the hell died in there?


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions

 10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on
 Windows XP ? - one attendee joking



 **  Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
 Exchange 2003 **
 --
 Martin Tuip
 MVP Exchange
 Exchange 2000 List owner
 www.exchange-mail.org
 www.sharepointserver.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Searching User Mailboxes

[Van Hooser, Chuck]

But does it come with Scharff in box?

Chuck 



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes


Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential
litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than
trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a
better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with
shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. 

OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes
Subject: Searching User Mailboxes


Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on
Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but
I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking,
as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . .
. We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X
subject . . .

Anyone know of one?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2000 Admin

[JimM]

I have Exchange 2000 running on a Win2k Server that is also the Active
Directory Domain controller.  I was the admin of the server but I can no
longer administer Exchange for some reason.  I checked the Exchange
Administration Delegation Wizard but it says I'm an Exchange Full
Administrator.  I deleted and re-added my self but I still cannot
open/administrate other mailboxes.  The Delegation wizard does say to verify
I am also an administrator of the local machine but this is a domain
controller and I cannot access local groups on it and I do not recall do
that previously.  Anyone have a hint as to what I'm missing?


Jim

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd

[Chris H]

6. Just how many Exchange Administrators does it take to fill Room D171/175
? Or, lets see what happens when we schedule our most popular Exchange
sessions in the smallest rooms?



This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com

- Original Message - 
From: Anthony Sollars [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:28 PM
Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd


 7. Is that a Blackberry in your pocket, or are you just happy to be here?

 Anthony L. Sollars
 Technology Consultant
 Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
 480 Houser Way, Renton Wa., 98055
 *  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (  425.254.4845
 )   425.681.4190
 2   425.793.6000

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions

 8. Wanna see my new Pocket PC ?


 - Original Message - 
 From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:42 PM
 Subject: RE: Top 10 things overheard at TechEd


  9. What the hell died in there?
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:11 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  10 Is an 8-node Active Exchange 2003 cluster supported under VMWare on
  Windows XP ? - one attendee joking
 
 
 
  **  Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with
  Exchange 2003 **
  --
  Martin Tuip
  MVP Exchange
  Exchange 2000 List owner
  www.exchange-mail.org
  www.sharepointserver.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  --
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
 

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
  =english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
 =english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:

http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: Another MS move

[Chris H]

totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for
Exchange? :)



This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: MS Purchase

[Chris H]

totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for
Exchange? :)



This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Another MS move

[William Lefkovics]

They may want the talent, not the product.

- Original Message - 
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:50 PM
Subject: OT: Another MS move


 totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
 Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for
 Exchange? :)


 
 This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
 from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MS Purchase

[Chris H]

Sorry for the dupe, but I got an error on delivery the first time . . .
guess you cannot trust those dang things! :)



This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com

- Original Message - 
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:51 PM
Subject: OT: MS Purchase


 totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
 Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for
 Exchange? :)


 
 This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
 from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MS Purchase

[Steve Molkentin]

Ex2K3 sp1

;)

themolk.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OT: MS Purchase
 
 
 totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
 Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server 
 or MS AV for Exchange? :)
 
 
 
 This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
 from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MS Purchase

[William Lefkovics]

Exchange 2000 RTM.


- Original Message - 
From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: MS Purchase


 Ex2K3 sp1

 ;)

 themolk.

  -Original Message-
  From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: OT: MS Purchase
 
 
  totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . .
  Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server
  or MS AV for Exchange? :)
 
 
  
  This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
  from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MS Purchase

[Steve Molkentin]

Sorry william - rtm? Not read the manual?

themolk.

 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:59 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: MS Purchase
 
 
 Exchange 2000 RTM.
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM
 Subject: RE: MS Purchase
 
 
  Ex2K3 sp1
 
  ;)
 
  themolk.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: OT: MS Purchase
  
  
   totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any 
   predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server 
 or MS AV 
   for Exchange? :)
  
  
   
   This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
   from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com
  
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Web Interface: 
   http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MS Purchase

[Christopher Hummert]

Release to manufacturing

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Molkentin
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Purchase


Sorry william - rtm? Not read the manual?

themolk.

 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:59 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: MS Purchase
 
 
 Exchange 2000 RTM.
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM
 Subject: RE: MS Purchase
 
 
  Ex2K3 sp1
 
  ;)
 
  themolk.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: OT: MS Purchase
  
  
   totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any
   predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server 
 or MS AV
   for Exchange? :)
  
  
   
   This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
   from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com
  
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Web Interface:
   http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2000 Admin

[Glenn Corbett]

Jim,

if this is an AD DC and you are the administrator of the local machine, then
you are possibly a domain admin (since the local machine doesnt actually
have a local security database, its the DC).  Same for local groups, it wont
have any.

Domain Admins are denied access to mailboxes, and a deny overrides any other
setting, so that could be the problem.

Glenn


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:55 AM
Subject: 2000 Admin


 I have Exchange 2000 running on a Win2k Server that is also the Active
 Directory Domain controller.  I was the admin of the server but I can no
 longer administer Exchange for some reason.  I checked the Exchange
 Administration Delegation Wizard but it says I'm an Exchange Full
 Administrator.  I deleted and re-added my self but I still cannot
 open/administrate other mailboxes.  The Delegation wizard does say to
verify
 I am also an administrator of the local machine but this is a domain
 controller and I cannot access local groups on it and I do not recall do
 that previously.  Anyone have a hint as to what I'm missing?


 Jim

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Searching User Mailboxes

[Slinger, Gary]

You have to be THIS tall to ride the...

Oh, wait - wrong thread :) 


-Original Message-
From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions

But does it come with Scharff in box?

Chuck 



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes


Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential
litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than
trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a
better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with
shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. 

OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes
Subject: Searching User Mailboxes


Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on
Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but
I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking,
as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . .
. We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X
subject . . .

Anyone know of one?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Searching User Mailboxes

[Andy David]

Van Hooser?
Whoda thunk?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Van Hooser, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes


But does it come with Scharff in box?

Chuck 



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes


Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential
litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than
trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a
better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with
shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. 

OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :)

-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes
Subject: Searching User Mailboxes


Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on
Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but
I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking,
as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default .. .
.. We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X
subject . . .

Anyone know of one?


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

One Forest / Two Trusted Forest

[Fioon]

Hi all,

Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore  one office in Sri
Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them
built in One forest or Two trusted forest. What wil be the pro  con... 

Any suggestion
Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest

[Chakravarty, Sakti]

One forest is easier for administration.  It is not easy to share Exchange GALs 
between organisations in different forests.

-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


Hi all,

Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore  one office in Sri
Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them
built in One forest or Two trusted forest. What wil be the pro  con... 

Any suggestion
Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest

[Fioon]

One forest is easier for administration. Will it makes Sri Lanka rely on HQ
to run? Touch wood, if all DCs in Singapore down, then Sri Lanka will be
affected? Maybe down for several hrs still can do, but if 2-3 days? 

thanks

-Original Message-
From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


One forest is easier for administration.  It is not easy to share Exchange
GALs between organisations in different forests.

-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


Hi all,

Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore  one office in Sri
Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them
built in One forest or Two trusted forest. What wil be the pro  con... 

Any suggestion
Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest

[Fioon]

Oh! So you mean that DC in SL can still able to run if SG's DCs are down?
Even for several days? 
thanks

-Original Message-
From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


So put a DC/GC in Sri Lanka!  If you want a separate forest for SL you're
going to need a DC anyway!

-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


One forest is easier for administration. Will it makes Sri Lanka rely on HQ
to run? Touch wood, if all DCs in Singapore down, then Sri Lanka will be
affected? Maybe down for several hrs still can do, but if 2-3 days? 

thanks

-Original Message-
From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


One forest is easier for administration.  It is not easy to share Exchange
GALs between organisations in different forests.

-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


Hi all,

Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore  one office in Sri
Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them
built in One forest or Two trusted forest. What wil be the pro  con... 

Any suggestion
Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest

[Chakravarty, Sakti]

Yes it will run indefinitely in the absence of other DCs ... just make sure you make 
it a Global Catalog server as well.

-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


Oh! So you mean that DC in SL can still able to run if SG's DCs are down?
Even for several days? 
thanks

-Original Message-
From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


So put a DC/GC in Sri Lanka!  If you want a separate forest for SL you're
going to need a DC anyway!

-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


One forest is easier for administration. Will it makes Sri Lanka rely on HQ
to run? Touch wood, if all DCs in Singapore down, then Sri Lanka will be
affected? Maybe down for several hrs still can do, but if 2-3 days? 

thanks

-Original Message-
From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


One forest is easier for administration.  It is not easy to share Exchange
GALs between organisations in different forests.

-Original Message-
From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: One Forest / Two Trusted Forest


Hi all,

Preparation on upgrading fr NT4 to 2K. HQ in Singapore  one office in Sri
Lanka. For the time being, they only need to share Exchange GAL. Shall them
built in One forest or Two trusted forest. What wil be the pro  con... 

Any suggestion
Thanks

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]