RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called research. You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you remembered
it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
+ is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification in
RFC2821 of atext as the fundamental atom of the local part of the address
and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing:
ALPHA / DIGIT / ! / # / $ / % / / ' / * / + / - / / /
= / ? / ^ / _ / ` / { / | / } / ~
The + character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A + has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even
let you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Group,
we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
dl's. We did have an at our organization level and my boss is
worried
about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
Any help would be appreciated.
thanks
Josh Douglas
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the strage group generates enormous number of transaction logs.
Hi, One of the storage groups of my Exchange 2000 enterprise version machine began generating lots of transaction logs per day (more than 400 + more than 4 gigs). When total transaction logs exceeds 4 gigs, database dismounts itself automatically. What could cause this? Is there any tool to track down the transactions so that i can pinpoint what or which client is causing this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ETRN - Dial Up only
Hi, ive got a server that will only be on dial up via a modem. I have set the server up to act as a Domain Controller so that is has its own copy of the active directory. I have installed Routing and Remote Access with dial on demand and static routes so that everything flows nicely. So far everything is okay, including active directory replication and mail, but only one way. Messages sent from that server get delivered to my main exchange server down here which forwards them on, but if you send an email back to a reciepient located on that server it is getting stuck in a queue. What im thinking of doing now is using the ETRN command so that the remote server connects and requests all mail for it to be delivered. I don't know much about this and was wondering if anyone could help me, or point me to some good documenation how to set this up. All the linked exchange servers are on the same domain so I need my main exchange server down here which other remote servers send there mail to, to queue the mail ready for the server on dial up to connect send the ETRN command and download all its emails. Or maybe im going about this the completely wrong way and about to get flamed for using stupid methods of mail delivery, well please, your comments are welcome and any help is greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
Just got round to trying this In addition to using your LMHOSTS file (mine didn't have any #PRE entries or the domain entry) and running NBTSTAT -R , I also removed the WINS server entry in TCP/IP properties this time around (DNS was already removed) so that all name resolution should be static mappings (I think) Works a treat now, and after installation, putting all the DNS and WINS entries back in doesn't affect the servers communicating Thanks a lot for your time and advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 17:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I wasn't too sure if it was 15 or 16. I may have done just 15 but I'm sure I get away with it, or that I'm lucky! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Midgley, Ian Sent: 01 July 2003 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? The \0x1b character must be the 16th character in the domain preload line. I may be counting incorrectly but is there an extra space in the example file? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Here are a few more things to check. Make sure that the LDAP port is listening on port 389. You can check this by going to the congiuration contain, protocols and checking out the propities on the LDAP. Or you could use an LDAP browser to try and connect to it. Also, insert an LMHOST file in to \winnt\system32\drivers\etc on the server you are configuring Use my sample below and change accordingly 192.168.1.1 mbexch1 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 1234567890123456789 192.168.1.1 YOURDOMAIN \0x1b #PRE 192.168.1.2 mbexch2 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 192.168.1.3 mbexch3 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN Now do a nbtstat -R to purge and reload the netbios cache. Let us know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Cant check the switch as the engineer who looks after that side isnt around this week (politics!!!) we havent experienced any other connectivity issues though There was a spare slot in one of the racks, so I took this compaq desktop down there, plugged it into the same switch as the other two servers, but same problem Have also tried installing exchange 5.5 onto a windows 2000 server, with exactly the same result At a total loss with this.any further advice? Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? What switch is it you are using? Have you logged on to it to make sure you are not getting errors etc I know that some Cisco switches (if not configured correctly) can cause problems when the nic on the server is forced to full-duplex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 09:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I was thinking of doing something similar Unfortunately, the 2 existing servers are rack mounted. This 3rd 'server' is merely a Compaq desktop, and for evaluating a fax solution, and so its not really possible to them all together on one hub I suppose I could take the desktop down to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch on my LAN. Is there any chance you could but the machines on to a hub and try it? It may be a shot in the dark...but worth a stab. k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 08:38 To: Exchange
RE: Virtual Memory error
Thanks for the info on the q article I will start digging in more, Just seems odd that this popped up after 6 months of running smoothly. Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook CPU 100 %
There's a tool called Scancal which is available from PSS. This tool may be able to find a corrupted calendar items for you then you can use OWA to delete corrupted item(s). Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wade Robinson Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook CPU 100 % I have a few users that when they select their calendar, Outlook appears to freeze and looking at task manager Outlook.exe begins to consume 100 % cup, has anyone had a similar issue? Outlook XP sp2 Exchange server 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Good Anti Spam Software
Hello James, Thanks for the info! Off hand do you know of any documentation out on the internet that talks about setting up a Linux mail relay? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Go to Exchange 2003 instead of 2000...it's got some spam filtering and content filtering built into the product. Add a Linux mail relayer in front of your Exchange box in the DMZ and you'll be good to go. -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Good Anti Spam Software Hello All, I am looking into purchasing Spam Filtering for our Exchange Server. We are currently Exchange 5.5 and will be moving to 2000 within the year. So I would like a solution that will work for both versions. Any good recommendations? Thank you in advance !!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Good Anti Spam Software
Sorry to jump in but try http://www.advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html - I did using Redhat 8.0 and Postfix and it works a charm (seriously, I am _very_ impressed and would be if it cost many $000's). regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 13:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Hello James, Thanks for the info! Off hand do you know of any documentation out on the internet that talks about setting up a Linux mail relay? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Go to Exchange 2003 instead of 2000...it's got some spam filtering and content filtering built into the product. Add a Linux mail relayer in front of your Exchange box in the DMZ and you'll be good to go. -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Good Anti Spam Software Hello All, I am looking into purchasing Spam Filtering for our Exchange Server. We are currently Exchange 5.5 and will be moving to 2000 within the year. So I would like a solution that will work for both versions. Any good recommendations? Thank you in advance !!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus?
Great news, I'm glad you came back and told us too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 03 July 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Just got round to trying this In addition to using your LMHOSTS file (mine didn't have any #PRE entries or the domain entry) and running NBTSTAT -R , I also removed the WINS server entry in TCP/IP properties this time around (DNS was already removed) so that all name resolution should be static mappings (I think) Works a treat now, and after installation, putting all the DNS and WINS entries back in doesn't affect the servers communicating Thanks a lot for your time and advice Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 17:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I wasn't too sure if it was 15 or 16. I may have done just 15 but I'm sure I get away with it, or that I'm lucky! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Midgley, Ian Sent: 01 July 2003 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? The \0x1b character must be the 16th character in the domain preload line. I may be counting incorrectly but is there an extra space in the example file? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Here are a few more things to check. Make sure that the LDAP port is listening on port 389. You can check this by going to the congiuration contain, protocols and checking out the propities on the LDAP. Or you could use an LDAP browser to try and connect to it. Also, insert an LMHOST file in to \winnt\system32\drivers\etc on the server you are configuring Use my sample below and change accordingly 192.168.1.1 mbexch1 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 1234567890123456789 192.168.1.1 YOURDOMAIN \0x1b #PRE 192.168.1.2 mbexch2 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN 192.168.1.3 mbexch3 #PRE #DOM:YOURDOMAIN Now do a nbtstat -R to purge and reload the netbios cache. Let us know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 11:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? Cant check the switch as the engineer who looks after that side isnt around this week (politics!!!) we havent experienced any other connectivity issues though There was a spare slot in one of the racks, so I took this compaq desktop down there, plugged it into the same switch as the other two servers, but same problem Have also tried installing exchange 5.5 onto a windows 2000 server, with exactly the same result At a total loss with this.any further advice? Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? What switch is it you are using? Have you logged on to it to make sure you are not getting errors etc I know that some Cisco switches (if not configured correctly) can cause problems when the nic on the server is forced to full-duplex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield Sent: 01 July 2003 09:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I was thinking of doing something similar Unfortunately, the 2 existing servers are rack mounted. This 3rd 'server' is merely a Compaq desktop, and for evaluating a fax solution, and so its not really possible to them all together on one hub I suppose I could take the desktop down to the computer room and plug into the same switch as the two exchange servers Regards, Mr. Niki Blowfield NT Administrator Extension 482 Martin-Baker Aircraft Company Ltd. Lower Road Higher Denham near Uxbridge Middlesex UB9 5AJ England Tel : 01895 836 760 Fax : 01895 832 587 -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 July 2003 09:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cannot Join Existing Site - Exch5.5 - RPCPing gurus? I've come across this before and for me it was a faulty switch on
RE: ETRN - Dial Up only
You need do use an SMTP Connector with the main server defined as the bridgehead to enable the queueing. The remote server will also need an SMTP Connector configured to set it to send the ETRN command when it connects. The servers should be in separate routing groups as well. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:00 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: ETRN - Dial Up only Hi, ive got a server that will only be on dial up via a modem. I have set the server up to act as a Domain Controller so that is has its own copy of the active directory. I have installed Routing and Remote Access with dial on demand and static routes so that everything flows nicely. So far everything is okay, including active directory replication and mail, but only one way. Messages sent from that server get delivered to my main exchange server down here which forwards them on, but if you send an email back to a reciepient located on that server it is getting stuck in a queue. What im thinking of doing now is using the ETRN command so that the remote server connects and requests all mail for it to be delivered. I don't know much about this and was wondering if anyone could help me, or point me to some good documenation how to set this up. All the linked exchange servers are on the same domain so I need my main exchange server down here which other remote servers send there mail to, to queue the mail ready for the server on dial up to connect send the ETRN command and download all its emails. Or maybe im going about this the completely wrong way and about to get flamed for using stupid methods of mail delivery, well please, your comments are welcome and any help is greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ETRN - Dial Up only
I think ive scrapped the idea, found that it started working normally after a few routes had been fixed. And to me, I may be wrong here, this is a guess on my behalf, but it looks like if you want to queue mail for ETRN delivery, the whole domain has to be queued and every remote server would have to issue ETRN commands to do the pickup, where they have sufficient connections to run real time. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 14:45 To: Exchange Discussions You need do use an SMTP Connector with the main server defined as the bridgehead to enable the queueing. The remote server will also need an SMTP Connector configured to set it to send the ETRN command when it connects. The servers should be in separate routing groups as well. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:00 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: ETRN - Dial Up only Hi, ive got a server that will only be on dial up via a modem. I have set the server up to act as a Domain Controller so that is has its own copy of the active directory. I have installed Routing and Remote Access with dial on demand and static routes so that everything flows nicely. So far everything is okay, including active directory replication and mail, but only one way. Messages sent from that server get delivered to my main exchange server down here which forwards them on, but if you send an email back to a reciepient located on that server it is getting stuck in a queue. What im thinking of doing now is using the ETRN command so that the remote server connects and requests all mail for it to be delivered. I don't know much about this and was wondering if anyone could help me, or point me to some good documenation how to set this up. All the linked exchange servers are on the same domain so I need my main exchange server down here which other remote servers send there mail to, to queue the mail ready for the server on dial up to connect send the ETRN command and download all its emails. Or maybe im going about this the completely wrong way and about to get flamed for using stupid methods of mail delivery, well please, your comments are welcome and any help is greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder calendar view
Hello all, Little problem, I have set up a PF (Exchange 5.5 SP4/NT4 SP6/ Outlook 2002) calendar as a Out List to maintain who is and is not in the office or on vacation for the entire company. I have given 3 people Reviewing Author rights and everyone else Reviewer rights. My issue is this: I have Owner rights to the PF and I see18 entries for today. Another user has Reviewer rights and only sees 10 entries for today. And yet another user, with Reviewer rights, only sees 15 entries for today. All three of us connect to the same mail server on the same LAN and authenticate to the same domain. Any ideas??? Josh Bennett Exchange Administrator Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA 19008 610.359.5929 Tel 610.353.1693 Fax www.cotelligent.com Connecting People to Information _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder calendar view
Are you using All Day event? If so, the screen resolution may play in this role. You probably have the highest resolution than others so you can see everything. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder calendar view Hello all, Little problem, I have set up a PF (Exchange 5.5 SP4/NT4 SP6/ Outlook 2002) calendar as a Out List to maintain who is and is not in the office or on vacation for the entire company. I have given 3 people Reviewing Author rights and everyone else Reviewer rights. My issue is this: I have Owner rights to the PF and I see18 entries for today. Another user has Reviewer rights and only sees 10 entries for today. And yet another user, with Reviewer rights, only sees 15 entries for today. All three of us connect to the same mail server on the same LAN and authenticate to the same domain. Any ideas??? Josh Bennett Exchange Administrator Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA 19008 610.359.5929 Tel 610.353.1693 Fax www.cotelligent.com Connecting People to Information _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Good Anti Spam Software
This one uses OpenBSD. http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Sorry to jump in but try http://www.advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html - I did using Redhat 8.0 and Postfix and it works a charm (seriously, I am _very_ impressed and would be if it cost many $000's). regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 13:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Hello James, Thanks for the info! Off hand do you know of any documentation out on the internet that talks about setting up a Linux mail relay? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Go to Exchange 2003 instead of 2000...it's got some spam filtering and content filtering built into the product. Add a Linux mail relayer in front of your Exchange box in the DMZ and you'll be good to go. -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Good Anti Spam Software Hello All, I am looking into purchasing Spam Filtering for our Exchange Server. We are currently Exchange 5.5 and will be moving to 2000 within the year. So I would like a solution that will work for both versions. Any good recommendations? Thank you in advance !!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Are you suggesting that this gentleman's name isn't Harvey knighTslayer?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called research. You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you remembered
it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
+ is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification in
RFC2821 of atext as the fundamental atom of the local part of the address
and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing: ALPHA / DIGIT
/ ! / # / $ / % / / ' / * / + / - / / / = / ? /
^ / _ / ` / { / | / } / ~
The + character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A + has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let
you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Group,
we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
dl's. We did have an at our organization level and my boss is
worried
about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
Any help would be appreciated.
thanks
Josh Douglas
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: One of the stirage group generates enormous number of transactionlogs.
Look for a mail loop and eradicate it. Or, you could just have a lot of traffic going through. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mustafa E. Senyuz Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: One of the stirage group generates enormous number of transaction logs. Hi, One of the storage groups of my Exchange 2000 enterprise version machine began generating lots of transaction logs per day (more than 400 + more than 4 gigs). When total transaction logs exceeds 4 gigs, database dismounts itself automatically. What could cause this? Is there any tool to track down the transactions so that i can pinpoint what or which client is causing this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Harvey WallBanger...
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:10 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Are you suggesting that this gentleman's name isn't Harvey knighTslayer?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called research. You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you remembered
it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
+ is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification in
RFC2821 of atext as the fundamental atom of the local part of the address
and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing: ALPHA / DIGIT
/ ! / # / $ / % / / ' / * / + / - / / / = / ? /
^ / _ / ` / { / | / } / ~
The + character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A + has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let
you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Group,
we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
dl's. We did have an at our organization level and my boss is
worried
about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
Any help would be appreciated.
thanks
Josh Douglas
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
RE: ETRN - Dial Up only
Well, you could set up a subdomain for the queueing if that were the case, but as long as it's working. Run with it. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:02 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: RE: ETRN - Dial Up only I think ive scrapped the idea, found that it started working normally after a few routes had been fixed. And to me, I may be wrong here, this is a guess on my behalf, but it looks like if you want to queue mail for ETRN delivery, the whole domain has to be queued and every remote server would have to issue ETRN commands to do the pickup, where they have sufficient connections to run real time. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 14:45 To: Exchange Discussions You need do use an SMTP Connector with the main server defined as the bridgehead to enable the queueing. The remote server will also need an SMTP Connector configured to set it to send the ETRN command when it connects. The servers should be in separate routing groups as well. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:00 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: ETRN - Dial Up only Hi, ive got a server that will only be on dial up via a modem. I have set the server up to act as a Domain Controller so that is has its own copy of the active directory. I have installed Routing and Remote Access with dial on demand and static routes so that everything flows nicely. So far everything is okay, including active directory replication and mail, but only one way. Messages sent from that server get delivered to my main exchange server down here which forwards them on, but if you send an email back to a reciepient located on that server it is getting stuck in a queue. What im thinking of doing now is using the ETRN command so that the remote server connects and requests all mail for it to be delivered. I don't know much about this and was wondering if anyone could help me, or point me to some good documenation how to set this up. All the linked exchange servers are on the same domain so I need my main exchange server down here which other remote servers send there mail to, to queue the mail ready for the server on dial up to connect send the ETRN command and download all its emails. Or maybe im going about this the completely wrong way and about to get flamed for using stupid methods of mail delivery, well please, your comments are welcome and any help is greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ETRN - Dial Up only
Just out of curiosity, I tried to put the server in its own group, only all the mails were coming undeliverbale even though the group was configured identically to the other sites group that I Have? How many groups can you have that feed off one master group? That should be infinite right? It should work in its own group :o -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 16:25 To: Exchange Discussions Well, you could set up a subdomain for the queueing if that were the case, but as long as it's working. Run with it. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:02 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: RE: ETRN - Dial Up only I think ive scrapped the idea, found that it started working normally after a few routes had been fixed. And to me, I may be wrong here, this is a guess on my behalf, but it looks like if you want to queue mail for ETRN delivery, the whole domain has to be queued and every remote server would have to issue ETRN commands to do the pickup, where they have sufficient connections to run real time. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 14:45 To: Exchange Discussions You need do use an SMTP Connector with the main server defined as the bridgehead to enable the queueing. The remote server will also need an SMTP Connector configured to set it to send the ETRN command when it connects. The servers should be in separate routing groups as well. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:00 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: ETRN - Dial Up only Hi, ive got a server that will only be on dial up via a modem. I have set the server up to act as a Domain Controller so that is has its own copy of the active directory. I have installed Routing and Remote Access with dial on demand and static routes so that everything flows nicely. So far everything is okay, including active directory replication and mail, but only one way. Messages sent from that server get delivered to my main exchange server down here which forwards them on, but if you send an email back to a reciepient located on that server it is getting stuck in a queue. What im thinking of doing now is using the ETRN command so that the remote server connects and requests all mail for it to be delivered. I don't know much about this and was wondering if anyone could help me, or point me to some good documenation how to set this up. All the linked exchange servers are on the same domain so I need my main exchange server down here which other remote servers send there mail to, to queue the mail ready for the server on dial up to connect send the ETRN command and download all its emails. Or maybe im going about this the completely wrong way and about to get flamed for using stupid methods of mail delivery, well please, your comments are welcome and any help is greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Public Folder calendar view
No, that's not it. They are all day events that everyone should see. If you scroll through there are no more events on the other users PC's. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder calendar view Are you using All Day event? If so, the screen resolution may play in this role. You probably have the highest resolution than others so you can see everything. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder calendar view Hello all, Little problem, I have set up a PF (Exchange 5.5 SP4/NT4 SP6/ Outlook 2002) calendar as a Out List to maintain who is and is not in the office or on vacation for the entire company. I have given 3 people Reviewing Author rights and everyone else Reviewer rights. My issue is this: I have Owner rights to the PF and I see18 entries for today. Another user has Reviewer rights and only sees 10 entries for today. And yet another user, with Reviewer rights, only sees 15 entries for today. All three of us connect to the same mail server on the same LAN and authenticate to the same domain. Any ideas??? Josh Bennett Exchange Administrator Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA 19008 610.359.5929 Tel 610.353.1693 Fax www.cotelligent.com Connecting People to Information _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ETRN - Dial Up only
When you put it in its own group, did you set up a routing group connector or did you set up the SMTP Connectors and specify the routing groups to connect to? ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:34 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: RE: ETRN - Dial Up only Just out of curiosity, I tried to put the server in its own group, only all the mails were coming undeliverbale even though the group was configured identically to the other sites group that I Have? How many groups can you have that feed off one master group? That should be infinite right? It should work in its own group :o -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 16:25 To: Exchange Discussions Well, you could set up a subdomain for the queueing if that were the case, but as long as it's working. Run with it. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:02 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: RE: ETRN - Dial Up only I think ive scrapped the idea, found that it started working normally after a few routes had been fixed. And to me, I may be wrong here, this is a guess on my behalf, but it looks like if you want to queue mail for ETRN delivery, the whole domain has to be queued and every remote server would have to issue ETRN commands to do the pickup, where they have sufficient connections to run real time. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 14:45 To: Exchange Discussions You need do use an SMTP Connector with the main server defined as the bridgehead to enable the queueing. The remote server will also need an SMTP Connector configured to set it to send the ETRN command when it connects. The servers should be in separate routing groups as well. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:00 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: ETRN - Dial Up only Hi, ive got a server that will only be on dial up via a modem. I have set the server up to act as a Domain Controller so that is has its own copy of the active directory. I have installed Routing and Remote Access with dial on demand and static routes so that everything flows nicely. So far everything is okay, including active directory replication and mail, but only one way. Messages sent from that server get delivered to my main exchange server down here which forwards them on, but if you send an email back to a reciepient located on that server it is getting stuck in a queue. What im thinking of doing now is using the ETRN command so that the remote server connects and requests all mail for it to be delivered. I don't know much about this and was wondering if anyone could help me, or point me to some good documenation how to set this up. All the linked exchange servers are on the same domain so I need my main exchange server down here which other remote servers send there mail to, to queue the mail ready for the server on dial up to connect send the ETRN command and download all its emails. Or maybe im going about this the completely wrong way and about to get flamed for using stupid methods of mail delivery, well please, your comments are welcome and any help is greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
Re: Good Anti Spam Software
Hi Jose, We have been very happy with Praetor which is installed directly on our Exchange 5.5 box. http://www.praetor.net Good luck, Kevin -- Kevin Bachelder Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) - Windows NT 4.0 Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator (MCSA) - Windows 2000 Citrix Certified Administrator (CCA) CompTIA A+ Certified Computer Repair Technician (A+) At 03:00 AM 7/3/2003, you wrote: Subject: Good Anti Spam Software From: Jose Manzano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 16:48:00 -0400 X-Message-Number: 19 Hello All, I am looking into purchasing Spam Filtering for our Exchange Server. We are currently Exchange 5.5 and will be moving to 2000 within the year. So I would like a solution that will work for both versions. Any good recommendations? Thank you in advance !!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ETRN - Dial Up only
I set up routing group connectors from the Sites group ive made to my Main group, that works fine. I made a new group, identical to the Sites group called Hull[dial], I created routing group connectors between Main and Hull[Dial], like sites and Main. I created an SMTP conenctor in the group that said forward all email to smarthost redditchexch, like there is in the Sites group, only the hull one would never work :o -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 16:58 To: Exchange Discussions When you put it in its own group, did you set up a routing group connector or did you set up the SMTP Connectors and specify the routing groups to connect to? ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:34 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: RE: ETRN - Dial Up only Just out of curiosity, I tried to put the server in its own group, only all the mails were coming undeliverbale even though the group was configured identically to the other sites group that I Have? How many groups can you have that feed off one master group? That should be infinite right? It should work in its own group :o -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 16:25 To: Exchange Discussions Well, you could set up a subdomain for the queueing if that were the case, but as long as it's working. Run with it. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:02 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: RE: ETRN - Dial Up only I think ive scrapped the idea, found that it started working normally after a few routes had been fixed. And to me, I may be wrong here, this is a guess on my behalf, but it looks like if you want to queue mail for ETRN delivery, the whole domain has to be queued and every remote server would have to issue ETRN commands to do the pickup, where they have sufficient connections to run real time. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 14:45 To: Exchange Discussions You need do use an SMTP Connector with the main server defined as the bridgehead to enable the queueing. The remote server will also need an SMTP Connector configured to set it to send the ETRN command when it connects. The servers should be in separate routing groups as well. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:00 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ETRN - Dial Up only Subject: ETRN - Dial Up only Hi, ive got a server that will only be on dial up via a modem. I have set the server up to act as a Domain Controller so that is has its own copy of the active directory. I have installed Routing and Remote Access with dial on demand and static routes so that everything flows nicely. So far everything is okay, including active directory replication and mail, but only one way. Messages sent from that server get delivered to my main exchange server down here which forwards them on, but if you send an email back to a reciepient located on that server it is getting stuck in a queue. What im thinking of doing now is using the ETRN command so that the remote server connects and requests all mail for it to be delivered. I don't know much about this and was wondering if anyone could help me, or point me to some good documenation how to set this up. All the linked exchange servers are on the same domain so I need my main exchange server down here which other remote servers send there mail to, to queue the mail ready for the server on dial up to connect send the ETRN command and download all its emails. Or maybe im going about this the completely wrong way and about to get flamed for using stupid methods of mail delivery, well please, your comments are welcome and any help is greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Good Anti Spam Software
Sybari Antigen combines virus scanning and antispam features and is installed on the same machine as the Exchange server. No relaying. IMO Sybari is the best. -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Yes or is there anything that could be used without a relay and sit directly on the Email server? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Would run a relay in a DMZ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Manzano Sent: 02 July 2003 21:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Good Anti Spam Software Hello All, I am looking into purchasing Spam Filtering for our Exchange Server. We are currently Exchange 5.5 and will be moving to 2000 within the year. So I would like a solution that will work for both versions. Any good recommendations? Thank you in advance !!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Memory error
maybe your server has mutated into the Advanced form? :) any radiation sources nearby? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virtual Memory error Thanks for the info on the q article I will start digging in more, Just seems odd that this popped up after 6 months of running smoothly. Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Good Anti Spam Software
Pure Message if you need an 800 # for support for the letter guys. Spamassassin if you can get whatever you want. Nuff said. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Sybari Antigen combines virus scanning and antispam features and is installed on the same machine as the Exchange server. No relaying. IMO Sybari is the best. -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Yes or is there anything that could be used without a relay and sit directly on the Email server? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Good Anti Spam Software Would run a relay in a DMZ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Manzano Sent: 02 July 2003 21:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Good Anti Spam Software Hello All, I am looking into purchasing Spam Filtering for our Exchange Server. We are currently Exchange 5.5 and will be moving to 2000 within the year. So I would like a solution that will work for both versions. Any good recommendations? Thank you in advance !!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder calendar view
When you use All Day Events, you'll only see limited number of events depending on the resolution you have on your computer. Why don't you change to higher resolution and see if you can more All Day Events. Try 800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024, 1600x1200, etc if your video card monitor can handle it. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder calendar view No, that's not it. They are all day events that everyone should see. If you scroll through there are no more events on the other users PC's. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder calendar view Are you using All Day event? If so, the screen resolution may play in this role. You probably have the highest resolution than others so you can see everything. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder calendar view Hello all, Little problem, I have set up a PF (Exchange 5.5 SP4/NT4 SP6/ Outlook 2002) calendar as a Out List to maintain who is and is not in the office or on vacation for the entire company. I have given 3 people Reviewing Author rights and everyone else Reviewer rights. My issue is this: I have Owner rights to the PF and I see18 entries for today. Another user has Reviewer rights and only sees 10 entries for today. And yet another user, with Reviewer rights, only sees 15 entries for today. All three of us connect to the same mail server on the same LAN and authenticate to the same domain. Any ideas??? Josh Bennett Exchange Administrator Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA 19008 610.359.5929 Tel 610.353.1693 Fax www.cotelligent.com Connecting People to Information _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder calendar view
Brian, Thanks, that is it. That has to be the strangest thing I have ever seen. Do you have any suggestions on how to work around this, as we would like to maintain this PF as a IN/OUT board. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder calendar view When you use All Day Events, you'll only see limited number of events depending on the resolution you have on your computer. Why don't you change to higher resolution and see if you can more All Day Events. Try 800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024, 1600x1200, etc if your video card monitor can handle it. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder calendar view No, that's not it. They are all day events that everyone should see. If you scroll through there are no more events on the other users PC's. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder calendar view Are you using All Day event? If so, the screen resolution may play in this role. You probably have the highest resolution than others so you can see everything. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder calendar view Hello all, Little problem, I have set up a PF (Exchange 5.5 SP4/NT4 SP6/ Outlook 2002) calendar as a Out List to maintain who is and is not in the office or on vacation for the entire company. I have given 3 people Reviewing Author rights and everyone else Reviewer rights. My issue is this: I have Owner rights to the PF and I see18 entries for today. Another user has Reviewer rights and only sees 10 entries for today. And yet another user, with Reviewer rights, only sees 15 entries for today. All three of us connect to the same mail server on the same LAN and authenticate to the same domain. Any ideas??? Josh Bennett Exchange Administrator Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA 19008 610.359.5929 Tel 610.353.1693 Fax www.cotelligent.com Connecting People to Information _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
I've no idea why he had a pop at me, anyway, what's in a name?
Harvey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: 03 July 2003 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Are you suggesting that this gentleman's name isn't Harvey knighTslayer?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called research. You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you
remembered it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
+ is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification
in RFC2821 of atext as the fundamental atom of the local part of the
address and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing:
ALPHA / DIGIT / ! / # / $ / % / / ' / * / + / - /
/ / = / ? / ^ / _ / ` / { / | / } / ~
The + character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A + has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even
let you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Group,
we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
dl's. We did have an at our organization level and my boss is
worried
about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
Any help would be appreciated.
thanks
Josh Douglas
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
ExMerge (2000) weirdness
I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
So you don't see any MAPI or permissions errors in the log? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ex2K - Distribution List Problems after EntAdmin Errors
Hi, After an Exchange admin at the top of the forest reset the default RUS (@X2k.com.xxx to @W2k.com.xxx) and added a RUS policy that went way beyond the correct scope a lot of stuff went totally pear-shaped here. Lots of people, P/Folders, dist lists and groups got a new default SMTP address on another domain in the forest. This is mostly fixed, all addresses have been corrected and automated updating turned firmly OFF. Now the main hangover is mail-enabled groups and dist lists, messages appear to send but no errors, bounce, ndr or anything stuck in a queue, they just disappear in to the ether. Seems a bit like the trick of deleting unwanted messages to a list with no members - but these lists DO have members. Created a new test DL with same result. Any ideas where to look for a fix? Setup: 3 x W2k SP3 Exchange servers Local DCs and GCs all W2K SP4 - mostly SP4 before forest config error. All AD controllers re-started today, all Exchange services re-started. TIA, Paul Christopher University College London _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one thread. IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4 threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads? From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:59:19 -0500 Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Hi, Andrey: ExMerge may be configured to only export the newer emails? Perhaps it's set by dates and picks-up only those mailboxes that have recent mail activity. Good luck! -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calendar Item will not delete.
I have a user with a calendar meeting that was canceled and deleted but the meeting still exists on one attendees Calendar. Trying to delete it the user gets Unknown Error. We tried to export the calendar and reimport it with overwrite dupes but the import creates a new instance instead of overwriting the old. The event has attachments and the user is able to open the attachments. . The exported event looks ok in text. Test Appointment4/7/200312:00:00 PM 4/7/2003 12:00:00 PM FALSE FALSE 4/7/200311:45:00 AM Smith Ken Jones Ken;Hatfields Brent McCoys Geoff;Smith Keith;Jones Bruce;Simpson Rick2M (2311 Above) Normal FALSE Normal 4 Its exchange 5.5 with outlook 2002. Anyone have an idea on how I can get rid of this meeting so the user can sync his palm again. Thanks Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar Item will not delete.
Have you tried to do it in OWA? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2003 20:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Item will not delete. I have a user with a calendar meeting that was canceled and deleted but the meeting still exists on one attendees Calendar. Trying to delete it the user gets Unknown Error. We tried to export the calendar and reimport it with overwrite dupes but the import creates a new instance instead of overwriting the old. The event has attachments and the user is able to open the attachments. . The exported event looks ok in text. Test Appointment4/7/200312:00:00 PM 4/7/2003 12:00:00 PM FALSE FALSE 4/7/200311:45:00 AM Smith Ken Jones Ken;Hatfields Brent McCoys Geoff;Smith Keith;Jones Bruce;Simpson Rick2M (2311 Above) Normal FALSE Normal 4 Its exchange 5.5 with outlook 2002. Anyone have an idea on how I can get rid of this meeting so the user can sync his palm again. Thanks Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
:) Yes, I am trying to export only the last day worth of e-mail. But I am sure that the mailboxes contain new messages for that day. -Original Message- From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Hi, Andrey: ExMerge may be configured to only export the newer emails? Perhaps it's set by dates and picks-up only those mailboxes that have recent mail activity. Good luck! -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Export PF info
Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Calendar Item will not delete.
Run the cleanfreebusy or maybe trydeleting it by using the old Exchange32 client. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Calendar Item will not delete. Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:51:02 -0400 I have a user with a calendar meeting that was canceled and deleted but the meeting still exists on one attendees Calendar. Trying to delete it the user gets Unknown Error. We tried to export the calendar and reimport it with overwrite dupes but the import creates a new instance instead of overwriting the old. The event has attachments and the user is able to open the attachments. . The exported event looks ok in text. Test Appointment4/7/200312:00:00 PM 4/7/2003 12:00:00 PM FALSE FALSE 4/7/200311:45:00 AM Smith Ken Jones Ken;Hatfields Brent McCoys Geoff;Smith Keith;Jones Bruce;Simpson Rick2M (2311 Above) Normal FALSE Normal 4 Its exchange 5.5 with outlook 2002. Anyone have an idea on how I can get rid of this meeting so the user can sync his palm again. Thanks Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export PF info
export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Forcing single thread seems to have done the trick. Multiple threads must have collided with each other in some way :) (some of the mailboxes are on a different server, maybe when ExMerge goes to dynamically connect to another server in multiple threads, it has some problems) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one thread. IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4 threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads? From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:59:19 -0500 Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From:Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export PF info
Would that also give me the path of the public folders? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export PF info
Mail-Enabled public folders will have an entry in AD that you can query. Non-mail enabled public folders have no AD entry. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:51 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Export PF info Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export PF info
No, sadly, the path of the public folder is not one of the properties promoted to the AD. It would have been really damn helpful if it was - especially since the property exists in the AD and since it was populated in Exchange 5.5. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:15 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Export PF info Subject: RE: Export PF info Would that also give me the path of the public folders? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Multiple threads are a nightmare. They routinely behave oddly. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:13 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Forcing single thread seems to have done the trick. Multiple threads must have collided with each other in some way :) (some of the mailboxes are on a different server, maybe when ExMerge goes to dynamically connect to another server in multiple threads, it has some problems) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one thread. IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4 threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads? From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:59:19 -0500 Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From:Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
first one for me :) BTW, Exchange 2003 is supposed to allow mailbox moves in multiple threads :0 -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Multiple threads are a nightmare. They routinely behave oddly. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:13 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Forcing single thread seems to have done the trick. Multiple threads must have collided with each other in some way :) (some of the mailboxes are on a different server, maybe when ExMerge goes to dynamically connect to another server in multiple threads, it has some problems) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one thread. IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4 threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads? From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:59:19 -0500 Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From:Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Export PF info
probably not -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Export PF info Would that also give me the path of the public folders? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Indeed it does. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:19 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness first one for me :) BTW, Exchange 2003 is supposed to allow mailbox moves in multiple threads :0 -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Multiple threads are a nightmare. They routinely behave oddly. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:13 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Forcing single thread seems to have done the trick. Multiple threads must have collided with each other in some way :) (some of the mailboxes are on a different server, maybe when ExMerge goes to dynamically connect to another server in multiple threads, it has some problems) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one thread. IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4 threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads? From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:59:19 -0500 Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From:Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Well it all makes more sense now in that when you run in interactives mode verses batch mode, interactive is single thread where batch mode uses mulitple threads based on the number of mailboxes being worked on From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:18:36 -0400 first one for me :) BTW, Exchange 2003 is supposed to allow mailbox moves in multiple threads :0 -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Multiple threads are a nightmare. They routinely behave oddly. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:13 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Forcing single thread seems to have done the trick. Multiple threads must have collided with each other in some way :) (some of the mailboxes are on a different server, maybe when ExMerge goes to dynamically connect to another server in multiple threads, it has some problems) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one thread. IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4 threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads? From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:59:19 -0500 Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Export PF info
I'm able to search for the smtp addresses but I need to know where it is so that I can change it. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions No, sadly, the path of the public folder is not one of the properties promoted to the AD. It would have been really damn helpful if it was - especially since the property exists in the AD and since it was populated in Exchange 5.5. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:15 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Export PF info Subject: RE: Export PF info Would that also give me the path of the public folders? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Export PF info
You can export the object class of publicFolder and the attribute you want is ProxyAddresses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:18 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Export PF info Subject: RE: Export PF info I'm able to search for the smtp addresses but I need to know where it is so that I can change it. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions No, sadly, the path of the public folder is not one of the properties promoted to the AD. It would have been really damn helpful if it was - especially since the property exists in the AD and since it was populated in Exchange 5.5. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:15 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Export PF info Subject: RE: Export PF info Would that also give me the path of the public folders? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Export PF info
I'll give this a try. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions You can export the object class of publicFolder and the attribute you want is ProxyAddresses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carmila Fresco Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:18 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Export PF info Subject: RE: Export PF info I'm able to search for the smtp addresses but I need to know where it is so that I can change it. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions No, sadly, the path of the public folder is not one of the properties promoted to the AD. It would have been really damn helpful if it was - especially since the property exists in the AD and since it was populated in Exchange 5.5. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:15 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Export PF info Subject: RE: Export PF info Would that also give me the path of the public folders? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions export the contents of the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container in AD with CSVDE or LDIFDE. Specify that you only want to export e-mail addresses. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Export PF info Is there a way to export the public folder info including the smtp addresses of the public folders? My users are requesting for distribution groups that need smtp addresses that are being used by the public folders. We don't use mail enabled PFs. The stmp addresses were stamped when we migrated from E55. Looked at pfadmin but it doesn't look like it will export the smtp address of the PFs unless I'm wrong. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or
RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Maybe he has something against slaying knights.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of knighTslayer
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
I've no idea why he had a pop at me, anyway, what's in a name?
Harvey
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: 03 July 2003 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Are you suggesting that this gentleman's name isn't Harvey knighTslayer?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
It's called research. You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC next to your mouse! Or have you remembered
it word for word?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: 02 July 2003 23:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
+ is a perfectly valid SMTP character as defined by the specification in
RFC2821 of atext as the fundamental atom of the local part of the address
and then definition of atext in RFC2822 (3.2.4) as containing: ALPHA / DIGIT
/ ! / # / $ / % / / ' / * / + / - / / / = / ? /
^ / _ / ` / { / | / } / ~
The + character in some mailers indicates a special function, but only
during local delivery, not routing.
ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A + has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let
you create that.
William
- Original Message -
From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Group,
we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox
method.
I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything
that
I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site
name. We
have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names,
mailboxes,
dl's. We did have an at our organization level and my boss is
worried
about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on
the
web that mentions anything other than organization and site name.
Any help would be appreciated.
thanks
Josh Douglas
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Interactive mode runs multithreaded as well with a large number of mailboxes. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:34 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Well it all makes more sense now in that when you run in interactives mode verses batch mode, interactive is single thread where batch mode uses mulitple threads based on the number of mailboxes being worked on From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:18:36 -0400 first one for me :) BTW, Exchange 2003 is supposed to allow mailbox moves in multiple threads :0 -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Multiple threads are a nightmare. They routinely behave oddly. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:13 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Forcing single thread seems to have done the trick. Multiple threads must have collided with each other in some way :) (some of the mailboxes are on a different server, maybe when ExMerge goes to dynamically connect to another server in multiple threads, it has some problems) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one thread. IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4 threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads? From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:59:19 -0500 Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Smarthost question
I'm having trouble with routing emails within an Exchange organization using a Smarthost. Here's the situation: Exchange 2000 is installed in 2 separate AD sites (1 Exchange org). An eSafe box is installed in Site1 that is supposed to scan all SMTP traffic. There is an internal link between Site 1 and Site 2 which are on separate subnets. The main MX record points to the eSafe box in Site1. When I configure the SMTP Virtual Server to send all mail to the eSafe Smarthost first, no mail routes to Site2. It stays in a loop between eSafe and the Exchange server in Site1. When I check the box to attempt local delivery first, all mail (including external mail) gets sent directly to the recipient bypassing the eSafe box. Since no MX record points directly to the Exchange server, recipients who do reverse DNS lookups are bouncing the mail. MS says that to get this to work, ensure the Exchange server does not have a path to the Internet. Can anyone suggest a better way to set this up so Exchange sends all Internal mail to the Internal Exchange server in Site 2 and External mail to the eSafe box? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Smarthost question
-Original Message- When I configure the SMTP Virtual Server to send all mail to the eSafe Smarthost first, no mail routes to Site2. Why are you messing with the SMTP Virtual Server properties? Do you have an SMTP Connector? In order to get your situation to work, all you have to do is create an SMTP Connector that forwards to your smarthost. You don't need to do anything on the SMTP Virtual Servers. Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Smarthost question
Jason - Thanks, Jason - or course it worked great. The answer to your question Why are you messing with the SMTP Virtual Server properties? is that my brain is not functioning very well today! Have a good weekend. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Smarthost question -Original Message- When I configure the SMTP Virtual Server to send all mail to the eSafe Smarthost first, no mail routes to Site2. Why are you messing with the SMTP Virtual Server properties? Do you have an SMTP Connector? In order to get your situation to work, all you have to do is create an SMTP Connector that forwards to your smarthost. You don't need to do anything on the SMTP Virtual Servers. Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Then why did it fail in batch node? Are you sure? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Interactive mode runs multithreaded as well with a large number of mailboxes. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:34 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Well it all makes more sense now in that when you run in interactives mode verses batch mode, interactive is single thread where batch mode uses mulitple threads based on the number of mailboxes being worked on From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:18:36 -0400 first one for me :) BTW, Exchange 2003 is supposed to allow mailbox moves in multiple threads :0 -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Multiple threads are a nightmare. They routinely behave oddly. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:13 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Forcing single thread seems to have done the trick. Multiple threads must have collided with each other in some way :) (some of the mailboxes are on a different server, maybe when ExMerge goes to dynamically connect to another server in multiple threads, it has some problems) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one thread. IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4 threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads? From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:59:19 -0500 Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending on its mood. What could be wrong with ExMerge? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness
Quite sure. Not sure why it failed in batch other than that I've seen it do that quite a lot. Unless we must, we always run batch mode with NUMTHREADS=1. I don't see the same instability in interactive mode. Perhaps the new build with e2k3 will be better. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:31 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Then why did it fail in batch node? Are you sure? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Interactive mode runs multithreaded as well with a large number of mailboxes. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released! http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:34 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Well it all makes more sense now in that when you run in interactives mode verses batch mode, interactive is single thread where batch mode uses mulitple threads based on the number of mailboxes being worked on From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:18:36 -0400 first one for me :) BTW, Exchange 2003 is supposed to allow mailbox moves in multiple threads :0 -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Multiple threads are a nightmare. They routinely behave oddly. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:13 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Forcing single thread seems to have done the trick. Multiple threads must have collided with each other in some way :) (some of the mailboxes are on a different server, maybe when ExMerge goes to dynamically connect to another server in multiple threads, it has some problems) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness As Andy says turn up logging. Also you can set it to only use one thread. IIRC it use one thread for every 5 mailboxes up to 20 for a maximum of 4 threads. Maybe the app is having problems with multiple threads? From: Webb, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:59:19 -0500 Turn up the logging level and find where the specific mailbox failures are. ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness Ok, at the beginning it acknowledges that there are 10 DNs and mailboxes in the range from 0 to 9 will be exported. Then it shows copying so and so's mailbox then successfully completed..., then at the end it says something stupid like 6 mailboxes successfully processed. 0 mailboxes were not successfully processed. weird... sometimes it is 6, sometimes it is 7 -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ExMerge (2000) weirdness What did the error log for ExMerge say? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2003 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:ExMerge (2000) weirdness I have to export 10 users' mailboxes. So I created a mailbox.txt file with the LegacyExchangeDN for all 10 users. Then I created an INI file. Then I created a batch file that contains Exmerge - b -f export.ini When I run this batch file interactively, all 10 get exported. When I schedule tihs batch file to run in Scheduled Tasks, it runs but only exports 6 or 7 mailboxes, depending
