Re: Message comes to inbox and disappears again - Solution

2003-10-20 Thread Uso
Looks like these messages are the HearBeat messages from Symantec
Antivirus for Exchange.
My mailbox was set there to receive those messages.

regards
Uso

- Original Message -
From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:17 PM
Subject: Message comes to inbox and disappears again


 Hi,

 twice today I receive a mail in my inbox and then it disappears again.
 The messages is coming from my own email address and the subject says:

 My-Exchange-Server-Name  - 10-13-2003 10-13-24-894ms

 any idea what that is?

 regards
 Uso


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


EXCDO and Event ID 8206

2003-10-20 Thread Ryan, Randy
Looking for some advice - 
 
Exchange 2000 Sp3 running on Dell 4600 full of hard drives and memory,
all hotfixes and post sp3 applied.  
 
Event ID 8206 Calendaring agent failed with error code 0x80070005 while
saving appointment and shows the public folder for each of the several
public folders that have calendars in them.
 
Log is showing as many as 10 to 12 per second.
 
Here's what I've done;  removed drive m, and gone over Q299046 ,
Q310440 , Q821293 , Q823159  .
 
Nothing addresses the 0x80070005 portion of the event.
 
Thanks, Randy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Upgrade 2000 to 2003

2003-10-20 Thread Rob Ellis
Can I please have comments on the following plan?

The current setup:

EX01, an Exchange 2000 Enterprise edition server sits on our LAN.  In
our DMZ we have MIS01, a Mobile Information Server 2002 server. (both
these servers are member servers in the AD)

Also in our DMZ, we have a workgroup win2k server which acts as our SMTP
gateway for Exchange.

Users access OWA on EX01 by connecting to our firewall using https, and
the firewall NATs that through to EX01.

All of that works fine.


The plan:

Taking advantage of our Software Assurance, upgrade EX01 to Exchange
2003 enterprise edition.

Buy a license for Exchange 2003 Standard edition, and install that on
MIS01, configure as front end server for OWA, connecting to mailboxes on
EX01

Re-jig so MIS01 is also acting as our SMTP gateway, probably retaining
the workgroup server as a backup MX

MIS functionality (serversync, OMA, etc) is included in Ex2003, so we
don't need MIS2002 anymore.



Thanks in advance.


Regards,

Rob Ellis
IT Manager 
Samsara Group plc 
Tel 023 9224 7979 
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2003.

2003-10-20 Thread Walden H. Leverich III
Well, if you're going to include 3rd party software:

salesforce.com's outlook edition doesn't work -- unloads itself, and their
won't-hold-you-to-it time line is 1Q04 for support. Synchronization
(intellisync-based) works fine.

Also, iHateSpam 3.x is unsupported, although I didn't have any problems with
it.

-Walden 



Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
 
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support.



Ryan



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2003.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange
2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on
our client systems.
 
My question is...
 
Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook
2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that
features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those
clients that still have Outlook 2002?
 
I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out
where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that
we can have a more gradual rollout.
 
Thanks
 

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver,
Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2003.

2003-10-20 Thread Alverson, Tom
 I am using the Blackberry desktop with outlook 2003.  I am using the final
released Outlook (11.5608.5606) and Desktop Manager 3.6.0.54.  I used to
have an older version of the desktop manager which did NOT work with outlook
2003.

Tom

-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support.



Ryan



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2003.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange
2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on
our client systems.
 
My question is...
 
Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook
2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that
features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those
clients that still have Outlook 2002?
 
I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out
where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that
we can have a more gradual rollout.
 
Thanks
 

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver,
Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2003.

2003-10-20 Thread Ken . Powell
Definitely third party software. Sometimes it seems like it is more
important to them that their niche software works more than Outlook.


Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:44 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

Well, if you're going to include 3rd party software:

salesforce.com's outlook edition doesn't work -- unloads itself, and their
won't-hold-you-to-it time line is 1Q04 for support. Synchronization
(intellisync-based) works fine.

Also, iHateSpam 3.x is unsupported, although I didn't have any problems with
it.

-Walden 



Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
 
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support.



Ryan



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2003.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to Exchange
2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002 on
our client systems.
 
My question is...
 
Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook
2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact that
features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those
clients that still have Outlook 2002?
 
I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured out
where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so that
we can have a more gradual rollout.
 
Thanks
 

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver,
Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Excluding specific email message types from backups

2003-10-20 Thread Steve Iadarola
Background:

Running Exchange 2000 with Cisco Unity's Unified Messaging.  Management
wants us to continue to use Cisco Unity to deliver voice messages left on our
IP phones to our email.  However, they do not want us to backup the voice
messages.  We are currently using Veritas Datacenter for backups.  We have
looked at the Veritas client, Leggato Exchange client, and the Microsoft
Backup Utility.  None of them allow you to exclude specific messages.  They
will allow you to exclude specific folders inside the mailbox but not the
object or message level.

Questions:

Does anyone know of a backup client specific for Exchange 2000 that will
allow you to exclude all .WAV files from backups?  Is there anyone else that
is not backing up voice messages within their message stores?  Is there a way
to do this with a script?  How are others handling unified messaging in their
environment?

Any help or thoughts would be greatly appreciated.


Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
65 Hayden Ave
Lexington, MA 02421

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Excluding specific email message types from backups

2003-10-20 Thread Tony Hlabse
Don't know of any other than using Exmerge maybe. What I would do is make a 
separate storage group for those mailboxes that contain wav files and not 
back them up during you normal runs. This will save space/time which sounds 
like what your trying to do

From: Steve Iadarola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Excluding specific email message types from backups
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:29:09 -0400
Background:

Running Exchange 2000 with Cisco Unity's Unified Messaging.  Management
wants us to continue to use Cisco Unity to deliver voice messages left on 
our
IP phones to our email.  However, they do not want us to backup the voice
messages.  We are currently using Veritas Datacenter for backups.  We have
looked at the Veritas client, Leggato Exchange client, and the Microsoft
Backup Utility.  None of them allow you to exclude specific messages.  They
will allow you to exclude specific folders inside the mailbox but not the
object or message level.

Questions:

Does anyone know of a backup client specific for Exchange 2000 that 
will
allow you to exclude all .WAV files from backups?  Is there anyone else that
is not backing up voice messages within their message stores?  Is there a 
way
to do this with a script?  How are others handling unified messaging in 
their
environment?

Any help or thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
65 Hayden Ave
Lexington, MA 02421
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups

2003-10-20 Thread Steve Iadarola
Problem is that the entire company is using Cisco's Unified Messaging and IP
phones.  We are looking for the lowest cost solution.  Obviously the zero
cost solution is to disable the unified messaging.  The highest cost solution
is not to back up the stores at all.  The moderately expensive option is to
use the Exchange server that runs on the Unity server and just create
everyone in the company a separate mailbox and configure outlook to open the
second mailbox and not back up that store.  The problem here is the cost for
the additional mailboxes/virus scanning/unity lisences/ect...  We would
really like to stick with the exclude from backups if it is available.  

Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 What I would do is make a 
separate storage group for those mailboxes that contain wav files and not 
back them up during you normal runs. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2003.

2003-10-20 Thread Anthony Sollars
Well I will be seeing you there then Ken, looking forward to what they're
presenting on 99.99% uptime without clustering.

Anthony L. Sollars
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(  425.254.4845
)   425.681.4190
2   425.793.6000
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

So true Even then I have gotten conflicting answers. I have been told
that we have purchased everything. I am just dragging my feet until there is
service pack released for Exchange 2003. That is how I got buy-off for
skipping 2000 and going straight to 2003.

At TechEd they made it seem that the best path from Exchange 5.5 was to go
straight to 2003. I am going to Orlando next month and will see what they
say there.

Thanks again.


Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:10 AM
To: Exchange 5.5 List
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

Check with your MS licensing rep for exact details.  I was told that each
Exchange 2003 CAL includes a license to use Outlook 2003, but not all of
Office.  I don't believe that you can use Exchange 2000 CAL's do to this,
though.  Again, to be sure, check with MS.  They are the only ones
authorized to quote official licensing. 


Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner  White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418


-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October
16, 2003 1:07 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Outlook 2003.
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.


Does Outlook 2003 have the same licensing setup as the other versions?
That is, I have an Exchange 2000 server, and licenses for Office 2000.
Can I install Outlook 2003 on workstations using the Exchange CALs?

Thanks,
Erick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Arlo Clizer
 Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:57 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
 
 
 Sure, do it. Outlook 2003 is really nice. We are upgrading from 2000 
 straight to 2003. What a difference!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 7:51 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Outlook 2003.
 
 We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to 
 Exchange
 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002

 on our client systems.
  
 My question is...
  
 Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to 
 Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it 
 against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from 
 the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be

 available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002?
  
 I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured 
 out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
 others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
  
 Thanks
  
 
 Ken Powell
 Systems Administrator
 Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
 Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
 Fax: (360) 759-6001
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   

RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups

2003-10-20 Thread Martin Blackstone
So the goal here is to save money on backup capacity? 

-Original Message-
From: Steve Iadarola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups

Problem is that the entire company is using Cisco's Unified Messaging and IP
phones.  We are looking for the lowest cost solution.  Obviously the zero
cost solution is to disable the unified messaging.  The highest cost
solution
is not to back up the stores at all.  The moderately expensive option is to
use the Exchange server that runs on the Unity server and just create
everyone in the company a separate mailbox and configure outlook to open the
second mailbox and not back up that store.  The problem here is the cost for
the additional mailboxes/virus scanning/unity lisences/ect...  We would
really like to stick with the exclude from backups if it is available.  

Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 What I would do is make a 
separate storage group for those mailboxes that contain wav files and not 
back them up during you normal runs. 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Outlook error for Mac.

2003-10-20 Thread John Strongosky
I have a mac user who is showing a event id 1132, Source:MSExchange POP3 
 An error (0x80070057) occurred while rendering a message for download on
mailbox 

The only KB Article I can find is KB Article 187869 and all it says it to
load the latest service pack, well this server is at Exchange 5.5 SP4. In
conversation with this user outlook it not installed a pop3 client.

Any Mac users out there that can give me any help.

john

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups

2003-10-20 Thread Steve Iadarola
Has nothing to do with saving any money on backups.

Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hep with PTR record

2003-10-20 Thread RBHATIA
I am suddenly having problems with my incoming email and it seems to be a
PTR record issue.

My incoming email server was reporting the following error message in the
App log :
PTR record. 198.77.178.129 has a PTR record, but does not match HELO
string fw, accepting anyway
Ptrs = cerberus-service.aiim.org  

I verified the DNS settings for the TCP/IP protocol of my firewall that was
sendign these emails to my mail server and found that the DNS hostname said
FW while the domain was blank. I thus changed this to say
Hostname: cerberus-service and domain: aiim.org
I then rebooted the firewall

However, my mail server still reports the same error. This time the error
says:
PTR record. 198.77.178.129 has a PTR record, but does not match HELO
string cerebus-service.aiim.org, accepting anyway
Ptrs = cerberus-service.aiim.org  

According to this message, the 2 PTR records do match then why am I still
getting the error ?

Please advise.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Hep with PTR record

2003-10-20 Thread RBHATIA
Oops ! Never mind folks..figured it out.
It was a typo in the DNS..thanks anyway

-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hep with PTR record
Importance: High


I am suddenly having problems with my incoming email and it seems to be a
PTR record issue.

My incoming email server was reporting the following error message in the
App log :
PTR record. 198.77.178.129 has a PTR record, but does not match HELO
string fw, accepting anyway
Ptrs = cerberus-service.aiim.org  

I verified the DNS settings for the TCP/IP protocol of my firewall that was
sendign these emails to my mail server and found that the DNS hostname said
FW while the domain was blank. I thus changed this to say
Hostname: cerberus-service and domain: aiim.org
I then rebooted the firewall

However, my mail server still reports the same error. This time the error
says:
PTR record. 198.77.178.129 has a PTR record, but does not match HELO
string cerebus-service.aiim.org, accepting anyway
Ptrs = cerberus-service.aiim.org  

According to this message, the 2 PTR records do match then why am I still
getting the error ?

Please advise.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups

2003-10-20 Thread Tony Hlabse
Maybe a rule to put all wav files into a PST? Not sure if what you want to 
do is doable without heavy user intervention. Will sit back and see what 
others have to say.

(Highest cost solution is to not back up the stores?)

From: Steve Iadarola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:52:35 -0400
Problem is that the entire company is using Cisco's Unified Messaging and IP
phones.  We are looking for the lowest cost solution.  Obviously the zero
cost solution is to disable the unified messaging.  The highest cost 
solution
is not to back up the stores at all.  The moderately expensive option is to
use the Exchange server that runs on the Unity server and just create
everyone in the company a separate mailbox and configure outlook to open the
second mailbox and not back up that store.  The problem here is the cost for
the additional mailboxes/virus scanning/unity lisences/ect...  We would
really like to stick with the exclude from backups if it is available.

Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 What I would do is make a
separate storage group for those mailboxes that contain wav files and not
back them up during you normal runs.
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account has exceeded 
its 2MB storage limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! 
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2003.

2003-10-20 Thread Warren Cundy
FWIW,

We are using the latest BES and the 3.6.0.54 Desktop manager, Blackberry
is great on Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003.

-Warren
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Alverson, Tom
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
 
  I am using the Blackberry desktop with outlook 2003.  I am 
 using the final released Outlook (11.5608.5606) and Desktop 
 Manager 3.6.0.54.  I used to have an older version of the 
 desktop manager which did NOT work with outlook 2003.
 
 Tom
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
 
 No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support.
 
 
 
 Ryan
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Outlook 2003.
 
 We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at 
 moving to Exchange
 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running 
 Outlook 2002 on our client systems.
  
 My question is...
  
 Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops 
 to Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues 
 running it against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed 
 versions aside from the fact that features that are 
 introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those 
 clients that still have Outlook 2002?
  
 I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have 
 figured out where everything went to. I would like to start 
 putting it on others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
  
 Thanks
  
 
 Ken Powell
 Systems Administrator
 Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
 Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
 Fax: (360) 759-6001 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=
 lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Hep with PTR record

2003-10-20 Thread Tony Hlabse
Yea was just going to ask which one is right?

cerebus-service.aiim.org
cerberus-service.aiim.org
From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Hep with PTR record
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:25:24 -0400
Oops ! Never mind folks..figured it out.
It was a typo in the DNS..thanks anyway
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Hep with PTR record
Importance: High
I am suddenly having problems with my incoming email and it seems to be a
PTR record issue.
My incoming email server was reporting the following error message in the
App log :
PTR record. 198.77.178.129 has a PTR record, but does not match HELO
string fw, accepting anyway
Ptrs = cerberus-service.aiim.org
I verified the DNS settings for the TCP/IP protocol of my firewall that was
sendign these emails to my mail server and found that the DNS hostname said
FW while the domain was blank. I thus changed this to say
Hostname: cerberus-service and domain: aiim.org
I then rebooted the firewall
However, my mail server still reports the same error. This time the error
says:
PTR record. 198.77.178.129 has a PTR record, but does not match HELO
string cerebus-service.aiim.org, accepting anyway
Ptrs = cerberus-service.aiim.org
According to this message, the 2 PTR records do match then why am I still
getting the error ?
Please advise.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account has exceeded 
its 2MB storage limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! 
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook error for Mac.

2003-10-20 Thread Couch, Nate
Can you give me more detail on this error?  What Mac OS is the user using?
What Outlook client?  Do they use Appletalk or TCPIP to connect to the
server?  Are they physically connected to your network or are they VPN'ing
into it?

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

 --
 From: John Strongosky
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 11:25 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  Outlook error for Mac.
 
 I have a mac user who is showing a event id 1132, Source:MSExchange POP3 
  An error (0x80070057) occurred while rendering a message for download on
 mailbox 
 
 The only KB Article I can find is KB Article 187869 and all it says it to
 load the latest service pack, well this server is at Exchange 5.5 SP4. In
 conversation with this user outlook it not installed a pop3 client.
 
 Any Mac users out there that can give me any help.
 
 john
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la
 ng=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Outlook Question

2003-10-20 Thread Pennell, Ronald B.
Running Exchange 2000 - outlook 2000, outlook-xp, etc.

Is there a way to setup a clients mailbox that will only receive mail?
We don't want to clients to be able to send from that account.

Ron Pennell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Excluding specific email message types from backups

2003-10-20 Thread bscott
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, at 11:29am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Running Exchange 2000 with Cisco Unity's Unified Messaging.  Management
 wants us to continue to use Cisco Unity to deliver voice messages left on
 our IP phones to our email.  However, they do not want us to backup the
 voice messages.  ... They will allow you to exclude specific folders
 inside the mailbox but not the object or message level.

  The MS-Exchange store is basically a paged database file, similar to
Oracle or MS-SQL.  It exists as a single unit.  You cannot control what is
backed up or restored below the database level.  This is a limitation of
Exchange.

  Other vendors might claim you can do individual mailbox backups, using
so-called brick level backups, but such backups are NOT supported or
recommended by Microsoft, and practical experience has shown they are
generally a really, really bad idea.  Search the web for details.

 Does anyone know of a backup client specific for Exchange 2000 that will
 allow you to exclude all .WAV files from backups?

  Not safely possible.  See above.

-- 
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do  |
| not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. |
| All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2003.

2003-10-20 Thread Ryan Finnesey
We are also having a problem that the Microsoft CRM Client is also
unsupported.


Ryan




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walden H.
Leverich III
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

Well, if you're going to include 3rd party software:

salesforce.com's outlook edition doesn't work -- unloads itself, and
their
won't-hold-you-to-it time line is 1Q04 for support. Synchronization
(intellisync-based) works fine.

Also, iHateSpam 3.x is unsupported, although I didn't have any problems
with
it.

-Walden 



Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
 
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support.



Ryan



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2003.

We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to
Exchange
2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running Outlook 2002
on
our client systems.
 
My question is...
 
Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to Outlook
2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues running it against
Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions aside from the fact
that
features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to
those
clients that still have Outlook 2002?
 
I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have figured
out
where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on others so
that
we can have a more gradual rollout.
 
Thanks
 

Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver,
Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
Fax: (360) 759-6001 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2003.

2003-10-20 Thread Ryan Finnesey
You have BES running on Exchange 2003?  I met with Blackberry last week
and they told me it was unsupported and they do not have any ETA on
support.



Ryan




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

FWIW,

We are using the latest BES and the 3.6.0.54 Desktop manager, Blackberry
is great on Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003.

-Warren
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Alverson, Tom
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
 
  I am using the Blackberry desktop with outlook 2003.  I am 
 using the final released Outlook (11.5608.5606) and Desktop 
 Manager 3.6.0.54.  I used to have an older version of the 
 desktop manager which did NOT work with outlook 2003.
 
 Tom
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
 
 No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support.
 
 
 
 Ryan
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Outlook 2003.
 
 We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at 
 moving to Exchange
 2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running 
 Outlook 2002 on our client systems.
  
 My question is...
  
 Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops 
 to Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues 
 running it against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed 
 versions aside from the fact that features that are 
 introduced in Outlook 2003 will not be available to those 
 clients that still have Outlook 2002?
  
 I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I have 
 figured out where everything went to. I would like to start 
 putting it on others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
  
 Thanks
  
 
 Ken Powell
 Systems Administrator
 Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
 Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
 Fax: (360) 759-6001 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=
 lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang
 =english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2003.

2003-10-20 Thread Warren Cundy
I didn't talk to Blackberry support myself, but a colleague here went up
a few levels of tech support with them and confirmed that it worked.  We
tested, and it did.

We aren't on native 2003 yet.  I'll be checking back with them before
that.

-Warren


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Ryan Finnesey
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 10:48 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
 
 You have BES running on Exchange 2003?  I met with Blackberry 
 last week and they told me it was unsupported and they do not 
 have any ETA on support.
 
 
 
 Ryan
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:44 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
 
 FWIW,
 
 We are using the latest BES and the 3.6.0.54 Desktop manager, 
 Blackberry is great on Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003.
 
 -Warren
  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, 
  Tom
  Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:52 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
  
   I am using the Blackberry desktop with outlook 2003.  I am 
 using the 
  final released Outlook (11.5608.5606) and Desktop Manager 
 3.6.0.54.  I 
  used to have an older version of the desktop manager which did NOT 
  work with outlook 2003.
  
  Tom
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
  
  No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support.
  
  
  
  Ryan
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Outlook 2003.
  
  We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to 
  Exchange
  2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running 
 Outlook 2002 
  on our client systems.
   
  My question is...
   
  Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to 
  Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues 
 running it 
  against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions 
 aside from 
  the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 
 will not be 
  available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002?
   
  I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I 
 have figured 
  out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
  others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
   
  Thanks
   
  
  Ken Powell
  Systems Administrator
  Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
  Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
  Fax: (360) 759-6001
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=
  lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang
  =english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=
 lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook 2003.

2003-10-20 Thread Ryan Finnesey
We are on native 2003 now and I have talked with two people to day at
Blackberry one tells me it will work and the other tells me it will not
work.  We are going to do some testing this weekend.



Ryan




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.

I didn't talk to Blackberry support myself, but a colleague here went up
a few levels of tech support with them and confirmed that it worked.  We
tested, and it did.

We aren't on native 2003 yet.  I'll be checking back with them before
that.

-Warren


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Ryan Finnesey
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 10:48 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
 
 You have BES running on Exchange 2003?  I met with Blackberry 
 last week and they told me it was unsupported and they do not 
 have any ETA on support.
 
 
 
 Ryan
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Cundy
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:44 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
 
 FWIW,
 
 We are using the latest BES and the 3.6.0.54 Desktop manager, 
 Blackberry is great on Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003.
 
 -Warren
  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, 
  Tom
  Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:52 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
  Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
  
   I am using the Blackberry desktop with outlook 2003.  I am 
 using the 
  final released Outlook (11.5608.5606) and Desktop Manager 
 3.6.0.54.  I 
  used to have an older version of the desktop manager which did NOT 
  work with outlook 2003.
  
  Tom
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Outlook 2003.
  
  No only problem I have found is no Blackberry desktop support.
  
  
  
  Ryan
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:51 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Outlook 2003.
  
  We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and are looking at moving to 
  Exchange
  2003 and skipping Exchange 2000. We are currently running 
 Outlook 2002 
  on our client systems.
   
  My question is...
   
  Are there any reasons not to begin moving our client desktops to 
  Outlook 2003? Does anyone know of any compatibility issues 
 running it 
  against Exchange 5.5 or having clients with mixed versions 
 aside from 
  the fact that features that are introduced in Outlook 2003 
 will not be 
  available to those clients that still have Outlook 2002?
   
  I have installed it on my desk and really like it once I 
 have figured 
  out where everything went to. I would like to start putting it on 
  others so that we can have a more gradual rollout.
   
  Thanks
   
  
  Ken Powell
  Systems Administrator
  Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) 
  Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658
  Fax: (360) 759-6001
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=
  lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang
  =english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface: 
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
 ext_mode=
 lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: 

RE: Outlook error for Mac.

2003-10-20 Thread John Strongosky
The MAC is on OS 10.2 and is using the latest Outlook for MAC 2001.  They
are connected to our lan via tcpip. He has 2 macs running outlook, 1 a
desktop and 1 a laptop.

This error shows up at odd times sometimes its 4 times a second then its
then it skips 2 or 3 seconds..

john

-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook error for Mac.


Can you give me more detail on this error?  What Mac OS is the user using?
What Outlook client?  Do they use Appletalk or TCPIP to connect to the
server?  Are they physically connected to your network or are they VPN'ing
into it?

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

 --
 From: John Strongosky
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 11:25 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  Outlook error for Mac.
 
 I have a mac user who is showing a event id 1132, Source:MSExchange POP3 
  An error (0x80070057) occurred while rendering a message for download on
 mailbox 
 
 The only KB Article I can find is KB Article 187869 and all it says it to
 load the latest service pack, well this server is at Exchange 5.5 SP4. In
 conversation with this user outlook it not installed a pop3 client.
 
 Any Mac users out there that can give me any help.
 
 john
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la
 ng=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook error for Mac.

2003-10-20 Thread Hague, Jeff
I have seen this error on our Exchange Server for several (all Mac, I think) clients 
as well and what I have read says that the Outlook client is set as both a POP3 and a 
MAPI client - check the users settings to see if he has it set up both ways. It says 
to go back through setting up the connection to Exchange and choose Corporate and 
Exchange Server only. I havent bothered to fix it here because it seems to just be an 
annoyance - the users are getting their mail.

Jeff Hague
MCSE
Network Manager
Randolph-Macon College


-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook error for Mac.


The MAC is on OS 10.2 and is using the latest Outlook for MAC 2001.  They
are connected to our lan via tcpip. He has 2 macs running outlook, 1 a
desktop and 1 a laptop.

This error shows up at odd times sometimes its 4 times a second then its
then it skips 2 or 3 seconds..

john

-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 9:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook error for Mac.


Can you give me more detail on this error?  What Mac OS is the user using?
What Outlook client?  Do they use Appletalk or TCPIP to connect to the
server?  Are they physically connected to your network or are they VPN'ing
into it?

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

 --
 From: John Strongosky
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 11:25 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  Outlook error for Mac.
 
 I have a mac user who is showing a event id 1132, Source:MSExchange POP3 
  An error (0x80070057) occurred while rendering a message for download on
 mailbox 
 
 The only KB Article I can find is KB Article 187869 and all it says it to
 load the latest service pack, well this server is at Exchange 5.5 SP4. In
 conversation with this user outlook it not installed a pop3 client.
 
 Any Mac users out there that can give me any help.
 
 john
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la
 ng=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query

2003-10-20 Thread Timothy Schilbach
Um,

  We have 4 domain controllers and the system doesnt fail over until the
next iteraqtion of the dsquery. This was moved from 5 minutes (SP2) to 15
minutes (in SP3). Thus my problem.

  I have found the solution for the issue to to hack the ds query time in
the registry. This is an issue brought on by design of how dsquery works.

-Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?

2003-10-20 Thread Timothy Schilbach
Hi There,

  I have a wierd issue and if anyone has any possibly explanation by all
means feel free to post.

  We have 4 AD serviers in our environment to date. All of the are Running
SP3 on them and we have many Exchange 2000 servers as well. Sometimes (not
on regular intervals, just randomly) the outlook clients we have all of a
sudden cannot get their email and the 'finding exchange server' dialog
pops up on outlook 2002.

  Even if you bail out of the client and try to go back in, you get the
same windows and then a failure to login. So I check the Exchange server.
It is running fine and everything is clam. No strange processes and even a
network scan reveals nothing unusual.

  There are no event log entries either. I check the AD to make sure its
ok and I can login via LDAP and Global Catalog ports without any issues. I
can query users and use the MMc snapin for management of the AD.

  The server also has no strange processes running on it and its also
calm. After finding nothing on a gut instinct I just restart the
'Netlogon' service and bang! everything returns to normal.

  What could be the issue? its happens randomly and sometimes it can go
for day or weeks without happening. Thsi has happened now 2 times within a
week and now has me and the executives worried about the stability of the
system.

  Any help would be greately appreciated.

-Timothy 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003

2003-10-20 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
I don't like putting a front-end server in a DMZ because of the number of
ports you must open.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 5:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrade 2000 to 2003

Can I please have comments on the following plan?

The current setup:

EX01, an Exchange 2000 Enterprise edition server sits on our LAN.  In our
DMZ we have MIS01, a Mobile Information Server 2002 server. (both these
servers are member servers in the AD)

Also in our DMZ, we have a workgroup win2k server which acts as our SMTP
gateway for Exchange.

Users access OWA on EX01 by connecting to our firewall using https, and the
firewall NATs that through to EX01.

All of that works fine.


The plan:

Taking advantage of our Software Assurance, upgrade EX01 to Exchange
2003 enterprise edition.

Buy a license for Exchange 2003 Standard edition, and install that on MIS01,
configure as front end server for OWA, connecting to mailboxes on
EX01

Re-jig so MIS01 is also acting as our SMTP gateway, probably retaining the
workgroup server as a backup MX

MIS functionality (serversync, OMA, etc) is included in Ex2003, so we don't
need MIS2002 anymore.



Thanks in advance.


Regards,

Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Outlook Question

2003-10-20 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
You can prevent them from sending mail to the Internet by the use of the
Delivery Restrictions tab in the SMTP Connector properties.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B.
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook Question

Running Exchange 2000 - outlook 2000, outlook-xp, etc.

Is there a way to setup a clients mailbox that will only receive mail?
We don't want to clients to be able to send from that account.

Ron Pennell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003

2003-10-20 Thread Martin Blackstone
It kind of negates the whole reason for putting it there in the first place.


-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade 2000 to 2003

I don't like putting a front-end server in a DMZ because of the number of
ports you must open.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 5:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrade 2000 to 2003

Can I please have comments on the following plan?

The current setup:

EX01, an Exchange 2000 Enterprise edition server sits on our LAN.  In our
DMZ we have MIS01, a Mobile Information Server 2002 server. (both these
servers are member servers in the AD)

Also in our DMZ, we have a workgroup win2k server which acts as our SMTP
gateway for Exchange.

Users access OWA on EX01 by connecting to our firewall using https, and the
firewall NATs that through to EX01.

All of that works fine.


The plan:

Taking advantage of our Software Assurance, upgrade EX01 to Exchange
2003 enterprise edition.

Buy a license for Exchange 2003 Standard edition, and install that on MIS01,
configure as front end server for OWA, connecting to mailboxes on
EX01

Re-jig so MIS01 is also acting as our SMTP gateway, probably retaining the
workgroup server as a backup MX

MIS functionality (serversync, OMA, etc) is included in Ex2003, so we don't
need MIS2002 anymore.



Thanks in advance.


Regards,

Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups

2003-10-20 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Give users two mailboxes on two separate databases, one for voice mail and
one for e-mail.  Don't back up the voice-mail store and set it to use
circular logging.  Heaven help you if there's a failure on that database.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Iadarola
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 8:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Excluding specific email message types from backups

Background:

Running Exchange 2000 with Cisco Unity's Unified Messaging.  Management
wants us to continue to use Cisco Unity to deliver voice messages left on
our IP phones to our email.  However, they do not want us to backup the
voice messages.  We are currently using Veritas Datacenter for backups.  We
have looked at the Veritas client, Leggato Exchange client, and the
Microsoft Backup Utility.  None of them allow you to exclude specific
messages.  They will allow you to exclude specific folders inside the
mailbox but not the object or message level.

Questions:

Does anyone know of a backup client specific for Exchange 2000 that will
allow you to exclude all .WAV files from backups?  Is there anyone else that
is not backing up voice messages within their message stores?  Is there a
way to do this with a script?  How are others handling unified messaging in
their environment?

Any help or thoughts would be greatly appreciated.


Steve Iadarola
Senior Support Specialist
Information Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
65 Hayden Ave
Lexington, MA 02421

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query

2003-10-20 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Are all those domain controllers in the same site as the Exchange server?

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query

Um,

  We have 4 domain controllers and the system doesnt fail over until the
next iteraqtion of the dsquery. This was moved from 5 minutes (SP2) to 15
minutes (in SP3). Thus my problem.

  I have found the solution for the issue to to hack the ds query time in
the registry. This is an issue brought on by design of how dsquery works.

-Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?

2003-10-20 Thread Tony Hlabse
DNS or possible Binding order

From: Timothy Schilbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:05:44 -0700
Hi There,

  I have a wierd issue and if anyone has any possibly explanation by all
means feel free to post.
  We have 4 AD serviers in our environment to date. All of the are Running
SP3 on them and we have many Exchange 2000 servers as well. Sometimes (not
on regular intervals, just randomly) the outlook clients we have all of a
sudden cannot get their email and the 'finding exchange server' dialog
pops up on outlook 2002.
  Even if you bail out of the client and try to go back in, you get the
same windows and then a failure to login. So I check the Exchange server.
It is running fine and everything is clam. No strange processes and even a
network scan reveals nothing unusual.
  There are no event log entries either. I check the AD to make sure its
ok and I can login via LDAP and Global Catalog ports without any issues. I
can query users and use the MMc snapin for management of the AD.
  The server also has no strange processes running on it and its also
calm. After finding nothing on a gut instinct I just restart the
'Netlogon' service and bang! everything returns to normal.
  What could be the issue? its happens randomly and sometimes it can go
for day or weeks without happening. Thsi has happened now 2 times within a
week and now has me and the executives worried about the stability of the
system.
  Any help would be greately appreciated.

-Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Cheer a special someone with a fun Halloween eCard from American Greetings! 
Go to  http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/index_msn.pd?source=msne134

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Replicating Public Folders in Exchange 2003

2003-10-20 Thread Justin Lape
1 server = Exchange 2000
1 server = Exchange 2003

I have installed the ADC for Exchange 2003 on the Exchange 2000 server and
when I open the Exchange system manager on the 2003 server I can view the
contents of the Exchange 2000 information store just fine.
My question is how do I force the public folders from the Exchange 2000
server to replicate to the Exchange 2003 server?

Also, do I have to transfer anything else other than mailboxes such as
databases, log files etc. before downing the Exchange 2000 server?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?

2003-10-20 Thread Timothy Schilbach
Hi There,

  I checked DNS and all server IP's are correctly registered and I checked
all the _msdcs directories and they are all registered correctly.

  Can you elaborate on what I should look for in binding order or dns?

-Timothy

 DNS or possible Binding order
 
 
 From: Timothy Schilbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?
 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:05:44 -0700
 
 Hi There,
 
I have a wierd issue and if anyone has any possibly explanation by all
 means feel free to post.
 
We have 4 AD serviers in our environment to date. All of the are Running
 SP3 on them and we have many Exchange 2000 servers as well. Sometimes (not
 on regular intervals, just randomly) the outlook clients we have all of a
 sudden cannot get their email and the 'finding exchange server' dialog
 pops up on outlook 2002.
 
Even if you bail out of the client and try to go back in, you get the
 same windows and then a failure to login. So I check the Exchange server.
 It is running fine and everything is clam. No strange processes and even a
 network scan reveals nothing unusual.
 
There are no event log entries either. I check the AD to make sure its
 ok and I can login via LDAP and Global Catalog ports without any issues. I
 can query users and use the MMc snapin for management of the AD.
 
The server also has no strange processes running on it and its also
 calm. After finding nothing on a gut instinct I just restart the
 'Netlogon' service and bang! everything returns to normal.
 
What could be the issue? its happens randomly and sometimes it can go
 for day or weeks without happening. Thsi has happened now 2 times within a
 week and now has me and the executives worried about the stability of the
 system.
 
Any help would be greately appreciated.
 
 -Timothy
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface: 
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 Cheer a special someone with a fun Halloween eCard from American Greetings!
 Go to  http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/index_msn.pd?source=msne134

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Viewing Public Folder Permissions via Outlook

2003-10-20 Thread Bryon Barkley
EK2K, SP3  Outlook 2K

I have a user that cannot access properties of a public folder via
Outlook.  When the user right clicks on any public folder and selects
properties, nothing happens.  The user must be able to access the Summary
tab on properties in order to see who the folder contacts are.  I have
searched MS and come up empty.  Has anyone seen this behavior before?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?

2003-10-20 Thread Tony Hlabse
Check the TCP binding order. Search MS for topics. Here is one.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;163576
From: Timothy Schilbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:32:14 -0700
Hi There,

  I checked DNS and all server IP's are correctly registered and I checked
all the _msdcs directories and they are all registered correctly.
  Can you elaborate on what I should look for in binding order or dns?

-Timothy

 DNS or possible Binding order


 From: Timothy Schilbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?
 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:05:44 -0700

 Hi There,

I have a wierd issue and if anyone has any possibly explanation by all
 means feel free to post.

We have 4 AD serviers in our environment to date. All of the are 
Running
 SP3 on them and we have many Exchange 2000 servers as well. Sometimes 
(not
 on regular intervals, just randomly) the outlook clients we have all of a
 sudden cannot get their email and the 'finding exchange server' dialog
 pops up on outlook 2002.

Even if you bail out of the client and try to go back in, you get the
 same windows and then a failure to login. So I check the Exchange server.
 It is running fine and everything is clam. No strange processes and even 
a
 network scan reveals nothing unusual.

There are no event log entries either. I check the AD to make sure its
 ok and I can login via LDAP and Global Catalog ports without any issues. 
I
 can query users and use the MMc snapin for management of the AD.

The server also has no strange processes running on it and its also
 calm. After finding nothing on a gut instinct I just restart the
 'Netlogon' service and bang! everything returns to normal.

What could be the issue? its happens randomly and sometimes it can go
 for day or weeks without happening. Thsi has happened now 2 times within 
a
 week and now has me and the executives worried about the stability of the
 system.

Any help would be greately appreciated.

 -Timothy

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 Cheer a special someone with a fun Halloween eCard from American 
Greetings!
 Go to  http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/index_msn.pd?source=msne134

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Want to check if your PC is virus-infected?  Get a FREE computer virus scan 
online from McAfee.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


SMTP testing tools

2003-10-20 Thread Erick Thompson
Does anyone know of some good remote/local applications that allow one to test SMTP 
connections? Something where I could put in an email, and SMTP server, and it would 
show me the trace of the communications between the two. 

In the past, I would telnet, but for some reason, the Telnet in Win2k won't allow a 
connection to another other ports. A remote/web based tool would be best as it would 
also be handy to see what happens from connections coming from outside of my network.

Thanks,
Erick

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SMTP testing tools

2003-10-20 Thread Guy Swartwood
telnet host port 

for example: telnet localhost 25

This will connect to the host at port 25. This works fine on my W2K box.

Guy Swartwood

-Original Message-
From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 4:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP testing tools


Does anyone know of some good remote/local applications that allow one
to test SMTP connections? Something where I could put in an email, and
SMTP server, and it would show me the trace of the communications
between the two. 

In the past, I would telnet, but for some reason, the Telnet in Win2k
won't allow a connection to another other ports. A remote/web based tool
would be best as it would also be handy to see what happens from
connections coming from outside of my network.

Thanks,
Erick

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SMTP testing tools

2003-10-20 Thread Erick Thompson
Ah, it does still work that way. 

It turns out the my Spam catcher was messing things up, and preventing a connection. 
That should teach me to assume that it's the tools, and not the system.

Thanks,
Erick

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Guy Swartwood
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 3:17 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SMTP testing tools
 
 
 telnet host port 
 
 for example: telnet localhost 25
 
 This will connect to the host at port 25. This works fine on 
 my W2K box.
 
 Guy Swartwood
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 4:57 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: SMTP testing tools
 
 
 Does anyone know of some good remote/local applications that allow one
 to test SMTP connections? Something where I could put in an email, and
 SMTP server, and it would show me the trace of the communications
 between the two. 
 
 In the past, I would telnet, but for some reason, the Telnet in Win2k
 won't allow a connection to another other ports. A remote/web 
 based tool
 would be best as it would also be handy to see what happens from
 connections coming from outside of my network.
 
 Thanks,
 Erick
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Web Interface:
 http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
ext_mode=
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


forestprep using standard or enterprise version?

2003-10-20 Thread Microsoft Exchange List Server
Hi all,

1 forest, 1tree, multiple childdomains 
W2KAD

I am planning to run exchange2003 /forestprep at the forestroot of our AD, the root 
will have 1 exchange2003 server (just 50 users, 1 storage group) but the childomains 
will have their own exchange2003 servers (some of them 10 databases).

Do you see any problem if at the forestroot I run /forestprep with an exchange2003 
standard version?, the childomains will get their own exchange2003 enterprise version.

thx


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Help! Mail Queue is all blocked up...

2003-10-20 Thread Wohlgemuth, Mike
Xwall 3.28 does allow for GAL checking ... Although I haven't tried it
yet 

mike

-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 5:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help! Mail Queue is all blocked up...


 Since Xwall has no knowledge of the users on the system, it
 accepts ALL
 stinking e-mail messages, and then forwards them to the Exchange box.
 Since spammers use blind name lists, attempting to get lucky, and hit
 all the possible [EMAIL PROTECTED], the Exchange Server wants 
 to send NDR
 reports to EACH and EVERY piece of Spam mail that comes into 
 the system.

You could try ORF from www.vamsoft.com - I've not used it but apparently
it hooks into Active Directory/LDAP at the RCPT TO to validate the
recipient. Another option, though not MS would be a linux/bsd MTA such
as postfix, I use this with an hourly export of the GAL and we reject
around 7000 pieces of mail a week to random/old addresses.

regards,
Paul

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]