RE: EXMERGE ERROR
Can you open the users mailbox logged in as you ? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 22:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR Ie Exchange admin privs, not just domain admin. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR Does the account you are logged into the desktop with have rights to the user mailbox? -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR I believe ExMerge can only be run against exchsrvr locally Tim. x3683 -Original Message- From: Reed, Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXMERGE ERROR Anyone have an issue running the EXMERGE from their desktop and it says you do not have permissions on the information store but you actually do? I found an article that mentions something about copying the mapi32.dll file over... Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify Network Defence Ltd. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. For more information please contact the Network Defence Technical Department on 01925 272001 Network Defence Ltd. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP banner
If its exchange 2k then it's always IIS as it uses its SMTP service. -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2002 13:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP banner Charles, I've tried telnetting to port 25 on an Exchange and a straight IIS box and get the same response as you from each. Mike -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2002 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP banner Is this from Exchange or IIS SMTP? (Or something else) Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.5329 ready at Fri, 29 Nov 2002 05:09:04 -0700 tia Charles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify Network Defence Ltd. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. For more information please contact the Network Defence Technical Department on 01925 272001 Network Defence Ltd. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reverse DNS on mail servers
Your send MTA may be routing mail from another IP address which doesn't match you MX records, so I believe. That is, your mx records for ownewilliams.co.uk is 193.133.143.82 with the highest preference. If you send mail via another IP address not in the MX records, then they will reject your mail. I think I'm right, so I'll wait for a second opinion!!! -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 April 2002 10:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reverse DNS on mail servers Hi all Hopefully just a quick one here...I have an issue with one of our cutomers who will not accept email from us because our mail server (apparently) is not reachable via a reverse DNS lookup. How and where do I configure this? I thought it was done by the ISP hosting our domain name on their DNS serversor do I need to specifically configure it on the mail server itself? Many thanks Dom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's
May have been asked before... Is there a reg hack that can stop outlook 2k2 from sending RR's and NR's when in cooperate mode ? TIA Ad www.networkdefence.com ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's
NR's = Not Read. I'm sure you're right, but dammed if I can find the option... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 April 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's Doesnt Outlook 2002 already support this for read receipts? Whats a NR? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's May have been asked before... Is there a reg hack that can stop outlook 2k2 from sending RR's and NR's when in cooperate mode ? TIA Ad www.networkdefence.com ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's
LMAO ! TVM ! Ad -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 April 2002 13:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's Ahh, Ok. With so many acronyms floating around, I am not sure sometimes what we are talking about anymore. Tools/Options/Email OPtions/Tracking Options - It works in Corp Mode. You should have SP1 installed as well so it works right. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's NR's = Not Read. I'm sure you're right, but dammed if I can find the option... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 April 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's Doesnt Outlook 2002 already support this for read receipts? Whats a NR? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 10 reg hack to stop RR's and NR's May have been asked before... Is there a reg hack that can stop outlook 2k2 from sending RR's and NR's when in cooperate mode ? TIA Ad www.networkdefence.com ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence
Totally off topic; convert .WMA to . WAV
Is there such a tool that will convert Windows Media player files to good old fashioned WAV files ? Rgds Ad ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
You have leaky memory. Performance monitor, Task manager. Use these tools to find the culprit and then . Chop it out/upgrade etc... -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 April 2002 17:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Due to MS wonder memory management in Win2K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server But why are the reboots required? -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server If you are into Perl, I've got a script that I use to reboot our MSX55 servers (monthly for mailbox servers, twice monthly for IMS, weekly for OWA). It could undoubtedly be tweaked for what you want. It shuts down the MSX services before the reboot (and verifies that they do indeed stop). After the reboot is complete, it verifies that any service running at the time of reboot is running after the reboot. Sends email showing the results. -Original Message- From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of Windows 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and have found next to nothing about how to do this. What I am trying to do is on our Mail server I want to have the machine reboot say every Sunday night at a certain time. If anyone knows how to do this in Windows 2000 I would greatly appreciate the information. _ James Cornett Network Administrator New Israel Fund 1101 14th Street, NW Sixth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-842-0900 ext. 269 Fax: 202-842-0991 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.newisraelfund.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DNS behaviour with MX preferences...
Guys, I'm trying to fully understand what happens with MX preferences and SMTP relays. Let me draw a picture. Lets says a company has 2 SMTP inbound connections for domain name example.com and the MX records show that example.com has 4 servers that will accept the mail. i.e. mailgate1.example.com pref = 10, mailgate2.example.com with pref = 20, fallback1.isp.com pref = 50 and fallback2.isp.com pref = 50. If mailgate1 is always available, will it be the only connector that takes the mail unless it has reached the maximum number of sessions ? If mailgate1 is down, how quickly does the sending SMTP connector give up and try the next MX record pref, i.e immediately or after a certain retry parameter ? TIA Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DNS behaviour with MX preferences...
Cheers, that's cleared that up! Adam -Original Message- From: Matt Monteleone-Haught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 April 2002 11:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: DNS behaviour with MX preferences... If mailgate1 is always available, will it be the only connector that takes the mail unless it has reached the maximum number of sessions ? Yes, although I have seen my 'secondary inbound' box accepting mail when the 'primary' box was clearly available. If you'd like them load balanced then have the preferencs set the same. If mailgate1 is down, how quickly does the sending SMTP connector give up and try the next MX record pref, i.e immediately or after a certain retry parameter ? Immediately as far as I understand it. If mail.wheaton.com is unavailable, it then tries mail1.wheaton.com, if that is unavailable, my ISP starts to queue the mail for me and will for the next 24 hours or until one of the MX records with a lower cost becomes available. I believe all of this is outlined in the RFCs. From RFC 974: If the list of MX RRs is not empty, the mailer should try to deliver the message to the MXs in order (lowest preference value tried first). The mailer is required to attempt delivery to the lowest valued MX. Implementors are encouraged to write mailers so that they try the MXs in order until one of the MXs accepts the message, or all the MXs have been tried. A somewhat less demanding system, in which a fixed number of MXs is tried, is also reasonable. Note that multiple MXs may have the same preference value. In this case, all MXs at with a given value must be tried before any of a higher value are tried. In addition, in the special case in which there are several MXs with the lowest preference value, all of them should be tried before a message is deemed undeliverable. Try. http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc974.html Matt - Original Message - From: Adam Romain [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:50 AM Subject: DNS behaviour with MX preferences... Guys, I'm trying to fully understand what happens with MX preferences and SMTP relays. Let me draw a picture. Lets says a company has 2 SMTP inbound connections for domain name example.com and the MX records show that example.com has 4 servers that will accept the mail. i.e. mailgate1.example.com pref = 10, mailgate2.example.com with pref = 20, fallback1.isp.com pref = 50 and fallback2.isp.com pref = 50. If mailgate1 is always available, will it be the only connector that takes the mail unless it has reached the maximum number of sessions ? If mailgate1 is down, how quickly does the sending SMTP connector give up and try the next MX record pref, i.e immediately or after a certain retry parameter ? TIA Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DNS behaviour with MX preferences...
Cheers Bud. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 April 2002 13:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: DNS behaviour with MX preferences... On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, at 10:50am, Adam Romain wrote: If mailgate1 is always available, will it be the only connector that takes the mail unless it has reached the maximum number of sessions ? In theory, yes. In practice, always available is not a realistic condition. Some random mail exchanger on the Internet may have trouble contacting mailgate1 for some reason unrelated to your systems, and end up using mailgate2 instead. If mailgate1 is down, how quickly does the sending SMTP connector give up and try the next MX record pref, i.e immediately or after a certain retry parameter ? This is implementation-specific. Most of the SMTP implementations I have seen try the next MX immediately. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, | entity or | organization. All information is provided without | warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Windows 2000 domain trusting an NT4.0 domain.
Quick one guys, just prove I have it right...or wrong... I have an NT4.0 domain that I do not want to upgrade. I want to install a new clean windows 2000 domain, install Exchange 2000 server and have a trust between the old NT4.0 and the new 2000 domain, so users can log on and get their email from the new exchange servers. Would this work ? Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disaster
It must have been the Easter Bunny! -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 April 2002 13:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disaster I have a situation. We have an office in London and it was robbed last night. They took our exchange server and file servers. The exchange server was a 5.5 server in our org in its own site. I guess this is a good time to try the disaster recovery switch huh? Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multi-2000 domain
Whoever said the monarchy is dying ? -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 February 2002 17:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multi-2000 domain Currently, I have a single 5.5 site in a single domain. We are planning to keep 5.5 co-existing with 2000 during the migration. For Windows 2000, we would like to create a parent/child domain (Management decision for no reason other than to add complexity) For the purposes of clarity, I'll call it the King domain, and the Prince domain. The King domain is the parent domain and the Prince domain would be a sub domain of the King domain. Users will be logging into the sub domain. My question is this: Which domain should I place the Exchange 2000 server in? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: French restrictions
We have a customer based in the UK, who has a branch office in France. We supply them with content and web access control for the whole company. In France though, we have been told that we cannot filter web-access, i.e. use products like Web-sense etc. because of their human rights. Same applies to emails. We are getting mixed answers from people in France and the people in the UK. Is this bull, or is there some sort of freedom of access there ? Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: French restrictions
We've advised our customer to do so. It's quite amazing to see how much time they spend looking for porn on the internet, they are frequently getting problems with viruses, it's just as well we keep on top of the AV control. They really are quite frisky!! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: French restrictions You should probably be talking to a lawyer. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: French restrictions We have a customer based in the UK, who has a branch office in France. We supply them with content and web access control for the whole company. In France though, we have been told that we cannot filter web-access, i.e. use products like Web-sense etc. because of their human rights. Same applies to emails. We are getting mixed answers from people in France and the people in the UK. Is this bull, or is there some sort of freedom of access there ? Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: French restrictions
I hear the food is good. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 14:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: French restrictions Hmmm...human rights consist of being allowed to browse for p0rnI'm moving to France :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 19 February 2002 14:15 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: French restrictions Subject: RE: French restrictions We've advised our customer to do so. It's quite amazing to see how much time they spend looking for porn on the internet, they are frequently getting problems with viruses, it's just as well we keep on top of the AV control. They really are quite frisky!! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: French restrictions You should probably be talking to a lawyer. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: French restrictions We have a customer based in the UK, who has a branch office in France. We supply them with content and web access control for the whole company. In France though, we have been told that we cannot filter web-access, i.e. use products like Web-sense etc. because of their human rights. Same applies to emails. We are getting mixed answers from people in France and the people in the UK. Is this bull, or is there some sort of freedom of access there ? Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailboxes
..and the answer to number 1 was - Yes. They are using 'deliver to personal folders' on the delivery tab in their mailbox service properties. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 15:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: mailboxes On the organisation, site and recipients properties pages, what role is administrator set to? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailboxes Hi, 1. half of my users don't seem to keep their mails on the server but on their C-drives, while the settings are exactly the same as the other lot. Can they change this in outlook? 2. I cannot access any mailboxes on the server (not even my own), it says access is denied, even though I log on as admin. The only mailbox I can access is Administrator. Kim -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config He isn't over his mailbox limit or anything is he? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 10:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config no permissions whatsoever... He typed them in separately... -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config So to get this straight. He resides on the same domain and LAN as yourself. His mailbox resides on the same Server as yourself? Are there any permissions on the mailboxes of the users he is trying to email? Is he adding their addresses separately to his email or has he got them in a DL? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 10:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config sure looks like it... -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config Yes indeed. Can you send to the people he was having trouble with? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config test sent from his PC, did you get it? -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config Including external? Could he, for example, mail me. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 09:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config he's on the LAN, he can send ok to most of his addressees... -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config And how does he connect to the network. Can he send to other addresses? -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 09:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config Hi Robert, it's a mail that our finance manager wanted to send to these people, and he almost immediately got this message back... -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: relay config Who are these people in relation to your site? Are you sure this isn't, for example, failed attempts at unauthorised relaying via your system (in which case the error shows your anti relay precautions are working). -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 08:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: relay config Now I start getting these messages... How can I get rid of those without having to have open relay?
RE: French restrictions
First screenshots http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/24116.html -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2002 15:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: French restrictions You gotta love the fact that the program that is supposed to provide freedom of information to the oppressed people of the world is called Peekabooty. I suppose humanity will really advance by providing free porn to fundamentalist states. No, you're still not allowed to send your daughter to school, but look you get free porn on your PC. Woohoo! S. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: French restrictions http://news.com.com/2100-1001-839764.html Maybe this will help out in the future. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: French restrictions This from a country that represses freedom of speech? Martin's right, talk to an international law lawyer. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! The quest for certainty blocks the search for meaning. Uncertainty is the very condition to impel man to unfold his powers. - Erich Fromm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: French restrictions We have a customer based in the UK, who has a branch office in France. We supply them with content and web access control for the whole company. In France though, we have been told that we cannot filter web-access, i.e. use products like Web-sense etc. because of their human rights. Same applies to emails. We are getting mixed answers from people in France and the people in the UK. Is this bull, or is there some sort of freedom of access there ? Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay blues
Are all these users in the same subnet 10.0.0.0 ? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 February 2002 20:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay blues I know this is fairly easy issue and discussed before but I don't understand why some users are getting 5.4 errors stating that the Exchange server can not relay their message. So bear with me on this one. I have a single E2K server sitting behind a Pix firewall. The email server is a domain controller in a single 2000 domain. The majority of the users log into NT4.0 domains, there 16 of them, and use mostly POP3 clients. The clients include Netscape, Express and Outlook. We are slowly converting all to use the full Outlook. I set the relay setting in E2K to the following. (Only the list below) is ticked and so is (Allow all computers that successfully authenticate) In the access list I put in 10.0.0.0 and subnet mask of 255.0.0.0 That is the schema they use. When set as above some users get the relay error message while others do not. As I was thinking about this this weekend it came to me that it may be a rights issue. If a user logs into a NT 4.0 domain and is using the Microsoft Exchange Server service for Outlook, that person will not be able to access his mailbox until that NT 4.0 users is given Mailbox rights on the AD where the exchange server resides. But for POP3 client users this is not true. But I am wondering if this is why when I have the relay settings as above that it's a mailbox rights issue causing the relay errors. NT 40 users of Full Outlook do not have this problem and of course were given full mailbox access in 2000 domain account. My guess is that it is a mailbox rights issue. Of course when I tell it to relay all, the errors go away. When I get in next Tuesday (school district) I am of going to add mailbox access rights to one of the erroring users and have them try again. Anything else that I might be missing? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Enumerate Existing Attachments
Using emerge and some clever switches in the .ini file you could achieve this quite easily. Look at the utility from ms support to remove the loveletter virus. Same sort of Idea.. Adam -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2002 16:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Enumerate Existing Attachments None that I've ever seen. In essence it shouldn't be too difficult a development project; walk the tree and make note of the types of attachments. - Original Message - From: Paul Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:34 AM Subject: Enumerate Existing Attachments Hi, I am tasked with enumerating existing attachments (file type, size, etc) in mailboxes and.or public folders on 5.5 and 2k systems. Any advice on products or code to achieve this? Thanks, Paul Christopher University College London _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Your Mailbox is over it's Limit Message
Is it to do with the wording RE. The PST's ? I now exactly the problem but couldn't find a solution. -Original Message- From: Bob P. Antonietti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 February 2002 12:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Your Mailbox is over it's Limit Message Hello. I know it has been posted before, however, I may have missed any responses to this query. Is there any scripting/registry/software patch available to reword the standard Mailbox Limit messages generated by Exchange 5.5? Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X400 virus scanning.
Guys, I have a large org with a huge x400 connection topology. I'm going to be responsible for a particular site. I want to protect my site (single server 5.5) on the X400 connector and the SMTP connector. I've solved the SMTP with a content checking relay. I want to protect the internal mail routed via x400 too. I would like to have x400 'relayed' from another server in my DMZ. (I'm also using a Firewall to protect my LAN from other LAN's). i.e. I want the mail scanned before it gets to my Exchange server as I have a complete dislike for products like Group Shield for Exchange and Mailsweeper for Exchange etc. I believe Exchange should have perimeter security for performance and reliability issues. Any suggestions ? Ps .I have free choice of firewall. Currently, I don't know of any firewalls that can proxy x400 and use CVP. Rgds Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: X400 virus scanning.
I agree with your points. In retrospect, I'm now more convinced that having AV in the server is also very important. In fact I would only would like to rely on it as a fallback and hope that it could be stopped on the perimeter. (The desktops already have AV). More to what I want though (I should of made this bit clearer), is content checking - being able to block certain attachments, documents, vbs, exe, with AV. There are many SMTP relays out there that can do this very well, but not much for x400, at least not for small scale deployments that I know of... MailGaurd can do x400 in the enterprise edition but at aprrox £25k (€4) is a bit expensive! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 13:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: X400 virus scanning. I think your theory is flawed, but that is just IMHO. While I agree you should have perimeter scanning, I think it is foolish to not have something on the server as well. If you don't have AV on the server and something gets through, how will you ever clean it? If a sender on the network sends a virus or other objectionable file, it will still be in their mailbox even if the perimeter scanner gets it. Bottom line is I believe you should have as many layers as possible. This means perimeter, server, desktop, etc. I dislike Groupshield as well. As far as I am concerned there are only 2 worth using. Trend and Antigen. Performance should not be too much of an issue and should NEVER take precedence over safety. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: X400 virus scanning. Guys, I have a large org with a huge x400 connection topology. I'm going to be responsible for a particular site. I want to protect my site (single server 5.5) on the X400 connector and the SMTP connector. I've solved the SMTP with a content checking relay. I want to protect the internal mail routed via x400 too. I would like to have x400 'relayed' from another server in my DMZ. (I'm also using a Firewall to protect my LAN from other LAN's). i.e. I want the mail scanned before it gets to my Exchange server as I have a complete dislike for products like Group Shield for Exchange and Mailsweeper for Exchange etc. I believe Exchange should have perimeter security for performance and reliability issues. Any suggestions ? Ps .I have free choice of firewall. Currently, I don't know of any firewalls that can proxy x400 and use CVP. Rgds Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ed Server Move Method - Corrupt Priv edb
I used the same method with a corrupt priv.edb. It was 12Gb in size and near enough the same on the new server. Make sure you follow the details for public folder replication too. When I ran the eseutil (in tests) I lost the attachment table. It depends where the corruption is, you may be lucky, you may not. Stick with the move method if you can. Adam -Original Message- From: Ravisa K. Daunivuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 00:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ed Server Move Method - Corrupt Priv edb We have a corrupt edb and want to use the eseutil repair method a as last resort for our last full backup was in December and our logs have been moved around the place since it backup had been failing. We want to try the above method and were just wondering whether this would actually bring the corrupt db to the new server. Any recommendations or suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatically printing eMAILs
I do for a law firm. They have mail printed that is sent to internet rcpts and received from the internet. I used a mail relay to duplicate the message to an internal mailbox and have a dedicated PC with a printer print any message that had certain words in the message header, i.e. ' received: ' You have to watch out for the attachments. Outlook 2k2 blocks .exe's and the like so this helped. They pledged to plant a tree a month ! -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 19:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatically printing eMAILs Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Does anyone automatically print out eMAILS from a mailbox? If so please share with me. Thanks. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
Not at all. Still, I'm learning the hard way (due to go on course in a few weeks though) What I was trying to get at is that you need to ensure that at least one domain in the forest is in native mode. I got this information from the whitepaper titled 'in place upgrade from 5.5 to ex2k' from the pre-requisites section. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Sure about that? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called EXCHANGEX. I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I'm confused now! I mean even more confused than normal... I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of running exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. Huh? E2K doesn't use a service account, does it? Am I missing something? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
Great. So if in a Org you have two domains, each a separate site and I was to upgrade one domain to win2k and then upgrade ex5.5 to 2k I wouldn't need to make it win2k native for that domain ? i.e. Org Site 1 is NT4.0 / Ex5.5 a site connector with replication. Site 2 is mixed mode ( 1 NT4.0 BDC with ex5.5 and 1 win2k ADS with ex5.5 ) with the intention to decommission the BDC to have 1 server being win2k/ex2k. Ta, Adam -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 16:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Again, that is not a requirement. It does make migration of public folder permissions work better. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Not at all. Still, I'm learning the hard way (due to go on course in a few weeks though) What I was trying to get at is that you need to ensure that at least one domain in the forest is in native mode. I got this information from the whitepaper titled 'in place upgrade from 5.5 to ex2k' from the pre-requisites section. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Sure about that? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called EXCHANGEX. I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I'm confused now! I mean even more confused than normal... I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of running exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. Huh? E2K doesn't use a service account, does it? Am I missing something? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message
RE: Event ID 290
Use the power of TechNet search -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 14:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 290 Ok, now Event 290's are common for exchange. When it gives you the message in the event, where can you find this message at. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I'm confused now!
Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called EXCHANGEX. I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so that I can move mailboxes. Will this not work? Does my E2K server have to be in the EXCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I'm confused now! I mean even more confused than normal... I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my aforementioned problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of running exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated: for example, all servers in the site must use a common service account. Huh? E2K doesn't use a service account, does it? Am I missing something? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Folder problem
-Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 11:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Folder problem It isn't anything stupid like your mailbox has reached its limit is it? That error pops up when you try to move things around the your mailbox when it has reached a limit. Just a thought. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tim John - Domainz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2002 19:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Folder problem I get the same error for a DL with 1 entry or 100 ! If I try and copy a DL from the contacts folder in my Mailbox, I get a similar error Can't move the item. The item cannot be moved. It was already moved or deleted, or access is denied. It's really weird. Just to check, I have created another folder, given myself the same permissions to the folder, added a contact and created a DL with that contact inside - and it worked perfectly !! Any other ideas ? Tim :-Original Message- :From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] :Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2002 03:32 :To: Exchange Discussions :Subject: RE: Folder problem : : :When you create the DL, do you attempt to add contacts to it, :or are you :simply trying to save an empty DL? There is a limit as to the :number of :contacts in a personal DL - 150, 160 or so. : :Can you create a personal DL somewhere else and copy it to this folder? : :-Original Message- :From: Tim John - Domainz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] :Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:57 PM :To: Exchange Discussions :Subject: Folder problem : : :Hi gang, : :Exchange 5.5, Outlook 2k : :I have created a public folder and have associated it with :Contacts. There :are about 300 contacts in this folder. : :I have just tried to create a distribution list, but when I 'Save and :Close', I get the following message:- : :The item could not be saved to this folder. The folder has :been deleted or :moved or you do not have permission. Do you want to save a copy in the :default folder for this item. : :The tree structure for this folder is Public FoldersAll Public :FoldersMyFolderSubFolder. I am the owner of both MyFolder :and SubFolder. I :can create new contacts, copy existing ones and do everything :else 'normal' :in this folder, except create a DL. : :Any ideas ? : :Thanks heaps, : :Tim : :_ :List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm :Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp :To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : :_ :List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm :Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp :To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outlook programming
www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 16:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook programming To do what? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook programming Does anyone know of a company that can program outlook to our companys need? RGDS Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
dsfijj -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 16:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's I'm going to address this question to Ed Missy primarily, since I'm assuming that working at Compaq, they have a lot of experience with e-mail over an iPaq. But if anyone else knows the answer to this question, feel free to respond. Everyone in our Operations group has an iPaq, Model 3670 with a Socket Low Power Ethernet PCMCIA card in the expansion pack. We have them successfully connecting to the network and sync'ing with the workstations over a 100 mbps switched connection. Here's the difficult part: After sync'ing and opening your Inbox, you have 4 folders to choose from, to look in. They are: Deleted (local) Inbox Outbox Sent I know this behaviour is by default and that there MAY be no workaround for it. However, does a third-party product or a workaround exist that would allow us to see sub-folders to our Inbox, like you can in OWA? TIA, Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
-Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 16:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's You just need to select which additional folders you want to sync in ActiveSync. No magic involved. Did you look at the options? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's I'm going to address this question to Ed Missy primarily, since I'm assuming that working at Compaq, they have a lot of experience with e-mail over an iPaq. But if anyone else knows the answer to this question, feel free to respond. Everyone in our Operations group has an iPaq, Model 3670 with a Socket Low Power Ethernet PCMCIA card in the expansion pack. We have them successfully connecting to the network and sync'ing with the workstations over a 100 mbps switched connection. Here's the difficult part: After sync'ing and opening your Inbox, you have 4 folders to choose from, to look in. They are: Deleted (local) Inbox Outbox Sent I know this behaviour is by default and that there MAY be no workaround for it. However, does a third-party product or a workaround exist that would allow us to see sub-folders to our Inbox, like you can in OWA? TIA, Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Could not open one or more attachments!
-Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 12:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Could not open one or more attachments! Typically where I see this is that your AV scanner hasn't had enough time to scan the attahcment due to it's size. By trying to open it up several times you give it the necessary time to complete it's scan.We have one customer who uses NAV and this is most common with this scanner. Other customers who use Groupshield or TM Scanmail rarely have this problem though it does occur there as well, on occassion. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: Helio Coragem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Could not open one or more attachments! Have you ever got this error message? (Outlook 98) If we try twice the same message in a mailbox, the attachment opens. It seems Exchange (5.5 SP4 - NT 4 SP6a) lost the pointer to the attachments. The same happens doing bricklevel backup. Arcserve stops the backup job. After forcing reading a mailbox using the Outlook 98 client the backup proceeds to the next mailbox until it finds another error. Any idea? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Directory Sync Problems on setup.
Listers, I have a peculiar problem and I would like to share it with you guys, just in case you might have come across it. I have a customer who's Exchange 5.5(sp4) Org is split over two sites. Currently a server in each site. They are connected via 128k link and directory replication works fine. In a bid to upgrade a site, I'm trying to add a second server in the second site. It's something I've done before and I'm familiar with what should be done. Initially, I tried to install the second exchange server on a Win2k Domain controller (Emulating as the PDC whilst in mixed mode). The first server in the site is running on an NT4.0 SP6a BDC by the way. When running set-up on the new server I chose the option to join an existing site and give the password. It likes this and continues. It gets to the point where it replicates the directory with the other server in the site and fails with error code 0xc1030b11 . It fails the set-up and now I'm stuck. I've tried this on 3 different servers in the domain. 2 of which are Win2k and the other was NT4.0 - same problem. In the event log I get an error in the application from MSExhcangeSetup Event ID 2013 - Replication Configuration. An error occurred adding replica of naming context '/o=SHG/ou=SUNGBR02/cn=Microsoft DMD' to server '51205SVR001' from server '51208SVR001'. 0xc1030b11 - A connection could not be made to the remote directory service, possibly due to network failure. Be sure that both directory services are running and that your network is available, and then try connecting again. I've tried different switches/lan cables etc. Any ideas ? Help is greatly appreciated Adam Romain Network Defence Ltd. www.networkdefence.com ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ... ?
Guys, Does anyone know of such a tool or a command that can find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ? TIA Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what user s belong to them ... ?
Both. Actually, just found it in the resource kit. Global.exe and local.exe Thanks -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what user s belong to them ... ? Are we talking NT local/global groups? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 10:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ... ? Guys, Does anyone know of such a tool or a command that can find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ? TIA Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server move to new machine
The server you moved too, is it a PDC/BDC or a stand alone ? Does it have a computer account in/from the original domain ? If not, you won't be able to start it. -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 November 2001 15:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server move to new machine I had to move the exchange server to a new machine, I followed the directions in the microsoft article q155216 and when I brought up the IS it wouldn't start, tried running the isinteg -patch and got the following msg DS_E_INSUFFICIENT _ACCESS_RIGHTS looked it up in the microsoft knowledge base and came up with nothing conclusive. Any ideas? Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Store.exe 105 plus 102 virtual Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe I would like to know what everyones average mem usage is for store.exe. Mine sits at around 98000. thanks rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault?
How big is your Store ? -Original Message- From: Gavin Rewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 10:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault? Hi there Daniel, There is NOTHING in the event log, the DPT Storage Manager, the DPT bios, or anywhere else that tells me what is going on. These errors are completely random. Might happen every day for 3 days and then nothing for a week. It is most bizarre. Overall, everything works perfectly. Cheers Gavin *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 26/11/2001 at 5:07 PM Daniel Chenault wrote: By 1018 do you mean a -1018? First thing I'd do is check the system log for SCSI errors. Dollar to a doughnut your RAID controller is heading south. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:05 PM Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault? During that thread can anyone repeat the the article or Q# that refers to approved raid controllers for eseutil. I am running E2K on a HP using Raid5 on a Netraid1 controller in a LPR2 box - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:59 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault? Among other things... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault? I thought I read somewhere on this forum that if you run eseutil on certain raid controllers you will get strange errors. - Original Message - From: Gavin Rewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 3:41 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5 restarting server - RAID controller at fault? Hi there folks, We have Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on an NT4 server. We also have Trend Scanmail, Serverprotect on the box. We backup using Backup Exec 7.3 with Exchange Agent. For the last couple of weeks we have been getting almost daily restarts of the server sometime around when the backup is happening at night. The errors in the log point to ESE Events 118 and 201 and 1018. We have a DPT Century RAID controller with 2 mirrored 18Gb disks. There is tons of space. Exchange PRIV database is about 1.8Gb in size. Does anyone know if the RAID controller can cause these problems? Any other ideas. There is so little on MS website regarding this, but the rebooting is driving us nuts. All integrity tests on both PRIV and PUB are clean. Thanks Gavin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for your email! *** Gavin Rewell Not Just Networks Phone: 02 9868 5595Fax: 02 9868 5585 Mobile: 0417 680 550 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: www.notjustnetworks.com.au And remember - your success is our success too _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE
Everyone is on Thanks Giving Holidays. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 November 2001 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WHERE IS EVERYONE Anyone out there? Wakie Wakie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE
Me 3. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 November 2001 14:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE Ditto. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 November 2001 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE I'm here, in the UK. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WHERE IS EVERYONE Anyone out there? Wakie Wakie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE
Shhh. Don't tempt the users!!! -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 November 2001 14:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE Seems like a generally quiet afternoon. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE Me 3. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 November 2001 14:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE Ditto. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 November 2001 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WHERE IS EVERYONE I'm here, in the UK. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WHERE IS EVERYONE Anyone out there? Wakie Wakie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migration of mail data
Listers, I have a situation where I need to import a whole bunch of email data in to Exchange 5.5. or Exchange 2k, not fussy. The problem with the data is the way it is formatted, although I can have it hosed in to a SQL server/access database etc. then reformatted. The format of the data is as such: to field : xxx [3 char] from field : xxx [3 char] sent : xx/xx/xx [date format] subject : xx [16 char] message body : xxx [70char * 15 lines] I can open a message in plain text format, but I need a method for getting it in the the Exchange server, say through a PST, SQL databases etc Has anyone got any pointers ? Thanks in advance Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migration of mail data
I like the BLAT idea. Interesting. The reason I need it on the server/PST's is because I'm migrating a custom made UNIX system (written in COBOL) to Exchange server. I like the BLAT / Script train of thought. The file currently has 75000 records/or messages. Pure plain text, so that makes it a bit simpler. So I could have a script that uses BLAT or MAPIsend and hoses it in to the accounts ? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2001 15:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migration of mail data Is there a reason you need it in the server. Depending on the size with that data you could Send it all to the server with a script and something like BLAT. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration of mail data Listers, I have a situation where I need to import a whole bunch of email data in to Exchange 5.5. or Exchange 2k, not fussy. The problem with the data is the way it is formatted, although I can have it hosed in to a SQL server/access database etc. then reformatted. The format of the data is as such: to field : xxx [3 char] from field : xxx [3 char] sent : xx/xx/xx [date format] subject : xx [16 char] message body : xxx [70char * 15 lines] I can open a message in plain text format, but I need a method for getting it in the the Exchange server, say through a PST, SQL databases etc Has anyone got any pointers ? Thanks in advance Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migration of mail data
The data is from an in house custom mail system written in Cobol One way to avoid exchange, write your own mail system!! -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2001 16:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migration of mail data What the heck is that data?!?!? Anyway, you should be able to format it in such a way that you can import it into Outlook - take a look at Slipstick.com and see what Sue has as reference. MSDN might have something too. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration of mail data Listers, I have a situation where I need to import a whole bunch of email data in to Exchange 5.5. or Exchange 2k, not fussy. The problem with the data is the way it is formatted, although I can have it hosed in to a SQL server/access database etc. then reformatted. The format of the data is as such: to field : xxx [3 char] from field : xxx [3 char] sent : xx/xx/xx [date format] subject : xx [16 char] message body : xxx [70char * 15 lines] I can open a message in plain text format, but I need a method for getting it in the the Exchange server, say through a PST, SQL databases etc Has anyone got any pointers ? Thanks in advance Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: turkey
Happy Thanks Giving Mr Bush America! http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/graphic/0,7367,602463,00.html -Original Message- From: Joel Musheno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2001 16:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: turkey not us, we will be here friday as well. So happy thanksgiving everybody and happy hangovers on friday, me. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: turkey Not us poor slobs... We are always the last to go. Our building is pretty empty today too. And the boss is gone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: turkey Everyone has probably already left on vacation. Have a nice thanksgiving everyone. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA stop
What version of Exchange ? Stop IIS/Do not publish the website/Deny each user access through protocol rights/Don't install it !! -Original Message- From: may [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 November 2001 12:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA stop i want to stop the OWA facility as kind of securing my mail boxes from being acessed from out side my domain can any one guide me _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cache file in Outlook?
Tell us then!! -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 November 2001 17:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cache file in Outlook? Nevermind I found it. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cache file in Outlook? Hi Everyone, Quick question. We are using Outlook 2002 (XP) and in the TO: field if you type in a few characters it automatically picks up the mailbox name. We have recently recreated a few mailboxes and are having a tough time explaining to the users that they first time they need to select the name from the global address book to update their mapi to that mailbox. Is there a file in the outlook client that deletes all of the cache entries? Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 Outlook 2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cache file in Outlook?
Ah! You mean Q287623 Thanks : ) -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 November 2001 19:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cache file in Outlook? Search for reset nickname in the knowledge base. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cache file in Outlook? Tell us then!! -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 November 2001 17:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cache file in Outlook? Nevermind I found it. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cache file in Outlook? Hi Everyone, Quick question. We are using Outlook 2002 (XP) and in the TO: field if you type in a few characters it automatically picks up the mailbox name. We have recently recreated a few mailboxes and are having a tough time explaining to the users that they first time they need to select the name from the global address book to update their mapi to that mailbox. Is there a file in the outlook client that deletes all of the cache entries? Thanks, Exchange 5.5 sp4 Outlook 2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
Great!!! Thanks a lot guys! -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 22:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk http://www.1e.com/products/SMSWakeUp/default.asp -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk I believe Wake on LAN is supported in 2.0. It's been a while though... I'm sure some TechNet queries would confirm this... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk That's a question for your reseller - I dunno! Wake on LAN, I think that's in 2.0. Don, can you confirm or deny that? I seem to recall that in 1.2 the machines have to be powered on already, and then you use the PCM service. But we don't do that. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk Can you still purchase 1.2 ? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 16:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager
OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
can you remote manage client with SMS ? i.e. see and control their desktop ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk You may want to look into MOM Microsoft Operations Manager. WWW.Microsoft.com/mom It should be able to help you with Asset management, Configuration management. Netmeeting is very good for Desktop remote control, and comes as standard equipment on NT and as a free upgrade for Win 95/98. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
great! Last question. Let's say I've got my SMS server setup, do my 95/98 clients run the SMS setup through a logon script which sets them up automatically or do I deploy it manually ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk Yes, but only if the user at the desk gives permission to do so. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk can you remote manage client with SMS ? i.e. see and control their desktop ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 17:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk You may want to look into MOM Microsoft Operations Manager. WWW.Microsoft.com/mom It should be able to help you with Asset management, Configuration management. Netmeeting is very good for Desktop remote control, and comes as standard equipment on NT and as a free upgrade for Win 95/98. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager
RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk
Can you still purchase 1.2 ? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 16:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk With those site requirements you sound like a textbook case for SMS 1.2. I know about 2.0 and its good points, but for stability and reliability, I gotta say 1.2 Rules. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC : Alternates to SMS and Intel LANDesk All, Would anyone have any suggestions to alternates to SMS and LANDesk. Picture is this: 650 users, 1 site, all win95/98 win NT4.0 servers. Need to rollout software upgrades, patches, etc. Keep asset management. Run remote desktop control for support etc. Any suggestions would greatly be appreciated. Cheers Adam ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ?
I also want it to run on my citrix servers. 800 users, a whole lot of profiles. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 16:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Your users actually log off? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Adam Romain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's not as simple as that. Anyway, I've found a possible solution. There is a reg hack where you can run an .exe at log off. Simply make the .exe cmd /c c:\logoffscript.bat Bingo! Yet to be tested though. Any thoughts ? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Why don't you use Group Policies to lock down the desktops so that you won't need to clean them up. You can even set it so that they can create whatever they want on the desktop and they vaporize as soon as they logoff. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? one would like to clean up scripts that got rid of rubish such as:- temp files desktop icons etc... -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Oh... That's strange... What pray tell would one want to run after a user logs off? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? no log off scripts -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Friggin Lyris!! Login scripts??? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? All, Does anybody know where one could find out what the reg hack would be to run commands and/or batch files at when a user logs of an NT workstation ? Thanks in Advance Ad ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager
RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ?
Do you run these scripts at log off or when they log on ? Or do you run scripts overnight ? -Original Message- From: Amir El Aziq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 16:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Maybe they're using Windows 9x? On second thoughts, nobody actually logs off of that - they just crash out... Seriously, we run scripts to move files that users have placed on their desktop to their home drive, and replace them with shortcuts - thus lowering the profile size. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 16:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Your users actually log off? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Adam Romain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's not as simple as that. Anyway, I've found a possible solution. There is a reg hack where you can run an .exe at log off. Simply make the .exe cmd /c c:\logoffscript.bat Bingo! Yet to be tested though. Any thoughts ? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Why don't you use Group Policies to lock down the desktops so that you won't need to clean them up. You can even set it so that they can create whatever they want on the desktop and they vaporize as soon as they logoff. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? one would like to clean up scripts that got rid of rubish such as:- temp files desktop icons etc... -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Oh... That's strange... What pray tell would one want to run after a user logs off? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? no log off scripts -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Friggin Lyris!! Login scripts??? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? All, Does anybody know where one could find out what the reg hack would be to run commands and/or batch files at when a user logs of an NT workstation ? Thanks in Advance Ad ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com
RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ?
one would like to clean up scripts that got rid of rubish such as:- temp files desktop icons etc... -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Oh... That's strange... What pray tell would one want to run after a user logs off? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? no log off scripts -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Friggin Lyris!! Login scripts??? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? All, Does anybody know where one could find out what the reg hack would be to run commands and/or batch files at when a user logs of an NT workstation ? Thanks in Advance Ad ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ?
I'll rephrase that. I would like a script to run when the user logs off to do specfic tasks, such as clean up temp files etc. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? I would love to see that -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? one would like to clean up scripts that got rid of rubish such as:- temp files desktop icons etc... -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Oh... That's strange... What pray tell would one want to run after a user logs off? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? no log off scripts -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Friggin Lyris!! Login scripts??? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? All, Does anybody know where one could find out what the reg hack would be to run commands and/or batch files at when a user logs of an NT workstation ? Thanks in Advance Ad ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted
RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ?
it's not as simple as that. Anyway, I've found a possible solution. There is a reg hack where you can run an .exe at log off. Simply make the .exe cmd /c c:\logoffscript.bat Bingo! Yet to be tested though. Any thoughts ? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Why don't you use Group Policies to lock down the desktops so that you won't need to clean them up. You can even set it so that they can create whatever they want on the desktop and they vaporize as soon as they logoff. -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? one would like to clean up scripts that got rid of rubish such as:- temp files desktop icons etc... -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Oh... That's strange... What pray tell would one want to run after a user logs off? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? no log off scripts -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? Friggin Lyris!! Login scripts??? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Running .bat's or .exe's at log off ? All, Does anybody know where one could find out what the reg hack would be to run commands and/or batch files at when a user logs of an NT workstation ? Thanks in Advance Ad ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: NT 4 related question.
backup and restore to an alternate location preserving file permissions if you can. Adam Romain Technical Consultant Network Defence http://www.networkdefence.com -Original Message- From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 September 2001 03:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT 4 related question. Dear all, I understand that this is an Exchange discussion, but I believe there are NT4 gurus amongst the gang. I have a question regarding shares and permissions of NT4. There is 2 HDD in this server and i want to move all the home directories of users to the second hdd due to space contraints. The problem is will the shares/ntfs permissions be lost? Both hdd are formatted as NTFS. IS there a way for me to move these data across and preserve everything exactly the way it is now with regards to permissions? Please advise. Thanks in advance. -David Ng _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT 4 related question.
It would do the job, but even the native winnt backup program can do it. I'm not an Arcserve fan, so I would recomend using the native backup. Regards Adam Romain Technical Consultant Network Defence http://www.networkdefence.com -Original Message- From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 September 2001 09:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 4 related question. Adam, The backup software we are using is ArcServe 6.61 for NT, can that do the job??? -David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 4 related question. backup and restore to an alternate location preserving file permissions if you can. Adam Romain Technical Consultant Network Defence http://www.networkdefence.com -Original Message- From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 September 2001 03:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT 4 related question. Dear all, I understand that this is an Exchange discussion, but I believe there are NT4 gurus amongst the gang. I have a question regarding shares and permissions of NT4. There is 2 HDD in this server and i want to move all the home directories of users to the second hdd due to space contraints. The problem is will the shares/ntfs permissions be lost? Both hdd are formatted as NTFS. IS there a way for me to move these data across and preserve everything exactly the way it is now with regards to permissions? Please advise. Thanks in advance. -David Ng _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT 4 related question.
Restores will not recreate the shares. Adam Romain Technical Consultant Network Defence http:://www.networkdefence.com -Original Message- From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 September 2001 09:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 4 related question. Restore won't recreate the shares will it? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 September 2001 09:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 4 related question. It would do the job, but even the native winnt backup program can do it. I'm not an Arcserve fan, so I would recomend using the native backup. Regards Adam Romain Technical Consultant Network Defence http://www.networkdefence.com -Original Message- From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 September 2001 09:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 4 related question. Adam, The backup software we are using is ArcServe 6.61 for NT, can that do the job??? -David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 4 related question. backup and restore to an alternate location preserving file permissions if you can. Adam Romain Technical Consultant Network Defence http://www.networkdefence.com -Original Message- From: David Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 September 2001 03:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT 4 related question. Dear all, I understand that this is an Exchange discussion, but I believe there are NT4 gurus amongst the gang. I have a question regarding shares and permissions of NT4. There is 2 HDD in this server and i want to move all the home directories of users to the second hdd due to space contraints. The problem is will the shares/ntfs permissions be lost? Both hdd are formatted as NTFS. IS there a way for me to move these data across and preserve everything exactly the way it is now with regards to permissions? Please advise. Thanks in advance. -David Ng _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality: This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please advise the sender by replying to this e-mail immediately and then delete the original from your computer. Opinion: Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are entirely those of the author and, unless specifically stated to the contrary, are not necessarily those of Direct Select (192) Limited. Security Warning: Internet e-mail is not necessarily a secure communications medium and we advise that you understand and consider this fact when e-mailing us. Direct Select (192) Limited does not accept responsibility for any changes made to this message after it was sent. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure
