RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
I agree also, we are a 40 person company and don't have the budget for a test lab of that size no matter how much I scream. I planned an exchange 2000 migration to a new server and joined it to the existing site. Well I have just finished and am waiting for a full backup to complete and the work day to end to switch to Native mode for Exchange. -Tony -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Or why not install a new server with E2k and join the site. Then move mailboxes. In place upgrades are plain scary if you can not test before hand. When you do upgrade in place will all your AV and Backups work the same way. Too much to chance I agree with Ryan. -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story I don't mean to rub salt into your wounds, but many of the gurus on this list frequently mention the need for a lab environment, even if it consist of only a couple of older PCs. Your situation could have been avoided if you restored your AD and exchange 5.5 into a 2-PC lab environment, and performed a test upgrade there. I was able to identify several items (mostly permissions related) from my lab upgrade experience that needed attention before the in-place Ex2k upgrade in my production environment. -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:41 AM Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story This is just an informational post, you're welcome to comment on it but I'm not really asking any questions. Just thought folks out there getting ready to upgrade might want to hear the story. I just spent the night upgrading (or trying to upgrade) my exchange 5.5 server. We have a very simple network. 1 domain. 200 users. 1 exchange server. 2 domain controllers (not the exchange server). Started about 2 weeks ago prepping for upgrade. Armed with: White Paper in-place upgrade from msoft exchange 5.5 to msoft exchange 2000 Q316886 How To: Migrate from exchange server 5.5 to exchange 2000 server Q282309 upgrading exchange server 5.5 service pack 4 to exchange 2000 server Q295922 considerations when you upgrade to exchange 2000 server Q296260 how to configure a two-way recipient connection agreement for exchange server 5.5 users Q253829 description of the active directory connector deletion mechanism And, of course, monitored this list (and the sun-exchange) one for upgrade ideas! Now some of the documents have conflicting information. If you weed thru the dates and such you can usually figure out what is really true. For example, the white paper states you MUST have at least one domain running in native mode, but the HOW TO describes a scenario where all domains are in mixed mode. With the domain controllers upgraded to win2k active directory (mixed mode) last month I tackled the exchange upgrade this month. Went thru the white paper and how to, updating the schema (forestprep and domainprep) and ran all the tests listed in those docs to verify it was working. Got exactly the results they told me! First time I ran the actual upgrade got my first rude surprise. My vendor had shipped me the Exchange 2000 standard edition media (which doesn't really say standard on it, just Exchange 2000) and the upgrade process stopped immediately with You can't go from enterprise to standard you idiot Two days later I have the correct media. Take the server off the network and run an online backup (Veritas backup exec with exchange option). Verify the backup worked. With exchange services down get back on the network and run domain tests again. Everything ok! Run the upgrade! The upgrade goes thru several processes but hangs at Setup failed while installing sub-component Site Replication Service with error code 0xC007041D -- retry or cancel search MS knowledge base and looks like a permissions issue (Q278254 and Q273730). Hmm, make sure the exchange service account has all the permissions and click retry. Still no work. Rats. Getting late so time to make the $250 call to PSS! PSS steps me thru lots of stuff, nothing works. They have me change the service account user permissions at the ORG container from CUSTOM to SERVICE ACCOUNT (i'm probably not saying this exactly correct). Still no joy. Try to cancel out of that error message. Nada. Have to task manager/shut down process. They then refer me to the ultimate nightmare: Q264309 - How to Roll Back A failed Upgraded from Exchange Server 5.5. to Exchange 2000. Yuck. Go into registry and delete the stuff, rename the exchsrvr
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
Although Exchange 2000 is really cool, I can see your point of view. It is very different from 5.5 from an administrative point of view. -TOny -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Actually if we had to do it over again I'd keep us at E5.5, and I'd fight to stay there until my retirement! Why? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange List Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Hello, I did in-place upgrades from Exchange Betas to E2K over the last 5+ years. They all worked fine except for 5.5 to E2K. I spent 3+ months labbing the in-place upgrade and got things seemingly to work just fine. (I went Native in Win2K before doing any Exchange upgrade). The upgrade went without a hitch seemingly, but we were left with strange permission problems for various things. Worked with PSS for months and months afterwards, and they were at a loss. If I had to do it over again, I'd setup a completely brand new Win2K Forest, and then a brand new E2K server in there. There are tools out there for Exchange migrations across Organizations, etc... (Actually if we had to do it over again I'd keep us at E5.5, and I'd fight to stay there until my retirement!) Former in-place upgrade fan, Brent -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:41 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story This is just an informational post, you're welcome to comment on it but I'm not really asking any questions. Just thought folks out there getting ready to upgrade might want to hear the story. I just spent the night upgrading (or trying to upgrade) my exchange 5.5 server. We have a very simple network. 1 domain. 200 users. 1 exchange server. 2 domain controllers (not the exchange server). Started about 2 weeks ago prepping for upgrade. Armed with: White Paper in-place upgrade from msoft exchange 5.5 to msoft exchange 2000 Q316886 How To: Migrate from exchange server 5.5 to exchange 2000 server Q282309 upgrading exchange server 5.5 service pack 4 to exchange 2000 server Q295922 considerations when you upgrade to exchange 2000 server Q296260 how to configure a two-way recipient connection agreement for exchange server 5.5 users Q253829 description of the active directory connector deletion mechanism And, of course, monitored this list (and the sun-exchange) one for upgrade ideas! Now some of the documents have conflicting information. If you weed thru the dates and such you can usually figure out what is really true. For example, the white paper states you MUST have at least one domain running in native mode, but the HOW TO describes a scenario where all domains are in mixed mode. With the domain controllers upgraded to win2k active directory (mixed mode) last month I tackled the exchange upgrade this month. Went thru the white paper and how to, updating the schema (forestprep and domainprep) and ran all the tests listed in those docs to verify it was working. Got exactly the results they told me! First time I ran the actual upgrade got my first rude surprise. My vendor had shipped me the Exchange 2000 standard edition media (which doesn't really say standard on it, just Exchange 2000) and the upgrade process stopped immediately with You can't go from enterprise to standard you idiot Two days later I have the correct media. Take the server off the network and run an online backup (Veritas backup exec with exchange option). Verify the backup worked. With exchange services down get back on the network and run domain tests again. Everything ok! Run the upgrade! The upgrade goes thru several processes but hangs at Setup failed while installing sub-component Site Replication Service with error code 0xC007041D -- retry or cancel search MS knowledge base and looks like a permissions issue (Q278254 and Q273730). Hmm, make sure the exchange service account has all the permissions and click retry. Still no work. Rats. Getting late so time to make the $250 call to PSS! PSS steps me thru lots of stuff, nothing works. They have me change the service account user permissions at the ORG container from CUSTOM to SERVICE ACCOUNT (i'm probably not saying this exactly correct). Still no joy. Try to cancel out of that error message. Nada. Have to task manager/shut down process. They then refer me to the ultimate nightmare: Q264309 - How to Roll Back A failed Upgraded from Exchange Server 5.5. to Exchange 2000. Yuck. Go into registry and delete the stuff, rename the exchsrvr folders, uninstall IIS, restart server,
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
Thanks for giving us your take on this, it is always good to hear both sides of the coin. I agree the value is not high, but easier administration was my push this. The OWA issue, being slow and such, I agree and I still am getting complaints. Told management that is how it is, and they refuse to accept it. -tony -Original Message- From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Actually if we had to do it over again I'd keep us at E5.5, and I'd fight to stay there until my retirement! Why? Hello, I found E5.5 to be very stable, and my little stash of Excel files and formulas made for administration with Import/Export quick and Easy. From cc:Mail in the late 80's, 90's ... through various versions of Exchange ... E5.5 gave my users the best of functionality, stability, and me the least problems. I suppose if you're a huge multi-national corp with a large decentralized IT structure, Win2K, and E2K provides some management structure that would be nice. But, if it's just you and a few others running the show with a centralized structure ... and only a couple thousand users, what's gained? After taking all that time, risk, cost ... what changes are your users going to see when they come in after the Domain and E2K upgrade? Not a thing, at least if things went well. OWA in E2K is an improvement to some, but it's much much slower over Dial-up.Issues too for some users behind firewalls and E2K OWA that will require them to access it through SSL, and that slows up things even more for them. Huge loss of functionality for users in this boat. These upgrades keep us employed, appreciative of that at times, but I don't believe the value-added is there for small shops. Brent -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 02, 2002 3:56 PM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Actually if we had to do it over again I'd keep us at E5.5, and I'd fight to stay there until my retirement! Why? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of MS Exchange List Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Hello, I did in-place upgrades from Exchange Betas to E2K over the last 5+ years. They all worked fine except for 5.5 to E2K. I spent 3+ months labbing the in-place upgrade and got things seemingly to work just fine. (I went Native in Win2K before doing any Exchange upgrade). The upgrade went without a hitch seemingly, but we were left with strange permission problems for various things. Worked with PSS for months and months afterwards, and they were at a loss. If I had to do it over again, I'd setup a completely brand new Win2K Forest, and then a brand new E2K server in there. There are tools out there for Exchange migrations across Organizations, etc... (Actually if we had to do it over again I'd keep us at E5.5, and I'd fight to stay there until my retirement!) Former in-place upgrade fan, Brent -Original Message- From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:41 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story This is just an informational post, you're welcome to comment on it but I'm not really asking any questions. Just thought folks out there getting ready to upgrade might want to hear the story. I just spent the night upgrading (or trying to upgrade) my exchange 5.5 server. We have a very simple network. 1 domain. 200 users. 1 exchange server. 2 domain controllers (not the exchange server). Started about 2 weeks ago prepping for upgrade. Armed with: White Paper in-place upgrade from msoft exchange 5.5 to msoft exchange 2000 Q316886 How To: Migrate from exchange server 5.5 to exchange 2000 server Q282309 upgrading exchange server 5.5 service pack 4 to exchange 2000 server Q295922 considerations when you upgrade to exchange 2000 server Q296260 how to configure a two-way recipient connection agreement for exchange server 5.5 users Q253829 description of the active directory connector deletion mechanism And, of course, monitored this list (and the sun-exchange) one for upgrade ideas! Now some of the documents have conflicting information. If you weed thru the dates and such you can usually figure out what is really true. For example, the white paper states you MUST have at least one domain running in native mode, but the HOW TO describes a scenario where all domains are in mixed mode. With the domain controllers upgraded to win2k active directory (mixed mode) last month I tackled the exchange upgrade this
Exchange 2000 question
I have migrated from Exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 sp3. Our old domain appliedinference.com is still showing up in our new exchange system, despite my best efforts to migrate to a clean system using our new company name. When I look in the M drive the folder there is named appliedinference.com, and so is the local delivery queue in the SMTP virtual server. How can I change these to read our new company name? These are what I believe are causing some of our OWA quirkiness. thanks Anthony L. Sollars System/Network Administrator Sightward, Inc. (425) 688-9921 x1024 (425) 460-5201 Direct (425) 681-4190 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sightward.com Power from Prediction _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 question
Iirc? I did this already, h.. I did this after finding the tip in my documentation. -Tony thanks -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 question Change your default recipient policy, iirc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 02:29 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 question Subject: Exchange 2000 question I have migrated from Exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 sp3. Our old domain appliedinference.com is still showing up in our new exchange system, despite my best efforts to migrate to a clean system using our new company name. When I look in the M drive the folder there is named appliedinference.com, and so is the local delivery queue in the SMTP virtual server. How can I change these to read our new company name? These are what I believe are causing some of our OWA quirkiness. thanks Anthony L. Sollars System/Network Administrator Sightward, Inc. (425) 688-9921 x1024 (425) 460-5201 Direct (425) 681-4190 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sightward.com Power from Prediction _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 question
Thanks for the reply tom, your idea, even though I thought I had already done, forced me to review my work again and I realized I had overlooked something that my documentation told me I didn't need to worry about. I had been adjusting the high priority recipient policy, but ignoring the default policy. Once I made this change to the default and restarted the services, all is well now. Thanks. -TOny -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 question Change your default recipient policy, iirc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 02:29 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 question Subject: Exchange 2000 question I have migrated from Exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000 sp3. Our old domain appliedinference.com is still showing up in our new exchange system, despite my best efforts to migrate to a clean system using our new company name. When I look in the M drive the folder there is named appliedinference.com, and so is the local delivery queue in the SMTP virtual server. How can I change these to read our new company name? These are what I believe are causing some of our OWA quirkiness. thanks Anthony L. Sollars System/Network Administrator Sightward, Inc. (425) 688-9921 x1024 (425) 460-5201 Direct (425) 681-4190 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sightward.com Power from Prediction _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA 2000 SP3 Performance
Has anyone else noticed sluggish OWA performancd owa 2000 sp3? It seems decent over the LAN, but as soon as you connect to it by dial-up, the wait is on. Are there some known tweaks I should make to our OWA environment? Thanks p.s. OWA and exchange are on the same server, with only 40 users in the company. -TOny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to all of you for your help!
I would like to thank everyone who replied to my questions, and those who just read them and wondered what the answer was, the same as I. We had an extremely successful Exchange 2000 migration to a brand new server, and we are up and running on it 100% today without a single hitch along the way. There really is something to be said for proper and thorough planning, imagine that. Have a great week Anthony L. Sollars System/Network Administrator Sightward, Inc. (425) 688-9921 x1024 (425) 460-5201 Direct (425) 681-4190 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sightward.com Power from Prediction _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA 2000
Does anyone know how to change the default exchange path, on the Exchange Virtual Server properties box. I have migrated from exchange 5.5 and 2000 grabbed our old domain name that was legacy in our old system. This is causing our OWA to not function. thanks Anthony L. Sollars System/Network Administrator Sightward, Inc. (425) 688-9921 x1024 (425) 460-5201 Direct (425) 681-4190 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sightward.com Power from Prediction _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating exch 5.5 mailboxes to Exchange 2000
Thanks for the reply, I am off to the testing lab to recreate this process. -TOny -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating exch 5.5 mailboxes to Exchange 2000 Yes, if you bring up Exchange 2000 properly to join the Exchange 5.5 site. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony L. Sollars Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating exch 5.5 mailboxes to Exchange 2000 If I change the display names of our site and org in exchange 5.5, will the site and org be named those when I migrate and move the resources to exchange 2000? Thanks -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migrating exch 5.5 mailboxes to Exchange 2000 My current endeavor is to migrate all Exchange 5.5 SP3 resources, that lies on our NT domain, to a brand new server, running Exchange 2000 SP2, that exists in our Windows2000 Native AD domain. The server have different names, but what I want to know is can I move these mailboxes and public folders to the new server with this one differing factor? We have changed the name of our company and I need to change the name of our Exchange Site and Organization. Can someone tell me if this is doable, and if so, point me in the right direction. thanks Anthony L. Sollars System/Network Administrator Sightward, Inc. (425) 688-9921 x1024 (425) 460-5201 Direct (425) 681-4190 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sightward.com Power from Prediction _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
Ok thanks for the input -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 Yes, but require SSL. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony L. Sollars Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 What would be the best way to implement OWA, for remote users in a 50 person company? The OWA service would be available to the internet. Is my best bet, to just install OWA on the exchange server, which is how our 5.5 is now, and allow traffic into our lan through the firewall? Thanks, tony -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 Au contraire. When users travel to branch offices, using OWA across the intranet is a perfect way for them to check their mail with minimum effort on their part. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 5:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 Just curious - isn't the fact that OWA is being used at all mean that the box is exposed to the Internet, even if it's NAT'ed behind a firewall? The idea is to use this via the Internet, not an Intranet. Thanks! Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 I don't think there are any security benefits unless you're going to expose it to the Internet. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: 'Michael A. Brown'; Stan Martin Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 We are looking to configure OWA for use with our lone Exchange 2000 server (SP2). Are there any security benefits to configuring this on a different machine than the Exchange server? Also, do we need to have the Enterprise Edition of Exchange 2000 and configure it as a front-end server to do this? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
What would be the best way to implement OWA, for remote users in a 50 person company? The OWA service would be available to the internet. Is my best bet, to just install OWA on the exchange server, which is how our 5.5 is now, and allow traffic into our lan through the firewall? Thanks, tony -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 4:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 Au contraire. When users travel to branch offices, using OWA across the intranet is a perfect way for them to check their mail with minimum effort on their part. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 5:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 Just curious - isn't the fact that OWA is being used at all mean that the box is exposed to the Internet, even if it's NAT'ed behind a firewall? The idea is to use this via the Internet, not an Intranet. Thanks! Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 I don't think there are any security benefits unless you're going to expose it to the Internet. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: 'Michael A. Brown'; Stan Martin Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 We are looking to configure OWA for use with our lone Exchange 2000 server (SP2). Are there any security benefits to configuring this on a different machine than the Exchange server? Also, do we need to have the Enterprise Edition of Exchange 2000 and configure it as a front-end server to do this? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 2000 - logon box weirdness
Because internally OWA is using windows authentication, and your user is logged into the domain, hence his authentication token is being passed to the OWA server allowing him access to his mailbox. Now if he can access other illegally then there is a problem. But remotely from home OWA relies on basic authentication to prove the user has permission to access the mailbox, because this user is not on the domain. Hope this helps,TOny -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 2000 - logon box weirdness Trying to make sense of this... My newly built Exchange 2000 box is running OWA. From the inside network, when I go to the OWA page (outlook.mycompany.com) I get prompted for a username, password, and domain box. I have IE5 on NT4. From the inside network, when my coworker goes to the OWA page (outlook.mycompany.com) he does not get prompted for a username, password, and domain box. It goes right into his mailbox without having to enter in credentials. He has IE5 with NT4. I had another user access the OWA page from home and they get prompted for the username, password, and domain. They used IE6. Anohter user accessed the OWA page from home, and they only got prompted for a username and password, NO domain. This person was not able to logon even though they supposedly used the domain\username appropriately. What's the deal with the 2 box logon versus the 3 box logon? And why do some PCs here need to authenticate and others go rihgt in? It's weird. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA for Exchange 2k
IS it common practice to segment an OWA only server into a DMZ? And only have this server here, and no others. I am designing our DMZ structure and wonder if I should create 2 DMZ's, one for email and another for other we services to decrease the security risk to our email systems. Your input is greatly appreciated. Anthony L. Sollars System/Network Administrator Sightward, Inc. (425) 688-9921 x1024 (425) 460-5201 Direct (425) 681-4190 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sightward.com Power from Prediction _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA for Exchange 2k
U, why yes I did. *Cowers back to this corner and reads* -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA for Exchange 2k Funny, this is being discussed in a couple of other threads. You didn't post your question without reading the transactions, did you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony L. Sollars Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA for Exchange 2k IS it common practice to segment an OWA only server into a DMZ? And only have this server here, and no others. I am designing our DMZ structure and wonder if I should create 2 DMZ's, one for email and another for other we services to decrease the security risk to our email systems. Your input is greatly appreciated. Anthony L. Sollars System/Network Administrator Sightward, Inc. (425) 688-9921 x1024 (425) 460-5201 Direct (425) 681-4190 Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.sightward.com Power from Prediction _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2
I am designing this exact system, but my plan is to use a front end exchange server on the intranet and a back-end OWA web server on the internet segmented in a DMZ. If this box does get compromised I don't want it having free access to the rest of my intranet. Do I have to have Enterprise edition Exch2k to have my OWA on a separate server? -TOny -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 The advantage of deploying a front-end server is that your mailbox server isn't touched directly by an Internet user. That is, you can configure your firewall to allow HTTPS only to the OWA server. It's not a huge security benefit, in my opinion, but it might make you sleep better. I agree with leaving the front-end server in the intranet and allowing HTTPS (SSL) only from the Internet. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 Just curious - isn't the fact that OWA is being used at all mean that the box is exposed to the Internet, even if it's NAT'ed behind a firewall? The idea is to use this via the Internet, not an Intranet. Thanks! Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 I don't think there are any security benefits unless you're going to expose it to the Internet. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: 'Michael A. Brown'; Stan Martin Subject: OWA Setup on a different machine on XCH2000 SP2 We are looking to configure OWA for use with our lone Exchange 2000 server (SP2). Are there any security benefits to configuring this on a different machine than the Exchange server? Also, do we need to have the Enterprise Edition of Exchange 2000 and configure it as a front-end server to do this? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was installed with Office XP Pro. 1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed just the application GUI. I have to bring up task manager and kill the outlook process before I can re-launch outlook. Any help would be great. This is running on a Dell workstation with Win2k Pro SP2 with all pre-sp3 hot fixes. 2. Running Office XP SP1 with all relevant hot fixes also. 3. Machine is also running as a member of a domain. -Tony S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
HAHHA, nice one. You wouldn't be biased now would you? IT is a weird problem, I had the same issue a week, but luckily it was time for a full rebuild. Now it still does it, hm. Doesn't start happening until after I install Pre-sp2 hotfixes for Office. I will try and reinstall office and leave those off. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging. Haven't seen that and I'm running the same version. Maybe it's the Dell--I'm running on a Compaq Deskpro and on a Compaq Armada laptop! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Anthony L. Sollars Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging. Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was installed with Office XP Pro. 1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed just the application GUI. I have to bring up task manager and kill the outlook process before I can re-launch outlook. Any help would be great. This is running on a Dell workstation with Win2k Pro SP2 with all pre-sp3 hot fixes. 2. Running Office XP SP1 with all relevant hot fixes also. 3. Machine is also running as a member of a domain. -Tony S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
No but I plan to install it -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging. Have you got some other application such as 'ActiveSync' running, which is keeping Outlook open. Yours, Julian Stone Exchange 2000 Consultant This message sent from Exchange 2000 SP3 build 6249.1 Netstore - Europe's Leading Application Service Provider Tel: +44 (0) 1344 444349 Mobile: +44 (0) 7710 122 312 Fax: +44 (0) 207 681 1238 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LOCATION: http://www.netstore.net/contact/location.htm HomePage: http://www.netstore.net/ -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 8:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging. Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was installed with Office XP Pro. 1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed just the application GUI. I have to bring up task manager and kill the outlook process before I can re-launch outlook. Any help would be great. This is running on a Dell workstation with Win2k Pro SP2 with all pre-sp3 hot fixes. 2. Running Office XP SP1 with all relevant hot fixes also. 3. Machine is also running as a member of a domain. -Tony S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not a named addressee, please inform the Netstore Technical Support Desk on +44 1344 444342 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are not a named addressee you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Although Netstore routinely screens for viruses, addressees should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This mail has been processed with the Netstore Content Filtering Service. Visit our website at www.netstore.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Hahah, I tend to do that with MS products occasionally. I so love linux for this, if it's screwing up I can pop the hood and get my arms greasy and fix it. -TOny -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging. I see this occasionally, no particular reason why it starts or stops. Most of the time, if I leave it for long enough it will go away. I blame it on the phase of the moon. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging. Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was installed with Office XP Pro. 1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed just the application GUI. I have to bring up task manager and kill the outlook process before I can re-launch outlook. Any help would be great. This is running on a Dell workstation with Win2k Pro SP2 with all pre-sp3 hot fixes. 2. Running Office XP SP1 with all relevant hot fixes also. 3. Machine is also running as a member of a domain. -Tony S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging.
Ok Thanks, I did update to the latest COM+ engine version. Wonder if there are some incompatibilities. -Original Message- From: Gary Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging. [2nd attempt; first was user error.] I saw this a lot when I was working on a com addin. Failing to set objects to nothing at exit will cause the app to keep running. I would check for a custom vbaproject.otm or any com addins. --Gary -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 issues with process hanging. Has anyone ever noticed this behavior from Outlook 2002, which was installed with Office XP Pro. 1. Whenever I close outlook, the process is never closed just the application GUI. I have to bring up task manager and kill the outlook process before I can re-launch outlook. Any help would be great. This is running on a Dell workstation with Win2k Pro SP2 with all pre-sp3 hot fixes. 2. Running Office XP SP1 with all relevant hot fixes also. 3. Machine is also running as a member of a domain. -Tony S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus
Hmmm, mind if a newcomer comes along. Been working here in Bellevue and on the list for a year and a half or so. -Tony Sollars -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus A bunch of us are headed out tonight to Pacific Crest Brew Pub, to say good Bye to Don Ely. He is leavening the PNW for the other coast next week. Come on up. You have about 4 hours to make it. Right at the North end of Boeing field. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Dr. Dogg! Yer in Seattle? Cool! If you ever need someone to go to a Sonics/Mariners/Seachickens game with ya, just let me know...I'm in the Tri-Cities...Richland to be specific. ;0) Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus That's the AB I know.. Way to go, High Five man. I was just given 2 tickets, BOX seats for tonight's Sonics game. Guess where I will be at 7:00 Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Screw em! I just did it -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus You sure? It is on my server? Wait I remember this, We had this conversation, didn't we AB? Your owners would not let you block that extension. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus Well isn't that a nice onecrap! -Original Message- From: Corney, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anybody been hit with the S.Gigger.A@mm Virus The virus is not in the wild yet ,The extension is htm , which is not on Martins blocking list. http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=JS_GIGGER .A _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting
RE: Email Scanners
WE use Sybari Antigen and Absolutely love it, had never failed and requires almost zero administration once in place. Can't say a virus attachment has gotten through our security system since we put it in. -TOny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners Content management with Antigen is in their beta product... contact me offline for more info (no one else will complain about my mail client that way) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:27 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Email Scanners | --- | Sorry... We are running Exchange 5.5 / SP4 and the guys upstairs want to be able to block attachments, scan for viruses and scan the content of the email for what management deems inappropriate. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:14 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Email Scanners | --- | I have been tasked to find an email scanner for our enterprise. I was wondering which one of the many products available do you recommend? Your advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: E2K SP2
If I were you I would test this sp2 on a test server before applying it to your production environment, plus backup your server first. ASfar as SP2 goes, yes MS sp's are cumalative, you do not need sp1 first. -TOny -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K SP2 Curious is this update like all others from MS. I just downloaded it. Can I apply this in a fresh install or do you have to do SP1 first. Or is SP2 all inclusive? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook!
Does anyone know how to reset the application that handles mailto links, and which application handles this? thanks -TOny -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Today is meet the moron day: http://www.vna1.com/sjvn.html -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Not at all. Look over his articles and I will bet that he's pumping the praise for NetScreen and Norton.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Anyone else think it's extremely funny that the guy writing this article has all of that equipment in his house. ...as I sit in my home in the Blue Ridge Mountains, looking over my NetScreen-10 Firewall Appliance log, I can see the number of attacks on my network rise above twenty--and that's just for today. Norton Anti-Virus for Gateways reports that three Nimda-infected messages have been blasted so far as they tried to reach my Ipswitch mail server. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? I prefer Outlook. I use a policy to keep it locked down on the client side. I don't believe that the problem stems from the creation of Outlook. The problem is that some admins are not pro-active. Others are simply too busy or overworked. I think most engineers know what to do they just have a hard time keeping up with everything. Especially when you a one man/woman (person?) shop! (I'll use myself as an example). -Original Message- From: Dean, Nathaniel, V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? This has been talked about before. Whatever is the dominant application will see the dominant hacks, security holes and have viruses written just for them. If your users are satisfied with the free products that are out then use them. We used pegasus mail back in the early 90's... -Original Message- From: Steve Dallas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ban Outlook? Anyone care to comment? http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,28 14683,00.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook!
hmmm I tried that, they are all set correctly. Whenever you click on a mailto link in Outlook 2000, you get an explorer window opened, that asks for you to select the link browser exe. -TOny -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook! I think that's under Internet Explorer, Tools-Internet options-Programs. -Peter -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook! Does anyone know how to reset the application that handles mailto links, and which application handles this? thanks -TOny -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Today is meet the moron day: http://www.vna1.com/sjvn.html -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Not at all. Look over his articles and I will bet that he's pumping the praise for NetScreen and Norton.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Anyone else think it's extremely funny that the guy writing this article has all of that equipment in his house. ...as I sit in my home in the Blue Ridge Mountains, looking over my NetScreen-10 Firewall Appliance log, I can see the number of attacks on my network rise above twenty--and that's just for today. Norton Anti-Virus for Gateways reports that three Nimda-infected messages have been blasted so far as they tried to reach my Ipswitch mail server. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? I prefer Outlook. I use a policy to keep it locked down on the client side. I don't believe that the problem stems from the creation of Outlook. The problem is that some admins are not pro-active. Others are simply too busy or overworked. I think most engineers know what to do they just have a hard time keeping up with everything. Especially when you a one man/woman (person?) shop! (I'll use myself as an example). -Original Message- From: Dean, Nathaniel, V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? This has been talked about before. Whatever is the dominant application will see the dominant hacks, security holes and have viruses written just for them. If your users are satisfied with the free products that are out then use them. We used pegasus mail back in the early 90's... -Original Message- From: Steve Dallas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ban Outlook? Anyone care to comment? http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,28 14683,00.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Newbie question so please don 't bash me..
You can set an alternate recipient in connection properties in the exchange manager, or you can setup a server based rule to forward the email. Be careful though, mail loops are caused by such things. -TOny -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Newbie question so please don 't bash me.. What is the easy way to forward one of my users email to his pop3 home account, cause under delivery options I can only select other exchange users..where am I missing the boat on this? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 FAX - 818-464-6982 www.raypak.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook!
no, this user installed earthlink dial-up services onto his laptop and he slected yes to allow eartlink to be his default everything. SO I am trying to undo earthlinks handy work. -TOny -Original Message- From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook! By chance, are you dealing with someone who also has Lotus Notes installed? James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Resetting the Mailto Application in Outlook! Does anyone know how to reset the application that handles mailto links, and which application handles this? thanks -TOny -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Today is meet the moron day: http://www.vna1.com/sjvn.html -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 7:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Not at all. Look over his articles and I will bet that he's pumping the praise for NetScreen and Norton.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Anyone else think it's extremely funny that the guy writing this article has all of that equipment in his house. ...as I sit in my home in the Blue Ridge Mountains, looking over my NetScreen-10 Firewall Appliance log, I can see the number of attacks on my network rise above twenty--and that's just for today. Norton Anti-Virus for Gateways reports that three Nimda-infected messages have been blasted so far as they tried to reach my Ipswitch mail server. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? I prefer Outlook. I use a policy to keep it locked down on the client side. I don't believe that the problem stems from the creation of Outlook. The problem is that some admins are not pro-active. Others are simply too busy or overworked. I think most engineers know what to do they just have a hard time keeping up with everything. Especially when you a one man/woman (person?) shop! (I'll use myself as an example). -Original Message- From: Dean, Nathaniel, V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? This has been talked about before. Whatever is the dominant application will see the dominant hacks, security holes and have viruses written just for them. If your users are satisfied with the free products that are out then use them. We used pegasus mail back in the early 90's... -Original Message- From: Steve Dallas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ban Outlook? Anyone care to comment? http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,28 14683,00.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto
RE: Connection to Exchange
what do you meet remotely? Are you connecting from outside the firewall/LAN or are you connecting to it on the LAN? -Tony -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connection to Exchange Maybe LMHOSTS -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Connection to Exchange I am attempting to connect to Exchange 5.5 w/ Outlook 98 from a remote computer and I get a Unable to display the folder. The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Excahnge server computer has failed. I can ping it, I can not connect to it via port 25, is that an issue? If NOT read on! No I am using the account credintials that I assigned to the mail box. Am I missing something? Thanks again, -Jhon Q ASP lNad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
Taco Delmar is a place here is SEattle -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Haiku Friday Can't hurt. - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:58 PM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday will it enhance my brain to make me smarter when it comes to exchange problem solving -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday A favorite dish of Exchange admins -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday where do u get a fish taco I never heard of them -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Must try fish tacos And learn to love them as well To be good admin -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I hear that I dont know about the tacos though -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Haiku calms my head All I need now is some beer And fish tacos too. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday I rolled out of bed. I don't have to work today. Why must my head hurt? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K
You guys are really dating yourselves. LOL I learned about these old machines in history... :P Though my first computer was a TI-99a -Tony -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K PDP-8M Yes I have, but it was Mylar, not paper tape. 5 level, baudot code. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to *ME*! -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K HP 2100 4K words of *core* memory, and a model 33 teletype w/ paper tape for program storage. Have you ever loaded an OS at 110 baud? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K PDP-11. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Man I remember the first computer I wrote my first Pascal program on. It was an 8086 PC with no hard disk and 256K of RAM. The code had different procedures for about 10 sorting algorithms and it was intended to be a tool for comparing how different algorithms performed with certain data sets. It had overwhelmed the CPU when I tried to compile it in Turbo pascal. Aah, the good old days... -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K As sarcastic as it is. It is interesting, if one presumes, that the very machines we're mentioning were in fact our first 'computers'. For me, reading your emails is like walking down memory lane...TRS-80's , TI-99a? Or 994a?, TRS-80's with 384K of RAM, etc... Thanks -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Ooh! Ooh! Can I get Colour Display for my TRS-80s? I've got a killer ap that I wrote in basic that draws these neato boxes on the screen and I have been aching to see it in full 8 bit colour! -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/01 8:46 AM Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K You've got COLOR DISPLAY When did THAT come out? -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K You all lose. I've clustered 25 Atari 2600's and can now play Mission Impossible in 8bit color -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier Sent: October 1, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Man, you're way too cutting-edge for me. I just use my VIC-20 and post to the local BBSs. And I can just copy my new software onto tapes... far more convenient than disks or CDs. Stephen -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/01 6:17 AM Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K That's too futuristic for me. I'm on Windows 3.0 and have a separate unix terminal running pine for email. Works great. Hardware costs are also low. You don't need no stinkin i386 class machines either. S. -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K nope, I'm sticking with the tried and true Windows for workgroups and ms mail. it's great! :) -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Has anyone used these products? Any Problems Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting
RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS
*Passes Don a Big juicy Fish Taco and his favorite Cold Beer* Now that's relaxing isn't it. -TOny -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS That's it!! I am hereby relinquishing my tech buddy assistance. It has become apparent that you do not care to learn for yourself and I as well as the rest of us are NOT going to baby you through Exchange. Maybe... Just maybe if you had one inkling of a clue you'd know how to search TechNet and other resources for such matters. I've never had a great deal of trouble researching TechNet. In fact, I find very useful information there almost daily as I would imagine others around here do. Maybe the problem is NOT TechNet, but YOU. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS yea I can never find crap that I want on technet. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Hanji Jr., No it's not...Have you been introduced to TechNet, yet? www.microsoft.com/technet Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eXCHANGE FOLDERS Does anyone know if the exchsrvr directory is shared by default. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nimda
is their a way to remotely tell what IE version a client machine has? -Original Message- From: Romero, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda Microsoft softwar is bad! period! --er -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda Yea, we rolled out IE6 to 80 WKS's in about 30 minutes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda Clearly snimda need to apply skcap ecivres to their srevres and snoitatskrow. I've taken the blame at our office because a few workstations were still on IE5.5 with no service pack. Someone visited a website. That's all it took. William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda I GOT NAILED BY IT I WAS AT WORK FOR 36 HOURS STRAIGHT TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO FIX IT. FINIALLY I GOT ABOUT 98% OF THE VIRUS OFF ALL MY WORKSTATIONS. AND 100% OFF THE SERVER. MAN THIS VIRUS REALLY CLOGS YOUR SYSTEM AND SCREWS UP ALOT OF PROGRAMS MOSTLY OFFICE 200O -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Nimda We have not had any come in through email. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Nimda I got none ... guess I don't have any friends ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- - Original Message - From: John Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:32 PM Subject: Nimda Did everyone get nailed by Nimda? This list is dead today! I got eight hits from it last night. Thank god for proper working antivirus apps! John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus / Worm ??
Just got off a Seminar with Cisco and they revealed this Web page that explains how to stop Nimda and Code REd at the router. Here is the Link. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/nimda.shtml -Tony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? You are right about ScanMail doing the attachment blocking. I have scanmail and emanager running. ScanMail is doing my attachment blocking and emanager is doing my content blocking. At 05:19 AM 9/20/01 -0700, you wrote: Really?? We're blocking .exe's just fine using Scanmail (scratching head). Does that mean we are special? Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: New Virus / Worm ?? You can't. You need a product like TrendMicro's eManager. There are some others too. At 04:11 PM 9/20/01 +0800, you wrote: where to configure at the Exchange servers??? I could not find any options to block it... huh!!! ;-( Thank you Carine Improve your customers' satisfaction at a lower cost. Click here for details :- http://www.scs.com.my/scsNews.asp?article=30 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: today's admin backwards virus
what firewall do you use Les, I have a Pix and I would like to start blocking the .eml files also. -TOny -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus All current IIS patches. Mail scanned by www.messagelabs.com Firewall set to block .eml[1] Users housetrained. [1] Thanks to a tip on the Raptor mailing list Les Bessant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: today's admin backwards virus I was just noticing that most of the gurus of the list had plenty of time to respond to the list regarding various questions. Am I missing something? I have been updating virus software, scanning mailboxes, patching iis/owa servers etc. all night. We were hit externally, but we only had to restore one webserver (although it was similiar to a slightly compressed support.microsoft.com). Is there some secret to this sh*t that you are keeping from me regarding quick draw administration or is this something you pawn off to others? I will compensate for information. (Depending on validity.) I'm not jealous or bitter, btw...not. Jennifer Baker Fluke Corporation http://www.fluke.com http://www.flukenetworks.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: today's admin backwards virus
We use Sybari Antigen and love it -Tony -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus So, does anyone have a strong opinion on what filtering software to use? We haven't done anything along those lines before (hell, we didn't have antivirus until last year). I just want to use it for blocking attachments; we don't care about abilities relating to disclaimers or scanning for certain language/words. Any opinions would help. Thanks! Matt -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus Jennifer, Most everyone has already hit on the obvious, most of us use the auto-update feature from the A/V product of our choosing. Then we go the extra step and use some sort of filtering, be it at the fire wall or just simple attachment blocking in our e-mail server A/V product. Here I block .exe;.vbs;.eml;.shs;.lnk attachments from even getting through the e-mail server. Take what has happened to your site up the ladder as a reason to put all this stuff in place! You might get some resistance, and even some complaints, however every time one of these things happens the efforts you have made will be seen and will be appreciated. TrueSecure www.trusecure.com has some good white papers on what types of attachments you should be, or at least thinking about blocking. Oh, the other thing we did was, well we threw IIS right out the window!! Good Luck Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: today's admin backwards virus I was just noticing that most of the gurus of the list had plenty of time to respond to the list regarding various questions. Am I missing something? I have been updating virus software, scanning mailboxes, patching iis/owa servers etc. all night. We were hit externally, but we only had to restore one webserver (although it was similiar to a slightly compressed support.microsoft.com). Is there some secret to this sh*t that you are keeping from me regarding quick draw administration or is this something you pawn off to others? I will compensate for information. (Depending on validity.) I'm not jealous or bitter, btw...not. Jennifer Baker Fluke Corporation http://www.fluke.com http://www.flukenetworks.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: today's admin backwards virus
One nice thing about Antigen is it Scans incoming Email in memory and quarantines virus loaded email before it is ever written to the Drive. -TOny -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus That is a side benefit, for sure. And that is exactly the sort of information I was looking for. My intent here really is to gather as much information as possible from people already using various products. We could have really used that sort of information before we purchased Arcserve two years ago. At the time we were using very old backup tape drives that were no longer working with NTBackup, but worked fine with Arcserve. However, when we moved to Exchange instead of Netscape Messaging Server, we discovered that Arcserve wasn't too friendly (plus we now had a new tape drive that would operate with NTBackup). I'm trying to pull this organization out of the technological stone ages and into the present, but I also have a lot to learn along the way. So, again, any help on what the benefits of one filtering system over another, in your expertise as Exchange admins, would be most helpful. Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus The nice thing about MAILsweeper for SMTP (and I'm assuming others - I haven't used them) is that you can quarantine messages, not just block them. We had MAILsweeper quarantine all suspicious incoming content and send a notification to the recipient that they had a message in quarantine. Our policy was that any user could request a message be released to them, at which point we (the admins) would review the message on a threat basis only and release at our discretion. A nice side benefit of this policy was that even though we were not policing the content of our incoming mail (impossible with 20,000+ recipients) the users were under the impression that we may have been. So they were telling their buddies to stop sending them porn, executables, etc for fear that they were being watched. Eric On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:07:05 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, there's a fundamental problem we have here; we're a public library, and freedom to write and receive email here is not to be impinged in any way. Even in blocking certain attachment types, I'm kind of stepping over the line. So, in terms of filtering for any virus-related terminology, I can probably get away with using software that filters for language. But, I will be told by management to turn it off if we attempt to do anything that restricts anything else. That's why I mentioned that it was not of great concern. Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus Blocking for certain words is an important part of filtering for viruses in my opinion. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus So, does anyone have a strong opinion on what filtering software to use? We haven't done anything along those lines before (hell, we didn't have antivirus until last year). I just want to use it for blocking attachments; we don't care about abilities relating to disclaimers or scanning for certain language/words. Any opinions would help. Thanks! Matt -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus Jennifer, Most everyone has already hit on the obvious, most of us use the auto-update feature from the A/V product of our choosing. Then we go the extra step and use some sort of filtering, be it at the fire wall or just simple attachment blocking in our e-mail server A/V product. Here I block .exe;.vbs;.eml;.shs;.lnk attachments from even getting through the e-mail server. Take what has happened to your site up the ladder as a reason to put all this stuff in place! You might get some resistance, and even some complaints, however every time one of these things happens the efforts you have made will be seen and will be appreciated. TrueSecure www.trusecure.com has some good white papers on what types of attachments you should be, or at least thinking about blocking. Oh, the other thing we did was, well we threw IIS right out the
RE: AD/GC Clarification
I agree, 3 should be the minimum. I was wondering Ed, are you still watching me. |:P -Tony -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AD/GC Clarification Given Microsoft's advice that your Infrastructure Master not be a GC, you should proabably have a minimum of three DCs so you can have two GCs, no? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AD/GC Clarification Thanks, I think that was what I was looking for. I wasn't certain whether Exchange could ONLY query GCs or if they could get info from DCs as well. In any case, I'm thinking that there should be 2 GCs even in a small single-domain environment, just for redundancy's sake. Otherwise the GC represents a single point of failure. Eric On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:34:25 -0700, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tony is saying this because GCs contain information about objects in other domains. With only one domain, all DCs contain essentially the same information as they would as GCs. But they do need to be marked as GCs for E2K to use them because E2K will query DNS for a GC to compile the GAL. So you need to worry about network topology. If you are crossing a WAN you may want to mark the DC on the far side of the WAN as a GC, but if they are all in a LAN environment, one might suit your needs just fine. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AD/GC Clarification Do Win2k AD controllers need to be GCs for Exchange to use them in a single domain environment? Tony Redmond's book says that all DCs in a single domain environment are effectively GCs - but do they need to be made GCs on the NTDS page for Exchange to use them? Thanks - I'm still getting up to speed with Ex2k. Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2000 on win98 over VPN.
Has anyone had any issues using the Microsoft vpn dialer in Win98 to connect to your corporate vpn system, and then launch outlook 2000 client to connect to the exchange server. Seem to be having problems with win98 clients, because all our win2k clients can remotely do this with no problems at all. We are also having problems with remote win98 clients connecting to server shares over VPN, they keep getting a login box with only the password field available, and it has //IPC$ for the login name. Thanks for any response. -Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Urgent!
hmmm, site comes up for me.. Just says we aregetting a lot of hits right now. -Original Message- From: Berquam, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! NATO.COM has a blank page that says helllo hello -Original Message- From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent! God Bless America! Has anyone heard any reports of any related cyber attacks that we should be watching out for? -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! Importance: High Seems that one of the towers collapsed ... man this is sickening :( Martin - Original Message - From: Martin Tuip [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: Re: Urgent! Something got hit in DC apperantly a Army Helicopter was 'involved' - Original Message - From: Robert Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:46 PM Subject: RE: Urgent! Is it also confirmed that the Pentagon has been hit with something as well? Rob -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Urgent! I saw the second one flying into the building live on TV. Apperantly a hijacked 767 passenger jet from Boston. Most of the newssites are hammered with traffic now; www.ananova.com www.msnbc.com www.cnn.com Martin - Original Message - From: Woodrick, Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: Urgent! Folks, If you haven't heard, two aircraft have crashed into the World Trade Center towers. This is not a joke. Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail
Norton ANtivirus Corporate Edition Prevents the users from disabling it, they can't even turn off the service. If they to change my forced settings or disabling the antivirus service they are prompted for an administrative password. MUHAHAHHAHAHANAV has worked flawlessly from day one and I have never had to hardly touch it. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail How do you enforce scanning the desktops (I assume you mean something is loading like CA InoculateIt)? What's to keep Joe User from disabling it? - Original Message - From: Monahon, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:14 PM Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail We scan incoming and outgoing and the IMCs. We scan the desktops, servers, and the mail store. We'll catch it one way or the other. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Well, pop mail doesn't come in anywhere except the client. The client sends using SMTP and does this via relaying. So you're saying you can scan mail that is being bounced off the external IMS interface? - Original Message - From: Monahon, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Okay, different management style here. We are scanning all our pop mail coming into the organization for viruses and spam content so it's not really a concern. We prefer to foster a healthy working relationship with our customers. We are winning our POP battle through attrition and the method I described below. IT is also gaining the respect of our users, something that was missing before the new regime was installed and changed the process. It depends what important to you, and maybe how big ones ego is. Cheers. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail I disagree. When your users are using external POP3 mail that's not under your control, it voids all of your virus/content filtering/etc. etc. protection you've employed. He's exactly right on what he wants to do. S. -Original Message- From: Monahon, Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail You may be going about it wrong. Instead of forcing users off POP and pissing off the user base, aggressively promote the advantages of Exchange combined with the Outlook for scheduling, calendaring, list services, OWA, backups etc. As the company and managers begin to realize the benefits of these value added solutions, you may begin to see some changes. When the POP users dwindle down to a cranky few, then you pull out the baseball bat. Revolutions usually begin quietly. Greg -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail And if you block POP3 in your firewall, it means your employees or administration can't pick up their email at home. Bob -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail But that is only about 25% of the battle, you also need to stop port 80 email as well, and there are only about a million of those. Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Firewall? Block the POP3 port. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Is there a way to prevent users from using (for example) AOL or any other 3rd party POP3 mail clients. We want to force our users to use only our exchange server for their e-mail. Can this be done?
RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail
Yes it does, I don't actually use the echange NAV just the desktop. I use Sybari Antigen for Exchange mail scanning of viruses. I agree with the features part but man do I love how automated the corp. edition grabs the new virus definitions and passes it around to all the workstations while alerting me to problems. -TOny -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail The only problem with the corporate edition is that it doesn't have as many feautures as the desktop edition. F'rinstance. It doesn't support the Word hook that lets it autoscan word docs before opening. This would have really helped me a couple of times. Also, it doesn't seem like the Exchange NAV has an MMC snap-in (or whatever those things are called) for the NAV system center. Beyond that, I love it. Works and saves me loads of worry and time. Jim -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Norton ANtivirus Corporate Edition Prevents the users from disabling it, they can't even turn off the service. If they to change my forced settings or disabling the antivirus service they are prompted for an administrative password. MUHAHAHHAHAHANAV has worked flawlessly from day one and I have never had to hardly touch it. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail How do you enforce scanning the desktops (I assume you mean something is loading like CA InoculateIt)? What's to keep Joe User from disabling it? - Original Message - From: Monahon, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:14 PM Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail We scan incoming and outgoing and the IMCs. We scan the desktops, servers, and the mail store. We'll catch it one way or the other. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Well, pop mail doesn't come in anywhere except the client. The client sends using SMTP and does this via relaying. So you're saying you can scan mail that is being bounced off the external IMS interface? - Original Message - From: Monahon, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Okay, different management style here. We are scanning all our pop mail coming into the organization for viruses and spam content so it's not really a concern. We prefer to foster a healthy working relationship with our customers. We are winning our POP battle through attrition and the method I described below. IT is also gaining the respect of our users, something that was missing before the new regime was installed and changed the process. It depends what important to you, and maybe how big ones ego is. Cheers. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail I disagree. When your users are using external POP3 mail that's not under your control, it voids all of your virus/content filtering/etc. etc. protection you've employed. He's exactly right on what he wants to do. S. -Original Message- From: Monahon, Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail You may be going about it wrong. Instead of forcing users off POP and pissing off the user base, aggressively promote the advantages of Exchange combined with the Outlook for scheduling, calendaring, list services, OWA, backups etc. As the company and managers begin to realize the benefits of these value added solutions, you may begin to see some changes. When the POP users dwindle down to a cranky few, then you pull out the baseball bat. Revolutions usually begin quietly. Greg -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail And if you block POP3 in your firewall, it means your employees or administration can't pick up
RE: Win2k Server Password recovery!
Thanks for all the input, I went ahead and called PSS and they had me reinstall windows 2k to a differently named winnt directory so I could recover the data, and rebuild. They still didn't have much information for me as to why the migration caused this behavior, I am just glad it is an isolated incident, since the following 20 machines have had no problems migrating at all. Thanks again, TOny -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k Server Password recovery! I hope you've already called PSS, but you want forceful? http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/ I think I'd have security escort that utility out of the building, if it were headed toward a production server. I'd pay PSS. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:48 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Win2k Server Password recovery! Subject: Win2k Server Password recovery! I have a win2k SP2 that I migrated from an NT4 domain to an AD domain today, now when I try and logon onto either domain I get an error stating that the computer accoutn in the primary domain is either corrupt or the password is incorrect. When I first logon to the AD domain and I have to change my password it says I do not have permission to change the password. 10 other machines have been successfully migrated, but his one server is being a pain. Now I cannpt even logon to the machine AT ALL. Somehow even the local admins password has been corrupted. Any help is appreciated ALso any pointers on forcefully resetting the admin password on the box. Anthony L. Sollars Sightward (Formerly Applied Inference) System/Network Administrator (425) 688-9921 - Voice (425) 241-6562 - Cell (425) 467-1006 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sightward.com When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. - Corinthians I 13:11 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
What VPN protocol and client are you usingPPTP or IPSEC...cisco or windows client software. If you are using IPSEC, make sure you set the MTU setting to 1400. -Tony -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook these clients just hang forever. When looking at the profile we see that the server name has been automatically switched as usual. However, if we rebuild the profile and try to resolve the mailbox name, that too hangs forever. If we create a mailbox on the Exchange 5.5 server and try to resolve that it all works fine. Any attempt to contact the Exchange 2000 server instead results in the process hanging - only on 98 and ME. Win2K works fine. We can map shares, ping, and do all kinds of other network things from these Windows-98 clients via VPN to the Exchange 2000 server. The connectivity seems to be there. We have tested with RPCPing and so on as well and that all works. I can't figure out what VPN would have to do with it and why it works fine for Windows 2000 clients. All work fine on the LAN. We have only seen this problem with VPN and only to the Exchange 2000 server - not the Exchange 5.5 Server. We also tried installing the Active Directory client add-on for Windows 9x (DSCLIENT) and that didn't fix it either. Any thoughts? Thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
Make sure you have WINS available for resolution and static mappings for your mail servers. I no MS says win2k does not need wins but as many have found out, that turining off wins causes many problems. I have directly discovered problems with Outlook over VPN when not using the wins service. -TOny -Original Message- From: McKnight, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem We had a similar deal on several 9x machines after moving to a new (5.5 in our case) server and it was simply that the new exchange server didn't have a DNS entry.. we added this and it immediately fixed it for all of these machines so you might try looking into a DNS, hosts file solution.. but again this was on and NT4/exch 5.5 setup so I may be way off.. Charles Charles F. McKnight PC/Lan Specialist Mercy Health System - NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook these clients just hang forever. When looking at the profile we see that the server name has been automatically switched as usual. However, if we rebuild the profile and try to resolve the mailbox name, that too hangs forever. If we create a mailbox on the Exchange 5.5 server and try to resolve that it all works fine. Any attempt to contact the Exchange 2000 server instead results in the process hanging - only on 98 and ME. Win2K works fine. We can map shares, ping, and do all kinds of other network things from these Windows-98 clients via VPN to the Exchange 2000 server. The connectivity seems to be there. We have tested with RPCPing and so on as well and that all works. I can't figure out what VPN would have to do with it and why it works fine for Windows 2000 clients. All work fine on the LAN. We have only seen this problem with VPN and only to the Exchange 2000 server - not the Exchange 5.5 Server. We also tried installing the Active Directory client add-on for Windows 9x (DSCLIENT) and that didn't fix it either. Any thoughts? Thanks, Michael _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem
Thanks for the response Ben, and I see your point to be very valid. I guess their is no real reason to have the static mappings, only that I did it as a precautionary measure. Since this action could pose to be my downfall, maybe I will just let windows do it's own thing with wins. Thanks again, TOny -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Static mappings in WINS should really only be used for non-Windows based servers (i.e. Unix-based) that for some reason, you need to resolve to their netbios names. I'm not arguing that WINS is bad or that you shouldn't use it, but for goodness sakes, don't put static WINS mappings in for Windows-based computers. You're just asking for problems. What are you going to do if you ever have to change the IP of some of the servers that have static mappings? Guess what, you just introduced some corruption into your WINS database. BELIEVE me, we have been dealing with crap like this for a while as a result of past mistakes. I haven't been deeply involved, but those that are doing the cleanup have said that it is a nightmare. Spare yourself while you still can. I am sure there have got to be some Q articles that detail why you don't use static mappings (except on Unix-based systems), but I don't have the time right now to look them up. Maybe I will another day. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Actually just restarting wins allowed my VPN Outlook user to connect to exchange where before when wins was stopped, they could not. Though my locl Outlook users were not effected at all, so it must have something to do with the VPN equation. Oh well it works great now, so I will leave wins in place. Also, why are static WINS mappings so evil if their mapped for a statically IP'd server. Just wondering, because I have never heard this, but I owuld like to know why? -TOny -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Ugh, are you serious? Static mappings in WINS are EVIL. Besides, DNS is where most of these problems are. Outlook uses DNS to resolve the Exchange server, not WINS. If Outlook is slugglish, putting static entries in WINS won't do anything to resolve the problem. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Make sure you have WINS available for resolution and static mappings for your mail servers. I no MS says win2k does not need wins but as many have found out, that turining off wins causes many problems. I have directly discovered problems with Outlook over VPN when not using the wins service. -TOny -Original Message- From: McKnight, Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem We had a similar deal on several 9x machines after moving to a new (5.5 in our case) server and it was simply that the new exchange server didn't have a DNS entry.. we added this and it immediately fixed it for all of these machines so you might try looking into a DNS, hosts file solution.. but again this was on and NT4/exch 5.5 setup so I may be way off.. Charles Charles F. McKnight PC/Lan Specialist Mercy Health System - NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Michael Marchiondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K Windows-98 VPN Connection Problem Hello Folks, This one has me stumped and my next stop is PSS but I thought I would try here first. We have been running Exchange 5.5 in our Windows 2000 domain for quite some time with the ADC. When E2K SP1 was released we started planning our migration. We installed the E2K server in the same site and moved all the mailboxes to the new server. We setup our cc:Mail connector and SMTP connector on the new server and disabled the old ones. Despite a few bumps it is working fairly well. We have a mixture of Windows 2000, NT 4.0, 98, and one ME client all using Outlook 2000. Everybody connects fine on the LAN. Some clients connect to the LAN via a VPN connection. All Windows 2000 clients connecting this way work fine. The Windows 98 and one ME client do not. When starting Outlook
RE: Server Side Notification Script
Just setup a server-side rule. Set up the rule to state: After the message has arrived sent only to me have the server reply with the following custom message. This should do what you want, and you don't need to have a client open for it to work. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server Side Notification Script Why not just add the mailbox receiving the new messages to the profile of the user needing to be notified (assuming Outlook is the client)? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Matthew Kerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server Side Notification Script Does anyone have a script written or know how to get Exchange Server to send a message through SMTP that a particular mailbox has received mail? I do not need the mail forwarded I just need to be notified. Matthew Kerner Network Administrator, Relocation Tax Services ph(303)894-3080 fx(303)894-3813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server Side Notification Script
Just setup and similiar rule, but instead of replying with a custom message redirect the email to specified folder, and make sure you give the mailbox owner permissions to that folder, plus anyone else who needs access. -Tony -Original Message- From: Matthew Kerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server Side Notification Script OK, sounds good but to set up a rule the folder has to be public so how can I automatically forward the mail from the inbox to the new public folder? Matthew Kerner Network Administrator, Relocation Tax Services ph(303)894-3080 fx(303)894-3813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Server Side Notification Script Just setup a server-side rule. Set up the rule to state: After the message has arrived sent only to me have the server reply with the following custom message. This should do what you want, and you don't need to have a client open for it to work. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server Side Notification Script Why not just add the mailbox receiving the new messages to the profile of the user needing to be notified (assuming Outlook is the client)? Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Matthew Kerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server Side Notification Script Does anyone have a script written or know how to get Exchange Server to send a message through SMTP that a particular mailbox has received mail? I do not need the mail forwarded I just need to be notified. Matthew Kerner Network Administrator, Relocation Tax Services ph(303)894-3080 fx(303)894-3813 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clients having trouble connecting to exchange server in AD doma i n.
I have a testlab setup where I have DDNS running in a win2000 AD domain with 2 test clients and test Domain contoller and exchange server. Also, in DNS the reverse entries are being made automatically just fine by dhcp users, but I don't seem to see the forward entries for my dhcp/ddns hosts? The dns is AD integrated of course. I think this is what is causing clients from not seeing the Exchange server. I can ping the hostname of the dhcp users, so it seems like the ddns forward entries are made, but I cannpt see them in the dsn database. Why is DDNS only making the reverse host entires and not the forward entries in the DNS database? Any help is appreciated. Anthony L. Sollars Sightward (Formerly Applied Inference) System/Network Administrator (425) 688-9921 - Voice (425) 241-6562 - Cell (425) 467-1006 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sightward.com When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. - Corinthians I 13:11 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inventory Listing Software
http://www.microforge.net/Products/Products_NIMOverview.htm I use this program, and it works pretty good. -Tony -Original Message- From: ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Inventory Listing Software Hey All I am looking for a cheap inventory listing software or a Access 2000 Database to do this . The company that I work for has been bought out and I need to put together a inventory list of hardware and software. We don't want to spend to much to do this since we are being sold. So any help is much appreciated. Thanks in Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clients having trouble connecting to exchange server in AD do ma i n.
Yup, I set the zone to allow DDNS updates. -Tony -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clients having trouble connecting to exchange server in AD doma i n. Be sure that the zone is configured to allow dynamic updates. This may seem obvious, but I've bumped into this more than once because this setting is not the default. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony L. Sollars Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clients having trouble connecting to exchange server in AD doma i n. I have a testlab setup where I have DDNS running in a win2000 AD domain with 2 test clients and test Domain contoller and exchange server. Also, in DNS the reverse entries are being made automatically just fine by dhcp users, but I don't seem to see the forward entries for my dhcp/ddns hosts? The dns is AD integrated of course. I think this is what is causing clients from not seeing the Exchange server. I can ping the hostname of the dhcp users, so it seems like the ddns forward entries are made, but I cannpt see them in the dsn database. Why is DDNS only making the reverse host entires and not the forward entries in the DNS database? Any help is appreciated. Anthony L. Sollars Sightward (Formerly Applied Inference) System/Network Administrator (425) 688-9921 - Voice (425) 241-6562 - Cell (425) 467-1006 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sightward.com When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. - Corinthians I 13:11 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems...
I would guess that you are having some severe DNS resolution problems. -Tony -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Sorry, most of us here are guys...It is well known that we have a short attention span (sorry, cant/wont speak for the ladies) therefore we have a tendency to stop reading after a paragraph. Since there was no question in the first one, we probably all got sidetracked by a donut or something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... I sent this out yesterday morning. Anyone have any ideas on it? I haven't seen any responses yet... Thanks again. clint -Original Message- From: Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Exchange Discussion List: Hi all. I've been off the list for over a year now (like anyone remembers me ;-)) and I've recently converted the Netware network I've been managing to all Windows 2000/Active Directory... I used the Services for Netware migration to assist in the process. The domain conversion and install went very smoothly but the Exchange 2000 server we installed has been throwing fits from day 1. After spending a whole week of battling it I finally realized the stupidity of my stubbornness and decided it was time to see the experts... I'm sure someone here has run into this... Here's my configuration. Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 (NON-advanced) server with SP2. Compaq ML530 with latest network driver On a TCP/IP network with 5 other 2000 servers. (3 terminal server, 1 Websense, 1 PDC) The PDC has the GC, DHCP and DNS services active and working. The websense is a BDC No NT4.0 at all. VPN to remote network with 3 2000 servers there. All DC's one is a GC Approximately 2000 accounts. The obvious problems it has, is some user can connect with Outlook other can't. They receive a name cannot be resolved error when trying. POP3 and web access works for ever account. Not so obvious client observations are that the global address list doesn't always show up at the client. At the server it gets deeper. No names show up in any of the address list (global or otherwise) under recipients. If you do a properties/preview on the global address list it will show users. But they aren't there otherwise. The server randomly goes through periods of slamming the event log with errors (during which time its goes down and needs to be restarted) I assume this coincides with the RUS but haven't been able to confirm. I have selected for force the RUS and haven' been able to make the errors occur. These errors resemble this. Event ID 2075 Source MSExchangeDSAccess Process INETINFO.EXE (PID=1080), DsBind failed. Athensasd.k12.pa.us. hr=0x8007054b, deltaT=47 the operation will be retried. It also dumps a similar error for STORE.EXE and EMSMTA.EXE. there is also a MAD.EXE with an event of 2064 and message of all the remote DS servers in user are not responding We had original install errors with RPC errors and the like. I fixed these with the new ML530 NIC driver and changes to the DC's and other servers on the network. The server has been wiped and reloaded from scratch at least twice and we've checked and rechecked our work. Poured over support and technet for hours on end. Does anyone have any ideas of where to go from here? Seen this before? Thanks Clint Nichols Director of Information Technology Athens Area School District [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: test clients having trouble connecting exchange server in AD doma in.
H, it's weird because the forward lookups don't show up in the dns manager, but I can ping by hostname as if it were in DNS. Any ideas. -Tony -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test clients having trouble connecting exchange server in AD doma in. Answers Are Inline 1. Are all the clients Windows 2000? Yes, all clients are windows 2000. 2. What do you have specified in the DNS tab of the DHCP servers Properties box? Automatically update DHCP client info in DNS is enabled. Update DNS only if DHCP client requests is disabled ALways update DNS is enabled Discard forward lookups when lease expires is enabled. Enable updates for dns clients that do not suport dynamic update is disabled. 3. Is your exchange server in the same domain and pointing to the same primary DNS server? Yes, my exchange server is in the same AD domain as the DC's and the DNS server. Byron -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test clients having trouble connecting exchange server in AD doma in. Well I see the server icon of course, plus their are three sub trees: 1. Forwardlookup zones 2.Reverse lookup zones and 3. Cached lookups. Under Forward lookup zones, I have sightward.net, and underneath that are _msdcs, _sites, _tcp and _udp. If I click on the sightward.net zone, it shows me the list of hosts int he right hand pane that I manually entered for static addressed servers. Their are no entries their for dhcp users. Thanks Tom -Tony snip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: test clients having trouble connecting exchange server in AD doma in.
disregard this, a ping test by host name does not work. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test clients having trouble connecting exchange server in AD doma in. H, it's weird because the forward lookups don't show up in the dns manager, but I can ping by hostname as if it were in DNS. Any ideas. -Tony -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test clients having trouble connecting exchange server in AD doma in. Answers Are Inline 1. Are all the clients Windows 2000? Yes, all clients are windows 2000. 2. What do you have specified in the DNS tab of the DHCP servers Properties box? Automatically update DHCP client info in DNS is enabled. Update DNS only if DHCP client requests is disabled ALways update DNS is enabled Discard forward lookups when lease expires is enabled. Enable updates for dns clients that do not suport dynamic update is disabled. 3. Is your exchange server in the same domain and pointing to the same primary DNS server? Yes, my exchange server is in the same AD domain as the DC's and the DNS server. Byron -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: test clients having trouble connecting exchange server in AD doma in. Well I see the server icon of course, plus their are three sub trees: 1. Forwardlookup zones 2.Reverse lookup zones and 3. Cached lookups. Under Forward lookup zones, I have sightward.net, and underneath that are _msdcs, _sites, _tcp and _udp. If I click on the sightward.net zone, it shows me the list of hosts int he right hand pane that I manually entered for static addressed servers. Their are no entries their for dhcp users. Thanks Tom -Tony snip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC Awards 2001
Congrats MAn -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *sigh* I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is due with our 2nd baby the first week of October. Unless I wanted to be single again (I don't) it didn't seem like a good time to skip out for a week.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 What about Best Fish Tacos? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnest A. Glazener Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Awards 2001 The deadline is Monday at noon Seattle time. You should seriously consider nominating your product/solution(s) for at least one of these. They are global, and you don't have to exhibit at the MEC to win. Visit http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2001/awards.asp for more information and to enter. There are 10 categories: - Best Solution by a Partner - Best Solution by a Customer - Best Developer Tool - Best Infrastructure Product - Best Management Tool or Utility - Best Use of Mobile Technologies - Best Productivity Solution - Best Use of Workflow - Best Vertical-focused Solution - Best Use of XML Please see the Web site for more information. Earnie Glazener Microsoft _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS relay secure?
within IIS Smtp you can configure it to only accept requests from specific domains or Ip adresses. You can alos require authentication for smtp to realy. It is highly configurable on these matters. If you need your web server to send mail from your web site, you could configure smtp on each box, and set the restrictions to only accept connections from the localhost, this is what I have done. Hope this helps. You can find these configs in SMTP server properties, in the IIS services manger snap-in. -Tony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS relay secure? cool, thanks, Ed. I'll tell them that. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - I'll hold it and you light the fuse. - Famous Last Words - -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS relay secure? As I recall, it's pretty obvious. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS relay secure? *sigh* Is IIS relay secure? If not, how to make it so? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Flutists and harpists have bad attitudes from all the 'angels and cloud' music they've been forced to play. -Frank Zappa - -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS relay secure? Was there a question here? ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS relay secure? On the Spam-L, we were discussing how to make Exchange 5.5 relay-secure somebody said, What I haven't found out in any of the MS Technet notes was how to secure the IIS server's SMTP relay. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Yoda of Borg are we: Futile is resistance. Assimilate you, we will. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fish Taco's
Preach on ! I grew up is Texas, and visited Mexico many a time, and they put all sorts of different things in those tacos. Man I swear I had a taco in Tijuana, that unknowingly to me had rat meat in it, because man it tasted weird, but since the tequila was so yummy, I didn't mind much. -Tony -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fish Taco's Now hold on a minute, Nate. I'm from El Paso and spent much of my youth in Juarez, Mexico and beyond. A taco in Mexico is whatever you want it to be. If you live by the sea, you put in mariscos (seafood). If you live in a ranch area, you put in anything that's raised in that area, up to and including barbecured goat! This notion of chicken or beef only is an American thing. V. Ewart -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fish Taco's Real tacos don't have fish. Chicken or beef yes. Fish - NEVER! A 'real' taco contains cheese, lettuce, beef/chicken, diced tomatoes, hot sauce within a crunchy corn or soft flour taco shell. Anything else must be from California. ; )) N8 -- From: Anthony L. Sollars Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Fish Taco's Wow, great town in California. Isn't their a large mission their?? My relatives donated all the land to that mission many years ago, was just their 2 years ago for a reunion, and would have to agree with you on those fish tacos. -Tony -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fish Taco's For the best Fish Tacos (note there is no ' in the plural of taco), come to San Luis Obispo, California and head for Pete's Southside cafe. Truly the best to be had! V. Ewart Computer Operations Mgr. Hunt Associats -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fish Taco's I suppose that you don't think that the Emperor is wearing any clothes either? Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: OT: Fish Taco's Okay.. I know the topic of fish taco's has been hashed out to death. But having gotten the opportunity to visit California recently, I figured I would stop by Rubio's and order up some fish taco's to see what keeps this list as entertained as it is about fish tacos. I have to say that I was not too impressed by them. They were certainly edible, but I did not find them all that special. The fish probably tasted better out of the taco than in the taco.. slather it with some of the hot sauce and it was definatly better out of the taco. So why all the fuss about fish taco's? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com
Outage
Nice big Power Outage in downtown Bellevue, Wa. Any other Seattle goers see it?? -Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ???
rofl MY ASS OFF -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? I tell him I'd do it only if he/she buys me Packard Bell hardware to run it on. S./ -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Issue Number Four! Your boss orders you to buy Arkanserve. What do you do? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? In the words of the inimitable [1] John McLaughlin [2], WRONG! Outlook uses DNS regardless of whatever you learned in MCSE boot camp about name resolution order. [1] Not really, Dana Carvey does a good one. [2] of the McLaughlin Group [3] [3] on PBS Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fabrig, Amado Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? yes it would. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? How about if you have wins configured on the box, will it queery netbios to resolve the server before dns ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? If you #PRE tag the Lmhosts entrys then they will get read before DNS or HOSTS, since they'd already be loaded in the NetBios Cache Table. -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? 5.5 doesn't care how the client resolves the name. Only the client cares, and Outlook uses DNS (or HOSTS) first. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Rick Boza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? With 5.5 the client needs to resolve the NetBios name. Easy to check, run nbtstat -a Server_Name Note the a must be lower case in this command syntax. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Would using a HOSTS file be better(quicker)? I'M thinking LMHOSTS is the last on the list when searching for hosts. Yes..no? -Original Message- From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? WINS. If there are only 4 users... you could even deploy an LMHOSTS file (WINS is preferred) -Original Message- From: Guy Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 17 August 2001 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using exchange server without a WINS/DNS server ??? Guy Stewart III 305-213-7637 MyMyComputerGuy.Com Inc. http://www.mymycomputerguy.com I have a client with Exchange 5.5 sp2 on a NT server. There are four users, and they all have accounts with the exchange server via outlook 98, or outlook 2000. There are two people who have internet connect via a static I/P address (a static entry for DNS and a gateway/router). One of the two users have problems connecting to the exchange (this is a local exchange on the LAN) server. Should I set up a wins server and or a DNS server? The reason I am asking is that he can't resolve the exchange server's name to an I/P address. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
