Exchange 2003 - OMA

2003-09-08 Thread DOT
I'm attempting to configure Mobile Services under Global Settings to
test/configure Outlook Mobile Access.  Does anyone know where to find the
how-to configure info on this piece?   The Microsoft site seems to be a
little vague on the implementation and configuration portion of this.

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


2002 OWA to 2003 OWA

2003-08-19 Thread DOT
I've upgraded my 2002 front-end server to 2003.

In my IIS configuration, I'm seeing stops for Exchange and Exchweb pointing
to \\.\BackOfficeStorage, which no longer exists.

Since IFS is not enabled in Exchange 2003 and I really have no need to
reference the M:\drive, is there some place that I can find the default
virtual directory settings for OWA.

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003

2003-07-30 Thread DOT
We did an in-place upgrade of our Exchange 2000 server to Exchange 2003
everything came up fine.  Then we upgraded the OS to Windows 2003 and now we
can't get the Exchange 2003 server to connect to the domain.  Has anyone
experienced this behavior?  I'm stumped.


Dot Harris
William Blair  Company



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003

2003-07-30 Thread DOT
I'm getting Event ID 63.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003


A few event IDs or such might be a little easier for us to help you out.
Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003

What if you re-do the Exchange 2003 installation?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003

We did an in-place upgrade of our Exchange 2000 server to Exchange 2003
everything came up fine.  Then we upgraded the OS to Windows 2003 and
now we can't get the Exchange 2003 server to connect to the domain.  Has
anyone experienced this behavior?  I'm stumped.


Dot Harris
William Blair  Company



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003

2003-07-30 Thread DOT
To be more specific, when attempting to join the domain.  I'm getting the
error:

The following error occurred attempting to join the domain domain name.

Access denied.

-Original Message-
From: Harris, Dot 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003


I'm getting Event ID 63.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003


A few event IDs or such might be a little easier for us to help you out.
Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003

What if you re-do the Exchange 2003 installation?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: In-place Upgrade to Windows 2003

We did an in-place upgrade of our Exchange 2000 server to Exchange 2003
everything came up fine.  Then we upgraded the OS to Windows 2003 and
now we can't get the Exchange 2003 server to connect to the domain.  Has
anyone experienced this behavior?  I'm stumped.


Dot Harris
William Blair  Company



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Where are the Exchange permissions coming from?

2003-07-14 Thread DOT
It's not cut and dry, but try this link:

Working with Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server Store Permissions

www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?ReleaseID=43501




-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Where are the Exchange permissions coming from?


I was recently examing the Exchange 2000 environment at a new client. I
ran the Delegation Wizard at the Org level to see which accounts had
rights into Exchange. To my surprise, only a single ExchangeAdmin
account (not a group) had been granted Exchange Full Admins rights. No
other accounts were listed. Yet they have many users that have full
control over the Exchange environment. When I asked them about this,
they of course said that they didn't do anything, it was always like
that. 

Upon further investigation, it appears that anyone in the Domain Admins
group automatically becomes an Exchange Administrator. Since this is not
configured from the Exchange Delegation Wizard, it's obviously being
picked up somewhere else. Any idea's where I can check?

Jason


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server

2003-07-08 Thread DOT
Bad, bad, bad idea.  To paraphrase Clint Eastwood, do you feel lucky, well
do you.  There can be some serious repercussions with this one.  You have
10,000 users on an Exchange servers in multiple sites and now he's
suggesting that your mail server function as an application server, hosting
multiple apps.  What about performance, what about backups?  You will need
to run an Exchange backup and a standard file backup.  You might need two
versions of a virus software, one for your files and one for Exchange
specifically. Oh this is the domain controller.

Don't forget the application that needs to be rebooted once its installed
and knocks off 10,000 users or even an application that overwrites certain
dlls and Exchange no longer loads.  These apps gonna' share the same drive
with the priv and pub?

I could go on, but you recall Renfields laugh when he was on the brink of
madness, he, he, he he.

Sorry, I got carried way.

Dot
  



-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server


All,

Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out
Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300
users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also as Domain
Controllers, with the addition of DNS and DHCP. Everything works just fine,
but now the CTO wants to start doing an Office in a Box concept - where we
load tons of additional apps on this server. Sort of like Small Business
Server - but with additional licenses (more than 50), and not all the apps
are Microsoft. I thought we were being a bit risky having Exchange on the
same server as a DC, DNS, and DHCP. Does anyone have any advice on this? Bad
idea? Terrible idea?

Thanks 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Distribution List Question

2003-03-14 Thread DOT
I removed the smtp addresses of all distribution lists on our Exchange 5.5
server.

I've since added an Exchange 2000 server to the site and I'm using a
connection agreement with the 5.5 server and Active Directory.  My problem,
the smtp addresses of those distribution lists seems to have returned.  What
did I do wrong here?

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?

2003-01-24 Thread Harris, Dot
Information Store size -- 77 gigabytes.  HP Ultrium tape drive, Ultrabac
software -- backup time 75 gigabytes per hour.

Restore time 2 hours - tops.

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company



-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?


Exchange 5.5 SP4

I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the
Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are
using?  

Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and
NT backup.

Pete Pfefferkorn
Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator
University of Cincinnati
51 Goodman Street
Cincinnati, OH  45221
Phone - (513) 556-9076
Fax - (513) 556-2042


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MTA database error

2003-01-22 Thread Harris, Dot
I found the reason for my issues, one of the network admins changed the DNS
server that one of my Exchange servers was pointing to and didn't think it
would be a problem.  I changed the DNS entries back to the original public
DNS server, the MTA Errors 105 and the 9318 and 9322 errors immediately went
away.  

So much for need to know.

Dot

-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 6:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MTA database error


the only thing that was changed is to get a faster link (T1 to Full T3) to
both of the offices but nothing was changed on the firewalls.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: MTA database error


 And nothing has changed? Run any netdiag utilities?

 On 1/21/03 16:15, M2web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 yes there is. it communicates between two other exchange servers thru our
 Netscreen firewall VPN connection. However this error has only occured in
 the past three weeks and we have been communicating between the three
 servers for the past one year with no error.


 - Original Message -
 From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:08 PM
 Subject: Re: MTA database error


  There's a firewall between this server and other Exchange servers it
  communicates with?
 
  On 1/21/03 14:41, M2web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  It is interesting, I am having the same exact problem which started
about
 3
  weeks ago.
  The MTA databases do not get deleted after a backup, I get the error he
is

  getting. However if I stop and start the services the databases are then
  automatically deleted.. Mine is also behind a firewall, not multihomed
and

  have no MTA logs on
  - Original Message -
  From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:54 AM
  Subject: Re: MTA database error
 
 
   Is this server multi-homed or behind a firewall?
  
   On 1/21/03 9:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  
   Logging level is set to none.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:04 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: MTA database error
  
  
   What level is the logging set to for the MTA on that server?
  
   On 1/21/03 8:52, Harris, Dot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  
   I'm seeing this error on one of my Exchange 5.5 Servers - Exch 5.5
sp4.
  It
   started a week ago. I've run the mtacheck utility, checked for bad
  messages,
  
  
   didn't find any, and I still can't resolve this.
  
   Warning Event ID 105
   An MTA database server error was encountered. [MTA XFER-IN 16 26] (14)
  
   Anyone have any suggestions on this one?
  
   Thanks.
  
  
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  
  
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]






 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http

MTA database error

2003-01-21 Thread Harris, Dot
I'm seeing this error on one of my Exchange 5.5 Servers - Exch 5.5 sp4.  It
started a week ago. I've run the mtacheck utility, checked for bad messages,
didn't find any, and I still can't resolve this.

Warning Event ID 105
An MTA database server error was encountered. [MTA XFER-IN 16 26] (14) 

Anyone have any suggestions on this one?

Thanks.

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company
222 West Adams Street
Chicago, IL  60606




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MTA database error

2003-01-21 Thread DOT
Logging level is set to none.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MTA database error


What level is the logging set to for the MTA on that server?

On 1/21/03 8:52, Harris, Dot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I'm seeing this error on one of my Exchange 5.5 Servers - Exch 5.5 sp4.  It 
started a week ago. I've run the mtacheck utility, checked for bad messages,

didn't find any, and I still can't resolve this. 

Warning Event ID 105 
An MTA database server error was encountered. [MTA XFER-IN 16 26] (14) 

Anyone have any suggestions on this one? 

Thanks. 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MTA database error

2003-01-21 Thread DOT
Behind a firewall.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MTA database error


Is this server multi-homed or behind a firewall?

On 1/21/03 9:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Logging level is set to none. 

-Original Message- 
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:04 AM 
To: Exchange Discussions 
Subject: Re: MTA database error 


What level is the logging set to for the MTA on that server? 

On 1/21/03 8:52, Harris, Dot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 



I'm seeing this error on one of my Exchange 5.5 Servers - Exch 5.5 sp4.  It 
started a week ago. I've run the mtacheck utility, checked for bad messages,


didn't find any, and I still can't resolve this. 

Warning Event ID 105 
An MTA database server error was encountered. [MTA XFER-IN 16 26] (14) 

Anyone have any suggestions on this one? 

Thanks. 



_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_ 
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm 
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp 
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Exchange Migration Wizard Question

2003-01-09 Thread Harris, Dot
On some mailboxes when using the Exchange Migration Wizard from Exchange 5.5
to Exchange 2000, in my test lab, it takes on an average 5 minutes and on
others it seems to go on for hours.  In fact, one did take 6 hours.

One mailbox, which seemed to be relatively small in size - about 150 mgs,
took about 30 minutes to migrate

Anybody have any clues on what the norm on this migration process should be?
I'm trying to find a trend here, but I'm at a lost.

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Schema Update Questions

2002-11-22 Thread DOT
Yes it does.

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions


Does the account you're using have Exchange permissions?

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions


The computer I'm using has the Exchange Management tools installed.
What I am not seeing when creating a user, is a drop-down to select
Exchange Tasks. I see that the ADC has started but nothing else -- no
errors, nothing.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions


These tabs will only appear on a machine where the Exchange management
tools are installed.
  
 -Original Message-
 From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:19 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in our
 environment in the next week.  It will coexist with our 
 Exchange 5.5 server for a few months.
 I used the ADC from Exchange Sp3 CD.  We've run /forestprep 
 and /domainprep and have created a two-way connection 
 agreement, but I have not seen anything relating to Exchange 
 reflected in the user's profiles, not even the Exchange features tab.
 
 Is there a way to verify the schema updates, I'm thinking its
 a permission issue with the account used for the updates?
 
 If that is the case, is there any gotcha's in running
 /forestprep and /domainprep again?
 
 Dot Harris
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Schema Update Questions

2002-11-21 Thread Harris, Dot
We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in our environment in the
next week.  It will coexist with our Exchange 5.5 server for a few months.
I used the ADC from Exchange Sp3 CD.  We've run /forestprep and /domainprep
and have created a two-way connection agreement, but I have not seen
anything relating to Exchange reflected in the user's profiles, not even the
Exchange features tab.

Is there a way to verify the schema updates, I'm thinking its a permission
issue with the account used for the updates?

If that is the case, is there any gotcha's in running /forestprep and
/domainprep again?

Dot Harris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Schema Update Questions

2002-11-21 Thread DOT
The computer I'm using has the Exchange Management tools installed.  What I
am not seeing when creating a user, is a drop-down to select Exchange Tasks.
I see that the ADC has started but nothing else -- no errors, nothing.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions


These tabs will only appear on a machine where the Exchange management tools
are installed.
  
 -Original Message-
 From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:19 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 
 We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in our 
 environment in the next week.  It will coexist with our 
 Exchange 5.5 server for a few months.
 I used the ADC from Exchange Sp3 CD.  We've run /forestprep 
 and /domainprep and have created a two-way connection 
 agreement, but I have not seen anything relating to Exchange 
 reflected in the user's profiles, not even the Exchange features tab.
 
 Is there a way to verify the schema updates, I'm thinking its 
 a permission issue with the account used for the updates?
 
 If that is the case, is there any gotcha's in running 
 /forestprep and /domainprep again?
 
 Dot Harris
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Who's there?

2002-10-03 Thread Harris, Dot

I've never seen this error before, but three times this week I've seen this
error on one of my smtp servers.  The error reported by Microsoft Operations
Manager:

Severity:  Error
Status:  New
Source:  MSExchangeIMC
Name:  Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed
with error: %4
Description:  Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
password.

Has anyone seen this before?  Looks to me as though someone's trying to
spam.  Any thoughts on this.


Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



IMC Error - Again

2002-10-03 Thread DOT

I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.

Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get into our smtp
server?  This is no evenid listed for this one.


Severity:  Error
Status:  New
Source:  MSExchangeIMC
Name:  Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed
with error: %4
Description:  Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
password.
 
Domain:  BLAIRNET
Agent:  EXCHSMTP1
Time:  10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:  
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MOMSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)


Thanks,

Dot Harris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Error - Again

2002-10-03 Thread DOT

I've seen two, there may have been three, of these.  Not ongoing.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again


Someone tried to send e-mail using authenticated relay and the
authentication failed. Are you seeing a slew of these?

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: IMC Error - Again
 
 
 I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.
 
 Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get 
 into our smtp server?  This is no evenid listed for this one.
 
 
 Severity:  Error
 Status:  New
 Source:  MSExchangeIMC
 Name:  Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() 
 call failed with error: %4
 Description:  Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 
 128.134.25.180 failed:
 HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown 
 user name or bad password.
  
 Domain:  BLAIRNET
 Agent:  EXCHSMTP1
 Time:  10/03/2002 01:53:45
 Owner:  
 (view with 
 http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MO
MSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)


Thanks,

Dot Harris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Error - Again

2002-10-03 Thread Harris, Dot

Thanks, a place to start.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again


Probably someone is trying to hack. Have you tried to investigate who this
IP address could be? I  just checked it and it seems to belong to some
Korean comrades. Not to say that they are all bad guys but recently there
has been a lot of spam coming from them. Maybe you should put an explicit
deny connection for this address.


whois whois.arin.net 128.134.25.180:


OrgName:Korea Telecom 
OrgID:  KOREAT

NetRange:   128.134.0.0 - 128.134.255.255 
CIDR:   128.134.0.0/16 
NetName:SDN
NetHandle:  NET-128-134-0-0-1
Parent: NET-128-0-0-0-0
NetType:Direct Assignment
NameServer: NS.KORNET.NET
NameServer: NS.KAIST.AC.KR
Comment:
RegDate:1986-06-30
Updated:1996-05-15

TechHandle: YL71-ARIN
TechName:   Lee, Young-il 
TechPhone:  82-2-766-5900
TechEmail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Error - Again


I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an answer for it.

Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get into our smtp
server?  This is no evenid listed for this one.


Severity:  Error
Status:  New
Source:  MSExchangeIMC
Name:  Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3() call failed
with error: %4
Description:  Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 128.134.25.180 failed:
HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad
password.
 
Domain:  BLAIRNET
Agent:  EXCHSMTP1
Time:  10/03/2002 01:53:45
Owner:  
(view with
http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MOMSRVtarget={4
35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)


Thanks,

Dot Harris

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IMC Error - Again

2002-10-03 Thread DOT

I'll do that.  Thanks for your help.

Dot

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again


At this point, I'd probably just watch it and if I were the curious type I
might keep a list of Ips as well... And if it because a more frequent event,
I might follow Andrey's advice and block the specific IPs in question. 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:50 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
 
 
 I've seen two, there may have been three, of these.  Not ongoing.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:31 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
 
 
 Someone tried to send e-mail using authenticated relay and 
 the authentication failed. Are you seeing a slew of these?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: IMC Error - Again
  
  
  I'm reposting this again, being pushed here to find an 
 answer for it.
  
  Does this error seem to suggest that someone is trying to get
  into our smtp server?  This is no evenid listed for this one.
  
  
  Severity:  Error
  Status:  New
  Source:  MSExchangeIMC
  Name:  Authentication attempt (AUTH %1) from %2 failed: %3()
  call failed with error: %4
  Description:  Authentication attempt (AUTH ntlm) from 
  128.134.25.180 failed:
  HrAccept() call failed with error: Logon failure: unknown 
  user name or bad password.
   
  Domain:  BLAIRNET
  Agent:  EXCHSMTP1
  Time:  10/03/2002 01:53:45
  Owner:
  (view with 
  http://MOMSRV/OnePointOperations/PropertySheet.asp?database=MO
 MSRVtarget={4
 35762EC-BAA2-4DA8-867F-5122101127FD}t=alert)
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Dot Harris
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Site Connector

2002-09-06 Thread Harris, Dot

I'm replacing one of my Exchange 5.5 smtp servers in the next couple of
weeks.  This server is also running a Site Connector which is used by our
Tokyo branch.  We will be replacing it with an Windows 2000 box runninng
Exchange 5.5.  Is there any documentation or suggestions on the best way to
do this?

Thanks.

Dot Harris
William Blair  Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Multiple IMC Servers

2002-08-13 Thread DOT

We have an Exchange 5.5 site, and we've just added a second IMC server to
the site.  Does anyone know what the behavior is when one of the IMC servers
is down for maintenance.  For instance, will messages queued to the downed
server eventually be delivered or simply remain queued 'til the server is
brought back on-line.

Just curious.  The reason for the second IMC server is to balance the load
of the SMTP traffic that we receive.

Dot Harris
William Blair  Company




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



NTDSNoMatch

2002-07-24 Thread DOT

I can't find this utility.  I've found articles on how to install it and
what it does.  It reports the number of Exchange 5.5 mailboxes mapped to the
same Primary Windows NT account.  Does any one know where I can download
this from?

Thanks.

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Storage Limits Warning

2002-07-17 Thread DOT

I have a user that received more than 30 storage limit warnings every 15
minutes for about 3 hours.  Is there a way to have the storage limit warning
fire once and not ongoing then stop their ability to send email or whatever
we determine appropriate until they've resolved the issue?

I'm hesistant to adjust the storage limits warning in the Information Store
Site Configuration,  since I've never actually seen anyone other than this
user hit their storage limits, and I don't want to compromise the way this
seems to work for other users.

We are currently using Exchange 5.5, sp4.  

Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

Dot

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Storage Limits Warning

2002-07-17 Thread DOT

Ours is set to kick off at 7 p.m. on Tuesday but what is throwing me off is
that the user got this error over and over from Friday evening to Monday
morning.  

Dot
Exchange Administrator

 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:35 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Storage Limits Warning
 
 As far as I know the Information Store Site Configuration is the only
 place
 to modify those settings.  How is yours currently setup?  What time(s) is
 it
 set to kick off?
 
 Nate Couch
 EDS Messaging
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:24 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Storage Limits Warning
 
 
 I have a user that received more than 30 storage limit warnings every 15
 minutes for about 3 hours.  Is there a way to have the storage limit
 warning
 fire once and not ongoing then stop their ability to send email or
 whatever
 we determine appropriate until they've resolved the issue?
 
 I'm hesistant to adjust the storage limits warning in the Information
 Store
 Site Configuration,  since I've never actually seen anyone other than this
 user hit their storage limits, and I don't want to compromise the way this
 seems to work for other users.
 
 We are currently using Exchange 5.5, sp4.  
 
 Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
 
 Dot
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VB - Retrieving contacts from Exchange Server

2002-07-03 Thread DOT

I'm interested, what was the mistake and your fix for this.

dot

 -Original Message-
 From: Sammy Rashid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 5:17 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: VB - Retrieving contacts from Exchange Server
 
 I am trying to use the code you sent and it seems to fail on the line :
 Set olGAL = olNS.AddressLists(Global Address List)
 
 Here is my code, please advise me on what I am doing wrong:
 Public objRecipients As MAPI.Recipients
 Public olGal As Object
 Public objSession As MAPI.Session
' MAPI session object
 Public objInfoStore As MAPI.InfoStore   ' Infostore
 object
 Public objInbox As MAPI.Folder  ' Folder
 object
 Public objFolder As MAPI.Folder ' Folder
 object
 Public objAddressLists As MAPI.AddressLists ' Address list
 collection
 Public objAddressList As MAPI.AddressList   ' Address list
 object
 Public objAddressEntries As MAPI.AddressEntries ' Address
 entry collection
 Public objAddressEntry As MAPI.AddressEntry ' Address
 entry object
 Public objContactEntry As MAPI.AddressEntry ' Contact
 address entry object ' Recipients collection
 Public objRecipient As MAPI.Recipient   ' Recipient
 object
 Public objMessages As MAPI.Messages ' Message
 collection
 Public objMessage As MAPI.Message   ' Message
 object
 Public objFields As MAPI.Fields ' Fields
 collection
 Public objField As MAPI.Field   ' Field object
 Public Const CdoPR_DISPLAY_NAME = H3001001F
 Public Const CdoPR_ENTRYID = HFFF0102
 ' Entry ID
 Public Const CdoPR_STORE_ENTRYID = HFFB0102
 ' Information store entry ID
 Public Const CdoPR_CONTAINER_CLASS = H3613001E
 ' Folder type
 
 ' Name MAPI property tags
 
 Public Const CdoPR_TITLE = H3A17001F
 ' Item.JobTitle
 Public Const CdoPR_COMPANY_NAME = H3A16001F
 ' Item.CompanyName
 Public Const CdoPR_DISPLAY_NAME_PREFIX = H3A45001E
 ' Item.Title
 Public Const CdoPR_SURNAME = H3A11001E
 ' Item.LastName
 Public Const CdoPR_MIDDLE_NAME = H3A44001F
 ' Item.MiddleName
 Public Const CdoPR_GIVEN_NAME = H3A06001F
 ' Item.FirstName
 Public Const CdoPR_GENERATION = H3A05001E
 ' Item.Suffix
 Public Const CdoPR_BUSINESS_HOME_PAGE = H3A51001F
 ' Item.BusinessHomePage
 Public Const CdoPR_PERSONAL_HOME_PAGE = H3A50001F
 ' Item.PersonalHomePage
 Public Const CdoPR_FTP_SITE = H3A4C001E
 ' Item.FTPSite
 Public Const CdoPR_INITIALS = H3A0A001E
 ' Item.Initials
 
 ' Non-documented name contact property tags
 Public Const CdoContact_WebPage =
 {04200600C046}0x802B  '
 Item.WebPage
 Public Const CdoContact_FileUnder =
 {04200600C046}0x8005'
 Item.FileAs
 Public Const CdoContact_CompanyAndFullName =
 {04200600C046}0x8018   '
 Item.CompanyAndFullName
 Public Const CdoContact_CompanyLastFirstNoSpace =
 {04200600C046}0x8032  '
 Item.CompanyLastFirstNoSpace
 Public Const CdoContact_CompanyLastFirstSpaceOnly =
 {04200600C046}0x8033'
 Item.CompanyLastFirstSpaceOnly
 Public Const CdoContact_FullNameAndCompany =
 {04200600C046}0x8019   '
 Item.FullNameAndCompany
 Public Const CdoContact_LastFirstAndSuffix =
 {04200600C046}0x8036   '
 Item.LastFirstAndSuffix
 Public Const CdoContact_LastFirstNoSpace =
 {04200600C046}0x8030 '
 Item.LastFirstNoSpace
 Public Const CdoContact_LastFirstNoSpaceCompany =
 {04200600C046}0x8034  '
 Item.LastFirstNoSpaceCompany
 Public Const CdoContact_LastFirstSpaceOnly =
 {04200600C046}0x8031   '
 Item.LastFirstSpaceOnly
 Public Const CdoContact_LastFirstSpaceOnlyCompany =
 {04200600C046}0x8035'
 Item.LastFirstSpaceOnlyCompany
 Public Const CdoContact_LastNameAndFirstName =
 {04200600C046}0x8017 '
 Item.LastNameandFirstName
 
 ' Non-documented e-mail contact property tags
 Public Const CdoContact_EmailOriginalDisplayName =
 {04200600C046}0x8084 '
 Item.EMail1DisplayName
 Public Const CdoContact_EmailEmailAddress =
 {04200600C046}0x8083'
 Item.EMail1Address
 Public Const CdoContact_EmailAddrType =
 {04200600C046}0x8082'
 Item.EMail1AddressType
 Public Const CdoContact_EmailOriginalEntryID =
 {04200600C046}0x8085 '
 Item.EMail1EntryID
 Public Const CdoContact_Email2OriginalDisplayName =
 {04200600C046}0x8094' Item.EMail2DisplayName
 Public Const

Message Journalling Question

2002-06-10 Thread DOT

When you enable message journalling does it journal inbound and outbound
mail as well as internal email as well or is that a separate hack on the
individual servers to get the internal email.

Dot

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cable Modems

2002-06-03 Thread DOT

With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech,
ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email
via these services.  Our mail server is not publicly accessible.  Does any
one have a good way of handling these requests?  Personally, I don't want to
enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever.  

Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Dot Harris
William Blair  Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cable Modems

2002-06-03 Thread DOT

We have two smtp servers that handle our mail routing.  

 -Original Message-
 From: Kevin Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:28 PM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Cable Modems
 
 How do you receive this email if you email server is not publicly
 accusable?
 
 --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
 http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:29 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Cable Modems
 
 
 With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by
 Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to
 their email via these services.  Our mail server is not publicly
 accessible.  Does any one have a good way of handling these requests?
 Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via
 Ameritech.net or whatever.  
 
 Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Dot Harris
 William Blair  Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cable Modems

2002-06-03 Thread DOT

Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be
the easiest to implement for us.

Dot

 -Original Message-
 From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Cable Modems
 
 VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office.
 
 John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
 Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
 (404) 239 - 2981
 
 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
 accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
 its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
 Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
 leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Cable Modems
 
 
 With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech,
 ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email
 via these services.  Our mail server is not publicly accessible.  Does any
 one have a good way of handling these requests?  Personally, I don't want
 to
 enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever.  
 
 Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Dot Harris
 William Blair  Company
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cable Modems

2002-06-03 Thread DOT

I wasn't mislead.  I know what it takes to put a vpn solution in place.
We've implemented a Cisco VPN solution in one of our London offices.  Makes
since to do the same here.

Dot

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:35 PM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Cable Modems
 
 Putting the rack mount brackets on
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Cable Modems
 
 
 It takes you that long???  Or are you including removing it from the box?
 :P
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Cable Modems
 
 
 I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in
 about
 5 minutes.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Cable Modems
 
 
 Dear Dot,
 
   I apologize.  I have misled you.  VPN is not easy.
   VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do.
 
 
 Rob Garrish
 Exchange Administrator
 Wawa Inc.
 610-558-8371
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Cable Modems
 
 
 Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be
 the easiest to implement for us.
 
 Dot
 
  -Original Message-
  From:   John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent:   Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject:RE: Cable Modems
  
  VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office.
  
  John Matteson; Exchange Manager
  Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
  (404) 239 - 2981
  
  Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has 
  been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely 
  temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort 
  to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in 
  my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Cable Modems
  
  
  With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by 
  Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access 
  to their email via these services.  Our mail server is not publicly 
  accessible.  Does any one have a good way of handling these requests?
  Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via 
  Ameritech.net or whatever.
  
  Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
  
  Dot Harris
  William Blair  Company
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: HOW DELETE A VIRUS MAIL FROM ALL THE MAIL BOXES - URGENT

2002-04-30 Thread DOT

You can do this with the exmerge utility.  This version on the Swynk web
site has a good sample of how to use the utility to remove the I love you
virus.  The documentation is good, takes a bit of reading.  It works.

Dot

-Original Message-
From: Venugopal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HOW DELETE A VIRUS MAIL FROM ALL THE MAIL BOXES - URGENT


Hai

Can any body pl. tell me how to delete a virus mail
(that is mail with virus attachments spreading it self)
from all the mail boxes of exchange server 5.5

we have exchange 5.5 on windows NT with around 400 mail boxes.

looking f/w to you all

regards
venu

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Busted

2002-04-30 Thread DOT

Ditto here.  I'm not interested in a fooddirectory.com.  Something new for
my spam filter.  Further, my email came back with the smtp version of my
address rather than the display name.  Someone leave a door open somewhere?

-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Busted
Importance: High


Whats happeniogn folks... has the moderator sold us out to this list...
now suddenly i get a mesage that I have been subscribed//. against
my knowledge to some fooddirectory.com site... 
Help
where is the moderator.. what happens when the cops get busted.. what
happens when a list server site that is sposed to cneect net and
sysadmins gets busted
the protectors are victimised now

-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 6:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


Hsent Friday.
I guess there is a long waiting list at MyFoodDirectory.com


-Original Message-
From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


Moderator:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


heh heh heh... now you could see the suspicious frown on my face.
there is one more government bloke on this list OK .. who is the
moderator of this list.. I want to see my attorney.. this is a breach of
UNIVERSAL SYS/NET ADMINS SOCIETY 
all that agreee with me.. please raise your hand and answer AYE... all
who dont do not bother... you will be ignored
KIdding folks... but its amazing to know that sometimes there are people
in the government THAT ACTUALLY WORK... I am surprised. 

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday


I am as ungovernmental as it gets - other than our financial aid dept.,
which I have nothing to do with other than provide email to them...
Jeremy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager

2002-04-15 Thread DOT

This is good to know.  Thank you.

Dot

 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Bartley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 6:26 PM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
 
 Depends on whether you have the Application Pack. Just MOM alone will do
 nothing for you with Ex5.5. It will monitor the Win2k OS out of the box.
 The agent is well behaved in 99% of the environments. 
 
 I haven't tried against Ex5.5, but it can have some issues with certain
 report scripts on E2k with App Pack. It does not bring the box down in
 one test arena, it just does not function consistently with the mailbox
 needed for Exchange reporting functions.
 
 I regularly have to restart the agent service to get a script to
 complete on one test arena. In another, it just won't work with the
 mailbox most of the time, no matter what I do. This is with the App
 Pack. It works fine on the OS, SQL, etc.
 
 In one of the test arenas, the WMI service regularly runs away with the
 CPU, due directly to the failure of the Exchange scripts. In the other
 one, it does not, it just fails to complete the scripts without
 restarting the agent.
 
 The biggest thing about MOM is to be sure you assign computer groups to
 the rule sets, or you'll get nothing, and be very careful what you
 decide to pull from the logs and scripts. The database will get very
 large, very quickly.
 
 Dan Bartley, MCSE+Internet
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:05
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
 
 I'm concerned with the agent and the overhead.
 
  -Original Message-
  From:   Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent:   Friday, April 12, 2002 9:46 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject:RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
  
  The agent or the application and databases and $tonofotheroverhead?
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:40 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
   
   
   Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server?  I have 
   Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a Windows 2000 server sp2.  I am 
   also running Trend Micro virus scan and content filter 3.52 
   and 3.11 respectively on it.  I have no issues with the 
   server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about 
   installing Microsoft Operations Manager on it.  My contention 
   is that I don't know enough about MOM to know the impact it 
   may have on Exchange.  Anyone have any thoughts on this?
   
   Thanks,
   
   Dot Harris
   William Blair  Company
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager

2002-04-12 Thread DOT

Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server?  I have Exchange 5.5 sp4
running on a Windows 2000 server sp2.  I am also running Trend Micro virus
scan and content filter 3.52 and 3.11 respectively on it.  I have no issues
with the server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about installing
Microsoft Operations Manager on it.  My contention is that I don't know
enough about MOM to know the impact it may have on Exchange.  Anyone have
any thoughts on this?

Thanks,

Dot Harris
William Blair  Company

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager

2002-04-12 Thread DOT

I'm concerned with the agent and the overhead.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:46 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
 
 The agent or the application and databases and $tonofotheroverhead?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:40 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
  
  
  Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server?  I have 
  Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a Windows 2000 server sp2.  I am 
  also running Trend Micro virus scan and content filter 3.52 
  and 3.11 respectively on it.  I have no issues with the 
  server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about 
  installing Microsoft Operations Manager on it.  My contention 
  is that I don't know enough about MOM to know the impact it 
  may have on Exchange.  Anyone have any thoughts on this?
  
  Thanks,
  
  Dot Harris
  William Blair  Company
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Journalling question

2002-03-18 Thread DOT

We are asked to set up message journalling to a custom recipient.  If the
custom recipient is unavailable does the email queue up on our Exchange
server until it can be delivered to the recipient.  I don't recall reading
anything that says journalling to a custom recipient will do that.  I know
that to a public folder, it will simply go to the folder but this is the
what the vendor is asking that we implement to use his product for capturing
all emails.

Anybody have any thoughts on this?

Dot



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!!

2002-03-05 Thread DOT

Why didn't my anti-spammer catch this?  :)


 -Original Message-
 From: Milton R Dogg [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:03 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!!
 
 
 My dog ate them.. Sorry. Who wants to follow him around with the baggy?
 
 Milton R Dogg
 Of The Dogg Foundation..
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson
 Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:01 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!!
 
 
 Alright, who hid Chris's medications?
 
 John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
 Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
 (404) 239 - 2981 
 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! 
 
 ***
 WARNING: Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and may not be
 authentic. If you have any doubts as to the contents of this e-mail,
 please telephone the Geac representative who appears to be the sender to
 confirm the validity of this communication .
 
 NOTE: This electronic transmission is intended only for those to whom it
 is addressed. It may contain information that is confidential and/or
 privileged by law.  Any claim to privilege is not waived or lost by
 reason of mistaken transmission of this information. If you are not the
 intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery to
 the intended recipient, you must not  review, distribute, copy or make
 any use of this transmission. In such case, please notify the sender by
 return e-mail and destroy all copies of same.
 ***
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:35 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: FREE HOT XXX EMAIL ADMINS!!! ADULTS ONLY!!!
  
  
  Hi! My name is Chris and I want to tell you all about what
  I've got under
  my pink sundress! I've done a brick-level backup of my 
  Private Information
  Store and run file-level antivirus scanning on my M: drive, 
  so you know I've
  been *very bad*!![1]
  
  [1] Anything else I can do for you Dean? [2]
  [2] Sorry for the spam folks. ;)
  --
  Chris Scharff
  The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com
  The Home Page for Mail Administrators.
  
  Software pick of the month: EasyDNS
  http://www.easydns.com
  Exchange FAQs:
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 _
 
 Do You Yahoo!?
 
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
 
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange Journalling

2002-02-28 Thread DOT

Sounds like a catastrophe waiting to happen.  My concern is that if the
custom recipient is unavailable where does this Archive folder exist that is
suppose to be created exist.  I've never heard of anyone journalling to a
customer recipient but to a specific mail box on an Exchange server.

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Journalling


That doesn't sound like a very good idea.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Journalling


We are using Exchange 5.5 with SP4.  We are planning on setting up
journalling to a custom recipient.  

If the custom recipient is available for a time, what happens to the
mail that is suppose to be journalled to that recipient?  Will it sit on
our server in a special directory or will it sit in a que somewhere?  I
just don't have a clue.


Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Exchange Journalling

2002-02-27 Thread DOT

We are using Exchange 5.5 with SP4.  We are planning on setting up
journalling to a custom recipient.  

If the custom recipient is available for a time, what happens to the mail
that is suppose to be journalled to that recipient?  Will it sit on our
server in a special directory or will it sit in a que somewhere?  I just
don't have a clue.


Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Microsoft Operations Manager

2002-02-20 Thread DOT

Has anyone worked with this tool, or know of any issues with it being used
with Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000.  I'm leary when someone suggests adding
an agent to my Exchange servers.


Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread DOT

Same here.

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company, L.L.C.

 -Original Message-
 From: Joyce, Louis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:15 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
 
 Neither did I and I got it.
 
 What's Exchange?
 
 Regards
 
 Mr Louis Joyce
 Network Support Analyst
 Exchange Administrator
 BT Ignite eSolutions
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 06 February 2002 10:01
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
 
 
 I never went to MEC01 and I got it
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 05 February 2002 22:44
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
 
 
 I did;  I just assumed it was marketing drivel from MEC01.  
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:32 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
  
  
  Invitation to Subscribe
  
  You're invited to subscribe to Exchange  Messaging News.
  This printed
  newsletter contains user case studies, product announcement, 
  and debate on
  issues pertinent to the Microsoft Exchange Administrator.  
  The forthcoming
  issue covers Disaster Recovery Planning  Procedures, Content
  Management - Why is this an issue?, Capacity Management  
  Archiving for
  Exchange as well as how one law firm manages intellectual property
  protection and monitoring within Exchange.
  
  I'd like to include you in the mailing for the next issue.
  
  It's free.  It's from C2C Systems.  You'll receive your copy
  in about two
  weeks.  All you need to do is provide me with the correct 
  information below:
  
  Your Name   
  Company Name
  Address Line 1
  Address Line 2  
  City
  State   
  Country 
  Postal Code 
  
  
  Pick One:
  
  [  ] Please send me the free newsletter.
  
  [  ] Please delete me from your database because I've got
  absolutely no
  interest in anything related to Microsoft Exchange Server 
  Administration.
  
  
  
  Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mr-new.bhi-erc.com with 
  qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.071276 secs); 05/02/2002 
  12:35:25
  Received: from c2c.adsl.spfdma.crocker.net (HELO c2c.com)
  (205.246.6.99)
by mr.bhi-erc.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2002 20:35:25 -
  From: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Exchange  Messaging News
  Sender: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Mime-Version: 1.0
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
  Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:19:18 -0500
  Reply-To: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
  
  ==
  
  c2c.adsl.spfdma.crocker.net resolves to 205.246.6.99
  
  Checking VISI.com Relay Stop List (RSL), Osirus Relays List (OSIRUS), 
  Dorkslayers ORBS-clone (DORKS), Dorkslayers Zero Tolerance List 
  (DORKZTL), Open Relay Database (ORDB), Arbitrary Blackhole List (ABL), 
  DevNull (DEVNULL), Five Ten (FIVETEN), ORBZ Inputs (ORBZIN), ORBZ
  Outputs (ORBZOUT),
  SpamCop Blacklist (SPAMCOP), Intersil (INTERSIL), Extreme 
  Blocking List
  (XBL), Compunet (COMPU), FloNetworks List (FLOWGO), Summit 
  Blocking List
  (SBL), Spam Prevention Early Warning System (SPEWS), Blitzed 
  Open Proxy
  Monitor (BOPM), Spamhaus Block List (SBL),
  
  205.246.6.99 listed in FIVETEN(127.0.0.7) XBL(127.0.0.4)
  
  Five Ten (FIVETEN):
  added 2002-02-01; spam support - dns servers at 65.169.9.21
  and 65.169.9.22
  supporting Empire Towers bzah.com 
  added 2002-01-05; spam support - dns server at 65.174.218.253 
  supporting
  http://www.poxteam2001.com 
  added 2002-01-07; spam support - dns server at 65.174.218.253 
  supporting
  http://compower.numberop.com 
  see also http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBX272 
  sprint finally removed that dns server on 2002-01-24, so this 
  listing was
  scheduled to be removed on 2002-02-02 
  added 2002-01-26; spam support - dns server at 65.173.116.25 
  supporting
  http://compower.numberop.com 
  sprint finally removed that dns server on 2002-01-28, so this 
  listing was
  scheduled to be removed on 2002-02-02 
  Extreme Blocking List (XBL):
  hosting webqwest 
  $1000 commission for $89 sale 
  marketing-2000.net 
  scelson 
  webpower
  
  
  
  Registrant:
  Crocker Communication (CROCKER-DOM)
 PO Box 710
 Greenfield, MA 01302
 US
  
 Domain Name: CROCKER.NET
  
 Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Billing Contact:
Crocker, Matthew  (MC331)  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crocker Communications
PO BOX 710
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
(413) 585-5164 (FAX) (413) 587-3352
  
 Record last updated on 20

RE: ScanMail Message: Action taken by policy - AOL top 10 Spam Li st

2002-02-06 Thread DOT



-Original Message-
From: Harris, Dot 
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 2:12 PM
To: SPAM CAPTURE
Subject: ScanMail Message: Action taken by policy - AOL top 10 Spam List



I think the 6.5 beta is now available for public download (Antigen)... it
does fcontent  file filtering.
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor


|+---
||  Boehm, Diane M.|
||  [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
||  Sent by: |
||  bounce-exchange-148870@ls|
||  .swynk.com   |
||   |
||   |
||  02/06/2002 03:02 PM  |
||  Please respond to|
||  Exchange Discussions   |
||   |
|+---
 
---
|
  |
|
  |  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
  |  cc:
|
  |  Subject: RE: Spam/Content filtering
|
 
---
|




www.messagelabs.com can do what you are looking for.

Diane

Diane Boehm
SC Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Spam/Content filtering


Hi there... I have noticed over the last few months that our spam has
increased to our users.

I was wondering what solutions people are using.

Also, I was wondering if there was one that blocked porn related content.

I'm also looking (not in the same product necessarily) for a HTTP
monitoring/filtering program.

Recommendations?

Thanks in advance!

  Dustin


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Strange behavior

2002-02-01 Thread DOT

I had a similar situation.  Two users had mailboxes that had over a million
items in it and the mailbox resources view of total k and # of items always
indicated 0.  You need to look at the mailboxes for the two users that show
0 items.  

Dot

 -Original Message-
 From: Arnold, Paul [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:07 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  Strange behavior
 
 Hi All.
 
 I have a strange problem. My exchange server is running pretty slow.
 We are running Exchange 5.5, sp4. The priv.mdb is 58 GB, and has slowly
 climbed to that size, but performance SUDDENLY went to a crawl this
 morning.
 There are no strange (or error) events in the event log, SMTP connections
 are still working in/out and CPU  memory usage are generally low.
 Traffic on the switch is low as well.
 
 (BTW: I know there is a 60GB threshold that we are dangerously close to,
 but
 a new 2000 clustered Exchange server will be in place within 6 weeks.)
 
 I don't expect a list thread of did you check.. (but I'd welcome it) but
 here is something strange:
 When I look at the list of mailboxes in Exch Admin on the server and sort
 by
 size, 4 mailboxes (each is quite large) get sorted above the empty
 mailboxes.
 So my sort looks like this:
 Mailbox   Total K Total items
 User1 2,227,430   21,129
 User2 2,535,232   18,538
 User3 3,344,777   32,785
 User4 3,444,626   57,871
 User5 0   0
 User6 0   0
 User7 1   1
 ...etc
 
 The bottom of the list looks normal enough...a few mailboxes some even
 near
 the same size.
 
 Has anyone experienced similar phenomena? I think I have noticed this in
 the
 past, and it may not be related to the performance, but it was bugging me.
 
 My suggestion was to clean up those mailboxes, export the content, then
 blow
 them away and recreate them.
 
 Thanks
 Paul
  
 LEGAL NOTICE - Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is
 confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s)
 only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not
 an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents or any action
 taken
 (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If
 you
 are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT - Exchange bitmap

2002-01-24 Thread DOT

Does anyone know where I might find a decent bitmap for an Exchange 2000
server.  My manager would like to use the lakside view from his condo.  I
prefer something more easily recognizable.

Thanks,

Dot

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)

2002-01-08 Thread DOT

Eventually it will dry up and blow away.

Dot

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:47 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
 
 You don't want to get in the way of s**t. You just let it keep going on
 down
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:39 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
 
 
 Sh!t rolling downhill from senior management:  ***
 Sh!t that I let to continue rolling down hill to team:  *
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
 
 
 Although his title makes my job a lot harder. I need to include graphs in
 all my communication with him.
 
 
 My Workload:  
 Doug's Workload:  *
 
 Can I take that * off your plate, Doug?[1]
 
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Senior Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 http://www.peregrine.com
 
 [1] Seriously, I'm just kidding. Give it to Jeffe[2]
 [2] he had free time yesterday
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:52 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
  
  
  Someone needs to get laid...
  
  Actually, I'm not a wanna be comedian, I'm officially one. My title 
  includes word manager and as many can testify that automajikally makes 
  me a comedian.
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:18 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
  
  
  You've got to be kidding...
  The excessive sarcasm is what ruins this list.
  This list contains far too many wannabee comedians and
  scornful nerds..
  -
  Previously from Thomas Nardo:
   
  
  If you can't hack the sarcasm, you might consider a different list 
  (maybe the carebears one). The sarcasm is what makes this list great 
  in my opinion. Everyone who is anyone in the Exchange world is here. 
  Did you run home with your ball when the other kids noticed you had 
  highwaters?
  ---
  
  
  
  
  
   
  .+--xm ,)r(?\?b=!6 0 ?zu1r,:.?
  m?[hy\z[,)r?Z Zvh'+-i?2G(
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Can't send to our Domain

2002-01-02 Thread DOT

I received this, quoted portion, via email from the postmaster at
caicheuvreuw.com.  They indicated that they are experiencing a time-out when
sending email to us and wanted to know if  we are having a problem.  They
can send to us via their yahoo account but not via their domain account.
Sounds like their problem.

Reporting-MTA: dns; pasmtp003.caicheuvreux.com Arrival-Date: Wed, 2 Jan
2002 12:04:13 +0100 (MET)
Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; exchsmtp2.wmblair.com Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002
16:22:14 +0100 (MET)
Will-Retry-Until: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:04:13 +0100 (MET)

Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair  Company
(312) 364-8227


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



HTML format

2001-11-15 Thread DOT

I have a user that when he receives an html document internally it shows up
as plain text, all the images and tags are lost.  When he receives one
externally he can see the html images and all is well.  I have no clue on
where to start to resolve this problem.  I found a reference to a Q article
but the article was not available.  Any thoughts?

Thanks.

Dot Harris
William Blair  Company

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?

2001-10-26 Thread DOT

Total IS size: 124GB
Largest mailbox 1GB
Users 1200
mailboxes  1300
No issues yet.

 --
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:34 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
 
 IS = 14g
 Users = approx 300
 Largest mailbox = 545,793k  (and, no, it's not mine)[1]
 
 Oh, and Jason?  Are you a size queen?  :-)
 
 
 [1] mine is 251,827k, after major archiving this week
 
 -Michèle
 Immigration site:  http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
 Our new 2001 Miata:  http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
 Tiggercam:  http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
 -
 If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kick boxing. 
 -
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
 
 
 I'm curious about the size of people's information store on exchange 5.5
 and
 the largest mailbox
 
 Also:
 Does anybody know if issues when the IS get's really large or if a single
 mailbox get's really large?
 
 Total IS size: 18GB
 Largest mailbox 2GB
 No issues yet.
 
 
 Thanks - Jason
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Off Topic Display IP from DOS using %???%

2001-10-04 Thread DOT

ipconfig or permutations thereof:  ipconfig /all

 -Original Message-
 From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 1:52 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  Off Topic Display IP from DOS using %???%
 
 Well,
 
   I know this can be done, but have forgotten!
 
 From dos type echo %username% and displays User name (vanhuia)
 
   What is it for Ip address?   echo %ip%?
 
 Thanks
   
 
 Adriaan Van Huissteden
 
 Network Administrator
 Connect Credit Union
 Phone: (03) 6233 0660
 
 
 
 DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
 legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to
 this
 message by anyone else is unauthorised.  If you are not the intended
 recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any
 action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may
 be
 unlawful.  Please contact the sender immediately if you have received this
 message in error. Thank you. 
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]