Re: Black List Recommendation
We use Spamcop as primary and NJABL as secondary. The most agile and accurate is Spamcop and you can expect to get rid of 90+% of Spam using that list. /Luis On 27 Jun 2003 at 12:03, Greg Marr wrote: Hi Am currently evaluating GFIs MailEssentials anti-spam product and would like to try the Black List functionality. Does anyone have a recommendation for a good black list??? Thanks in advance Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient Policy - Adding e-mail addresses
Under 5.5 it was easy: The routing Tab in the Internet mail connector allowed for specification of additional e-mail domains to be treated as inbound or re-routed into another domain name. And worked instantly after IMC restart. The Recipient policy is supposed to go into its place. I need our recipient to be adressable under both conexion.com and conexion.com.gt domains. I have added an SMTP type address in Recipient policy under a new policy as secondary address. The highest priority policy cannot be added to apparently because this is a test server running in the same site with a 5.5 until I can move the mailboxes. The policy simply won't generate the secondary addresses, after waiting for the recipient update service to kick in. It won't work on neither new addresses nor existing. I have filtered for specific addresses and I have left the filter blank, still nuttin'. Hints? Of course I have read the respective Kb articles. I have a hunch that the current non-deletable non-editable no-downgradable no-nuttin' site policy is overriding the next policy in the list. Thanks, /Luis ~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~# Ludwig (Luis) Deutsch - System Administrator at Conexion.com 4ta Calle Oriente # 14 | 03001 Antigua Guatemala | Guatemala C.A. Fax:+502 8320082 / Voice :+502 8323768 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient Policy - Adding e-mail addresses
Under 5.5 it was easy: The routing Tab in the Internet mail connector allowed for specification of additional e-mail domains to be treated as inbound or re-routed into another domain name. And worked instantly after IMC restart. The Recipient policy is supposed to go into its place. I need our recipient to be adressable under both conexion.com and conexion.com.gt domains. I have added an SMTP type address in Recipient policy under a new policy as secondary address. The highest priority policy cannot be added to apparently because this is a test server running in the same site with a 5.5 until I can move the mailboxes. The policy simply won't generate the secondary addresses, after waiting for the recipient update service to kick in. It won't work on neither new addresses nor existing. I have filtered for specific addresses and I have left the filter blank, still nothing. What am I missing here? Of course I have read the respective Kb articles. I have a hunch that the current non-deletable non-editable no-downgradable no-nuttin' site policy is overriding the next policy in the list. Thanks, /Luis ~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~# Ludwig (Luis) Deutsch - System Administrator at Conexion.com 4ta Calle Oriente # 14 | 03001 Antigua Guatemala | Guatemala C.A. Fax:+502 8320082 / Voice :+502 8323768 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Relay Restrictions
I have a problem that, hopefully, someone could help me out with. I have a app that provides customers with an online store that includes a form that they can fill out to order product. This form fires off 2 emails, one to our internal people to let them know a new order as been placed and the other email is a confirmation sent to the user to acknowledge receipt of their order. The app uses Miva script (similar to XML) to create the email and it runs on a server in our network. The problem is our mail server (Exchange 5.5 SP4) is not allowing the acknowledgment to be delivered because relaying is prohibited. So the original mail (internal) gets delivered fine but the mail that gets sent externally (to the users email) never gets sent. When I review the logs I see: RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Relaying is prohibited I have gone to the routing restrictions enabled the hosts and clients w/ these ip addresses and entered the IP address and mask of the system generating the emails as outlined in KB q196626 but the error is the same. I've reviewed q259531 on how to configure smtp relay for domains but I don't believe it is applicable to my case. Is there someway around this? If anyone has any suggestions I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay Restrictions
The IP address is the address of the internal server that is running the app: IP 192.206.170.200 SM 255.255.255.0 It IS a multihomed server I did restart the IMC service (several times by now...) Thanks -Original Message- From: Steve Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:28 PM To: Ludwig, Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Relay Restrictions Mark, What IP address and subnet mask are you specifying under Routing Restrictions? Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/10/02 01:59PM I have a problem that, hopefully, someone could help me out with. I have a app that provides customers with an online store that includes a form that they can fill out to order product. This form fires off 2 emails, one to our internal people to let them know a new order as been placed and the other email is a confirmation sent to the user to acknowledge receipt of their order. The app uses Miva script (similar to XML) to create the email and it runs on a server in our network. The problem is our mail server (Exchange 5.5 SP4) is not allowing the acknowledgment to be delivered because relaying is prohibited. So the original mail (internal) gets delivered fine but the mail that gets sent externally (to the users email) never gets sent. When I review the logs I see: RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Relaying is prohibited I have gone to the routing restrictions enabled the hosts and clients w/ these ip addresses and entered the IP address and mask of the system generating the emails as outlined in KB q196626 but the error is the same. I've reviewed q259531 on how to configure smtp relay for domains but I don't believe it is applicable to my case. Is there someway around this? If anyone has any suggestions I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay Restrictions
The Exch Server Webserver are separate The Webserver is a W2000 Server\IIS 5.0 IP settings are set to all unassigned Thanks for the suggestions I will look into trying the scenario's you've suggested. -Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay Restrictions I'm assuming (I do this alot) that the Exch 5.5 server is seperate from the webserver attempting to send mail. You probably have some type of SMTP component running on this box that relay's mail to the Exchange Server. If this component is SMTP service that comes with IIS 5.0 (or 4.0) then you probably have the IP settings set to All unassigned. Or, you could be sending all requests to your internal mail server? In the first scenario I would suggest this: Is there anyway to configure your app to use different mail relays depending on the domain name. For example, you could modify your app to use the local relay (127.0.0.1) to send non-internal mail. Setup the local relay to use DNS for resolution type. Send all internal (your domain) to the internal address. If your sending all requests to the internal mail server you might try adding both IP addresses to the ACL list for routing then restart the IMC service. Murphy -Original Message- From: Ludwig, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay Restrictions The IP address is the address of the internal server that is running the app: IP 192.206.170.200 SM 255.255.255.0 It IS a multihomed server I did restart the IMC service (several times by now...) Thanks -Original Message- From: Steve Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:28 PM To: Ludwig, Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Relay Restrictions Mark, What IP address and subnet mask are you specifying under Routing Restrictions? Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/10/02 01:59PM I have a problem that, hopefully, someone could help me out with. I have a app that provides customers with an online store that includes a form that they can fill out to order product. This form fires off 2 emails, one to our internal people to let them know a new order as been placed and the other email is a confirmation sent to the user to acknowledge receipt of their order. The app uses Miva script (similar to XML) to create the email and it runs on a server in our network. The problem is our mail server (Exchange 5.5 SP4) is not allowing the acknowledgment to be delivered because relaying is prohibited. So the original mail (internal) gets delivered fine but the mail that gets sent externally (to the users email) never gets sent. When I review the logs I see: RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Relaying is prohibited I have gone to the routing restrictions enabled the hosts and clients w/ these ip addresses and entered the IP address and mask of the system generating the emails as outlined in KB q196626 but the error is the same. I've reviewed q259531 on how to configure smtp relay for domains but I don't believe it is applicable to my case. Is there someway around this? If anyone has any suggestions I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay Restrictions
Thanks to all that replied. This looks like the fix as it is working now for me when I test it. My customer I've been working with is gone until tomorrow but I feel pretty confidant that it's fixed. Thanks again, Mark -Original Message- From: Steve Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:53 PM To: Ludwig, Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Relay Restrictions Mark, Don't over-complicate this. You almost had it before. Just change the mask to 255.255.255.255 and you'll be OK. Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/10/02 03:40PM The Exch Server Webserver are separate The Webserver is a W2000 Server\IIS 5.0 IP settings are set to all unassigned Thanks for the suggestions I will look into trying the scenario's you've suggested. -Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay Restrictions I'm assuming (I do this alot) that the Exch 5.5 server is seperate from the webserver attempting to send mail. You probably have some type of SMTP component running on this box that relay's mail to the Exchange Server. If this component is SMTP service that comes with IIS 5.0 (or 4.0) then you probably have the IP settings set to All unassigned. Or, you could be sending all requests to your internal mail server? In the first scenario I would suggest this: Is there anyway to configure your app to use different mail relays depending on the domain name. For example, you could modify your app to use the local relay (127.0.0.1) to send non-internal mail. Setup the local relay to use DNS for resolution type. Send all internal (your domain) to the internal address. If your sending all requests to the internal mail server you might try adding both IP addresses to the ACL list for routing then restart the IMC service. Murphy -Original Message- From: Ludwig, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay Restrictions The IP address is the address of the internal server that is running the app: IP 192.206.170.200 SM 255.255.255.0 It IS a multihomed server I did restart the IMC service (several times by now...) Thanks -Original Message- From: Steve Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:28 PM To: Ludwig, Mark; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Relay Restrictions Mark, What IP address and subnet mask are you specifying under Routing Restrictions? Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/10/02 01:59PM I have a problem that, hopefully, someone could help me out with. I have a app that provides customers with an online store that includes a form that they can fill out to order product. This form fires off 2 emails, one to our internal people to let them know a new order as been placed and the other email is a confirmation sent to the user to acknowledge receipt of their order. The app uses Miva script (similar to XML) to create the email and it runs on a server in our network. The problem is our mail server (Exchange 5.5 SP4) is not allowing the acknowledgment to be delivered because relaying is prohibited. So the original mail (internal) gets delivered fine but the mail that gets sent externally (to the users email) never gets sent. When I review the logs I see: RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Relaying is prohibited I have gone to the routing restrictions enabled the hosts and clients w/ these ip addresses and entered the IP address and mask of the system generating the emails as outlined in KB q196626 but the error is the same. I've reviewed q259531 on how to configure smtp relay for domains but I don't believe it is applicable to my case. Is there someway around this? If anyone has any suggestions I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups
I absolutely agree with you and I've suggested the Ed Crowley Never Restore method. However I work for a small company and the owners name is on the building and he wants to be able to get back one piece of mail that someone deleted six months ago if they decide they want it back. We are talking about replacing Arcserve now and I will look into ScanMail 3.6. Thanks for the suggestions. -M -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups Well, the real solution to your problem is 1. Stop doing brick level backups 2. Get rid of ArghServe 3. Buy CommVault Galaxy to do backups. Their product provides real item level recovery and also supports restores 4. Upgrade ScanMail to 3.6 and use ESE scanning. If this is too much to do right away, go ahead and do #4 and it'll be a workaround. When you have some time though, you really should 1. Stop doing brick level backups 2. Get rid of ArghServe 3. Buy CommVault Galaxy to do backups. Their product provides real item level recovery and also supports restores S. -Original Message- From: Ludwig, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AVAPI virus-scan preventing Brick-level backups Hi all, I am having a problem that includes several apps and I hope someone has seen a similar issue. The list of products involved: NT Server 4.0 Cluster Server SP 6a Exchange Server 5.5 SP 4 ArcServeIT 6.61 SP 2a Trend ScanMail for Exchange 3.52 Problem: Since switching ScanMail to run in AVAPI mode from MAPI mode we are unable to perform Brick-Level backups on our Exchange Server. (Regular backups are fine) In the ArcServe Log I see error E8601 Failed to connect agent (AGENT = dbaxchg2, EC = 402). When I go to Arcserve and try and manually do a brick backup as soon as I tickle the icon for the brick an error pops up: EC = EXCH Exchange Agent - - (402) Exchange system error. Now I've called ArcServe and I've done research and found that 402 normally means the mailbox you are trying to restore is either not there or hidden. I have verified that that's not the case, and their support doesn't seem to know of a problem with AVAPI virus brick backups. I found one KB article Q264731 (http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q264731)bu t my Registry already had the suggested settings. I'm hoping someone has been able to resolve a similar issue because management is talking about going back to MAPI mode in order to continue bricklevel backups which I am trying to fight against. Thanks, Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
