RE: Store.exe in Task Manager
Kurt, This is totally normal. Store.exe grabs all the memory it needs, but is well behaved about giving it back as the system requires it. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 October 2003 12:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Store.exe in Task Manager Using: W2K sp3 + Exch 2K sp4. When I look in Task Manager I see that the store.exe process has a size of about 700 MB. When I reboot my server and I look again to the store.exe process it only has a value of 25 MB. Is there a way to do this manually in stead of rebooting? Ok, I could do this probably by restarting the services, but is it also possible to act without stopping the services. (And maybe an extra: how come?) Many thaks Kurt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Mike Scott IT Manager, Edinburgh Petroleum Services Ltd Research Park, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP Tel: +44 (0) 131 449 4536 Fax: +44 (0) 131 449 5123 www.e-petroleumservices.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admin@...
Kim, Sounds like Mimail virus - http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2003-02.html has the gory details. I suggest you update your anti-virus protection, this has been around for a while. Regards, Mike Scott -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:] Sent: 22 September 2003 10:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Mike Scott IT Manager, Edinburgh Petroleum Services Ltd Research Park, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP Tel: +44 (0) 131 449 4536 Fax: +44 (0) 131 449 5123 www.e-petroleumservices.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: admin@...
Kim, This is the Mimail virus - The headers tell you that Scanmail is picking it up. Looks like it's doing it's job fine - Be happy! Mike -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 September 2003 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4457 - 0001 - 80040546 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b Content-Type: message/delivery-status --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from mail pickup service by morpheus.intas.be with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 thread-index: AcOA/4U6leJxzAlUTPW20EQujsqr6w== Thread-Topic: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. From: Administrator Sender: Administrator To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender virus found and action taken. Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:03 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2003 11:49:03.0874 (UTC) FILETIME=[85593E20:01C380FF] --9B095B5ADSN=_01C380E0B0AB7684030Bmorpheus.intas.b-- Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56 === -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mongo check headers. - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Mike Scott IT Manager, Edinburgh Petroleum Services Ltd Research Park, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP Tel: +44 (0) 131 449 4536 Fax: +44 (0) 131 449 5123 www.e-petroleumservices.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore
John, What about deleted item retention? Even if it wasn't switched on when the user deleted the folders, putting it on before the restore might catch the deletion run by the logs. Just a thought - Something to try. Mike -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 July 2003 22:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Exchange Discussions Subject: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore Got a question for everyone on the lists: If someone deletes a tree of public folders, and I restore the previous day's backup, then allow the log files to play to get the public folder database back to consistency; will the deletion re-occur since that action is contained in the log files? Exchange 2000 with all SPs Win2K with SP2 or three (one less than the latest) Backup and restore with Backup Exec. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-- Buy Coral Calcium for Greater Health - $23.95 http://www.challengerone.com/t/l.asp?cid=2805lp=calcium2.asp http://us.click.yahoo.com/MmkSQC/NTVGAA/ySSFAA/eJp0lB/TM -~- Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Mike Scott IT Manager, Edinburgh Petroleum Services Ltd Research Park, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP Tel: +44 (0) 131 449 4536 Fax: +44 (0) 131 449 5123 www.e-petroleumservices.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore
Ah, I guess it's a restore then. Sounds like an ideal job for the person that used ESM to delete the folders! Mike -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 July 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore The public folder was deleted through the ESM utility, not via Outlook. It looks like I'll be building a recovery server, air-gapped from the production network and getting some practical experience doing the restore to an offline server. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:49 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore John, What about deleted item retention? Even if it wasn't switched on when the user deleted the folders, putting it on before the restore might catch the deletion run by the logs. Just a thought - Something to try. Mike -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 July 2003 22:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Exchange Discussions Subject: [Exchange2000] Public Folders Restore Got a question for everyone on the lists: If someone deletes a tree of public folders, and I restore the previous day's backup, then allow the log files to play to get the public folder database back to consistency; will the deletion re-occur since that action is contained in the log files? Exchange 2000 with all SPs Win2K with SP2 or three (one less than the latest) Backup and restore with Backup Exec. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-- Buy Coral Calcium for Greater Health - $23.95 http://www.challengerone.com/t/l.asp?cid=2805lp=calcium2.asp http://us.click.yahoo.com/MmkSQC/NTVGAA/ySSFAA/eJp0lB/TM -~- Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Mike Scott IT Manager, Edinburgh Petroleum Services Ltd Research Park, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP Tel: +44 (0) 131 449 4536 Fax: +44 (0) 131 449 5123 www.e-petroleumservices.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk Mike Scott IT Manager, Edinburgh Petroleum Services Ltd Research Park, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AP Tel: +44 (0) 131 449 4536 Fax: +44 (0) 131 449 5123 www.e-petroleumservices.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Memory leak store .exe
Marc, Exchange's Store.exe will use up all the physical RAM it can get. However, it is generally well behaved when giving it back to other processes that need it. Are you seeing errors on the server? Your conector server probably isn't exhibiting this behaviour since Store.exe isn't doing much. Regards, Mike Scott -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 February 2003 15:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Memory leak store .exe Robert 1 We are getting alerts from our TNG alerting system to say that the server is low on physical memory. 2.After a reboot the server slowly eats up the physical memory and does not seem to drop back. Regards -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 February 2003 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Memory leak store .exe -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 February 2003 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Memory leak store .exe User Group We have an exchange server where the store.exe seems to be slowly using up all the physical memory. Has any one seen any Q article for this problem? We also have another server that runs in tandem with the problem server and this does not seem to leak memory (two connector servers) Why do you feel this is a memory leak rather than normal behaviour? Robert Moir MSMVP IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps. Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Memory leak store .exe
Marc, As mailboxes get accessed, messages moved in and out and so on, RAM usage will increase. This is normal. A quick search on the MS KB for 'store memory' will give some articles describing instances where things are going wrong, but from the information we have here I don't think that's the case. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 February 2003 16:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Memory leak store .exe Mike What concerns me is the fact that the memory usage for the store.exe just creeps up all the time. On the other server it is pretty static. Regards -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 February 2003 16:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Memory leak store .exe Marc, Exchange's Store.exe will use up all the physical RAM it can get. However, it is generally well behaved when giving it back to other processes that need it. Are you seeing errors on the server? Your conector server probably isn't exhibiting this behaviour since Store.exe isn't doing much. Regards, Mike Scott -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 February 2003 15:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Memory leak store .exe Robert 1 We are getting alerts from our TNG alerting system to say that the server is low on physical memory. 2.After a reboot the server slowly eats up the physical memory and does not seem to drop back. Regards -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 February 2003 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Memory leak store .exe -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 February 2003 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Memory leak store .exe User Group We have an exchange server where the store.exe seems to be slowly using up all the physical memory. Has any one seen any Q article for this problem? We also have another server that runs in tandem with the problem server and this does not seem to leak memory (two connector servers) Why do you feel this is a memory leak rather than normal behaviour? Robert Moir MSMVP IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps. Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted
RE: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?
Ronni, Given that your other VPN clients work OK except this one I think I'd be looking at the specifics of this guys VPN and network setup and start with the simple stuff like the Watchguard traffic monitor and logs to see if anything's getting blocked and with the name resolution and dialup performance at the client end, rather than diving in with a bunch of hotfixes. We have a very similar setup here, and these tools fix pretty much all these issues here. Just my approach, Mike -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 February 2003 22:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix? We are a one Exchange 5.5 server shop. A few months ago I began the process of moving us to a new server. New hardware, new name, following Ed's Move Server Method which I have already done once without issue on NT4 to NT4. This time we moved to Windows 2000 for the new server's OS. New server is therefore Exch 5.5 SP4 on Win2k SP2 + security fixes and old server was/is Exch 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP 6a + security fixes. I moved mailboxes over the course of a few days and everyone was fine, running happily without issues, except for one guy (the n-sigma where n is a big number guy of course) whose home machine couldn't connect fully to the new mail server over VPN as it had when it was on the NT4 box. It does make connections to the Exchange Server. I can see that with netstat -a on either side but it does not appear to transfer data. He uses a software vpn client to connect to our network. So at first I was ready to blame the MTU issue and make the modifications necessary to correct that. However, when I researched it, it seemed as though I should be having the same problem with all the clients that use vpn. Now some of my vpn clients have an appliance (Watchguard SOHO at user's home connects to our Watchguard Firebox) and some have the software client. Those with the appliance might not see the issue but my box at home uses the software client (SafeNet created for Watchguard) and it works fine as do all the SOHOs. The only pertinent difference I can see between my n-sigma user's connection and mine is that he uses dial-up and I use a dsl line. I have also verified that this is dial-up related in that a second user also has the issue with dial-up access. I have googled. I have technetted. I have searched archives. I have found/done the following: I have read Q301337 PMTU Detection May Not Work After You Install Windows 2000 SP2 and while it appears to be the most pertinent, I am leery of adding a fix that until recently was not available except through PSS just to fix 2 people's e-mail access from home. Certainly it is true that our software vpn assigns an address on the same subnet to the client pc. But that is true for my machine as well, so I am also not 100% convinced that this will solve my issue. Has anyone here installed the Q301337 hotfix Q301337_W2k_SP3_x86_en.exe on a Windows 2000 SP2 Exchange Server and found that it caused problems? If not I am willing to try it. But I find myself a bit nervous about that Uninstall is not available note at the bottom of the download page. I do not have a server I can test with at the moment. If I get no positive feedback on this fix I may decide to build one first. Positive feedback about this fix would be appreciated as I am not sure where I can find a box to build a temporary test Exchange Server out of. Following Q159211 Diagnoses and Treatment of Black Hole Routers I did find a breakdown at an MTU of about 1200 for the n-sigma user's machine over dial-up and at 1450 for the other user's machine so I am reasonably certain MTU is a factor. I reviewed Q259783 PPPoE with ICS Requires MTU Setting Below 1492 on the ICS Client however, neither user is running ICS, nor is either one running PPPoE. Q120642 TCP/IP NBT Configuration Parameters for Windows seems to indicate that I could add the MTU value for the dialup adapter to solve this problem but that has not worked for the second user and Q3031337 seems to indicate it might be ignored anyway due to the way the software VPN client behaves. Any other suggestions/pointers will be gratefully received. Ronni _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List
RE: OWA Authentication Problem
Niki, Does IIS have the correct domain listed as the default for NT logons? I've seen something similar where IIS seemed to 'forget' the domain setting. Also, although you're using domain logins,I'd check the IUSR account isn't locked out - worth a look. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 January 2003 08:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Authentication Problem No-one have any ideas? :( -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 02 January 2003 14:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Authentication Problem Hello Have a frustrating problem that's greeted me back to work Running Exchange Server 5.5 on NT Server 4 with SP6a No problems prior to christmas, all that has happened to the server over the break is one of the techs have applied the latest critical updates as recommended on windows update, no idea if its related to this problem Basically, some remote users cannot access email through OWA where they could before no problem I can log into their accounts here via OWA no problem, and theres too many people with the same problem for it to be a mistyped password Issue Its only affecting users that dial in to our NT4 RAS Server (not the same server as the one running OWA). I've tried from home lunchtime and can access their email no problem, I'm running XP Pro at home and access via VPN, or alternatively can connect straight to the OWA server across the internet without the need for the VPN. I mention this as I suspected it might be to do with the dialin machines not being members of our NT domain It doesn't seem to matter whether the OS is Win2k or NT, same problems experienced I've tried with the username on its own, as well as in the format; OURDOMAIN\username But still the same At a bit of a loss right now This is the error recorded in Event Viewer on the OWA server, though I suspect it the generic 'you typed your password wrong, stupid' error Didn't seem to yield anything applicable on technet Source: W3SVC EventID: 100 The server was unable to logon the Windows NT account 'useraccount' due to the following error: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. The data is the error code. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000
Andy, In ESM navigate to the public folder, right click, All Tasks, Mail Disable. Voila, Mike -Original Message- From: Andy Haigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 09:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folders on Exchange 2000 Is there a way to un mail enable a Public Folder? Apart from deleting and re-creating. Thanks Andy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP banner
Charles, I've tried telnetting to port 25 on an Exchange and a straight IIS box and get the same response as you from each. Mike -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2002 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP banner Is this from Exchange or IIS SMTP? (Or something else) Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 5.0.2195.5329 ready at Fri, 29 Nov 2002 05:09:04 -0700 tia Charles _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MessageLab's managed email security service feedback
Brian, We have been using the anti-virus service since late 1999, and it is very good. We have had no infected messages into our Exchange system in that time. We have about 150 recipient addresses and typically 20 to 30 messages are intercepted per week. Cost is an issue at £1 per e-mail address but we feel it's money well spent. They also seem to react well to new infections, but do occasionally get a false detect on a message and trap it incorrectly. We havn't tried the anti-spam service but I'd recommend the anti-virus. Regards, Mike Scott EPS -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:bksh;attbi.com] Sent: 01 November 2002 15:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MessageLab's managed email security service feedback Hello! Is anyone using MessagLab's Managed Email security service now? Or have you used the service in the past? If so, can you share you experience with their service? Good or bad? Our management is interested in using them to catch viruses and filter SPAM emails. Of course, this would be in addition to our Exchange AV software on our Exchange servers. Thank you in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advice on infrastructure design
Niki, If they're large, you're right it'll take ages. However, why not just EXMerge them to .PSTs on each of the servers, copy onto CDs and carry or post. Regards, Mike Scott EPS Ltd -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 10:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design That's great, thanks Mark I think this will work well for us performance wise, and returning everyone to a single server will certainly cut down on a lot of headaches, whilst raising one or two more such as our backup capabilities Thanks all for the help, now have a long weekend of moving mailboxes across 256k ADSL :( -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 09:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Niki, Take a look at the outlook performance document at http://www.microsoft.com/office/outlook/evaluation/performance.asp This gives some good tips on tuning for slow links/dialup/etc. cheers Mark -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 09:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design How is it possible to force a client to work offline? Our laptop users have OST files configured, but will automatically work online if they can find the exchange server, i.e if they're plugged into the LAN or connected via VPN thanks -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 12:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Set up all the remote users in MAPI (ie Exchange) mode, and set them to work offline, and to syncronize every 10-15 minutes. That will manage your connect time very well. I'd also spring for a real circuit at the central location, but that's just me - it might not fit the budget. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Would you suggest all users connect with outlook in 'Exchange Mode' as opposed to POP3 retrieval? Our ADSL is capped at 256k upload from the central office, and in my experience, those who are configured to connect to the central server over ADSL (i.e. roaming laptop users) find it quite slow. At least in this config, users have local, faster access to their mail stores and public folders, and the slow mail transfer happens 'behind the scenes' I would prefer to work with one server, but would appreciate some advice before doing this as to possible performance issues Nik -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 October 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design No. Move the mailboxes to your central site, and save the cost of 5 Exchange servers. I have had plenty of 20 person offices hitting Exchange across WAN links without issue. In fact, I have 2 offices going half way across Europe, with 30 users each, to the only office there that can support Exchange (from an admin standpoint). Personally, I think a server for less than about 40-50 users is insane. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Hi Very few to be honest, at our head office we have something like 30 users, then each site has around 10-15 Am I correct in assuming mailboxes need to be moved to our central server first, then the sites created, then the mailboxes moved back? Thanks Nik -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 October 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Good point -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Advice on infrastructure design I agree, but am curious as too how many users at each site? Do you really need one at each location. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange
RE: Advice on infrastructure design
True... I guess it depends on how large the mailboxes are as to how big a hassle it's going to be. MS -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 12:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design I'll do one site at a time, and will indeed use this method as I have successfully in the past (actually by logging on as said user and exporting to PST via outlook) What concerned me though was, although this is fine for relocating the mailboxes back to head office, when the users carry out the first synchronisation, we'll still have this problem as the store is pulled back across the ADSL Unless I'm missing something Cheers Nik -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 10:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Niki, If they're large, you're right it'll take ages. However, why not just EXMerge them to .PSTs on each of the servers, copy onto CDs and carry or post. Regards, Mike Scott EPS Ltd -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 10:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design That's great, thanks Mark I think this will work well for us performance wise, and returning everyone to a single server will certainly cut down on a lot of headaches, whilst raising one or two more such as our backup capabilities Thanks all for the help, now have a long weekend of moving mailboxes across 256k ADSL :( -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 09:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Niki, Take a look at the outlook performance document at http://www.microsoft.com/office/outlook/evaluation/performance.asp This gives some good tips on tuning for slow links/dialup/etc. cheers Mark -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 09:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design How is it possible to force a client to work offline? Our laptop users have OST files configured, but will automatically work online if they can find the exchange server, i.e if they're plugged into the LAN or connected via VPN thanks -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 12:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Set up all the remote users in MAPI (ie Exchange) mode, and set them to work offline, and to syncronize every 10-15 minutes. That will manage your connect time very well. I'd also spring for a real circuit at the central location, but that's just me - it might not fit the budget. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Would you suggest all users connect with outlook in 'Exchange Mode' as opposed to POP3 retrieval? Our ADSL is capped at 256k upload from the central office, and in my experience, those who are configured to connect to the central server over ADSL (i.e. roaming laptop users) find it quite slow. At least in this config, users have local, faster access to their mail stores and public folders, and the slow mail transfer happens 'behind the scenes' I would prefer to work with one server, but would appreciate some advice before doing this as to possible performance issues Nik -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 October 2002 16:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design No. Move the mailboxes to your central site, and save the cost of 5 Exchange servers. I have had plenty of 20 person offices hitting Exchange across WAN links without issue. In fact, I have 2 offices going half way across Europe, with 30 users each, to the only office there that can support Exchange (from an admin standpoint). Personally, I think a server for less than about 40-50 users is insane. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Hi Very few to be honest, at our head office we have something like 30 users, then each site has around 10-15 Am I correct in assuming mailboxes need to be moved
RE: public folder
Richard, I had to do an offline defrag a few weeks ago when the store filled to 16Gb. Remember you can use a mapped drive as the 'working' space for the defrag. I guess it'll be a little slower, but it worked OK for us. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 22:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder I know it is really stupid question but i never did a offline defrag and someone the other day told me that when you do an offline defrag you need the same amount of free disk space on your hd as you have in your database. Is this true, thanks. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder Oh nohere comes the flames -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Coleman Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: public folder In order to really recover the space that comes from deleting email, mailboxes, etc. an offline defrag is a must. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M Drive
Jeffrey, You can you any backup software you like to backup your M: drive, but it is highly un-recommended. The M: drive is a virtual drive looking at the Exchange IS. For any other purpose it is best to leave alone, at the risk of causing database corruption or at least confusion. To backup the Exchange IS you can use the Exchange aware version of NTBACKUP that you get with Exchange installed on Windows, or any number of Exchange aware products specifically designed to backup the Exchange information store, eg: Arcserve, BackupExec etc. You may see an M: drive there, but do your best to ignore it. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 22:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M Drive What program can I use to Back-up the M drive and, will this make my server have any problems by doing so _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: M Drive
Jeffrey, Find the server that the public folders are homed on and backup the Public Folder store there, using an Exchange aware product. Mike -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 July 2002 15:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: M Drive My intent is to find out how to backup my public folders, I can only find them on the m drive, is there a way to backup this information, or is it also in the information store. thanks, Jeffery Caudill -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Jeffery Caudill Subject: RE: M Drive Jeffrey, You can you any backup software you like to backup your M: drive, but it is highly un-recommended. The M: drive is a virtual drive looking at the Exchange IS. For any other purpose it is best to leave alone, at the risk of causing database corruption or at least confusion. To backup the Exchange IS you can use the Exchange aware version of NTBACKUP that you get with Exchange installed on Windows, or any number of Exchange aware products specifically designed to backup the Exchange information store, eg: Arcserve, BackupExec etc. You may see an M: drive there, but do your best to ignore it. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 July 2002 22:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: M Drive What program can I use to Back-up the M drive and, will this make my server have any problems by doing so _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AS400 Faxing
David, A long time ago I worked for a company in the UK called Techland (they're still around at www.techland.co.uk) and we had a product called FAX/400 that would probably do what you need. I don't know if they still do it, but it may be worth your while asking them if this, or something more modern is available. Good Luck! Mike Scott -Original Message- From: Camara, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: AS400 Faxing This is quite off-topic. Can anyone recommend a product that will enable us to fax from an AS400 server? We've need to auto-fax reports that are generated from it. Thanks! Jose David P. Camara II IT-NT Administration Credit Lyonnais *** Credit Lyonnais This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging to Credit Lyonnais and is intended solely for the addressees. The unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. Credit Lyonnais shall not be liable for this e-mail if modified or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender of the wrong delivery and the mail deletion. Credit Lyonnais in the Americas: Credit Lyonnais, S.A., Credit Lyonnais Bank New York Branch, Credit Lyonnais Securities (USA) Inc., Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia Ltd., Credit Lyonnais Rouse (USA) Ltd., and Credit Lyonnais Rouse Ltd. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: new users do not show up in Store
Will, The mailbox doesn't show up until the user logs in with Outlook. Rgds, Mike Scott -Original Message- From: Will Pawlikowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 February 2002 17:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: new users do not show up in Store Hello all, I am having a problem with my exchange server 2000 Sp2 running on Windows 2000 Advanced Server Sp2. When I create a new user or contact through the AD Users and Computers their mailbox does not show up in the Exchange Storage Group in the Exchange Manager as well the the Global Address List. There are no errors in my event log that would point to a problem. does anyone have any suggestions or had this problem in the past Thanks, Will Will Pawlikowski, MCP Systems Manager The Ohio State University CCIC Phone: 614-247-7082 Fax: 614-247-7200 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The day after superbowl
Curling may not be as high speed or as violent as ice hockey, but it can be exciting none the less. Mike (former curler) -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 17:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl A good friend of mine has been a volunteer with the Salt Lake City olympic committee for years, and has been doing tons of work in preparation. Guess what he is assigned to do for the duration of the games...He gets to keep an eye on radio and TV communications at the curling event, which apparently is the longest event of the games (like 14 days or something). If for any reason there happens to be *ANY* TV or radio broadcast from the curling site, don't be suprised to hear giggling in the background from him as he watches grown men chase a big sinker down an ice runway desperately sweeping stuff out from in front of it. The giggling will be coming from a guy named Bob. If he isn't giggling, he'll be snoring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Levis Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:13 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: The day after superbowl I haven't seen a good curling match in years =) -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl actually, we very much understand baseball. it's almost identical to a traditional english sport called 'rounders' - except this is mainly played in school by girls. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 16:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl It's pretty popular in Latin America, Japan and Taiwan as well. Nobody expects you to understand it any more than we understand Cricket. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl A man convinced against his will, Is of the same opinion still. You're all right and you're all wrong. However, I still don't understand the world series baseball, or whatever it's called, that only has 1 country playing it (or is it 2 with Canada?) :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Kishore Vara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 February 2002 15:30 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: The day after superbowl Subject: RE: The day after superbowl You might change your mind if you watch Manchester United play.. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message-
RE: Restricting use of MSN Messenger
Instant messenger programs have a habit of using things like port 80, that you probably don't want to block. Most firewall vendors will have technotes for blocking the commonest IM programs though. Try yours. Mike -Original Message- From: Ritu Sangha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 02:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: re: Restricting use of MSN Messenger Will blocking the ports being used by MSN Messenger at the firewall work? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: average lifespan server
Kim, A server is only worthless after 3 years if the load on it has outgrown it's capacity, or it's becoming difficult to maintain the hardware. We have several machines around 5 years old, happily running along doing their jobs. One of my mottos is 'if it ain't broke don't fix (or replace) it'. Mike Scott -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January 2002 10:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan server how do you deal with your accounting department? They can't grasp it that a machine is worthless as a server after three years... -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 January, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: average lifespan server Depends on server configuration and load..etc..etc -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:average lifespan server Hi, how long do you generally use the following servers before replacing them: 1. mailserver 2. PDC 3. BDC 4. Database servers tx, Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 as a file server (IXFS, Web Folder, http://server/public/files)
Jean-Francois, We tried it here as well and were very disappointed with the results. It would have been really good to have a single file-store accessible with a variety of clients, but alas IFS just doesn't work very well. A real shame. Mike Scott EPS Ltd -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 January 2002 02:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 as a file server (IXFS, Web Folder, http://server/public/files) does anyone use EX 2k as a file server to have one central location for accessing files on the road or from the office ? I tried to create a network shortcut in w2k Pro and XP Pro, connecting to http://server/public/files It was prompting very often for authentification. I could drag files to that folder but was having error when saving file from Word or Excel... But could drag those .doc or .xls file to the folder manually From what I understand, I heard that sharing a Folder from the M drive could be dangerous (corruption of the exchange database) We must create webFolder if we want to hare ordinary folder within our w2k server. but for exchange public Folder I was expecting that it would work smoothly... Any comment is appreciated... JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K full-text indexing
Peter, There's an article (http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/BestIndexing .asp) that describes the file locations and functions. This should tell you all you need to know. I ended up using a utility called Catutil to move the index file locations off my C: drive altogether. Regards, Mike Scott EPS -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2001 00:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K full-text indexing Hi, I have 2 E2K sp1 w2k sp2 servers with full-text indexing enabled on the private store. One of them went down the other day reporting c: drive full. After some seaching we found 5 GB worth of Exel files in c:\winnt\temp\gthrsvc. It is looks like when the indexing is running it will make a copy of all exel files found in the store. Checked the other server and it is the same. Deleting the files did not seems to have any advers effect on the server but I'm not looking forward to delete them manualy. The name of the files are the original name prepended by a hex number, like A56Bmyoriginalfile.xls. I checked technet w/o any luck. Did somebody see this problem? TIA /Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
